1. 23 8月, 2012 2 次提交
  2. 17 8月, 2012 2 次提交
  3. 10 8月, 2012 5 次提交
  4. 26 7月, 2012 5 次提交
  5. 20 7月, 2012 4 次提交
  6. 05 7月, 2012 6 次提交
  7. 04 7月, 2012 2 次提交
  8. 29 6月, 2012 1 次提交
  9. 21 6月, 2012 1 次提交
  10. 20 6月, 2012 3 次提交
  11. 19 6月, 2012 3 次提交
  12. 14 6月, 2012 3 次提交
    • B
      drm/i915: PIPE_CONTROL_TLB_INVALIDATE · cc0f6398
      Ben Widawsky 提交于
      This has showed up in several other patches. It's required for the next
      context workaround.
      
      I tested this one on its own and saw no differences in basic tests
      (performance or otherwise). This patch is relatively likely to cause
      regressions, hence why it's split out.
      Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      cc0f6398
    • B
      drm/i915: Ivybridge MI_ARB_ON_OFF context w/a · e37ec39b
      Ben Widawsky 提交于
      The workaround itself applies to gen7 only (according to the docs) and
      as Eric Anholt points out shouldn't be required since we don't use HW
      scheduling features, and therefore arbitration. Though since it is a
      small, and simple addition, and we don't really understand the issue,
      just do it.
      
      FWIW, I eventually want to play with some of the arbitration stuff, and
      I'd hate to forget about this.
      Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      e37ec39b
    • B
      drm/i915: CXT_SIZE register offsets added · fe1cc68f
      Ben Widawsky 提交于
      The GPUs can have different default context layouts, and the sizes could
      vary based on platform or BIOS. In order to back the context object with
      a properly sized BO, we must read this register in order to find out a
      sufficient size.
      
      Thankfully (sarcarm!), the register moves and changes meanings
      throughout generations.
      
      CTX and CXT differences are intentional as that is how it is in the
      documentation (prior to GEN6 it was CXT).
      Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      fe1cc68f
  13. 13 6月, 2012 2 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: clear up backlight #define confusion on gen4+ · 7cf41601
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      - Regroup definitions for BLC_PWM_CTL so that they're all together and
        and ordered according to the bitfields.
      
      - Add all missing definitions for BLC_PWM_CTL2.
      
      - Use the BLM_ (for backlight modulation) prefix consistently.
      
      - Note that combination mode (i.e. also taking the legacy backlight
        control value from pci config space into account) is gen4 only.
      
      - Move the new registers for PCH-split machines up, they're an almost
        match for the gen4 defitions.  Prefix the special PCH-only bits with
        BLM_PCH_. Also add the pipe C select bit for ivb.
      
      - Rip out the second pair of PCH polarity definitions - they're only
        valid on early (pre-production) ilk silicon.
      
      - Adapt the existing code to use the new definitions. This has the
        nice benefit of killing a magic (1 << 30) left behind be Jesse
        Barnes.
      
      No functional changes in this patch.
      Reviewed-by: NEugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      7cf41601
    • D
      drm/i915: pnv has a backlight polarity control bit, too · 534b5a53
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      We already correctly ignore bit0 on gen < 4, now we also know why ;-)
      I've decided that losing that single bit of precision isn't worth the
      trouble to sprinkle IS_PINEVIEW checks all over the backlight control
      code - that code is way too fragile imo.
      Reviewed-by: NEugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
      Signed-Off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      534b5a53
  14. 07 6月, 2012 1 次提交