Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 20 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  3. 19 9月, 2006 1 次提交
    • I
      [PATCH] genirq core: fix handle_level_irq() · 86998aa6
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      while porting the -rt tree to 2.6.18-rc7 i noticed the following
screaming-IRQ scenario on an SMP system:

 2274  0Dn.:1 0.001ms: do_IRQ+0xc/0x103  <= (ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf)
 2274  0Dn.:1 0.010ms: do_IRQ+0xc/0x103  <= (ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf)
 2274  0Dn.:1 0.020ms: do_IRQ+0xc/0x103  <= (ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf)
 2274  0Dn.:1 0.029ms: do_IRQ+0xc/0x103  <= (ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf)
 2274  0Dn.:1 0.039ms: do_IRQ+0xc/0x103  <= (ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf)
 2274  0Dn.:1 0.048ms: do_IRQ+0xc/0x103  <= (ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf)
 2274  0Dn.:1 0.058ms: do_IRQ+0xc/0x103  <= (ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf)
 2274  0Dn.:1 0.068ms: do_IRQ+0xc/0x103  <= (ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf)
 2274  0Dn.:1 0.077ms: do_IRQ+0xc/0x103  <= (ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf)
 2274  0Dn.:1 0.087ms: do_IRQ+0xc/0x103  <= (ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf)
 2274  0Dn.:1 0.097ms: do_IRQ+0xc/0x103  <= (ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf)

as it turns out, the bug is caused by handle_level_irq(), which if it
races with another CPU already handling this IRQ, it _unmasks_ the IRQ
line on the way out. This is not how 2.6.17 works, and we introduced
this bug in one of the early genirq cleanups right before it went into
-mm. (the bug was not in the genirq patchset for a long time, and we
didnt notice the bug due to the lack of -rt rebase to the new genirq
code. -rt, and hardirq-preemption in particular opens up such races much
wider than anything else.)
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      86998aa6
  5. 17 9月, 2006 2 次提交
  7. 13 9月, 2006 2 次提交
  9. 12 9月, 2006 4 次提交
  11. 09 9月, 2006 1 次提交
    • T
      [PATCH] Use the correct restart option for futex_lock_pi · c5780e97
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      The current implementation of futex_lock_pi returns -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK
in case that the lock operation has been interrupted by a signal.  This
results in a return of -EINTR to userspace in case there is an handler for
the signal.  This is wrong, because userspace expects that the lock
function does not return in any case of signal delivery.

This was not caught by my insufficient test case, but triggered a nasty
userspace problem in an high load application scenario.  Unfortunately also
glibc does not check for this invalid return value.

Using -ERSTARTNOINTR makes sure, that the interrupted syscall is restarted.
 The restart block related code can be safely removed, as the possible
timeout argument is an absolute time value.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      c5780e97
  13. 07 9月, 2006 3 次提交
  15. 03 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  17. 02 9月, 2006 2 次提交
  19. 28 8月, 2006 5 次提交
  21. 15 8月, 2006 5 次提交
    • A
      [PATCH] workqueue: remove lock_cpu_hotplug() · 9b41ea72
      由 Andrew Morton 提交于 
      Use a private lock instead.  It protects all per-cpu data structures in
workqueue.c, including the workqueues list.

Fix a bug in schedule_on_each_cpu(): it was forgetting to lock down the
per-cpu resources.

Unfixed long-standing bug: if someone unplugs the CPU identified by
`singlethread_cpu' the kernel will get very sick.

Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      9b41ea72
    • J
      [PATCH] futex_handle_fault always fails · e579dcbf
      由 john stultz 提交于 
      We found this issue last week w/ the -RT kernel, but it seems the same
issue is in mainline as well.

Basically it is possible for futex_unlock_pi to return without actually
freeing the lock.  This is due to buggy logic in the use of
futex_handle_fault() and its attempt argument in a failure case.

