Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 07 2月, 2018 15 次提交
  3. 06 2月, 2018 1 次提交
  5. 24 1月, 2018 3 次提交
  7. 23 1月, 2018 3 次提交
  9. 17 1月, 2018 1 次提交
    • C
      arm64: kpti: Fix the interaction between ASID switching and software PAN · 6b88a32c
      由 Catalin Marinas 提交于 
      With ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN enabled, the exception entry code checks the
active ASID to decide whether user access was enabled (non-zero ASID)
when the exception was taken. On return from exception, if user access
was previously disabled, it re-instates TTBR0_EL1 from the per-thread
saved value (updated in switch_mm() or efi_set_pgd()).

Commit 7655abb9 ("arm64: mm: Move ASID from TTBR0 to TTBR1") makes a
TTBR0_EL1 + ASID switching non-atomic. Subsequently, commit 27a921e7
("arm64: mm: Fix and re-enable ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN") changes the
__uaccess_ttbr0_disable() function and asm macro to first write the
reserved TTBR0_EL1 followed by the ASID=0 update in TTBR1_EL1. If an
exception occurs between these two, the exception return code will
re-instate a valid TTBR0_EL1. Similar scenario can happen in
cpu_switch_mm() between setting the reserved TTBR0_EL1 and the ASID
update in cpu_do_switch_mm().

This patch reverts the entry.S check for ASID == 0 to TTBR0_EL1 and
disables the interrupts around the TTBR0_EL1 and ASID switching code in
__uaccess_ttbr0_disable(). It also ensures that, when returning from the
EFI runtime services, efi_set_pgd() doesn't leave a non-zero ASID in
TTBR1_EL1 by using uaccess_ttbr0_{enable,disable}.

The accesses to current_thread_info()->ttbr0 are updated to use
READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE.

As a safety measure, __uaccess_ttbr0_enable() always masks out any
existing non-zero ASID TTBR1_EL1 before writing in the new ASID.

Fixes: 27a921e7 ("arm64: mm: Fix and re-enable ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN")
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reported-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Tested-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Co-developed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      6b88a32c
  11. 16 1月, 2018 11 次提交
    • J
      KVM: arm64: Handle RAS SErrors from EL2 on guest exit · 0067df41
      由 James Morse 提交于 
      We expect to have firmware-first handling of RAS SErrors, with errors
notified via an APEI method. For systems without firmware-first, add
some minimal handling to KVM.

There are two ways KVM can take an SError due to a guest, either may be a
RAS error: we exit the guest due to an SError routed to EL2 by HCR_EL2.AMO,
or we take an SError from EL2 when we unmask PSTATE.A from __guest_exit.

The current SError from EL2 code unmasks SError and tries to fence any
pending SError into a single instruction window. It then leaves SError
unmasked.

With the v8.2 RAS Extensions we may take an SError for a 'corrected'
error, but KVM is only able to handle SError from EL2 if they occur
during this single instruction window...

The RAS Extensions give us a new instruction to synchronise and
consume SErrors. The RAS Extensions document (ARM DDI0587),
'2.4.1 ESB and Unrecoverable errors' describes ESB as synchronising
SError interrupts generated by 'instructions, translation table walks,
hardware updates to the translation tables, and instruction fetches on
the same PE'. This makes ESB equivalent to KVMs existing
'dsb, mrs-daifclr, isb' sequence.

Use the alternatives to synchronise and consume any SError using ESB
instead of unmasking and taking the SError. Set ARM_EXIT_WITH_SERROR_BIT
in the exit_code so that we can restart the vcpu if it turns out this
SError has no impact on the vcpu.
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      0067df41
    • J
      arm64: kernel: Prepare for a DISR user · 68ddbf09
      由 James Morse 提交于 
      KVM would like to consume any pending SError (or RAS error) after guest
exit. Today it has to unmask SError and use dsb+isb to synchronise the
CPU. With the RAS extensions we can use ESB to synchronise any pending
SError.

