Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 23 6月, 2015 11 次提交
    • J
      drm/i915: Update ppgtt_init_ring() & context_enable() to take requests · b3dd6b96
      由 John Harrison 提交于 
      The final step in removing the OLR from i915_gem_init_hw() is to pass the newly
allocated request structure in to each step rather than passing a ring
structure. This patch updates both i915_ppgtt_init_ring() and
i915_gem_context_enable() to take request pointers.

For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      b3dd6b96
    • J
      drm/i915: Add explicit request management to i915_gem_init_hw() · dc4be607
      由 John Harrison 提交于 
      Now that a single per ring loop is being done for all the different
intialisation steps in i915_gem_init_hw(), it is possible to add proper request
management as well. The last remaining issue is that the context enable call
eventually ends up within *_render_state_init() and this does its own private
_i915_add_request() call.

This patch adds explicit request creation and submission to the top level loop
and removes the add_request() from deep within the sub-functions.

v2: Updated for removal of batch_obj from add_request call in previous patch.

For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      dc4be607
    • J
      drm/i915: Moved the for_each_ring loop outside of i915_gem_context_enable() · 90638cc1
      由 John Harrison 提交于 
      The start of day context initialisation code in i915_gem_context_enable() loops
over each ring and calls the legacy switch context or the execlist init context
code as appropriate.

This patch moves the ring looping out of that function in to the top level
caller i915_gem_init_hw(). This means the a single pass can be made over all
rings doing the PPGTT, L3 remap and context initialisation of each ring
altogether.

For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      90638cc1
    • J
      drm/i915: Add flag to i915_add_request() to skip the cache flush · 5b4a60c2
      由 John Harrison 提交于 
      In order to explcitly track all GPU work (and completely remove the outstanding
lazy request), it is necessary to add extra i915_add_request() calls to various
places. Some of these do not need the implicit cache flush done as part of the
standard batch buffer submission process.

This patch adds a flag to _add_request() to specify whether the flush is
required or not.

For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      5b4a60c2
    • J
      drm/i915: Update execbuffer_move_to_active() to take a request structure · 8a8edb59
      由 John Harrison 提交于 
      The plan is to pass requests around as the basic submission tracking structure
rather than rings and contexts. This patch updates the
execbuffer_move_to_active() code path.

For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      8a8edb59
    • J
      drm/i915: Add request to execbuf params and add explicit cleanup · 6a6ae79a
      由 John Harrison 提交于 
      Rather than just having a local request variable in the execbuff code, the
request pointer is now stored in the execbuff params structure. Also added
explicit cleanup of the request (plus wiping the OLR to match) in the error
case. This means that the execbuff code is no longer dependent upon the OLR
keeping track of the request so as to not leak it when things do go wrong. Note
that in the success case, the i915_add_request() at the end of the submission
function will tidy up the request and clear the OLR.

For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      6a6ae79a
    • J
      drm/i915: Update alloc_request to return the allocated request · 217e46b5
      由 John Harrison 提交于 
      The alloc_request() function does not actually return the newly allocated
request. Instead, it must be pulled from ring->outstanding_lazy_request. This
patch fixes this so that code can create a request and start using it knowing
exactly which request it actually owns.

v2: Updated for new i915_gem_request_alloc() scheme.

For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      217e46b5
    • J
      drm/i915: Simplify i915_gem_execbuffer_retire_commands() parameters · adeca76d
      由 John Harrison 提交于 
      Shrunk the parameter list of i915_gem_execbuffer_retire_commands() to a single
structure as everything it requires is available in the execbuff_params object.

For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      adeca76d
    • J
      drm/i915: Merged the many do_execbuf() parameters into a structure · 5f19e2bf
      由 John Harrison 提交于 
      The do_execbuf() function takes quite a few parameters. The actual set of
parameters is going to change with the conversion to passing requests around.
Further, it is due to grow massively with the arrival of the GPU scheduler.

This patch simplifies the prototype by passing a parameter structure instead.
Changing the parameter set in the future is then simply a matter of
adding/removing items to the structure.

