- 30 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The /proc/fs/jbd2/<dev>/history was maintained manually; by using tracepoints, we can get all of the existing functionality of the /proc file plus extra capabilities thanks to the ftrace infrastructure. We save memory as a bonus. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 16 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
It's only set, it's never checked. Kill it. Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
- 11 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Previously the journal_async_commit mount option was equivalent to using barrier=0 (and just as unsafe). This patch fixes it so that we eliminate the barrier before the commit block (by not using ordered mode), and explicitly issuing an empty barrier bio after writing the commit block. Because of the journal checksum, it is safe to do this; if the journal blocks are not all written before a power failure, the checksum in the commit block will prevent the last transaction from being replayed. Using the fs_mark benchmark, using journal_async_commit shows a 50% improvement: FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 8 1000 10240 30.5 28242 vs. FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead 8 1000 10240 45.8 28620 Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 17 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 14 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The revoke records must be written using the same way as the rest of the blocks during the commit process; that is, either marked as synchronous writes or as asynchornous writes. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 06 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
When you are going to be submitting several sync writes, we want to give the IO scheduler a chance to merge some of them. Instead of using the implicitly unplugging WRITE_SYNC variant, use WRITE_SYNC_PLUG and rely on sync_buffer() doing the unplug when someone does a wait_on_buffer()/lock_buffer(). Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 26 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
If a commit is triggered by fsync(), set a flag indicating the journal blocks associated with the transaction should be flushed out using WRITE_SYNC. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 06 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joel Becker 提交于
Filesystems often to do compute intensive operation on some metadata. If this operation is repeated many times, it can be very expensive. It would be much nicer if the operation could be performed once before a buffer goes to disk. This adds triggers to jbd2 buffer heads. Just before writing a metadata buffer to the journal, jbd2 will optionally call a commit trigger associated with the buffer. If the journal is aborted, an abort trigger will be called on any dirty buffers as they are dropped from pending transactions. ocfs2 will use this feature. Initially I tried to come up with a more generic trigger that could be used for non-buffer-related events like transaction completion. It doesn't tie nicely, because the information a buffer trigger needs (specific to a journal_head) isn't the same as what a transaction trigger needs (specific to a tranaction_t or perhaps journal_t). So I implemented a buffer set, with the understanding that journal/transaction wide triggers should be implemented separately. There is only one trigger set allowed per buffer. I can't think of any reason to attach more than one set. Contrast this with a journal or transaction in which multiple places may want to watch the entire transaction separately. The trigger sets are considered static allocation from the jbd2 perspective. ocfs2 will just have one trigger set per block type, setting the same set on every bh of the same type. Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
- 05 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Since we will be waiting the write of the commit record to the journal to complete in journal_submit_commit_record(), submit it using WRITE_SYNC. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 07 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
Avoid freeing the transaction in __jbd2_journal_drop_transaction() so the journal commit callback can run without holding j_list_lock, to avoid lock contention on this spinlock. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 26 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This patch removes the static sleep time in favor of a more self optimizing approach where we measure the average amount of time it takes to commit a transaction to disk and the ammount of time a transaction has been running. If somebody does a sync write or an fsync() traditionally we would sleep for 1 jiffies, which depending on the value of HZ could be a significant amount of time compared to how long it takes to commit a transaction to the underlying storage. With this patch instead of sleeping for a jiffie, we check to see if the amount of time this transaction has been running is less than the average commit time, and if it is we sleep for the delta using schedule_hrtimeout to give us a higher precision sleep time. This greatly benefits high end storage where you could end up sleeping for longer than it takes to commit the transaction and therefore sitting idle instead of allowing the transaction to be committed by keeping the sleep time to a minimum so you are sure to always be doing something. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 06 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Xen doesn't report that barriers are not supported until buffer I/O is reported as completed, instead of when the buffer I/O is submitted. Add a check and a fallback codepath to journal_wait_on_commit_record() to detect this case, so that attempts to mount ext4 filesystems on LVM/devicemapper devices on Xen guests don't blow up with an "Aborting journal on device XXX"; "Remounting filesystem read-only" error. Thanks to Andreas Sundstrom for reporting this issue. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
