Currently when inserting extent in ext4_ext_insert_extent() we would
only try to to see if we can append new extent to the found extent. If
we can not, then we proceed with adding new extent into the extent tree,
but then possibly merging it back again.

We can avoid this situation by trying to append and prepend new extent
to the existing ones. However since the new extent can be on either
sides of the existing extent, we have to pick the right extent to try to
append/prepend to.

This patch adds the conditions to pick the right extent to
append/prepend to and adds the actual prepending condition as well. This
will also eliminate the need to use "reserved" block for possibly
growing extent tree.
Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>

Currently when converting extent to initialized we attempt to transfer
initialized block to the left neighbour if possible when certain
criteria are met. However we do not attempt to do the same for the
right neighbor.

This commit adds the possibility to transfer initialized block to the
right neighbour if:

1. We're not converting the whole extent
2. Both extents are stored in the same extent tree node
3. Right neighbor is initialized
4. Right neighbor is logically abutting the current one
5. Right neighbor is physically abutting the current one
6. Right neighbor would not overflow the length limit

This is basically the same logic as with transferring to the left. This
will gain us some performance benefits since it is faster than inserting
extent and then merging it.

It would also prevent some situation in delalloc patch when we might run
out of metadata reservation. This is due to the fact that we would
attempt to split the extent first (possibly allocating new metadata
block) even though we did not counted for that because it can (and will)
be merged again. This commit fix that scenario, because we no longer
need to split the extent in such case.
Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>

Currently on many places in ext4 we're using
ext4_get_group_no_and_offset() even though we're only interested in
knowing the block group of the particular block, not the offset within
the block group so we can use more efficient way to compute block
group.

This patch introduces ext4_get_group_number() which computes block
group for a given block much more efficiently. Use this function
instead of ext4_get_group_no_and_offset() everywhere where we're only
interested in knowing the block group.
Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>

Currently in when getting the block group number for a particular
block in ext4_block_in_group() we're using
ext4_get_group_no_and_offset() which uses do_div() to get the block
group and the remainer which is offset within the group.

We don't need all of that in ext4_block_in_group() as we only need to
figure out the group number.

This commit changes ext4_block_in_group() to calculate group number
directly. This shows as a big improvement with regards to cpu
utilization. Measuring fallocate -l 15T on fresh file system with perf
showed that 23% of cpu time was spend in the
ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(). With this change it completely
disappears from the list only bumping the occurrence of
ext4_init_block_bitmap() which is the biggest user of
ext4_block_in_group() by 4%. As the result of this change on my system
the fallocate call was approx. 10% faster.

However since there is '-g' option in mkfs which allow us setting
different groups size (mostly for developers) I've introduced new per
file system flag whether we have a standard block group size or
not. The flag is used to determine whether we can use the bit shift
optimization or not.
Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>

Otherwise destroyed ext_sb_info will be part of global shinker list
and result in the following OOPS:

