- 08 5月, 2015 40 次提交
-
-
由 Nickolaus Woodruff 提交于
This patch fixes the following sparse warnings in r8192U_core.c: CHECK drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c:3212:6: warning: symbol 'rtl819x_watchdog_wqcallback' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c:3276:6: warning: symbol 'watch_dog_timer_callback' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c:3282:5: warning: symbol '_rtl8192_up' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c:3333:5: warning: symbol 'rtl8192_close' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c:3406:6: warning: symbol 'rtl8192_restart' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c:4618:6: warning: symbol 'rtl8192_irq_rx_tasklet' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c:4736:6: warning: symbol 'rtl8192_cancel_deferred_work' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: NNickolaus Woodruff <nickolauswoodruff@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Ian Abbott 提交于
Signed-off-by: NIan Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NH Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Ian Abbott 提交于
Reformat some function declarations to avoid bunching up near column 80. Also add a blank line after a `struct` definition. Signed-off-by: NIan Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NH Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Ian Abbott 提交于
Use the usual style for block comments. Squash double spaces after comment opening sequences. Signed-off-by: NIan Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NH Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Ian Abbott 提交于
Use the usual style for block comments. Squash double spaces after comment opening sequences. Signed-off-by: NIan Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NH Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Ian Abbott 提交于
"mite.h" relies on a lot of things declared including "../comedi_pci.h", but doesn't need anything in "../comedi_pci.h" itself. None of the Comedi modules that include "mite.h" rely on it to include "../comedi_pci.h" on their behalf. Remove the inclusion of "../comedi_pci.h" from "mite.h", and add enough other includes and (incomplete) `struct` declarations to make it compile without warnings or errors even when included first in a .c file. Signed-off-by: NIan Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NH Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Ian Abbott 提交于
The definition of the macro `USE_KMALLOC` is commented out, and nothing refers to it. Remove the commented out macro. Signed-off-by: NIan Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NH Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Ian Abbott 提交于
The macro `PCIMIO_COMPAT` is defined, but never used. Remove it. Signed-off-by: NIan Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NH Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Ian Abbott 提交于
The Comedi driver modules build fine if the inclusion of <linux/slab.h> is removed from "mite.h", so remove it. However, since "mite.c" calls `kzalloc()`, include <linux/slab.h> there. Signed-off-by: NIan Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NH Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Giedrius Statkevičius 提交于
count doesn't get changed in between identical checks in dgnc_tty_write() so remove the second check Signed-off-by: NGiedrius Statkevičius <giedrius.statkevicius@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Giedrius Statkevičius 提交于
Remove the dead code protected by in_user in dgnc_tty_write() because it is set to 0 and never changed to 1 thus the code in ifs never gets executed. Signed-off-by: NGiedrius Statkevičius <giedrius.statkevicius@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Mitchel Humpherys 提交于
We're currently printing to the kernel log at `info' level when we successfully create the chunk heap, but success messages should be done at `debug' level. Fix this. Signed-off-by: NMitchel Humpherys <mitchelh@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Giedrius Statkevičius 提交于
Remove checks that are redundant since we don't have boards with partially initialized ->channels[i]. Signed-off-by: NGiedrius Statkevičius <giedrius.statkevicius@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Giedrius Statkevičius 提交于
Add a check if ->channels[i] is NULL because a NULL pointer may be dereferenced in case one of the allocations failed Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NGiedrius Statkevičius <giedrius.statkevicius@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Giedrius Statkevičius 提交于
Check if kzalloc fails in dgnc_tty_init() and if it does then free all previously allocated ->channels[i] and set them to NULL. This makes the code less error/bug prone because instead of needing programmers attention to add checks everywhere we do that in one place. Also, remove a bogus comment and check in the same loop because ->channels[i] isn't allocated anywhere else. Finally, remove a unnecessary check if ->channels[i] is NULL in the next loop because it can't be. Signed-off-by: NGiedrius Statkevičius <giedrius.statkevicius@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Robin Karlsson 提交于
Fixed spelling error in TODO. Signed-off-by: NRobin Karlsson <s.r.karlsson@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Amitoj Kaur Chawla 提交于
Fixed error by removing space after open parenthesis '(' Problem found using checkpatch.pl ERROR: space prohibited after that open parenthesis '(' Signed-off-by: NAmitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Giedrius Statkevičius 提交于
Remove some dead code that will never be executed or which serves no purpose Signed-off-by: NGiedrius Statkevičius <giedrius.statkevicius@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Carlos E. Garcia 提交于
Fixed multiple spelling errors. Signed-off-by: NCarlos E. Garcia <carlos@cgarcia.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Tolga Ceylan 提交于