Add the necessary macros to allow DISR to be read and converted to an
ESR.

We clear the DISR register when we enable the RAS cpufeature, and the
kernel has not executed any ESB instructions. Any value we find in DISR
must have belonged to firmware. Executing an ESB instruction is the
only way to update DISR, so we can expect firmware to have handled
any deferred SError. By the same logic we clear DISR in the idle path.
Reviewed-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      68ddbf09
    • J
      arm64: kernel: Survive corrected RAS errors notified by SError · 6bf0dcfd
      由 James Morse 提交于 
      Prior to v8.2, SError is an uncontainable fatal exception. The v8.2 RAS
extensions use SError to notify software about RAS errors, these can be
contained by the Error Syncronization Barrier.

An ACPI system with firmware-first may use SError as its 'SEI'
notification. Future patches may add code to 'claim' this SError as a
notification.

Other systems can distinguish these RAS errors from the SError ESR and
use the AET bits and additional data from RAS-Error registers to handle
the error. Future patches may add this kernel-first handling.

Without support for either of these we will panic(), even if we received
a corrected error. Add code to decode the severity of RAS errors. We can
safely ignore contained errors where the CPU can continue to make
progress. For all other errors we continue to panic().
Signed-off-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      6bf0dcfd
    • X
      arm64: cpufeature: Detect CPU RAS Extentions · 64c02720
      由 Xie XiuQi 提交于 
      ARM's v8.2 Extentions add support for Reliability, Availability and
Serviceability (RAS). On CPUs with these extensions system software
can use additional barriers to isolate errors and determine if faults
are pending. Add cpufeature detection.

Platform level RAS support may require additional firmware support.
Reviewed-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NXie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
[Rebased added config option, reworded commit message]
Signed-off-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      64c02720
    • J
      arm64: sysreg: Move to use definitions for all the SCTLR bits · 7a00d68e
      由 James Morse 提交于 
      __cpu_setup() configures SCTLR_EL1 using some hard coded hex masks,
and el2_setup() duplicates some this when setting RES1 bits.

Lets make this the same as KVM's hyp_init, which uses named bits.

First, we add definitions for all the SCTLR_EL{1,2} bits, the RES{1,0}
bits, and those we want to set or clear.

Add a build_bug checks to ensures all bits are either set or clear.
This means we don't need to preserve endian-ness configuration
generated elsewhere.

Finally, move the head.S and proc.S users of these hard-coded masks
over to the macro versions.
Signed-off-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      7a00d68e
    • J
      arm64: cpufeature: __this_cpu_has_cap() shouldn't stop early · edf298cf
      由 James Morse 提交于 
      this_cpu_has_cap() tests caps->desc not caps->matches, so it stops
walking the list when it finds a 'silent' feature, instead of
walking to the end of the list.

Prior to v4.6's 644c2ae1 ("arm64: cpufeature: Test 'matches' pointer
to find the end of the list") we always tested desc to find the end of
a capability list. This was changed for dubious things like PAN_NOT_UAO.
v4.7's e3661b12 ("arm64: Allow a capability to be checked on
single CPU") added this_cpu_has_cap() using the old desc style test.

CC: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      edf298cf
    • D
      arm64: fpsimd: Fix state leakage when migrating after sigreturn · 0abdeff5
      由 Dave Martin 提交于 
      When refactoring the sigreturn code to handle SVE, I changed the
sigreturn implementation to store the new FPSIMD state from the
user sigframe into task_struct before reloading the state into the
CPU regs.  This makes it easier to convert the data for SVE when
needed.

However, it turns out that the fpsimd_state structure passed into
fpsimd_update_current_state is not fully initialised, so assigning
the structure as a whole corrupts current->thread.fpsimd_state.cpu
with uninitialised data.