Note that the structure does not contain absolutely everything that is passed
in. This is because the intention is to use this structure more extensively
later in this patch series and more especially in the GPU scheduler that is
coming soon. The latter requires hanging on to the structure as the final
hardware submission can be delayed until long after the execbuf IOCTL has
returned to user land. Thus it is unsafe to put anything in the structure that
is local to the IOCTL call itself - such as the 'args' parameter. All entries
must be copies of data or pointers to structures that are reference counted in
some way and guaranteed to exist for the duration of the batch buffer's life.

v2: Rebased to newer tree and updated for changes to the command parser.
Specifically, a code shuffle has required saving the batch start address in the
params structure.

For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      5f19e2bf
    • J
      drm/i915: i915_add_request must not fail · bf7dc5b7
      由 John Harrison 提交于 
      The i915_add_request() function is called to keep track of work that has been
written to the ring buffer. It adds epilogue commands to track progress (seqno
updates and such), moves the request structure onto the right list and other
such house keeping tasks. However, the work itself has already been written to
the ring and will get executed whether or not the add request call succeeds. So
no matter what goes wrong, there isn't a whole lot of point in failing the call.

At the moment, this is fine(ish). If the add request does bail early on and not
do the housekeeping, the request will still float around in the
ring->outstanding_lazy_request field and be picked up next time. It means
multiple pieces of work will be tagged as the same request and driver can't
actually wait for the first piece of work until something else has been
submitted. But it all sort of hangs together.

This patch series is all about removing the OLR and guaranteeing that each piece
of work gets its own personal request. That means that there is no more
'hoovering up of forgotten requests'. If the request does not get tracked then
it will be leaked. Thus the add request call _must_ not fail. The previous patch
should have already ensured that it _will_ not fail by removing the potential
for running out of ring space. This patch enforces the rule by actually removing
the early exit paths and the return code.

Note that if something does manage to fail and the epilogue commands don't get
written to the ring, the driver will still hang together. The request will be
added to the tracking lists. And as in the old case, any subsequent work will
generate a new seqno which will suffice for marking the old one as complete.

v2: Improved WARNings (Tomas Elf review request).

For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      bf7dc5b7
    • J
      drm/i915: Reserve ring buffer space for i915_add_request() commands · 29b1b415
      由 John Harrison 提交于 
      It is a bad idea for i915_add_request() to fail. The work will already have been
send to the ring and will be processed, but there will not be any tracking or
management of that work.

The only way the add request call can fail is if it can't write its epilogue
commands to the ring (cache flushing, seqno updates, interrupt signalling). The
reasons for that are mostly down to running out of ring buffer space and the
problems associated with trying to get some more. This patch prevents that
situation from happening in the first place.

When a request is created, it marks sufficient space as reserved for the
epilogue commands. Thus guaranteeing that by the time the epilogue is written,
there will be plenty of space for it. Note that a ring_begin() call is required
to actually reserve the space (and do any potential waiting). However, that is
not currently done at request creation time. This is because the ring_begin()
code can allocate a request. Hence calling begin() from the request allocation
code would lead to infinite recursion! Later patches in this series remove the
need for begin() to do the allocate. At that point, it becomes safe for the
allocate to call begin() and really reserve the space.

Until then, there is a potential for insufficient space to be available at the
point of calling i915_add_request(). However, that would only be in the case
where the request was created and immediately submitted without ever calling
ring_begin() and adding any work to that request. Which should never happen. And
even if it does, and if that request happens to fall down the tiny window of
opportunity for failing due to being out of ring space then does it really
matter because the request wasn't doing anything in the first place?

v2: Updated the 'reserved space too small' warning to include the offending
sizes. Added a 'cancel' operation to clean up when a request is abandoned. Added
re-initialisation of tracking state after a buffer wrap to keep the sanity
checks accurate.

v3: Incremented the reserved size to accommodate Ironlake (after finally
managing to run on an ILK system). Also fixed missing wrap code in LRC mode.

v4: Added extra comment and removed duplicate WARN (feedback from Tomas).

