Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 02 11月, 2011 2 次提交
  3. 01 11月, 2011 2 次提交
  5. 28 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  7. 31 8月, 2011 1 次提交
    • J
      ext4: remove i_mutex lock in ext4_evict_inode to fix lockdep complaining · 8c0bec21
      由 Jiaying Zhang 提交于 
      The i_mutex lock and flush_completed_IO() added by commit 2581fdc8
in ext4_evict_inode() causes lockdep complaining about potential
deadlock in several places.  In most/all of these LOCKDEP complaints
it looks like it's a false positive, since many of the potential
circular locking cases can't take place by the time the
ext4_evict_inode() is called; but since at the very least it may mask
real problems, we need to address this.

This change removes the flush_completed_IO() and i_mutex lock in
ext4_evict_inode().  Instead, we take a different approach to resolve
the software lockup that commit 2581fdc8 intends to fix.  Rather
than having ext4-dio-unwritten thread wait for grabing the i_mutex
lock of an inode, we use mutex_trylock() instead, and simply requeue
the work item if we fail to grab the inode's i_mutex lock.

This should speed up work queue processing in general and also
prevents the following deadlock scenario: During page fault,
shrink_icache_memory is called that in turn evicts another inode B.
Inode B has some pending io_end work so it calls ext4_ioend_wait()
that waits for inode B's i_ioend_count to become zero.  However, inode
B's ioend work was queued behind some of inode A's ioend work on the
same cpu's ext4-dio-unwritten workqueue.  As the ext4-dio-unwritten
thread on that cpu is processing inode A's ioend work, it tries to
grab inode A's i_mutex lock.  Since the i_mutex lock of inode A is
still hold before the page fault happened, we enter a deadlock.
Signed-off-by: NJiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      8c0bec21
  9. 23 8月, 2011 2 次提交
  11. 20 8月, 2011 1 次提交
    • J
      ext4: flush any pending end_io requests before DIO reads w/dioread_nolock · dccaf33f
      由 Jiaying Zhang 提交于 
      There is a race between ext4 buffer write and direct_IO read with
dioread_nolock mount option enabled. The problem is that we clear
PageWriteback flag during end_io time but will do
uninitialized-to-initialized extent conversion later with dioread_nolock.
If an O_direct read request comes in during this period, ext4 will return
zero instead of the recently written data.

This patch checks whether there are any pending uninitialized-to-initialized
extent conversion requests before doing O_direct read to close the race.
Note that this is just a bandaid fix. The fundamental issue is that we
clear PageWriteback flag before we really complete an IO, which is
problem-prone. To fix the fundamental issue, we may need to implement an
extent tree cache that we can use to look up pending to-be-converted extents.
Signed-off-by: NJiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
      dccaf33f
  13. 14 8月, 2011 3 次提交
    • T
      ext4: fix nomblk_io_submit option so it correctly converts uninit blocks · 9dd75f1f
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      Bug discovered by Jan Kara:

Finally, commit 1449032b returned back
the old IO submission code but apparently it forgot to return the old
handling of uninitialized buffers so we unconditionnaly call
block_write_full_page() without specifying end_io function. So AFAICS
we never convert unwritten extents to written in some cases. For
example when I mount the fs as: mount -t ext4 -o
nomblk_io_submit,dioread_nolock /dev/ubdb /mnt and do
        int fd = open(argv[1], O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC, 0600);
        char buf[1024];
        memset(buf, 'a', sizeof(buf));
        fallocate(fd, 0, 0, 16384);
        write(fd, buf, sizeof(buf));

I get a file full of zeros (after remounting the filesystem so that
pagecache is dropped) instead of seeing the first KB contain 'a's.
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
      9dd75f1f
    • T
      ext4: Resolve the hang of direct i/o read in handling EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN. · 32c80b32
      由 Tao Ma 提交于 
      EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN flag set and the increase of i_aiodio_unwritten
should be done simultaneously since ext4_end_io_nolock always clear
the flag and decrease the counter in the same time.

We don't increase i_aiodio_unwritten when setting
EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN so it will go nagative and causes some process
to wait forever.

Part of the patch came from Eric in his e-mail, but it doesn't fix the
problem met by Michael actually.

http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=131316851417460&w=2

Reported-and-Tested-by: Michael Tokarev<mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
      32c80b32
    • J
      ext4: call ext4_ioend_wait and ext4_flush_completed_IO in ext4_evict_inode · 2581fdc8
      由 Jiaying Zhang 提交于 
      Flush inode's i_completed_io_list before calling ext4_io_wait to
prevent the following deadlock scenario: A page fault happens while
some process is writing inode A. During page fault,
shrink_icache_memory is called that in turn evicts another inode
B. Inode B has some pending io_end work so it calls ext4_ioend_wait()
that waits for inode B's i_ioend_count to become zero. However, inode
B's ioend work was queued behind some of inode A's ioend work on the
same cpu's ext4-dio-unwritten workqueue. As the ext4-dio-unwritten
thread on that cpu is processing inode A's ioend work, it tries to
grab inode A's i_mutex lock. Since the i_mutex lock of inode A is
still hold before the page fault happened, we enter a deadlock.