- 29 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The transaction can potentially get dropped if there are no buffers that need to be written. Make sure we call the commit callback before potentially deciding to drop the transaction. Also avoid dereferencing the commit_transaction pointer in the marker for the same reason. This patch fixes the bug reported by Eric Paris at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11838Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Acked-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Tested-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
- 17 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The multiblock allocator needs to be able to release blocks (and issue a blkdev discard request) when the transaction which freed those blocks is committed. Previously this was done via a polling mechanism when blocks are allocated or freed. A much better way of doing things is to create a jbd2 callback function and attaching the list of blocks to be freed directly to the transaction structure. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 11 10月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Hidehiro Kawai 提交于
If the journal doesn't abort when it gets an IO error in file data blocks, the file data corruption will spread silently. Because most of applications and commands do buffered writes without fsync(), they don't notice the IO error. It's scary for mission critical systems. On the other hand, if the journal aborts whenever it gets an IO error in file data blocks, the system will easily become inoperable. So this patch introduces a filesystem option to determine whether it aborts the journal or just call printk() when it gets an IO error in file data. If you mount an ext4 fs with data_err=abort option, it aborts on file data write error. If you mount it with data_err=ignore, it doesn't abort, just call printk(). data_err=ignore is the default. Here is the corresponding patch of the ext3 version: http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/9/9/3239374Signed-off-by: NHidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Hidehiro Kawai 提交于
Currently, original metadata buffers are dirtied when they are unfiled whether the journal has aborted or not. Eventually these buffers will be written-back to the filesystem by pdflush. This means some metadata buffers are written to the filesystem without journaling if the journal aborts. So if both journal abort and system crash happen at the same time, the filesystem would become inconsistent state. Additionally, replaying journaled metadata can overwrite the latest metadata on the filesystem partly. Because, if the journal gets aborted, journaled metadata are preserved and replayed during the next mount not to lose uncheckpointed metadata. This would also break the consistency of the filesystem. This patch prevents original metadata buffers from being dirtied on abort by clearing BH_JBDDirty flag from those buffers. Thus, no metadata buffers are written to the filesystem without journaling. Signed-off-by: NHidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 13 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Hidehiro Kawai 提交于
If we failed to write metadata buffers to the journal space and succeeded to write the commit record, stale data can be written back to the filesystem as metadata in the recovery phase. To avoid this, when we failed to write out metadata buffers, abort the journal before writing the commit record. We can also avoid this kind of corruption by using the journal checksum feature because it can detect invalid metadata blocks in the journal and avoid them from being replayed. So we don't need to care about asynchronous commit record writeout with a checksum. Signed-off-by: NHidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 07 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Also make sure the buffer heads are marked clean before submitting bh for writing. The previous code was marking the buffer head dirty, which would have forced an unneeded write (and seek) to the journal for no good reason. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 06 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This debugging markers are designed to debug problems such as the random filesystem latency problems reported by Arjan. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 17 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Calculate the journal device name once and stash it away in the journal_s structure. This avoids needing to call bdevname() everywhere and reduces stack usage by not needing to allocate an on-stack buffer. In addition, we eliminate the '/' that can appear in device names (e.g. "cciss/c0d0p9" --- see kernel bugzilla #11321) that can cause problems when creating proc directory names, and include the inode number to support ocfs2 which creates multiple journals with different inode numbers. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 05 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nick Piggin 提交于
Converting page lock to new locking bitops requires a change of page flag operation naming, so we might as well convert it to something nicer (!TestSetPageLocked_Lock => trylock_page, SetPageLocked => set_page_locked). This also facilitates lockdeping of page lock. Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Acked-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 01 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Hidehiro Kawai 提交于
In ordered mode, the current jbd2 aborts the journal if a file data buffer has an error. But this behavior is unintended, and we found that it has been adopted accidentally. This patch undoes it and just calls printk() instead of aborting the journal. Unlike a similar patch for ext3/jbd, file data buffers are written via generic_writepages(). But we also need to set AS_EIO into their mappings because wait_on_page_writeback_range() clears AS_EIO before a user process sees it. Signed-off-by: NHidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 12 7月, 2008 4 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
This provides a new ordered mode implementation which gets rid of using buffer heads to enforce the ordering between metadata change with the related data chage. Instead, in the new ordering mode, it keeps track of all of the inodes touched by each transaction on a list, and when that transaction is committed, it flushes all of the dirty pages for those inodes. In addition, the new ordered mode reverses the lock ordering of the page lock and transaction lock, which provides easier support for delayed allocation. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