For: VIZ-5115
CC: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      29b1b415
  3. 22 6月, 2015 2 次提交
  5. 20 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  7. 16 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  9. 15 6月, 2015 3 次提交
  11. 12 6月, 2015 4 次提交
  13. 29 5月, 2015 3 次提交
  15. 28 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  17. 27 5月, 2015 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Use spinlocks for checking when to waitboost · 8d3afd7d
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      In commit 1854d5ca
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Tue Apr 7 16:20:32 2015 +0100

    drm/i915: Deminish contribution of wait-boosting from clients

we removed an atomic timer based check for allowing waitboosting and
moved it below the mutex taken during RPS. However, that mutex can be
held for long periods of time on Vallyview/Cherryview as communication
with the PCU is slow. As clients may frequently wait for results (e.g.
such as tranform feedback) we introduced contention between the client
and the RPS worker. We can take advantage of the RPS worker, by
switching the wait boost decision to use spin locks and defer the
actual reclocking to the worker.

Fixes a regression of up to 45% on Baytrail and Baswell!

v2 (Daniel):
- Use max_freq_softlimit instead of the not-yet-merged boost
  frequency.
- Don't inject a fake irq into the boost work, instead treat
  client_boost as just another legit waker.

v3: Drop the now unused mask (Chris).

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90112
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v1)
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      8d3afd7d
  19. 23 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  21. 22 5月, 2015 2 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Introduce DRM_I915_THROTTLE_JIFFIES · d0bc54f2
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      As Daniel commented on

commit b7ffe1362c5f468b853223acc9268804aa92afc8
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Mon Apr 27 13:41:24 2015 +0100

    drm/i915: Free RPS boosts for all laggards

it is better to be explicit when sharing hardcoded values such as
throttle/boost timeouts. Make it so!
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      d0bc54f2
    • D
      drm/i915/skl: Deinit/init the display at suspend/resume · 5d96d8af
      由 Damien Lespiau 提交于 
      We need to re-init the display hardware when going out of suspend. This
includes:

  - Hooking the PCH to the reset logic
  - Restoring CDCDLK
  - Enabling the DDB power

Among those, only the CDCDLK one is a bit tricky. There's some
complexity in that:

  - DPLL0 (which is the source for CDCLK) has two VCOs, each with a set
    of supported frequencies. As eDP also uses DPLL0 for its link rate,
    once DPLL0 is on, we restrict the possible eDP link rates the chosen
    VCO.
  - CDCLK also limits the bandwidth available to push pixels.

So, as a first step, this commit restore what the BIOS set, until I can
do more testing.

In case that's of interest for the reviewer, I've unit tested the
function that derives the decimal frequency field:

  #include <stdio.h>
  #include <stdint.h>
  #include <assert.h>

  #define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x) / sizeof(*(x)))

  static const struct dpll_freq {
          unsigned int freq;
          unsigned int decimal;
  } freqs[] = {
          { .freq = 308570, .decimal = 0b01001100111},
          { .freq = 337500, .decimal = 0b01010100001},
          { .freq = 432000, .decimal = 0b01101011110},
          { .freq = 450000, .decimal = 0b01110000010},
          { .freq = 540000, .decimal = 0b10000110110},
          { .freq = 617140, .decimal = 0b10011010000},
          { .freq = 675000, .decimal = 0b10101000100},
  };

  static void intbits(unsigned int v)
  {
          int i;

          for(i = 10; i >= 0; i--)
                  putchar('0' + ((v >> i) & 1));
  }

  static unsigned int freq_decimal(unsigned int freq /* in kHz */)
  {
          return (freq - 1000) / 500;
  }

  static void test_freq(const struct dpll_freq *entry)
  {
          unsigned int decimal = freq_decimal(entry->freq);

          printf("freq: %d, expected: ", entry->freq);
          intbits(entry->decimal);
          printf(", got: ");
          intbits(decimal);
          putchar('\n');

          assert(decimal == entry->decimal);
  }

  int main(int argc, char **argv)
  {
          int i;

          for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(freqs); i++)
                  test_freq(&freqs[i]);

