1. 06 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  2. 20 4月, 2010 6 次提交
  3. 24 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • D
      acpi: Support IBM SMBus CMI devices · 222e82ac
      Darrick J. Wong 提交于
      On some old IBM workstations and desktop computers, the BIOS presents in the
      DSDT an SMBus object that is missing the HID identifier that the i2c-scmi
      driver looks for.  Modify the ACPI device scan code to insert the missing HID
      if it finds an IBM system with such an object.
      
      Affected machines: IntelliStation Z20/Z30.  Note that the i2c-i801 driver no
      longer works on these machines because of ACPI resource conflicts.
      Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
      222e82ac
  4. 15 3月, 2010 2 次提交
  5. 24 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  6. 23 2月, 2010 3 次提交
    • R
      PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up · b67ea761
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in
      principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time,
      platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up
      events that can be delivered to the kernel.  If ACPI is used for this
      purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI
      GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that
      we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured
      correctly.
      
      Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated
      with them is quite limited.  The devices without dedicated GPEs have
      to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of
      cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to
      generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them.
      
      Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up:
      o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify
        handlers for run-time PM.
      o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct
        pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to
        generate wake-up events for given device.  Implemet this callback
        for the ACPI platform.
      o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and
        make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all
        PCI devices present in the ACPI tables.
      o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to
        check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at
        run time.
      
      Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      b67ea761
    • R
      ACPI / PM: Add more run-time wake-up fields · f517709d
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Use the run_wake flag to mark all devices for which run-time wake-up
      events may be generated by the platform.  Introduce a new wake-up
      flag, always_enabled, for marking devices that should be permanently
      enabled to generate run-time events.  Also, introduce a reference
      counter for run-wake devices and a function that will initialize all
      of the run-time wake-up fields for given device.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Acked-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      f517709d
    • R
      ACPI: Use GPE reference counting to support shared GPEs · 9630bdd9
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      ACPI GPEs may map to multiple devices.  The current GPE interface
      only provides a mechanism for enabling and disabling GPEs, making
      it difficult to change the state of GPEs at runtime without extensive
      cooperation between devices.
      
      Add an API to allow devices to indicate whether or not they want
      their device's GPE to be enabled for both runtime and wakeup events.
      
      Remove the old GPE type handling entirely, which gets rid of various
      quirks, like the implicit disabling with GPE type setting. This
      requires a small amount of rework in order to ensure that non-wake
      GPEs are enabled by default to preserve existing behaviour.
      
      Based on patches from Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>.
      Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      9630bdd9
  7. 17 2月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      percpu: add __percpu sparse annotations to what's left · a29d8b8e
      Tejun Heo 提交于
      Add __percpu sparse annotations to places which didn't make it in one
      of the previous patches.  All converions are trivial.
      
      These annotations are to make sparse consider percpu variables to be
      in a different address space and warn if accessed without going
      through percpu accessors.  This patch doesn't affect normal builds.
      Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NBorislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
      Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
      Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
      Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
      a29d8b8e
  8. 28 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  9. 23 1月, 2010 5 次提交
  10. 16 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  11. 22 12月, 2009 5 次提交
    • A
      ACPI: processor: remove _PDC object list from struct acpi_processor · e59897fe
      Alex Chiang 提交于
      When we call _PDC, we get a handle to the processor, allocate the
      object list buffer as needed, and free it immediately after calling
      _PDC.
      
      There's no need to drag around this object list with us everywhere
      else, so let's just get rid of it.
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      e59897fe
    • A
      ACPI: processor: change acpi_processor_set_pdc() interface · 43bab25c
      Alex Chiang 提交于
      When calling _PDC, we really only need the handle to the processor
      to call the method; we don't look at any other parts of the
      struct acpi_processor * given to us.
      
      In the early path, when we walk the namespace, we are given the
      handle directly, so just pass it through to acpi_processor_set_pdc()
      without stuffing it into a wasteful struct acpi_processor allocated
      on the stack each time
      
      This saves 2834 bytes of stack.
      
      Update the interface accordingly.
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      43bab25c
    • A
      ACPI: processor: unify arch_acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc · 47817254
      Alex Chiang 提交于
      The x86 and ia64 implementations of the function in $subject are
      exactly the same.
      
      Also, since the arch-specific implementations of setting _PDC have
      been completely hollowed out, remove the empty shells.
      
      Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
      Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      47817254
    • A
      ACPI: processor: finish unifying arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc() · 6c5807d7
      Alex Chiang 提交于
      The only thing arch-specific about calling _PDC is what bits get
      set in the input obj_list buffer.
      
      There's no need for several levels of indirection to twiddle those
      bits. Additionally, since we're just messing around with a buffer,
      we can simplify the interface; no need to pass around the entire
      struct acpi_processor * just to get at the buffer.
      
      Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
      Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      6c5807d7
    • A
      ACPI: processor: call _PDC early · 78f16996
      Alex Chiang 提交于
      We discovered that at least one machine (HP Envy), methods in the DSDT
      attempt to call external methods defined in a dynamically loaded SSDT.
      
      Unfortunately, the DSDT methods we are trying to call are part of the
      EC initialization, which happens very early, and the the dynamic SSDT
      is only loaded when a processor _PDC method runs much later.
      
      This results in namespace lookup errors for the (as of yet) undefined
      methods.
      
      Since Windows doesn't have any issues with this machine, we take it
      as a hint that they must be evaluating _PDC much earlier than we are.
      
      Thus, the proper thing for Linux to do should be to match the Windows
      implementation more closely.
      
      Provide a mechanism to call _PDC before we enable the EC. Doing so loads
      the dynamic tables, and allows the EC to be enabled correctly.
      
      The ACPI processor driver will still evaluate _PDC in its .add() method
      to cover the hotplug case.
      
      Resolves: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14824
      
      Cc: ming.m.lin@intel.com
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      78f16996
  12. 16 12月, 2009 2 次提交
  13. 25 11月, 2009 4 次提交
  14. 06 11月, 2009 1 次提交
    • Z
      ACPI: Notify the _PPC evaluation status to the platform · d81c45e1
      Zhao Yakui 提交于
      According to the ACPI spec(section 8.4.4.3) OSPM should convey the _PPC
      evaluations status to the platform if there exists the _OST object.
      The _OST contains two arguments:
      	The first is the PERFORMANCE notificatin event.
      	The second is the status of _PPC object.
      OSPM will convey the _PPC evaluation status to the platform.
      Of course when the module parameter of "ignore_ppc" is added, OSPM won't
      evaluate the _PPC object. But it will call the _OST object.
      
      At the same time the _OST object will be evaluated only when the PERFORMANCE
      notification event is received.
      Signed-off-by: NZhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      d81c45e1
  15. 05 11月, 2009 1 次提交
    • M
      PCI: PCIe AER: honor ACPI HEST FIRMWARE FIRST mode · 05843961
      Matt Domsch 提交于
      Feedback from Hidetoshi Seto and Kenji Kaneshige incorporated.  This
      correctly handles PCI-X bridges, PCIe root ports and endpoints, and
      prints debug messages when invalid/reserved types are found in the
      HEST.  PCI devices not in domain/segment 0 are not represented in
      HEST, thus will be ignored.
      
      Today, the PCIe Advanced Error Reporting (AER) driver attaches itself
      to every PCIe root port for which BIOS reports it should, via ACPI
      _OSC.
      
      However, _OSC alone is insufficient for newer BIOSes.  Part of ACPI
      4.0 is the new APEI (ACPI Platform Error Interfaces) which is a way
      for OS and BIOS to handshake over which errors for which components
      each will handle.  One table in ACPI 4.0 is the Hardware Error Source
      Table (HEST), where BIOS can define that errors for certain PCIe
      devices (or all devices), should be handled by BIOS ("Firmware First
      mode"), rather than be handled by the OS.
      
      Dell PowerEdge 11G server BIOS defines Firmware First mode in HEST, so
      that it may manage such errors, log them to the System Event Log, and
      possibly take other actions.  The aer driver should honor this, and
      not attach itself to devices noted as such.
      
      Furthermore, Kenji Kaneshige reminded us to disallow changing the AER
      registers when respecting Firmware First mode.  Platform firmware is
      expected to manage these, and if changes to them are allowed, it could
      break that firmware's behavior.
      
      The HEST parsing code may be replaced in the future by a more
      feature-rich implementation.  This patch provides the minimum needed
      to prevent breakage until that implementation is available.
      Reviewed-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Reviewed-by: NHidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMatt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      05843961
  16. 26 9月, 2009 5 次提交