- 24 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Some of the code has been gradually transitioned to using the proper struct request_queue, but there's lots left. So do a full sweet of the kernel and get rid of this typedef and replace its uses with the proper type. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
- 20 7月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
There are some leftover bits from the task cooperator patch, that was yanked out again. While it will get reintroduced, no point in having this write-only stuff in the tree. So yank it. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Vasily Tarasov 提交于
If we have two processes with different ioprio_class, but the same ioprio_data, their async requests will fall into the same queue. I guess such behavior is not expected, because it's not right to put real-time requests and best-effort requests in the same queue. The attached patch fixes the problem by introducing additional *cfqq fields on cfqd, pointing to per-(class,priority) async queues. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
- 18 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Lameter 提交于
kmalloc_node() and kmem_cache_alloc_node() were not available in a zeroing variant in the past. But with __GFP_ZERO it is possible now to do zeroing while allocating. Use __GFP_ZERO to remove the explicit clearing of memory via memset whereever we can. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 10 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
With the cfq_queue hash removal, we inadvertently got rid of the async queue sharing. This was not intentional, in fact CFQ purposely shares the async queue per priority level to get good merging for async writes. So put some logic in cfq_get_queue() to track the shared queues. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
- 08 5月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Lameter 提交于
This patch provides a new macro KMEM_CACHE(<struct>, <flags>) to simplify slab creation. KMEM_CACHE creates a slab with the name of the struct, with the size of the struct and with the alignment of the struct. Additional slab flags may be specified if necessary. Example struct test_slab { int a,b,c; struct list_head; } __cacheline_aligned_in_smp; test_slab_cache = KMEM_CACHE(test_slab, SLAB_PANIC) will create a new slab named "test_slab" of the size sizeof(struct test_slab) and aligned to the alignment of test slab. If it fails then we panic. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 30 4月, 2007 17 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
We often lookup the same queue many times in succession, so cache the last looked up queue to avoid browsing the rbtree. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Vasily Tarasov 提交于
cfq hash is no more necessary. We always can get cfqq from io context. cfq_get_io_context_noalloc() function is introduced, because we don't want to allocate cic on merging and checking may_queue. In order to identify sync queue we've used hash key = CFQ_KEY_ASYNC. Since hash is eliminated we need to use other criterion: sync flag for queue is added. In all places where we dig in rb_tree we're in current context, so no additional locking is required. Advantages of this patch: no additional memory for hash, no seeking in hash, code is cleaner. But it is necessary now to seek cic in per-ioc rbtree, but it is faster: - most processes work only with few devices - most systems have only few block devices - it is a rb-tree Signed-off-by: NVasily Tarasov <vtaras@openvz.org> Changes by me: - Merge into CFQ devel branch - Get rid of cfq_get_io_context_noalloc() - Fix various bugs with dereferencing cic->cfqq[] with offset other than 0 or 1. - Fix bug in cfqq setup, is_sync condition was reversed. - Fix bug where only bio_sync() is used, we need to check for a READ too Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
For tagged devices, allow overlap of requests if the idle window isn't enabled on the current active queue. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
We don't enable it by default, don't let it get enabled during runtime. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
We can track it fairly accurately locally, let the slice handling take care of the rest. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
We don't use it anymore in the slice expiry handling. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
It's only used for preemption now that the IDLE and RT queues also use the rbtree. If we pass an 'add_front' variable to cfq_service_tree_add(), we can set ->rb_key to 0 to force insertion at the front of the tree. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Use the max_slice-cur_slice as the multipler for the insertion offset. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Same treatment as the RT conversion, just put the sorted idle branch at the end of the tree. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Currently CFQ does a linked insert into the current list for RT queues. We can just factor the class into the rb insertion, and then we don't have to treat RT queues in a special way. It's faster, too. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
For cases where the rbtree is mainly used for sorting and min retrieval, a nice speedup of the rbtree code is to maintain a cache of the leftmost node in the tree. Also spotted in the CFS CPU scheduler code. Improved by Alan D. Brunelle <Alan.Brunelle@hp.com> by updating the leftmost hint in cfq_rb_first() if it isn't set, instead of only updating it on insert. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Drawing on some inspiration from the CFS CPU scheduler design, overhaul the pending cfq_queue concept list management. Currently CFQ uses a doubly linked list per priority level for sorting and service uses. Kill those lists and maintain an rbtree of cfq_queue's, sorted by when to service them. This unfortunately means that the ionice levels aren't as strong anymore, will work on improving those later. We only scale the slice time now, not the number of times we service. This means that latency is better (for all priority levels), but that the distinction between the highest and lower levels aren't as big. The diffstat speaks for itself. cfq-iosched.c | 363 +++++++++++++++++--------------------------------- 1 file changed, 125 insertions(+), 238 deletions(-) Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