JBD2: corrupted journal superblock
JBD2: recovery failed
EXT4-fs (dm-2): error loading journal
general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
Modules linked in: fuse acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf coretemp kvm_intel kvm crc32c_intel microcode sg button sd_mod crc_t10dif ahci libahci pata_acpi ata_generic dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_\
mod
CPU 1
Pid: 2758, comm: mount Not tainted 3.8.0-rc3+ #136                  /DH55TC
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff811bfb2d>]  [<ffffffff811bfb2d>] unregister_shrinker+0xad/0xe0
RSP: 0000:ffff88011d5cbcd8  EFLAGS: 00010207
RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RBX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b53 RCX: 0000000000000006
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000246
RBP: ffff88011d5cbce8 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88011cd3f848
R13: ffff88011cd3f830 R14: ffff88011cd3f000 R15: 0000000000000000
FS:  00007f7b721dd7e0(0000) GS:ffff880121a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 00007fffa6f75038 CR3: 000000011bc1c000 CR4: 00000000000007e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process mount (pid: 2758, threadinfo ffff88011d5ca000, task ffff880116aacb80)
Stack:
ffff88011cd3f000 ffffffff8209b6c0 ffff88011d5cbd18 ffffffff812482f1
00000000000003f3 00000000ffffffea ffff880115f4c200 0000000000000000
ffff88011d5cbda8 ffffffff81249381 ffff8801219d8bf8 ffffffff00000000
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff812482f1>] deactivate_locked_super+0x91/0xb0
[<ffffffff81249381>] mount_bdev+0x331/0x340
[<ffffffff81376730>] ? ext4_alloc_flex_bg_array+0x180/0x180
[<ffffffff81362035>] ext4_mount+0x15/0x20
[<ffffffff8124869a>] mount_fs+0x9a/0x2e0
[<ffffffff81277e25>] vfs_kern_mount+0xc5/0x170
[<ffffffff81279c02>] do_new_mount+0x172/0x2e0
[<ffffffff8127aa56>] do_mount+0x376/0x380
[<ffffffff8127ab98>] sys_mount+0x138/0x150
[<ffffffff818ffed9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Code: 8b 05 88 04 eb 00 48 3d 90 ff 06 82 48 8d 58 e8 75 19 4c 89 e7 e8 e4 d7 2c 00 48 c7 c7 00 ff 06 82 e8 58 5f ef ff 5b 41 5c c9 c3 <48> 8b 4b 18 48 8b 73 20 48 89 da 31 c0 48 c7 c7 c5 a0 e4 81 e\
8
RIP  [<ffffffff811bfb2d>] unregister_shrinker+0xad/0xe0
RSP <ffff88011d5cbcd8>
Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

It is incorrect to use list_for_each_entry_safe() for journal callback
traversial because ->next may be removed by other task:
->ext4_mb_free_metadata()
  ->ext4_mb_free_metadata()
    ->ext4_journal_callback_del()

This results in the following issue:

WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:62 __list_del_entry+0x1c0/0x250()
Hardware name:
list_del corruption. prev->next should be ffff88019a4ec198, but was 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b
Modules linked in: cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf coretemp kvm_intel kvm crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel microcode sg xhci_hcd button sd_mod crc_t10dif aesni_intel ablk_helper cryptd lrw aes_x86_64 xts gf128mul ahci libahci pata_acpi ata_generic dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
Pid: 16400, comm: jbd2/dm-1-8 Tainted: G        W    3.8.0-rc3+ #107
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8106fb0d>] warn_slowpath_common+0xad/0xf0
 [<ffffffff8106fc06>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
 [<ffffffff813637e9>] ? ext4_journal_commit_callback+0x99/0xc0
 [<ffffffff8148cae0>] __list_del_entry+0x1c0/0x250
 [<ffffffff813637bf>] ext4_journal_commit_callback+0x6f/0xc0
 [<ffffffff813ca336>] jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x23a6/0x2570
 [<ffffffff8108aa42>] ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0x82/0xa0
 [<ffffffff8108b491>] ? del_timer_sync+0x91/0x1e0
 [<ffffffff813d3ecf>] kjournald2+0x19f/0x6a0
 [<ffffffff810ad630>] ? wake_up_bit+0x40/0x40
 [<ffffffff813d3d30>] ? bit_spin_lock+0x80/0x80
 [<ffffffff810ac6be>] kthread+0x10e/0x120
 [<ffffffff810ac5b0>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
 [<ffffffff818ff6ac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
 [<ffffffff810ac5b0>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70

This patch fix the issue as follows:
- ext4_journal_commit_callback() make list truly traversial safe
  simply by always starting from list_head
- fix race between two ext4_journal_callback_del() and
  ext4_journal_callback_try_del()
Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.com

The following race is possible:

