These tests always returned true; clearly that wasn't what was intended.

In keeping with kernel style, make them functions instead of macros while
we're at it.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

We're checking nfs_in_grace here a few times when there isn't really any
reason to--bad_stateid is probably the more sensible return value anyway.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Fix an improper unlock in an error path.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

locking init cleanups:

 - convert " = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED" to spin_lock_init() or DEFINE_SPINLOCK()
 - convert rwlocks in a similar manner

this patch was generated automatically.

Motivation:

 - cleanliness
 - lockdep needs control of lock initialization, which the open-coded
   variants do not give
 - it's also useful for -rt and for lock debugging in general
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

This patch converts the combination of list_del(A) and list_add(A, B) to
list_move(A, B) under fs/.

Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Acked-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: Hans Reiser <reiserfs-dev@namesys.com>
Cc: Urban Widmark <urban@teststation.com>
Acked-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NMark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAkinobu Mita <mita@miraclelinux.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Keep unused openowners around for at least one lease period, to avoid the need
for as many open confirmations and to allow handing out more delegations.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

It's very easy for the server to DOS itself by just giving out too many
delegations.

For now we just solve the problem with a dumb hard limit.  Eventually we'll
want a smarter policy.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

We should be shutting down rpciod for the callback channel when we shut down
the server.

Also note that we do rpciod_up() and create the callback client *before*
setting cb_set--the cb_set only determines whether the initial null was
succesful.  So cb_set is not a reliable determiner of whether we need to clean
up, only cb_client is.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

We need to make sure the laundromat work doesn't reschedule itself just when
we try to cancel it.  Also, we shouldn't be waiting for it to finish running
while holding the state lock, as that's a potential deadlock.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Use the fl_lmops field to identify which locks are ours, instead of trying to
look them up in our private hash.  This is safer and more efficient.

Earlier versions of this patch used a lock flag instead, but Trond pointed out
that adding a new flag for each lock manager wasn't going to scale well, and
suggested this approach instead; a separate patch converts lockd to using
fl_lmops in the same way.

In the NFSv4 case this looks like a bit of a hack, since the NFSv4 server
isn't currently actually defining a lock_manager_operations struct, so we end
up defining one *just* to serve as a cookie to identify our locks.

But it works, and we actually do expect to start using the
lock_manager_operations at some point anyway.
Signed-off-by: NMarc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Update the NFSv4 server to use the new posix_lock_file_conf() interface.
Remove unnecessary (and race-prone) posix_test_file() calls.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Semaphore to mutex conversion.

The conversion was generated via scripts, and the result was validated
automatically via a script as well.
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@ericvh.myip.org>
Cc: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

posix_test_lock() returns a pointer to a struct file_lock which is unprotected
and can be removed while in use by the caller.  Move the conflicting lock from
the return to a parameter, and copy the conflicting lock.

In most cases the caller ends up putting the copy of the conflicting lock on
the stack.  On i386, sizeof(struct file_lock) appears to be about 100 bytes.
We're assuming that's reasonable.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

missing nfserrno() in default case of a switch by return value of
posix_lock_file(); as the result we send negative host-endian to clients that
expect positive network-endian, preferably mentioned in RFC...  BTW, that case
is not impossible - posix_lock_file() can return -ENOLCK and we do not handle
that one explicitly.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

->rp_status is network-endian and nobody byteswaps it before sending to
client; putting NFSERR_SERVERFAULT instead of nfserr_serverfault in there is
not nice...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

-EINVAL (in host order, no less) is not a good thing to return to client.

nfsd4_truncate() returns it in one case and its callers expect nfs_....  from
it.  AFAICS, it should be nfserr_inval
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Bad bookkeeping of the share reservations when handling open upgrades was
causing open downgrade to fail.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

In an earlier patch (commit b648330a) I noted
that a too-early grace-period check was preventing us from bumping the
sequence id on open.  Unfortunately in that patch I stupidly moved the
grace-period check back too far, so now an open for create can succesfully
create the file while still returning ERR_GRACE.

The correct place for that check is after we've set the open_owner and handled
any replays, but before we actually start mucking with the filesystem.

Thanks to Avishay Traeger for reporting the bug.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

nfsd4_process_open1 is very highly nested; flatten it out a bit.

Also, the preceding comment, which just outlines the logic, seems redundant.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

We shouldn't check for replays until after checking whether the open owner is
confirmed.  Clients are allowed to reuse openowners without bumping the seqid.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Fix some bad logic.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

It's confusing having both release_stateowner() and release_state_owner().

And as it turns out, release_state_owner() is short and only called from one
place; so just remove it.

Also note the confirmed check is superfluous there--preprocess_seqid_op
already check this.

