- 29 5月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Neuendorffer 提交于
Previously, DCR support was configured at compile time to either use MMIO or native dcr instructions. Although this works for most platforms, it fails on FPGA platforms: 1) Systems may include more than one DCR bus. 2) Systems may be native DCR capable and still use memory mapped DCR interface. This patch provides runtime support based on the device trees for the case where CONFIG_PPC_DCR_MMIO and CONFIG_PPC_DCR_NATIVE are both selected. Previously, this was a poorly defined configuration, which happened to provide NATIVE support. The runtime selection is made based on the dcr-controller having a 'dcr-access-method' attribute in the device tree. If only one of the above options is selected, then the code uses #defines to select only the used code in order to avoid introducing overhead in existing usage. Signed-off-by: NStephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com> Signed-off-by: NJosh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 16 10月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
With the base stored in dcr_host_t, there's no need for callers to pass the dcr_n into dcr_unmap(). In fact this removes the possibility of them passing the incorrect value, which would then be iounmap()'ed. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NJeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
Now that all users of dcr_read()/dcr_write() add the dcr_host_t.base, we can save them the trouble and do it in dcr_read()/dcr_write(). As some background to why we just went through all this jiggery-pokery, benh sayeth: Initially the goal of the dcr_read/dcr_write routines was to operate like mfdcr/mtdcr which take absolute DCR numbers. The reason is that on 4xx hardware, indirect DCR access is a pain (goes through a table of instructions) and it's useful to have the compiler resolve an absolute DCR inline. We decided that wasn't worth the API bastardisation since most places where absolute DCR values are used are low level 4xx-only code which may as well continue using mfdcr/mtdcr, while the new API is designed for device "instances" that can exist on 4xx and Axon type platforms and may be located at variable DCR offsets. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NJeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
-
- 03 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
In its current form, dcr_map() doesn't remember the base address you passed it, which means you need to store it somewhere else. Rather than adding the base to another struct it seems simpler to store it in the dcr_host_t. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Acked-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 04 12月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
This patch adds new dcr_map/dcr_read/dcr_write accessors for DCRs that can be used by drivers to transparently address either native DCRs or memory mapped DCRs. The implementation for memory mapped DCRs is done after the binding being currently worked on for SLOF and the Axon chipset. This patch enables it for the cell native platform Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-