[kjournald2]                              other_task
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction()
  j_state = T_FINISHED;
  spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
                                         ->jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint()
					   ->jbd2_journal_free_transaction();
					     ->kmem_cache_free(transaction)
  ->j_commit_callback(journal, transaction);
    -> USE_AFTER_FREE

WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:62 __list_del_entry+0x1c0/0x250()
Hardware name:
list_del corruption. prev->next should be ffff88019a4ec198, but was 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b
Modules linked in: cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf coretemp kvm_intel kvm crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel microcode sg xhci_hcd button sd_mod crc_t10dif aesni_intel ablk_helper cryptd lrw aes_x86_64 xts gf128mul ahci libahci pata_acpi ata_generic dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
Pid: 16400, comm: jbd2/dm-1-8 Tainted: G        W    3.8.0-rc3+ #107
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8106fb0d>] warn_slowpath_common+0xad/0xf0
 [<ffffffff8106fc06>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
 [<ffffffff813637e9>] ? ext4_journal_commit_callback+0x99/0xc0
 [<ffffffff8148cae0>] __list_del_entry+0x1c0/0x250
 [<ffffffff813637bf>] ext4_journal_commit_callback+0x6f/0xc0
 [<ffffffff813ca336>] jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x23a6/0x2570
 [<ffffffff8108aa42>] ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0x82/0xa0
 [<ffffffff8108b491>] ? del_timer_sync+0x91/0x1e0
 [<ffffffff813d3ecf>] kjournald2+0x19f/0x6a0
 [<ffffffff810ad630>] ? wake_up_bit+0x40/0x40
 [<ffffffff813d3d30>] ? bit_spin_lock+0x80/0x80
 [<ffffffff810ac6be>] kthread+0x10e/0x120
 [<ffffffff810ac5b0>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
 [<ffffffff818ff6ac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
 [<ffffffff810ac5b0>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70

In order to demonstrace this issue one should mount ext4 with mount -o
discard option on SSD disk.  This makes callback longer and race
window becomes wider.

In order to fix this we should mark transaction as finished only after
callbacks have completed
Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

In order to make it simpler to test the code which support
i_blocks/indirect-mapped inodes, support the conversion of inodes
which are less than 12 blocks and which are contained in no more than
a single extent.

The primary intended use of this code is to converting freshly created
zero-length files and empty directories.

Note that the version of chattr in e2fsprogs 1.42.7 and earlier has a
check that prevents the clearing of the extent flag.  A simple patch
which allows "chattr -e <file>" to work will be checked into the
e2fsprogs git repository.
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>

In the case where an inode has a very stale transaction id (tid) in
i_datasync_tid or i_sync_tid, it's possible that after a very large
(2**31) number of transactions, that the tid number space might wrap,
causing tid_geq()'s calculations to fail.

Commit deeeaf13 "jbd2: fix fsync() tid wraparound bug", later modified
by commit e7b04ac0 "jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily",
attempted to fix this problem, but it only avoided kjournald spinning
forever by fixing the logic in jbd2_log_start_commit().

Unfortunately, in the codepaths in fs/ext4/fsync.c and fs/ext4/inode.c
that might call jbd2_log_start_commit() with a stale tid, those
functions will subsequently call jbd2_log_wait_commit() with the same
stale tid, and then wait for a very long time.  To fix this, we
replace the calls to jbd2_log_start_commit() and
jbd2_log_wait_commit() with a call to a new function,
jbd2_complete_transaction(), which will correctly handle stale tid's.

As a bonus, jbd2_complete_transaction() will avoid locking
j_state_lock for writing unless a commit needs to be started.  This
should have a small (but probably not measurable) improvement for
ext4's scalability.
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reported-by: NBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Reported-by: NGeorge Barnett <gbarnett@atlassian.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>

[ Added fixup from Lukáš Czerner which only checks the assertion when
  the inode is not new and is not being freed. ]
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>

Move common code in ext4_ind_truncate() and ext4_ext_truncate() into
ext4_truncate().  This saves over 60 lines of code.
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>

Move common code in ext4_ind_punch_hole() and ext4_ext_punch_hole()
into ext4_punch_hole().  This saves over 150 lines of code.