This means that if the garbage data written to .cpu happens to be a
valid cpu number, and the task is subsequently migrated to the cpu
identified by the that number, and then tries to enter userspace,
the CPU FPSIMD regs will be assumed to be correct for the task and
not reloaded as they should be.  This can result in returning to
userspace with the FPSIMD registers containing data that is stale or
that belongs to another task or to the kernel.

Knowingly handing around a kernel structure that is incompletely
initialised with user data is a potential source of mistakes,
especially across source file boundaries.  To help avoid a repeat
of this issue, this patch adapts the relevant internal API to hand
around the user-accessible subset only: struct user_fpsimd_state.

To avoid future surprises, this patch also converts all uses of
struct fpsimd_state that really only access the user subset, to use
struct user_fpsimd_state.  A few missing consts are added to
function prototypes for good measure.

Thanks to Will for spotting the cause of the bug here.
Reported-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: NDave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      0abdeff5
    • S
      arm64: Inform user if software PAN is in use · 894cfd14
      由 Stephen Boyd 提交于 
      It isn't entirely obvious if we're using software PAN because we
don't say anything about it in the boot log. But if we're using
hardware PAN we'll print a nice CPU feature message indicating
it. Add a print for software PAN too so we know if it's being
used or not.
Signed-off-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      894cfd14
    • E
      signal: Unify and correct copy_siginfo_to_user32 · ea64d5ac
      由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于 
      Among the existing architecture specific versions of
copy_siginfo_to_user32 there are several different implementation
problems.  Some architectures fail to handle all of the cases in in
the siginfo union.  Some architectures perform a blind copy of the
siginfo union when the si_code is negative.  A blind copy suggests the
data is expected to be in 32bit siginfo format, which means that
receiving such a signal via signalfd won't work, or that the data is
in 64bit siginfo and the code is copying nonsense to userspace.

Create a single instance of copy_siginfo_to_user32 that all of the
architectures can share, and teach it to handle all of the cases in
the siginfo union correctly, with the assumption that siginfo is
stored internally to the kernel is 64bit siginfo format.

A special case is made for x86 x32 format.  This is needed as presence
of both x32 and ia32 on x86_64 results in two different 32bit signal
formats.  By allowing this small special case there winds up being
exactly one code base that needs to be maintained between all of the
architectures.  Vastly increasing the testing base and the chances of
finding bugs.

As the x86 copy of copy_siginfo_to_user32 the call of the x86
signal_compat_build_tests were moved into sigaction_compat_abi, so
that they will keep running.
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      ea64d5ac
    • E
      signal: Unify and correct copy_siginfo_from_user32 · 212a36a1
      由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于 
      The function copy_siginfo_from_user32 is used for two things, in ptrace
since the dawn of siginfo for arbirarily modifying a signal that
user space sees, and in sigqueueinfo to send a signal with arbirary
siginfo data.

Create a single copy of copy_siginfo_from_user32 that all architectures
share, and teach it to handle all of the cases in the siginfo union.

In the generic version of copy_siginfo_from_user32 ensure that all
of the fields in siginfo are initialized so that the siginfo structure
can be safely copied to userspace if necessary.

When copying the embedded sigval union copy the si_int member.  That
ensures the 32bit values passes through the kernel unchanged.
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      212a36a1
    • S
      arm64: capabilities: Handle duplicate entries for a capability · 67948af4
      由 Suzuki K Poulose 提交于 
      Sometimes a single capability could be listed multiple times with
differing matches(), e.g, CPU errata for different MIDR versions.
This breaks verify_local_cpu_feature() and this_cpu_has_cap() as
we stop checking for a capability on a CPU with the first
entry in the given table, which is not sufficient. Make sure we
run the checks for all entries of the same capability. We do
this by fixing __this_cpu_has_cap() to run through all the
entries in the given table for a match and reuse it for
verify_local_cpu_feature().

Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      67948af4
  13. 15 1月, 2018 6 次提交