And remove a redundant comment and a superfluous line assignment while we're
at it.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

One of the things that's confusing about nfsd4_lock is that the lk_stateowner
field could be set to either of two different lockowners: the open owner or
the lock owner.  Rename to lk_replay_owner and add a comment to make it clear
that it's used for whichever stateowner has its sequence id bumped for replay
detection.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

release_state_owner also puts the lock owner on the close_lru.  There's no
need for that, though; replays of the failed lock would be handled by the
openowner not the lockowner.

Also consolidate the cleanup a bit, fixing leaks that can happen if errors
occur between the time a new lock owner is allocated and the lock is done.

Remove a comment and dprintk that look a little redundant.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Logic fixes for LOCK and UNLOCK.

- Move the permission check on the current file handle outside of
  nfs4_lock_state()

- remove the file manager fl_release_private calls; fl_ops is not set.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

We could try to unlock the state lock here without having first locked it.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

In the case of a lock which introduces a new lockowner, the openowner's
sequence id should be incremented, even when the operation fails, if the
error is a sequence-id-mutating error.  The current code fails to do that
in some cases.  Fix this by using the same sequence-id-incrementing
mechanism that all other such operations use.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

It seems more natural to move the setting of the replay_owner into the
relevant procedure instead of doing it in nfsv4_proc_compound.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Demote some printk's that look like they could be triggered by non-buggy
clients to dprintk's.  (For example, stale clientid's are normal
occurrences on reboot, and on a server with a lot of clients these messages
could become annoying.)

Also remove some redundant dprintk's (e.g. no need for both STALE_CLIENTID
and its callers to do dprintks).
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

We shouldn't be allowing, e.g., write locks on files not open for read.  To
enforce this, we add a pointer from the lock stateid back to the open stateid
it came from, so that the check will continue to be correct even after the
open is upgraded or downgraded.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

As long as we're here, do some miscellaneous cleanup.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

The handling of close_lru in preprocess_stateid_op was a source of some
confusion here recently.  Try to make the logic a little clearer, by renaming
find_openstateowner_id to make its purpose clearer and untangling some
unnecessarily complicated goto's.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op is called by NFSv4 operations that imply an implicit
renewal of the client lease.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

from RFC 3530:
"Share reservations are established by OPEN operations and by their
nature are mandatory in that when the OPEN denies READ or WRITE
operations, that denial results in such operations being rejected
with error NFS4ERR_LOCKED."

(Note that share_denied is really only a legal error for OPEN.)
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

An OPEN from the same client/open stateowner requires a stateid update because
of the share/deny access update.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

We're insisting that the lock sequence id field passed in the
open_to_lockowner struct always be zero.  This is probably thanks to the
sentence in rfc3530: "The first request issued for any given lock_owner is
issued with a sequence number of zero."

But there doesn't seem to be any problem with allowing initial sequence
numbers other than zero.  And currently this is causing lock reclaims from the
Linux client to fail.

In the spirit of "be liberal in what you accept, conservative in what you
send", we'll relax the check (and patch the Linux client as well).
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

The sequence number we store in the sequence id is the last one we received
from the client.  So on the next operation we'll check that the client gives
us the next higher number.

We increment sequence id's at the last moment, in encode, so that we're sure
of knowing the right error return.  (The decision to increment the sequence id
depends on the exact error returned.)

However on the *first* use of a sequence number, if we set the sequence number
to the one received from the client and then let the increment happen on
encode, we'll be left with a sequence number one to high.

For that reason, ENCODE_SEQID_OP_TAIL only increments the sequence id on
*confirmed* stateowners.

This creates a problem for open reclaims, which are confirmed on first use.
Therefore the open reclaim code, as a special exception, *decrements* the
sequence id, cancelling out the undesired increment on encode.  But this
prevents the sequence id from ever being incremented in the case where
multiple reclaims are sent with the same openowner.  Yuch!

We could add another exception to the open reclaim code, decrementing the
sequence id only if this is the first use of the open owner.

But it's simpler by far to modify the meaning of the op_seqid field: instead
of representing the previous value sent by the client, we take op_seqid, after
encoding, to represent the *next* sequence id that we expect from the client.
This eliminates the need for special-case handling of the first use of a
stateowner.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Yeah, it's trivial, but this drives me up the wall....
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

A misreading of the spec lead us to convert all errors on open and lock
reclaims to RECLAIM_BAD.  This causes problems--for example, a reboot within
the grace period could lead to reclaims with stale stateid's, and we'd like to
return STALE errors in those cases.

What rfc3530 actually says about RECLAIM_BAD: "The reclaim provided by the
client does not match any of the server's state consistency checks and is
bad." I'm assuming that "state consistency checks" refers to checks for
consistency with the state recorded to stable storage, and that the error
should be reserved for that case.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>