- Move the queue_new flag clear to when the queue is selected - Only select the non-first queue in cfq_get_best_queue(), if there's a substantial difference between the best and first. - Get rid of ->busy_rr - Only select a close cooperator, if the current queue is known to take a while to "think". Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
- Implement logic for detecting cooperating processes, so we choose the best available queue whenever possible. - Improve residual slice time accounting. - Remove dead code: we no longer see async requests coming in on sync queues. That part was removed a long time ago. That means that we can also remove the difference between cfq_cfqq_sync() and cfq_cfqq_class_sync(), they are now indentical. And we can kill the on_dispatch array, just make it a counter. - Allow a process to go into the current list, if it hasn't been serviced in this scheduler tick yet. Possible future improvements including caching the cfqq lookup in cfq_close_cooperator(), so we don't have to look it up twice. cfq_get_best_queue() should just use that last decision instead of doing it again. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
When testing the syslet async io approach, I discovered that CFQ sometimes didn't perform as well as expected. cfq_should_preempt() needs to better check for cooperating tasks, so fix that by allowing preemption of an equal priority queue if the recently queued request is as good a candidate for IO as the one we are currently waiting for. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
- 25 4月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
There's a really rare and obscure bug in CFQ, that causes a crash in cfq_dispatch_insert() due to rq == NULL. One example of the resulting oops is seen here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/15/41 Neil correctly diagnosed the situation for how this can happen: if two concurrent requests with the exact same sector number (due to direct IO or aliasing between MD and the raw device access), the alias handling will add the request to the sortlist, but next_rq remains NULL. Read the more complete analysis at: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/4/25/57 This looks like it requires md to trigger, even though it should potentially be possible to due with O_DIRECT (at least if you edit the kernel and doctor some of the unplug calls). The fix is to move the ->next_rq update to when we add a request to the rbtree. Then we remove the possibility for a request to exist in the rbtree code, but not have ->next_rq correctly updated. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 21 4月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
We have a 10-15% performance regression for sequential writes on TCQ/NCQ enabled drives in 2.6.21-rcX after the CFQ update went in. It has been reported by Valerie Clement <valerie.clement@bull.net> and the Intel testing folks. The regression is because of CFQ's now more aggressive queue control, limiting the depth available to the device. This patches fixes that regression by allowing a greater depth when only one queue is busy. It has been tested to not impact sync-vs-async workloads too much - we still do a lot better than 2.6.20. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 12 2月, 2007 11 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
This improves performance considerably for sync requests when you have command queuing enabled. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
We only really need it for a process going away, so move it to those locations. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Makes it more fair for the residual slice count. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
We currently check the FIFO once per slice. Optimize that a bit and only do it as the first thing for a new slice, so we don't end up doing a single request and then seek to the FIFO requests. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
It must always be the active queue, otherwise it's a bug. So just use the active_queue, don't pass it in explicitly. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
If a slice uses less than it is entitled to (or perhaps more), include that in the decision on how much time to give it the next time it gets serviced. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
This better matches what time the queue is actually spending doing IO. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Right now we use slice_start, which gives async queues an unfair advantage. Chance that to service_last, and base the resorter on that. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Move the on_rr check into cfq_resort_rr_list(), every call site needs to check it anyway. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
It hasn't been used for a while, kill it off and remove the old if 0 code chunk. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
- 03 1月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Two issues: - The final return 1 should be a return 0, otherwise comparing cfqq is a noop. - bio_sync() only checks the sync flag, while rq_is_sync() checks both for READ and sync. The latter is what we want. Expand the bio check to include reads, and relax the restriction to allow merging of async io into sync requests. In the future we want to clean up the SYNC logic, right now it means both sync request (such as READ and O_DIRECT WRITE) and unplug-on-issue. Leave that for later. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 23 12月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
The logic in cfq_allow_merge() wasn't clear enough - basically allow merging for the same queues only. Do a fast check for 'rq and bio both sync/async' before doing the cfqq hash lookup. This is verified to work with the fixed elv_try_merge() from commit bb4067e3. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 20 12月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Currently we allow any merge, even if the io originates from different processes. This can cause really bad starvation and unfairness, if those ios happen to be synchronous (reads or direct writes). So add a allow_merge hook to the io scheduler ops, so an io scheduler can help decide whether a bio/process combination may be merged with an existing request. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
- 13 12月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
We need to do this, otherwise the io schedulers don't get access to the sync flag. Then they cannot tell the difference between a regular write and an O_DIRECT write, which can cause a performance loss. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-