This also fixes a potential bug when the punch_hole() code is racing
against indirect-to-extents or extents-to-indirect migation.  We are
currently using i_mutex to protect against changes to the inode flag;
specifically, the append-only, immutable, and extents inode flags.  So
we need to take i_mutex before deciding whether to use the
extents-specific or indirect-specific punch_hole code.

Also, there was a missing call to ext4_inode_block_unlocked_dio() in
the indirect punch codepath.  This was added in commit 02d262df
to block DIO readers racing against the punch operation in the
codepath for extent-mapped inodes, but it was missing for
indirect-block mapped inodes.  One of the advantages of refactoring
the code is that it makes such oversights much less likely.
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>

The older code was far more complicated than it needed to be because
of how we spliced in the ext4's new multiblock allocator into ext3's
indirect block code.  By folding ext4_alloc_blocks() into
ext4_alloc_branch(), we make the code far more understable, shave off
over 130 lines of code and half a kilobyte of compiled object code.
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>

After collapsing the handling of data ordered and data writeback
codepath, ext4_generic_write_end() has only one caller,
ext4_write_end().  So we fold it into ext4_write_end().
Signed-off-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>

The only difference between how we handle data=ordered and
data=writeback is a single call to ext4_jbd2_file_inode().  Eliminate
code duplication by factoring out redundant the code paths.
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>

When an extent was zeroed out, we forgot to do convert from cpu to le16.
It could make us hit a BUG_ON when we try to write dirty pages out.  So
fix it.

[ Also fix a bug found by Dmitry Monakhov where we were missing
  le32_to_cpu() calls in the new indirect punch hole code.

  There are a number of other big endian warnings found by static code
  analyzers, but we'll wait for the next merge window to fix them all
  up.  These fixes are designed to be Obviously Correct by code
  inspection, and easy to demonstrate that it won't make any
  difference (and hence, won't introduce any bugs) on little endian
  architectures such as x86.  --tytso ]
Signed-off-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reported-by: NCAI Qian <caiqian@redhat.com>
Reported-by: NChristian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>

A user reported a panic where we were panicing somewhere in
tree_backref_for_extent from scrub_print_warning.  He only captured the trace
but looking at scrub_print_warning we drop the path right before we mess with
the extent buffer to print out a bunch of stuff, which isn't right.  So fix this
by dropping the path after we use the eb if we need to.  Thanks,

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

If we don't find the expected csum item, but find a csum item which is
adjacent to the specified extent, we should return -EFBIG, or we should
return -ENOENT. But btrfs_lookup_csum() return -EFBIG even the csum item
is not adjacent to the specified extent. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

We reserve the space for csums only when we write data into a file, in
the other cases, such as tree log, log replay, we don't do reservation,
so we can use the reservation of the transaction handle just for the former.
And for the latter, we should use the tree's own reservation. But the
function - btrfs_csum_file_blocks() didn't differentiate between these
two types of the cases, fix it.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

The function btrfs_find_all_roots is responsible to allocate
memory for 'roots' and free it if errors happen,so the caller should not
free it again since the work has been done.

Besides,'tmp' is allocated after the function btrfs_find_all_roots,
so we can return directly if btrfs_find_all_roots() fails.
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

A user reported a problem where he was getting early ENOSPC with hundreds of
gigs of free data space and 6 gigs of free metadata space.  This is because the
global block reserve was taking up the entire free metadata space.  This is
ridiculous, we have infrastructure in place to throttle if we start using too
much of the global reserve, so instead of letting it get this huge just limit it
to 512mb so that users can still get work done.  This allowed the user to
complete his rsync without issues.  Thanks

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-and-tested-by: NStefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

