1. 23 10月, 2008 1 次提交
    • C
      p54: enable 2.4/5GHz spectrum by eeprom bits. · 4cc683c9
      Christian Lamparter 提交于
      Badness at /home/proski/src/linux-2.6/net/mac80211/rx.c:2200
      NIP: c02bc850 LR: c02ab268 CTR: 00000000
      REGS: ef01fcc0 TRAP: 0700   Tainted: G        W  (2.6.27-wl)
      MSR: 00029032 <EE,ME,IR,DR>  CR: 22004084  XER: 20000000
      TASK = c1a58800[1778] 'p54pci' THREAD: ef01e000
      [...]
      NIP [c02bc850] __ieee80211_rx+0x17c/0x638
      LR [c02ab268] ieee80211_tasklet_handler+0x104/0x120
      Call Trace:
      [ef01fd70] [c1a0c020] 0xc1a0c020 (unreliable)
      [ef01fdb0] [c02ab268] ieee80211_tasklet_handler+0x104/0x120
      [...]
      
      the problem was that some older cards are mis-identified and didn't support
      5GHz rates, while they have the right MAC & Synth chip.
      
      This patch changes the way how p54 decides if it should enable 11a channels
      or not.
      Reported-by: NPavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
      Signed-off-by: NChristian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      4cc683c9
  2. 15 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  3. 07 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  4. 01 10月, 2008 1 次提交
    • L
      p54: Fix sparse warnings · 1f1c0e33
      Larry Finger 提交于
      The command
      
      make C=2 CF="-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__" drivers/net/wireless/p54/
      
      generates the following warnings:
      
      .../p54common.c:152:38: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
      .../p54common.c:152:38:    expected restricted __be32 const [usertype] *p
      .../p54common.c:152:38:    got unsigned int *<noident>
      .../p54common.c:184:15: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer
      .../p54common.c:185:29: warning: cast to restricted __le16
      .../p54common.c:309:11: warning: symbol 'p54_rf_chips' was not declared.
      		        Should it be static?
      .../p54common.c:313:5: warning: symbol 'p54_parse_eeprom' was not declared.
      		       Should it be static?
      .../p54common.c:620:43: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types)
      .../p54common.c:620:43:    expected unsigned long [unsigned] [usertype] len
      .../p54common.c:620:43:    got restricted __le16 [usertype] len
      .../p54common.c:780:41: warning: restricted __le16 degrades to integer
      .../p54common.c:781:32: warning: restricted __le16 degrades to integer
      .../p54common.c:1250:28: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types)
      .../p54common.c:1250:28:    expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] filter_type
      .../p54common.c:1250:28:    got restricted __le16 [usertype] filter_type
      .../p54common.c:1252:28: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types)
      .../p54common.c:1252:28:    expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] filter_type
      .../p54common.c:1252:28:    got restricted __le16 [usertype] filter_type
      .../p54common.c:1257:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types)
      .../p54common.c:1257:42:    expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] filter_type
      .../p54common.c:1257:42:    got restricted __le16
      .../p54common.c:1260:42: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types)
      .../p54common.c:1260:42:    expected unsigned short [unsigned] [usertype] filter_type
      .../p54common.c:1260:42:    got restricted __le16
      .../p54usb.c:228:10: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer
      .../p54usb.c:228:23: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer
      .../p54usb.c:228:7: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
      .../p54usb.c:228:7:    expected restricted __le32 [assigned] [usertype] chk
      .../p54usb.c:228:7:    got unsigned int
      .../p54usb.c:221:8: warning: symbol 'p54u_lm87_chksum' was not declared.
      		    Should it be static?
      
      All of the above have been fixed. One question, however, remains: In struct
      bootrec, the array "data" is treated in many places as native CPU order, but
      it may be little-endian everywhere. As far as I can tell, this driver has only
      been used with little-endian hardware.
      Signed-off-by: NLarry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      1f1c0e33
  5. 16 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  6. 12 9月, 2008 5 次提交
  7. 09 9月, 2008 2 次提交
  8. 06 9月, 2008 4 次提交
  9. 30 8月, 2008 3 次提交
  10. 18 8月, 2008 2 次提交
  11. 07 8月, 2008 2 次提交
  12. 05 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  13. 03 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  14. 04 6月, 2008 1 次提交
  15. 22 5月, 2008 4 次提交
  16. 15 5月, 2008 1 次提交
    • B
      mac80211: use hardware flags for signal/noise units · 566bfe5a
      Bruno Randolf 提交于
      trying to clean up the signal/noise code. the previous code in mac80211 had
      confusing names for the related variables, did not have much definition of
      what units of signal and noise were provided and used implicit mechanisms from
      the wireless extensions.
      
      this patch introduces hardware capability flags to let the hardware specify
      clearly if it can provide signal and noise level values and which units it can
      provide. this also anticipates possible new units like RCPI in the future.
      
      for signal:
      
        IEEE80211_HW_SIGNAL_UNSPEC - unspecified, unknown, hw specific
        IEEE80211_HW_SIGNAL_DB     - dB difference to unspecified reference point
        IEEE80211_HW_SIGNAL_DBM    - dBm, difference to 1mW
      
      for noise we currently only have dBm:
      
        IEEE80211_HW_NOISE_DBM     - dBm, difference to 1mW
      
      if IEEE80211_HW_SIGNAL_UNSPEC or IEEE80211_HW_SIGNAL_DB is used the driver has
      to provide the maximum value (max_signal) it reports in order for applications
      to make sense of the signal values.
      
      i tried my best to find out for each driver what it can provide and update it
      but i'm not sure (?) for some of them and used the more conservative guess in
      doubt. this can be fixed easily after this patch has been merged by changing
      the hardware flags of the driver.
      
      DRIVER          SIGNAL    MAX	NOISE   QUAL
      -----------------------------------------------------------------
      adm8211         unspec(?) 100   n/a     missing
      at76_usb        unspec(?) (?)   unused  missing
      ath5k           dBm             dBm     percent rssi
      b43legacy       dBm             dBm     percent jssi(?)
      b43             dBm             dBm     percent jssi(?)
      iwl-3945        dBm             dBm     percent snr+more
      iwl-4965        dBm             dBm     percent snr+more
      p54             unspec    127   n/a     missing
      rt2x00          dBm	        n/a     percent rssi+tx/rx frame success
        rt2400        dBm             n/a
        rt2500pci     dBm             n/a
        rt2500usb     dBm             n/a
        rt61pci       dBm             n/a
        rt73usb       dBm             n/a
      rtl8180         unspec(?) 65    n/a     (?)
      rtl8187         unspec(?) 65    (?)     noise(?)
      zd1211          dB(?)     100   n/a     percent
      
      drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c:      Changes-licensed-under: 3-Clause-BSD
      Signed-off-by: NBruno Randolf <br1@einfach.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      566bfe5a
  17. 08 5月, 2008 3 次提交
  18. 09 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  19. 05 3月, 2008 2 次提交
  20. 01 3月, 2008 3 次提交