Also moves ext4_flush_completed_IO and ext4_ioend_wait from
ext4_destroy_inode() to ext4_evict_inode(). During inode deleteion,
ext4_evict_inode() is called before ext4_destroy_inode() and in
ext4_evict_inode(), we may call ext4_truncate() without holding
i_mutex lock. As a result, there is a race between flush_completed_IO
that is called from ext4_ext_truncate() and ext4_end_io_work, which
may cause corruption on an io_end structure. This change moves
ext4_flush_completed_IO and ext4_ioend_wait from ext4_destroy_inode()
to ext4_evict_inode() to resolve the race between ext4_truncate() and
ext4_end_io_work during inode deletion.
Signed-off-by: NJiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
      2581fdc8
  15. 13 8月, 2011 1 次提交
    • C
      ext4: Fix ext4_should_writeback_data() for no-journal mode · 441c8508
      由 Curt Wohlgemuth 提交于 
      ext4_should_writeback_data() had an incorrect sequence of
tests to determine if it should return 0 or 1: in
particular, even in no-journal mode, 0 was being returned
for a non-regular-file inode.

This meant that, in non-journal mode, we would use
ext4_journalled_aops for directories, symlinks, and other
non-regular files.  However, calling journalled aop
callbacks when there is no valid handle, can cause problems.

This would cause a kernel crash with Jan Kara's commit
2d859db3 ("ext4: fix data corruption in inodes with
journalled data"), because we now dereference 'handle' in
ext4_journalled_write_end().

I also added BUG_ONs to check for a valid handle in the
obviously journal-only aops callbacks.

I tested this running xfstests with a scratch device in
these modes:

   - no-journal
   - data=ordered
   - data=writeback
   - data=journal

All work fine; the data=journal run has many failures and a
crash in xfstests 074, but this is no different from a
vanilla kernel.
Signed-off-by: NCurt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
      441c8508
  17. 12 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  19. 04 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  21. 02 8月, 2011 3 次提交
  23. 01 8月, 2011 5 次提交
  25. 31 7月, 2011 2 次提交
    • D
      ext4: add missing kfree() on error return path in add_new_gdb() · c49bafa3
      由 Dan Carpenter 提交于 
      We added some more error handling in b4097142 "ext4: add error
checking to calls to ext4_handle_dirty_metadata()".  But we need to
call kfree() as well to avoid a memory leak.
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      c49bafa3
    • T
      ext4: fix races in ext4_sync_parent() · d59729f4
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      Fix problems if fsync() races against a rename of a parent directory
as pointed out by Al Viro in his own inimitable way:

>While we are at it, could somebody please explain what the hell is ext4
>doing in
>static int ext4_sync_parent(struct inode *inode)
>{
>        struct writeback_control wbc;
>        struct dentry *dentry = NULL;
>        int ret = 0;
>
>        while (inode && ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_NEWENTRY)) {
>                ext4_clear_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_NEWENTRY);
>                dentry = list_entry(inode->i_dentry.next,
>                                    struct dentry, d_alias);
>                if (!dentry || !dentry->d_parent || !dentry->d_parent->d_inode)
>                        break;
>                inode = dentry->d_parent->d_inode;
>                ret = sync_mapping_buffers(inode->i_mapping);
>                ...
>Note that dentry obviously can't be NULL there.  dentry->d_parent is never
>NULL.  And dentry->d_parent would better not be negative, for crying out
>loud!  What's worse, there's no guarantees that dentry->d_parent will
>remain our parent over that sync_mapping_buffers() *and* that inode won't
>just be freed under us (after rename() and memory pressure leading to
>eviction of what used to be our dentry->d_parent)......
Reported-by: NAl Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      d59729f4
  27. 28 7月, 2011 5 次提交
  29. 27 7月, 2011 8 次提交
  31. 26 7月, 2011 2 次提交
    • J
      ext4: fix data corruption in inodes with journalled data · 2d859db3
      由 Jan Kara 提交于 
      When journalling data for an inode (either because it is a symlink or
because the filesystem is mounted in data=journal mode), ext4_evict_inode()
can discard unwritten data by calling truncate_inode_pages(). This is
because we don't mark the buffer / page dirty when journalling data but only
add the buffer to the running transaction and thus mm does not know there
are still unwritten data.

Fix the problem by carefully tracking transaction containing inode's data,
committing this transaction, and writing uncheckpointed buffers when inode
should be reaped.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      2d859db3
    • C
      fs: take the ACL checks to common code · 4e34e719
      由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于 
      Replace the ->check_acl method with a ->get_acl method that simply reads an
ACL from disk after having a cache miss.  This means we can replace the ACL
checking boilerplate code with a single implementation in namei.c.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      4e34e719