We need to hold the ordered_operations mutex while waiting on ordered extents
since we splice and run the ordered extents list.  We need to make sure anybody
else who wants to wait on ordered extents does actually wait for them to be
completed.  This will keep us from bailing out of flushing in case somebody is
already waiting on ordered extents to complete.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

We are way over-reserving for unlink and rename.  Rename is just some random
huge number and unlink accounts for tree log operations that don't actually
happen during unlink, not to mention the tree log doesn't take from the trans
block rsv anyway so it's completely useless.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Dave reported a warning when running xfstest 275.  We have been leaking delalloc
metadata space when our reservations fail.  This is because we were improperly
calculating how much space to free for our checksum reservations.  The problem
is we would sometimes free up space that had already been freed in another
thread and we would end up with negative usage for the delalloc space.  This
patch fixes the problem by calculating how much space the other threads would
have already freed, and then calculate how much space we need to free had we not
done the reservation at all, and then freeing any excess space.  This makes
xfstests 275 no longer have leaked space.  Thanks

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

When you take a snapshot, punch a hole where there has been data, then take
another snapshot and try to send an incremental stream, btrfs send would
give you EIO. That is because is_extent_unchanged had no support for holes
being punched. With this patch, instead of returning EIO we just return
0 (== the extent is not unchanged) and we're good.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Cc: Alexander Block <ablock84@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Commit 06ae43f3 ("Don't bother with redoing rw_verify_area() from
default_file_splice_from()") lost the checks to test existence of the
write/aio_write methods.  My apologies ;-/

Eventually, we want that in fs/splice.c side of things (no point
repeating it for every buffer, after all), but for now this is the
obvious minimal fix.
Reported-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Only allow unprivileged mounts of proc and sysfs if they are already
mounted when the user namespace is created.

proc and sysfs are interesting because they have content that is
per namespace, and so fresh mounts are needed when new namespaces
are created while at the same time proc and sysfs have content that
is shared between every instance.

Respect the policy of who may see the shared content of proc and sysfs
by only allowing new mounts if there was an existing mount at the time
the user namespace was created.

In practice there are only two interesting cases: proc and sysfs are
mounted at their usual places, proc and sysfs are not mounted at all
(some form of mount namespace jail).

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

As a matter of policy MNT_READONLY should not be changable if the
original mounter had more privileges than creator of the mount
namespace.

Add the flag CL_UNPRIVILEGED to note when we are copying a mount from
a mount namespace that requires more privileges to a mount namespace
that requires fewer privileges.

When the CL_UNPRIVILEGED flag is set cause clone_mnt to set MNT_NO_REMOUNT
if any of the mnt flags that should never be changed are set.

This protects both mount propagation and the initial creation of a less
privileged mount namespace.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Reported-by: NAndy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

When a read-only bind mount is copied from mount namespace in a higher
privileged user namespace to a mount namespace in a lesser privileged
user namespace, it should not be possible to remove the the read-only
restriction.

Add a MNT_LOCK_READONLY mount flag to indicate that a mount must
remain read-only.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

Guarantee that the policy of which files may be access that is
established by setting the root directory will not be violated
by user namespaces by verifying that the root directory points
to the root of the mount namespace at the time of user namespace
creation.

Changing the root is a privileged operation, and as a matter of policy
it serves to limit unprivileged processes to files below the current
root directory.

For reasons of simplicity and comprehensibility the privilege to
change the root directory is gated solely on the CAP_SYS_CHROOT
capability in the user namespace.  Therefore when creating a user
namespace we must ensure that the policy of which files may be access
can not be violated by changing the root directory.

Anyone who runs a processes in a chroot and would like to use user
namespace can setup the same view of filesystems with a mount
namespace instead.  With this result that this is not a practical
limitation for using user namespaces.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Reported-by: NAndy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

... lest we get livelocks between path_is_under() and d_path() and friends.