Looking at futex.c the logic is as follows:

1) In futex_unlock_pi() we start w/ ret=0 and we go down to the first
   futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic(), where we find uval==-EFAULT.  We then
   jump to the pi_faulted label.

2) From pi_faulted: We increment attempt, unlock the sem and hit the
   retry label.

3) From the retry label, with ret still zero, we again hit EFAULT on the
   first futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic(), and again goto the pi_faulted
   label.

4) Again from pi_faulted: we increment attempt and enter the
   conditional, where we call futex_handle_fault.

5) futex_handle_fault fails, and we goto the out_unlock_release_sem
   label.

6) From out_unlock_release_sem we return, and since ret is still zero,
   we return without error, while never actually unlocking the lock.

Issue #1: at the first futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() we should probably
be setting ret=-EFAULT before jumping to pi_faulted: However in our case
this doesn't really affect anything, as the glibc we're using ignores the
error value from futex_unlock_pi().

Issue #2: Look at futex_handle_fault(), its first conditional will return
-EFAULT if attempt is >= 2.  However, from the "if(attempt++)
futex_handle_fault(attempt)" logic above, we'll *never* call
futex_handle_fault when attempt is less then two.  So we never get a chance
to even try to fault the page in.

The following patch addresses these two issues by 1) Always setting ret to
-EFAULT if futex_handle_fault fails, and 2) Removing the = in
futex_handle_fault's (attempt >= 2) check.

I'm really not sure this is the right fix, but wanted to bring it up so
folks knew the issue is alive and well in the current -git tree.  From
looking at the git logs the logic was first introduced (then later copied
to other places) in the following commit almost a year ago:

http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=4732efbeb997189d9f9b04708dc26bf8613ed721;hp=5b039e681b8c5f30aac9cc04385cc94be45d0823

Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      e579dcbf
    • K
      [PATCH] sys_getppid oopses on debug kernel · 6997a6fa
      由 Kirill Korotaev 提交于 
      sys_getppid() optimization can access a freed memory.  On kernels with
DEBUG_SLAB turned ON, this results in Oops.  As Dave Hansen noted, this
optimization is also unsafe for memory hotplug.

So this patch always takes the lock to be safe.

[oleg@tv-sign.ru: simplifications]
Signed-off-by: NKirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      6997a6fa
    • A
      [PATCH] panic.c build fix · 657b3010
      由 Andrew Morton 提交于 
      kernel/panic.c: In function 'add_taint':
kernel/panic.c:176: warning: implicit declaration of function 'debug_locks_off'

Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      657b3010
    • J
      [PATCH] fix hrtimer percpu usage typo · 3773dc92
      由 Jan Blunck 提交于 
      The percpu variable is used incorrectly in switch_hrtimer_base().
Signed-off-by: NJan Blunck <jblunck@suse.de>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      3773dc92
  23. 06 8月, 2006 7 次提交
    • T
      [PATCH] futex: Apply recent futex fixes to futex_compat · ce2c6b53
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      The recent fixups in futex.c need to be applied to futex_compat.c too.  Fixes
a hang reported by Olaf.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      ce2c6b53
    • K
      [PATCH] memory hotadd fixes: find_next_system_ram catch range fix · 58c1b5b0
      由 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 提交于 
      find_next_system_ram() is used to find available memory resource at onlining
newly added memory.  This patch fixes following problem.

find_next_system_ram() cannot catch this case.

Resource:      (start)-------------(end)
Section :                (start)-------------(end)
Signed-off-by: NKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Keith Mannthey <kmannth@gmail.com>
Cc: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      58c1b5b0
    • K
      [PATCH] memory hotadd fixes: change find_next_system_ram's return value manner · 0f04ab5e
      由 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 提交于 
      find_next_system_ram() returns valid memory range which meets requested area,
only used by memory-hot-add.