This patch adds necessary framework into JBD2 to be able to track inodes with each transaction and write-out their dirty data during transaction commit time. This new ordered mode brings all sorts of advantages such as possibility to get rid of journal heads and buffer heads for data buffers in ordered mode, better ordering of writes on transaction commit, simplification of some JBD code, no more anonymous pages when truncate of data being committed happens. Also with this new ordered mode, delayed allocation on ordered mode is much simpler. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Carlo Wood has demonstrated that it's possible to recover deleted files from the journal. Something that will make this easier is if we can put the time of the commit into commit block. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 04 6月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
If the device doesn't support write barriers, the write is retried without ordered mode. But the buffer head needs to be re-locked or submit_bh will fail with on BUG(!buffer_locked(bh)). Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 16 5月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mingming Cao 提交于
Updating the current transaction's t_state is protected by j_state_lock. We need to do the same when updating the t_state to T_COMMIT. Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 17 4月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
There are several cases where the running transaction can get buffers added to its BJ_Metadata list which it never dirtied, which makes its t_nr_buffers counter end up larger than its t_outstanding_credits counter. This will cause issues when starting new transactions as while we are logging buffers we decrement t_outstanding_buffers, so when t_outstanding_buffers goes negative, we will report that we need less space in the journal than we actually need, so transactions will be started even though there may not be enough room for them. In the worst case scenario (which admittedly is almost impossible to reproduce) this will result in the journal running out of space. The fix is to only refile buffers from the committing transaction to the running transactions BJ_Modified list when b_modified is set on that journal, which is the only way to be sure if the running transaction has modified that buffer. This patch also fixes an accounting error in journal_forget, it is possible that we can call journal_forget on a buffer without having modified it, only gotten write access to it, so instead of freeing a credit, we only do so if the buffer was modified. The assert will help catch if this problem occurs. Without these two patches I could hit this assert within minutes of running postmark, with them this issue no longer arises. Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Currently at the start of a journal commit we loop through all of the buffers on the committing transaction and clear the b_modified flag (the flag that is set when a transaction modifies the buffer) under the j_list_lock. The problem is that everywhere else this flag is modified only under the jbd2 lock buffer flag, so it will race with a running transaction who could potentially set it, and have it unset by the committing transaction. This is also a big waste, you can have several thousands of buffers that you are clearing the modified flag on when you may not need to. This patch removes this code and instead clears the b_modified flag upon entering do_get_write_access/journal_get_create_access, so if that transaction does indeed use the buffer then it will be accounted for properly, and if it does not then we know we didn't use it. That will be important for the next patch in this series. Tested thoroughly by myself using postmark/iozone/bonnie++. Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 10 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Kleikamp 提交于
In JBD2 jbd2_journal_write_commit_record(), clear the buffer_ordered flag for the bh after barried IO has succeed. This prevents later, if the same buffer head were submitted to the underlying device, which has been reconfigured to not support barrier request, the JBD2 commit code could treat it as a normal IO (without barrier). This is a port from JBD/ext3 fix from Neil Brown. More details from Neil: Some devices - notably dm and md - can change their behaviour in response to BIO_RW_BARRIER requests. They might start out accepting such requests but on reconfiguration, they find out that they cannot any more. JBD2 deal with this by always testing if BIO_RW_BARRIER requests fail with EOPNOTSUPP, and retrying the write requests without the barrier (probably after waiting for any pending writes to complete). However there is a bug in the handling this in JBD2 for ext4 . When ext4/JBD2 to submit a BIO_RW_BARRIER request, it sets the buffer_ordered flag on the buffer head. If the request completes successfully, the flag STAYS SET. Other code might then write the same buffer_head after the device has been reconfigured to not accept barriers. This write will then fail, but the "other code" is not ready to handle EOPNOTSUPP errors and the error will be treated as fatal. Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NDave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 05 2月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_ASYNC_COMMIT needs to be checked with JBD2_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
With journal checksum patch we added asynchronous commits of journal commit headers, and accidentally dropped taking a reference on the buffer head. (Before the change, sync_dirty_buffer did the get_bh(). The associative put_bh is done by journal_wait_on_commit_record().) Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Mingming Cao 提交于
The buffer head pointer passed to journal_wait_on_commit_record() could be NULL if the previous journal_submit_commit_record() failed or journal has already aborted. Looking at the jbd2 debug messages, before the oops happened, the jbd2 is aborted due to trying to access the next log block beyond the end of device. This might be caused by using a corrupted image. We need to check the error returns from journal_submit_commit_record() and avoid calling journal_wait_on_commit_record() in the failure case. This addresses Kernel Bugzilla #9849 Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 30 1月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nick Piggin 提交于