The thing is, wrt fairness lglocks are more similar to rwsems than to rwlocks;
it is possible to have thread B spin on attempt to take lock shared while thread
A is already holding it shared, if B is on lower-numbered CPU than A and there's
a thread C spinning on attempt to take the same lock exclusive.

As the result, we need consistent ordering between vfsmount_lock (lglock) and
rename_lock (seq_lock), even though everything that takes both is going to take
vfsmount_lock only shared.
Spotted-by: NBrad Spengler <spender@grsecurity.net>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Btrfs uses page_mkwrite to ensure stable pages during
crc calculations and mmap workloads.  We call clear_page_dirty_for_io
before we do any crcs, and this forces any application with the file
mapped to wait for the crc to finish before it is allowed to change
the file.

With compression on, the clear_page_dirty_for_io step is happening after
we've compressed the pages.  This means the applications might be
changing the pages while we are compressing them, and some of those
modifications might not hit the disk.

This commit adds the clear_page_dirty_for_io before compression starts
and makes sure to redirty the page if we have to fallback to
uncompressed IO as well.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Reported-by: NAlexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org>
cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

vfs_writev() updates the offset argument - but the code then passes the
offset to vfs_fsync_range(). Since offset now points to the offset after
what was just written, this is probably not what was intended

Introduced by face1502 "nfsd: use
vfs_fsync_range(), not O_SYNC, for stable writes".
Signed-off-by: NKent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: NZach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Dave Jones found another /proc issue with his Trinity tool: thanks to
the namespace model, we can have multiple /proc dentries that point to
the same inode, aliasing directories in /proc/<pid>/net/ for example.

This ends up being a total disaster, because it acts like hardlinked
directories, and causes locking problems.  We rely on the topological
sort of the inodes pointed to by dentries, and if we have aliased
directories, that odering becomes unreliable.

In short: don't do this.  Multiple dentries with the same (directory)
inode is just a bad idea, and the namespace code should never have
exposed things this way.  But we're kind of stuck with it.

This solves things by just always allocating a new inode during /proc
dentry lookup, instead of using "iget_locked()" to look up existing
inodes by superblock and number.  That actually simplies the code a bit,
at the cost of potentially doing more inode [de]allocations.

That said, the inode lookup wasn't free either (and did a lot of locking
of inodes), so it is probably not that noticeable.  We could easily keep
the old lookup model for non-directory entries, but rather than try to
be excessively clever this just implements the minimal and simplest
workaround for the problem.
Reported-and-tested-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Analyzed-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

We should free leaf and root before returning from the error
handling code.
Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

To resolve backrefs, ROOT_REPLACE operations in the tree mod log are
required to be tied to at least one KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING operation.
Therefore, those operations must be enclosed by tree_mod_log_write_lock()
and tree_mod_log_write_unlock() calls.

Those calls are private to the tree_mod_log_* functions, which means that
removal of the elements of an old root node must be logged from
tree_mod_log_insert_root. This partly reverts and corrects commit ba1bfbd5
(Btrfs: fix a tree mod logging issue for root replacement operations).

This fixes the brand-new version of xfstest 276 as of commit cfe73f71.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Steps to reproduce:
	mkfs.btrfs <disk>
	mount <disk> <mnt>
	btrfs quota enable <mnt>
	btrfs sub create <mnt>/subv
	btrfs qgroup limit 10M <mnt>/subv
	fallocate --length 20M <mnt>/subv/data

For the above example, fallocating will return successfully which
is not expected, we try to fix it by doing qgroup reservation before
fallocating.
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

If you restore a btrfs-image file system and try to mount that file system we'll
panic.  That's because btrfs-image restores and just makes one big chunk to
envelope the whole disk, since they are really only meant to be messed with by
our btrfs-progs.  So fix up btrfs_rmap_block and the callers of it for mount so
that we no longer panic but instead just return an error and fail to mount.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Now that we use bit operation to check fs_state, update
btrfs_free_fs_root()'s checker, otherwise we get back to
memory leak case.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>