- 28 7月, 2014 9 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
Although we expect some small discrepancies for very large counts, we seem to be able to count up to 64 billion instructions without too much skew, so do so. Also switch to using decimals for the instruction counts. This just makes it easier to visually compare the expected vs actual values, as well as the raw result from instructions. Before: instructions: result 68719476753 running/enabled 13101961654 cycles: result 38077343785 running/enabled 13101725752 Looped for 68719476736 instructions, overhead 17 Expected 68719476753 Actual 68719476753 Delta 0, 0.000000% success: count_instructions After: instructions: result 64000000016 running/enabled 12197599964 cycles: result 35412471674 running/enabled 12197534110 Looped for 64000000000 instructions, overhead 16 Expected 64000000016 Actual 64000000016 Delta 0, 0.000000% success: count_instructions Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
Have a task eat some cpu while we are counting instructions to create some scheduler pressure. The idea being to try and unearth any bugs we have in counting that only appear when context switching is happening. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
There is at least one bug in core_busy_loop(), we use r0, but it's not in the clobber list. We were getting away with this it seems but that was luck. It's also fishy to be touching the stack, even if we do it below the stack pointer. It seems we get away with it, but looking at the generated code that may just be luck. So move it into assembler, do all the stack handling by hand. We create a stack frame to save the non-volatiles in, so we can muck around with them. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
start and end should be unsigned long. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
Currently we ignore errors from our sub Makefiles. We inherited that from the top-level selftests Makefile which aims to build and run as many tests as possible and damn the torpedoes. For the powerpc tests we'd instead like any errors to fail the build, so we can automatically catch build failures. We can achieve the best of both worlds by using -k, which tells make to keep building when it hits an error, but still reports the error. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 24 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
This gives us standardised success/failure output and also handles killing the test if it runs forever (2 minutes). Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 11 6月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
The Power8 Performance Monitor Unit (PMU) has a new feature called Event Based Branches (EBB). This commit adds tests of the kernel API for using EBBs. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
Allows us to kill the test and any children it has spawned. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Sam bobroff 提交于
Correct the DSCR SPR becoming temporarily corrupted if a task is context switched during a transaction. The problem occurs while suspending the task and is caused by saving the DSCR to thread.dscr after it has already been set to the CPU's default value: __switch_to() calls __switch_to_tm() which calls tm_reclaim_task() which calls tm_reclaim_thread() which calls tm_reclaim() where the DSCR is set to the CPU's default __switch_to() calls _switch() where thread.dscr is set to the DSCR When the task is resumed, it's transaction will be doomed (as usual) and the DSCR SPR will be corrupted, although the checkpointed value will be correct. Therefore the DSCR will be immediately corrected by the transaction aborting, unless it has been suspended. In that case the incorrect value can be seen by the task until it resumes the transaction. The fix is to treat the DSCR similarly to the TAR and save it early in __switch_to(). A program exposing the problem is added to the kernel self tests as: tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-resched-dscr. Signed-off-by: NSam Bobroff <sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com> CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [v3.10+] Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 06 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Reviewed-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 23 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anton Blanchard 提交于
Add some new definitions required to build the copyloop tests. Signed-off-by: NAnton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
-
- 07 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
Turn Anton's memcpy / copy_tofrom_user test into something that can live in tools/testing/selftests. It requires one turd in arch/powerpc/lib/memcpy_64.S, but it's pretty harmless IMHO. We are sailing very close to the wind with the feature macros. We define them to nothing, which currently means we get a few extra nops and include the unaligned calls. Signed-off-by: NAnton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 14 8月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
This commit adds a test of instruction counting using the PMU on powerpc. Although the bulk of the code is architecture agnostic, the code needs to run a precisely sized loop which is implemented in assembler. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
This commit adds support code used by upcoming powerpc tests. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
This commit adds a powerpc subdirectory to tools/testing/selftests, for tests that are powerpc specific. On other architectures nothing is built. The makefile supports cross compilation if the user sets ARCH and CROSS_COMPILE. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-