- 05 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Scott Wood 提交于
This implements perf_event support for the Freescale embedded performance monitor, based on the existing perf_event.c that supports server/classic chips. Some limitations: - Performance monitor interrupts are regular EE interrupts, and thus you can't profile places with interrupts disabled. We may want to implement soft IRQ-disabling, with perfmon interrupts exempted and treated as NMIs. - When trying to schedule multiple event groups at once, and using restricted events, situations could arise where scheduling fails even though it would be possible. Consider three groups, each with two events. One group has restricted events, the others don't. The two non-restricted groups are scheduled, then one is removed, which happens to occupy the two counters that can't do restricted events. The remaining non-restricted group will not be moved to the non-restricted-capable counters to make room if the restricted group tries to be scheduled. Signed-off-by: NScott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> Acked-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NKumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 04 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 André Goddard Rosa 提交于
That is "success", "unknown", "through", "performance", "[re|un]mapping" , "access", "default", "reasonable", "[con]currently", "temperature" , "channel", "[un]used", "application", "example","hierarchy", "therefore" , "[over|under]flow", "contiguous", "threshold", "enough" and others. Signed-off-by: NAndré Goddard Rosa <andre.goddard@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
- 04 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Rothwell 提交于
from include/asm-powerpc. This is the result of a mkdir arch/powerpc/include/asm git mv include/asm-powerpc/* arch/powerpc/include/asm Followed by a few documentation/comment fixups and a couple of places where <asm-powepc/...> was being used explicitly. Of the latter only one was outside the arch code and it is a driver only built for powerpc. Signed-off-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 06 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Fleming 提交于
Some of the more recent e300 cores have the same performance monitor implementation as the e500. e300 isn't book-e, so the name isn't really appropriate. In preparation for e300 support, rename a bunch of fsl_booke things to say fsl_emb (Freescale Embedded Performance Monitors). Signed-off-by: NAndy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: NKumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
-