- 14 6月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
Normally, percpu_ref_init() initializes and percpu_ref_kill() initiates destruction which completes asynchronously. The asynchronous destruction can be problematic in init failure path where the caller wants to destroy half-constructed object - distinguishing half-constructed objects from the usual release method can be painful for complex objects. This patch implements percpu_ref_cancel_init() which synchronously destroys the percpu_ref without invoking release. To avoid unintentional misuses, the function requires the ref to have finished percpu_ref_init() but never used and triggers WARN otherwise. v2: Explain the weird name and usage restriction in the function comment. Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: NKent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
percpu-refcount: add __must_check to percpu_ref_init() and don't use ACCESS_ONCE() in percpu_ref_kill_rcu() Two small changes. * Unlike most init functions, percpu_ref_init() allocates memory and may fail. Let's mark it with __must_check in case the caller forgets. * percpu_ref_kill_rcu() is unnecessarily using ACCESS_ONCE() to dereference @ref->pcpu_count, which can be misleading. The pointer is guaranteed to be valid and visible and can't change underneath the function. Drop ACCESS_ONCE(). Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
- 13 6月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
* s/percpu_ref_release/percpu_ref_func_t/ as it's customary to have _t postfix for types and the type is gonna be used for a different type of callback too. * Add @ARG to function comments. * Drop unnecessary and unaligned indentation from percpu_ref_init() function comment. Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: NKent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
percpu_ref_get/put() are using preempt_disable/enable() while percpu_ref_kill() is using plain call_rcu() instead of call_rcu_sched(). This is buggy as grace periods of the two may not match. Fix it by using plain RCU in percpu_ref_get/put(). (I suggested using sched RCU in the first place but there's no actual benefit in doing so unless we're gonna introduce different variants of get/put to be called while preemption is alredy disabled, which we definitely shouldn't.) Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reported-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: NKent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
-
- 04 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kent Overstreet 提交于
This implements a refcount with similar semantics to atomic_get()/atomic_dec_and_test() - but percpu. It also implements two stage shutdown, as we need it to tear down the percpu counts. Before dropping the initial refcount, you must call percpu_ref_kill(); this puts the refcount in "shutting down mode" and switches back to a single atomic refcount with the appropriate barriers (synchronize_rcu()). It's also legal to call percpu_ref_kill() multiple times - it only returns true once, so callers don't have to reimplement shutdown synchronization. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style tweak] Signed-off-by: NKent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Asai Thambi S P <asamymuthupa@micron.com> Cc: Selvan Mani <smani@micron.com> Cc: Sam Bradshaw <sbradshaw@micron.com> Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-