          return 0;
  }

v2:
  - Rebase on top of -nightly
  - Use (freq - 1000) / 500 for the decimal frequency (Ville)
  - Fix setting the enable bit of HSW_NDE_RSTWRN_OPT (Ville)
  - Rename skl_display_{resume,suspend} to skl_{init,uninit}_cdclk to
    be consistent with the BXT code (Ville)
  - Store boot CDCLK in ddi_pll_init (Ville)
  - Merge dev_priv's skl_boot_cdclk into cdclk_freq
  - Use LCPLL_PLL_LOCK instead of (1 << 30) (Ville)
  - Replace various '0' by SKL_DPLL0 to be a bit more explicit that
    we're programming DPLL0
  - Busy poll the PCU before doing the frequency change. It takes about
    3/4 cycles, each separated by 10us, to get the ACK from the CPU
    (Ville)

v3:
  - Restore dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk, leaving unification with
    dev_priv->cdclk_freq for a later patch (Daniel, Ville)
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      5d96d8af
  23. 21 5月, 2015 4 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Convert RPS tracking to a intel_rps_client struct · 2e1b8730
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Now that we have internal clients, rather than faking a whole
drm_i915_file_private just for tracking RPS boosts, create a new struct
intel_rps_client and pass it along when waiting.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[danvet: s/rq/req/]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      2e1b8730
    • C
      drm/i915: Limit mmio flip RPS boosts · bcafc4e3
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Since we will often pageflip to an active surface, we will often have to
wait for the surface to be written before issuing the flip. Also we are
likely to wait on that surface in plenty of time before the vblank.
Since we have a mechanism for boosting when a flip misses the expected
vblank, curtain the number of times we RPS boost when simply waiting for
mmioflip.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[danvet: s/rq/req/]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      bcafc4e3
    • C
      drm/i915: Limit ring synchronisation (sw sempahores) RPS boosts · a6f766f3
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Ring switches can occur many times per frame, and are often out of
control, causing frequent RPS boosting for no practical benefit. Treat
the sw semaphore synchronisation as a separate client and only allow it
to boost once per busy/idle cycle.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[danvet: s/rq/req/]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      a6f766f3
    • C
      drm/i915: Implement inter-engine read-read optimisations · b4716185
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Currently, we only track the last request globally across all engines.
This prevents us from issuing concurrent read requests on e.g. the RCS
and BCS engines (or more likely the render and media engines). Without
semaphores, we incur costly stalls as we synchronise between rings -
greatly impacting the current performance of Broadwell versus Haswell in
certain workloads (like video decode). With the introduction of
reference counted requests, it is much easier to track the last request
per ring, as well as the last global write request so that we can
optimise inter-engine read read requests (as well as better optimise
certain CPU waits).

v2: Fix inverted readonly condition for nonblocking waits.
v3: Handle non-continguous engine array after waits
v4: Rebase, tidy, rewrite ring list debugging
v5: Use obj->active as a bitfield, it looks cool
v6: Micro-optimise, mostly involving moving code around
v7: Fix retire-requests-upto for execlists (and multiple rq->ringbuf)
v8: Rebase
v9: Refactor i915_gem_object_sync() to allow the compiler to better
optimise it.

Benchmark: igt/gem_read_read_speed
hsw:gt3e (with semaphores):
Before: Time to read-read 1024k:		275.794µs
After:  Time to read-read 1024k:		123.260µs

hsw:gt3e (w/o semaphores):
Before: Time to read-read 1024k:		230.433µs
After:  Time to read-read 1024k:		124.593µs

bdw-u (w/o semaphores):             Before          After
Time to read-read 1x1:            26.274µs       10.350µs
Time to read-read 128x128:        40.097µs       21.366µs
Time to read-read 256x256:        77.087µs       42.608µs
Time to read-read 512x512:       281.999µs      181.155µs
Time to read-read 1024x1024:    1196.141µs     1118.223µs
Time to read-read 2048x2048:    5639.072µs     5225.837µs
Time to read-read 4096x4096:   22401.662µs    21137.067µs
Time to read-read 8192x8192:   89617.735µs    85637.681µs

Testcase: igt/gem_concurrent_blit (read-read and friends)
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> [v8]
[danvet: s/\<rq\>/req/g]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      b4716185
  25. 20 5月, 2015 6 次提交