The break_lock data structure and code for spinlocks is quite nasty. Not only does it double the size of a spinlock but it changes locking to a potentially less optimal trylock. Put all of that under CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK, and introduce a __raw_spin_is_contended that uses the lock data itself to determine whether there are waiters on the lock, to be used if CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK is not set. Rename need_lockbreak to spin_needbreak, make it use spin_is_contended to decouple it from the spinlock implementation, and make it typesafe (rwlocks do not have any need_lockbreak sites -- why do they even get bloated up with that break_lock then?). Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 29 1月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
由 Girish Shilamkar 提交于
The journal checksum feature adds two new flags i.e JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_ASYNC_COMMIT and JBD2_FEATURE_COMPAT_CHECKSUM. JBD2_FEATURE_CHECKSUM flag indicates that the commit block contains the checksum for the blocks described by the descriptor blocks. Due to checksums, writing of the commit record no longer needs to be synchronous. Now commit record can be sent to disk without waiting for descriptor blocks to be written to disk. This behavior is controlled using JBD2_FEATURE_ASYNC_COMMIT flag. Older kernels/e2fsck should not be able to recover the journal with _ASYNC_COMMIT hence it is made incompat. The commit header has been extended to hold the checksum along with the type of the checksum. For recovery in pass scan checksums are verified to ensure the sanity and completeness(in case of _ASYNC_COMMIT) of every transaction. Signed-off-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com> Signed-off-by: NGirish Shilamkar <girish@clusterfs.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
-
由 Johann Lombardi 提交于
The patch below updates the jbd stats patch to 2.6.20/jbd2. The initial patch was posted by Alex Tomas in December 2005 (http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=113538565128617&w=2). It provides statistics via procfs such as transaction lifetime and size. Sometimes, investigating performance problems, i find useful to have stats from jbd about transaction's lifetime, size, etc. here is a patch for review and inclusion probably. for example, stats after creation of 3M files in htree directory: [root@bob ~]# cat /proc/fs/jbd/sda/history R/C tid wait run lock flush log hndls block inlog ctime write drop close R 261 8260 2720 0 0 750 9892 8170 8187 C 259 750 0 4885 1 R 262 20 2200 10 0 770 9836 8170 8187 R 263 30 2200 10 0 3070 9812 8170 8187 R 264 0 5000 10 0 1340 0 0 0 C 261 8240 3212 4957 0 R 265 8260 1470 0 0 4640 9854 8170 8187 R 266 0 5000 10 0 1460 0 0 0 C 262 8210 2989 4868 0 R 267 8230 1490 10 0 4440 9875 8171 8188 R 268 0 5000 10 0 1260 0 0 0 C 263 7710 2937 4908 0 R 269 7730 1470 10 0 3330 9841 8170 8187 R 270 0 5000 10 0 830 0 0 0 C 265 8140 3234 4898 0 C 267 720 0 4849 1 R 271 8630 2740 20 0 740 9819 8170 8187 C 269 800 0 4214 1 R 272 40 2170 10 0 830 9716 8170 8187 R 273 40 2280 0 0 3530 9799 8170 8187 R 274 0 5000 10 0 990 0 0 0 where, R - line for transaction's life from T_RUNNING to T_FINISHED C - line for transaction's checkpointing tid - transaction's id wait - for how long we were waiting for new transaction to start (the longest period journal_start() took in this transaction) run - real transaction's lifetime (from T_RUNNING to T_LOCKED lock - how long we were waiting for all handles to close (time the transaction was in T_LOCKED) flush - how long it took to flush all data (data=ordered) log - how long it took to write the transaction to the log hndls - how many handles got to the transaction block - how many blocks got to the transaction inlog - how many blocks are written to the log (block + descriptors) ctime - how long it took to checkpoint the transaction write - how many blocks have been written during checkpointing drop - how many blocks have been dropped during checkpointing close - how many running transactions have been closed to checkpoint this one all times are in msec. [root@bob ~]# cat /proc/fs/jbd/sda/info 280 transaction, each upto 8192 blocks average: 1633ms waiting for transaction 3616ms running transaction 5ms transaction was being locked 1ms flushing data (in ordered mode) 1799ms logging transaction 11781 handles per transaction 5629 blocks per transaction 5641 logged blocks per transaction Signed-off-by: NJohann Lombardi <johann.lombardi@bull.net> Signed-off-by: NMariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Before we start committing a transaction, we call __journal_clean_checkpoint_list() to cleanup transaction's written-back buffers. If this call happens to remove all of them (and there were already some buffers), __journal_remove_checkpoint() will decide to free the transaction because it isn't (yet) a committing transaction and soon we fail some assertion - the transaction really isn't ready to be freed :). We change the check in __journal_remove_checkpoint() to free only a transaction in T_FINISHED state. The locking there is subtle though (as everywhere in JBD ;(). We use j_list_lock to protect the check and a subsequent call to __journal_drop_transaction() and do the same in the end of journal_commit_transaction() which is the only place where a transaction can get to T_FINISHED state. Probably I'm too paranoid here and such locking is not really necessary - checkpoint lists are processed only from log_do_checkpoint() where a transaction must be already committed to be processed or from __journal_clean_checkpoint_list() where kjournald itself calls it and thus transaction cannot change state either. Better be safe if something changes in future... Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 18 10月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
We should really call journal_abort() and not __journal_abort_hard() in case of errors. The latter call does not record the error in the journal superblock and thus filesystem won't be marked as with errors later (and user could happily mount it without any warning). Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Mingming Cao 提交于
change JBD_XXX macros to JBD2_XXX in JBD2/Ext4 Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-