This function always rewrite requested resource even if returned area is not
fully fit in requested one.  And sometimes the returnd resource is larger than
requested area.  This annoyes the caller.  This patch changes the returned
value to fit in requested area.
Signed-off-by: NKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Keith Mannthey <kmannth@gmail.com>
Cc: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      0f04ab5e
    • A
      [PATCH] vt: printk: Fix framebuffer console triggering might_sleep assertion · 78944e54
      由 Antonino A. Daplas 提交于 
      Reported by: Dave Jones

Whilst printk'ing to both console and serial console, I got this...
(2.6.18rc1)

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/sched.c:4438
in_atomic():0, irqs_disabled():1

Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff80271db8>] show_trace+0xaa/0x23d
 [<ffffffff80271f60>] dump_stack+0x15/0x17
 [<ffffffff8020b9f8>] __might_sleep+0xb2/0xb4
 [<ffffffff8029232e>] __cond_resched+0x15/0x55
 [<ffffffff80267eb8>] cond_resched+0x3b/0x42
 [<ffffffff80268c64>] console_conditional_schedule+0x12/0x14
 [<ffffffff80368159>] fbcon_redraw+0xf6/0x160
 [<ffffffff80369c58>] fbcon_scroll+0x5d9/0xb52
 [<ffffffff803a43c4>] scrup+0x6b/0xd6
 [<ffffffff803a4453>] lf+0x24/0x44
 [<ffffffff803a7ff8>] vt_console_print+0x166/0x23d
 [<ffffffff80295528>] __call_console_drivers+0x65/0x76
 [<ffffffff80295597>] _call_console_drivers+0x5e/0x62
 [<ffffffff80217e3f>] release_console_sem+0x14b/0x232
 [<ffffffff8036acd6>] fb_flashcursor+0x279/0x2a6
 [<ffffffff80251e3f>] run_workqueue+0xa8/0xfb
 [<ffffffff8024e5e0>] worker_thread+0xef/0x122
 [<ffffffff8023660f>] kthread+0x100/0x136
 [<ffffffff8026419e>] child_rip+0x8/0x12

This can occur when release_console_sem() is called but the log
buffer still has contents that need to be flushed. The console drivers
are called while the console_may_schedule flag is still true. The
might_sleep() is triggered when fbcon calls console_conditional_schedule().

Fix by setting console_may_schedule to zero earlier, before the call to the
console drivers.
Signed-off-by: NAntonino Daplas <adaplas@pol.net>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      78944e54
    • C
      [PATCH] ptrace: make pid of child process available for PTRACE_EVENT_VFORK_DONE · 9f59ce5d
      由 Chuck Ebbert 提交于 
      When delivering PTRACE_EVENT_VFORK_DONE, provide pid of the child process
when tracer calls ptrace(PTRACE_GETEVENTMSG).  This is already
(accidentally) available when the tracer is tracing VFORK in addition to
VFORK_DONE.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
Cc: Albert Cahalan <acahalan@gmail.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      9f59ce5d
    • C
      [PATCH] bug in futex unqueue_me · e91467ec
      由 Christian Borntraeger 提交于 
      This patch adds a barrier() in futex unqueue_me to avoid aliasing of two
pointers.

On my s390x system I saw the following oops:

Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference at virtual kernel address
0000000000000000
Oops: 0004 [#1]
CPU:    0    Not tainted
Process mytool (pid: 13613, task: 000000003ecb6ac0, ksp: 00000000366bdbd8)
Krnl PSW : 0704d00180000000 00000000003c9ac2 (_spin_lock+0xe/0x30)
Krnl GPRS: 00000000ffffffff 000000003ecb6ac0 0000000000000000 0700000000000000
           0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000001fe00002028 00000000000c091f
           000001fe00002054 000001fe00002054 0000000000000000 00000000366bddc0
           00000000005ef8c0 00000000003d00e8 0000000000144f91 00000000366bdcb8
Krnl Code: ba 4e 20 00 12 44 b9 16 00 3e a7 84 00 08 e3 e0 f0 88 00 04
Call Trace:
([<0000000000144f90>] unqueue_me+0x40/0xe4)
 [<0000000000145a0c>] do_futex+0x33c/0xc40
 [<000000000014643e>] sys_futex+0x12e/0x144
 [<000000000010bb00>] sysc_noemu+0x10/0x16
 [<000002000003741c>] 0x2000003741c