To fix sparse warning of incorrect type in assignment (different address space), added annotation __iomem to vmem8 and modified direct reads with ioread8(). Signed-off-by: NTolga Ceylan <tolga.ceylan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Replace OBD_CPT_ALLOC, OBD_CPT_ALLOC_PTR, and OBD_CPT_ALLOC_GFP by corresponding calls to kzalloc_node. The semantic patch for the OBD_CPT_ALLOC case is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/). // <smpl> @@ expression ptr,cptab,cpt,size; @@ - OBD_CPT_ALLOC(ptr, cptab, cpt, size) + ptr = kzalloc_node(size, GFP_NOFS, cfs_cpt_spread_node(cptab, cpt)) // </smpl> Note that the original OBD macros would check if the cptab argument was NULL and fall back on kzalloc in that case. Oleg Drokin argues that this test is not needed because the code containing these calls is only invoked after initialization has been completed, in which case the possible cptab arguments are not NULL. Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Replace OBD_CPT_ALLOC, OBD_CPT_ALLOC_PTR, and OBD_CPT_ALLOC_GFP by corresponding calls to kzalloc_node. The semantic patch for the OBD_CPT_ALLOC case is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/). // <smpl> @@ expression ptr,cptab,cpt,size; @@ - OBD_CPT_ALLOC(ptr, cptab, cpt, size) + ptr = kzalloc_node(size, GFP_NOFS, cfs_cpt_spread_node(cptab, cpt)) // </smpl> Note that the original OBD macros would check if the cptab argument was NULL and fall back on kzalloc in that case. Oleg Drokin argues that this test is not needed because the code containing these calls is only invoked after initialization has been completed, in which case the possible cptab arguments are not NULL. Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Replace OBD_CPT_ALLOC, OBD_CPT_ALLOC_PTR, and OBD_CPT_ALLOC_GFP by corresponding calls to kzalloc_node. The semantic patch for the OBD_CPT_ALLOC case is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/). // <smpl> @@ expression ptr,cptab,cpt,size; @@ - OBD_CPT_ALLOC(ptr, cptab, cpt, size) + ptr = kzalloc_node(size, GFP_NOFS, cfs_cpt_spread_node(cptab, cpt)) // </smpl> Note that the original OBD macros would check if the cptab argument was NULL and fall back on kzalloc in that case. Oleg Drokin argues that this test is not needed because the code containing these calls is only invoked after initialization has been completed, in which case the possible cptab arguments are not NULL. Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Kfree can cope with a null argument, so drop null tests. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression ptr; @@ - if (ptr != NULL) kfree(ptr); @@ expression ptr; @@ - if (ptr != NULL) { kfree(ptr); ptr = NULL; - } // </smpl> In the first case, specific labels are introduced to free only what is needed. Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Kfree can cope with a null argument, so drop null tests. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression ptr; @@ - if (ptr != NULL) kfree(ptr); // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Kfree can cope with a null argument, so drop null tests. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression ptr; @@ - if (ptr != NULL) kfree(ptr); // </smpl> In the first case, the only cleanup needed is the unlock, so jump to that directly. Likewise, in the first two failure cases of ptlrpc_lprocfs_nrs_seq_write, no cleanup is needed, so just drop the goto and return directly. Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Kfree can cope with a null argument, so drop null tests. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression ptr; @@ - if (ptr != NULL) kfree(ptr); // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Kfree can cope with a null argument, so drop null tests. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression ptr; @@ - if (ptr != NULL) kfree(ptr); // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Kfree can cope with a null argument, so drop null tests. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression ptr; @@ - if (ptr != NULL) kfree(ptr); @@ expression ptr; @@ - if (ptr != NULL) { kfree(ptr); ptr = NULL; - } // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Kfree can cope with a null argument, so drop null tests. The semantic patch that identifies this issue is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression ptr; @@ - if (ptr != NULL) kfree(ptr); // </smpl> The first part of the patch introduces new labels to avoid unnecessary calls to kfree. In addition, lprof->lp_md is always null in the cleanup code at the end of the function, so that kfree is just dropped. Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Kfree can cope with a null argument, so drop null tests. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression ptr; @@ - if (ptr != NULL) kfree(ptr); // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Kfree can cope with a null argument, so drop null tests. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression ptr; @@ - if (ptr != NULL) kfree(ptr); // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Kfree can cope with a null argument, so drop null tests. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression ptr; @@ - if (ptr != NULL) kfree(ptr); // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Kfree can cope with a null argument, so drop null tests. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression ptr; @@ - if (ptr != NULL) kfree(ptr); // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Kfree can cope with a null argument, so drop null tests. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression ptr; @@ - if (ptr != NULL) kfree(ptr); // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Kfree can cope with a null argument, so drop null tests. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression ptr; @@ - if (ptr != NULL) kfree(ptr); // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Kfree can cope with a null argument, so drop null tests. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression ptr; @@ - if (ptr != NULL) kfree(ptr); // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Kfree can cope with a null argument, so drop null tests. The semantic patch that finds this issue is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression ptr; @@ - if (ptr != NULL) kfree(ptr); // </smpl> In the first case, llss can never be null at the point of the kfree anyway. In the second set of changes, the gotos are either eliminated, when no freeing is needed (hss failure case), or rewritten so that there is no call to free on data that has not yet been allocated (free_hss goto case). There is no goto at which attr is not null, so the out label is simply dropped. Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Kfree can cope with a null argument, so drop null tests. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression ptr; @@ - if (ptr != NULL) kfree(ptr); // </smpl> This patch additionally simplifies one case where the free, and thus the jump to the end of the function, is not needed. Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Kfree can cope with a null argument, so drop null tests. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression ptr; @@ - if (ptr != NULL) { kfree(ptr); ptr = NULL; - } // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-