1. 01 9月, 2013 34 次提交
  2. 10 8月, 2013 6 次提交
    • Z
      btrfs: don't loop on large offsets in readdir · db62efbb
      Zach Brown 提交于
      When btrfs readdir() hits the last entry it sets the readdir offset to a
      huge value to stop buggy apps from breaking when the same name is
      returned by readdir() with concurrent rename()s.
      
      But unconditionally setting the offset to INT_MAX causes readdir() to
      loop returning any entries with offsets past INT_MAX.  It only takes a
      few hours of constant file creation and removal to create entries past
      INT_MAX.
      
      So let's set the huge offset to LLONG_MAX if the last entry has already
      overflowed 32bit loff_t.   Without large offsets behaviour is identical.
      With large offsets 64bit apps will work and 32bit apps will be no more
      broken than they currently are if they see large offsets.
      Signed-off-by: NZach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      db62efbb
    • J
      Btrfs: check to see if root_list is empty before adding it to dead roots · cfad392b
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      A user reported a panic when running with autodefrag and deleting snapshots.
      This is because we could end up trying to add the root to the dead roots list
      twice.  To fix this check to see if we are empty before adding ourselves to the
      dead roots list.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      cfad392b
    • J
      Btrfs: release both paths before logging dir/changed extents · f3b15ccd
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      The ceph guys tripped over this bug where we were still holding onto the
      original path that we used to copy the inode with when logging.  This is based
      on Chris's fix which was reported to fix the problem.  We need to drop the paths
      in two cases anyway so just move the drop up so that we don't have duplicate
      code.  Thanks,
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      f3b15ccd
    • J
      Btrfs: allow splitting of hole em's when dropping extent cache · ee20a983
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      I noticed while running multi-threaded fsync tests that sometimes fsck would
      complain about an improper gap.  This happens because we fail to add a hole
      extent to the file, which was happening when we'd split a hole EM because
      btrfs_drop_extent_cache was just discarding the whole em instead of splitting
      it.  So this patch fixes this by allowing us to split a hole em properly, which
      means that added holes actually get logged properly and we no longer see this
      fsck error.  Thankfully we're tolerant of these sort of problems so a user would
      not see any adverse effects of this bug, other than fsck complaining.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      ee20a983
    • J
      Btrfs: make sure the backref walker catches all refs to our extent · ed8c4913
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Because we don't mess with the offset into the extent for compressed we will
      properly find both extents for this case
      
      [extent a][extent b][rest of extent a]
      
      but because we already added a ref for the front half we won't add the inode
      information for the second half.  This causes us to leak that memory and not
      print out the other offset when we do logical-resolve.  So fix this by calling
      ulist_add_merge and then add our eie to the existing entry if there is one.
      With this patch we get both offsets out of logical-resolve.  With this and the
      other 2 patches I've sent we now pass btrfs/276 on my vm with compress-force=lzo
      set.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      ed8c4913
    • J
      Btrfs: fix backref walking when we hit a compressed extent · 8ca15e05
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      If you do btrfs inspect-internal logical-resolve on a compressed extent that has
      been partly overwritten it won't find anything.  This is because we try and
      match the extent offset we've searched for based on the extent offset in the
      data extent entry.  However this doesn't work for compressed extents because the
      offsets are for the uncompressed size, not the compressed size.  So instead only
      do this check if we are not compressed, that way we can get an actual entry for
      the physical offset rather than nothing for compressed.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      8ca15e05