The code in question is:

static int unqueue_me(struct futex_q *q)
{
        int ret = 0;
        spinlock_t *lock_ptr;

        /* In the common case we don't take the spinlock, which is nice. */
 retry:
        lock_ptr = q->lock_ptr;
        if (lock_ptr != 0) {
                spin_lock(lock_ptr);
		/*
                 * q->lock_ptr can change between reading it and
                 * spin_lock(), causing us to take the wrong lock.  This
                 * corrects the race condition.
[...]

and my compiler (gcc 4.1.0) makes the following out of it:

00000000000003c8 <unqueue_me>:
     3c8:       eb bf f0 70 00 24       stmg    %r11,%r15,112(%r15)
     3ce:       c0 d0 00 00 00 00       larl    %r13,3ce <unqueue_me+0x6>
                        3d0: R_390_PC32DBL      .rodata+0x2a
     3d4:       a7 f1 1e 00             tml     %r15,7680
     3d8:       a7 84 00 01             je      3da <unqueue_me+0x12>
     3dc:       b9 04 00 ef             lgr     %r14,%r15
     3e0:       a7 fb ff d0             aghi    %r15,-48
     3e4:       b9 04 00 b2             lgr     %r11,%r2
     3e8:       e3 e0 f0 98 00 24       stg     %r14,152(%r15)
     3ee:       e3 c0 b0 28 00 04       lg      %r12,40(%r11)
		/* write q->lock_ptr in r12 */
     3f4:       b9 02 00 cc             ltgr    %r12,%r12
     3f8:       a7 84 00 4b             je      48e <unqueue_me+0xc6>
		/* if r12 is zero then jump over the code.... */
     3fc:       e3 20 b0 28 00 04       lg      %r2,40(%r11)
		/* write q->lock_ptr in r2 */
     402:       c0 e5 00 00 00 00       brasl   %r14,402 <unqueue_me+0x3a>
                        404: R_390_PC32DBL      _spin_lock+0x2
		/* use r2 as parameter for spin_lock */

So the code becomes more or less:
if (q->lock_ptr != 0) spin_lock(q->lock_ptr)
instead of
if (lock_ptr != 0) spin_lock(lock_ptr)

Which caused the oops from above.
After adding a barrier gcc creates code without this problem:
[...] (the same)
     3ee:       e3 c0 b0 28 00 04       lg      %r12,40(%r11)
     3f4:       b9 02 00 cc             ltgr    %r12,%r12
     3f8:       b9 04 00 2c             lgr     %r2,%r12
     3fc:       a7 84 00 48             je      48c <unqueue_me+0xc4>
     400:       c0 e5 00 00 00 00       brasl   %r14,400 <unqueue_me+0x38>
                        402: R_390_PC32DBL      _spin_lock+0x2

As a general note, this code of unqueue_me seems a bit fishy. The retry logic
of unqueue_me only works if we can guarantee, that the original value of
q->lock_ptr is always a spinlock (Otherwise we overwrite kernel memory). We
know that q->lock_ptr can change. I dont know what happens with the original
spinlock, as I am not an expert with the futex code.

Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@timesys.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntrae@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      e91467ec
    • R
      [PATCH] Make suspend possible with a traced process at a breakpoint · a7ef7878
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      It should be possible to suspend, either to RAM or to disk, if there's a
traced process that has just reached a breakpoint.  However, this is a
special case, because its parent process might have been frozen already and
then we are unable to deliver the "freeze" signal to the traced process.
If this happens, it's better to cancel the freezing of the traced process.

Ref. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6787Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      a7ef7878
  25. 03 8月, 2006 6 次提交