1. 02 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  2. 26 11月, 2013 4 次提交
    • L
      cfg80211: move regulatory flags to their own variable · a2f73b6c
      Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
      We'll expand this later, this will make it easier to
      classify and review what things are related to regulatory
      or not.
      
      Coccinelle only missed 4 hits, which I had to do manually,
      supplying the SmPL in case of merge conflicts.
      
      @@
      struct wiphy *wiphy;
      @@
      -wiphy->flags |= WIPHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY
      +wiphy->regulatory_flags |= REGULATORY_CUSTOM_REG
      @@
      expression e;
      @@
      -e->flags |= WIPHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY
      +e->regulatory_flags |= REGULATORY_CUSTOM_REG
      @@
      struct wiphy *wiphy;
      @@
      -wiphy->flags &= ~WIPHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY
      +wiphy->regulatory_flags &= ~REGULATORY_CUSTOM_REG
      @@
      struct wiphy *wiphy;
      @@
      -wiphy->flags & WIPHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY
      +wiphy->regulatory_flags & REGULATORY_CUSTOM_REG
      
      @@
      struct wiphy *wiphy;
      @@
      -wiphy->flags |= WIPHY_FLAG_STRICT_REGULATORY
      +wiphy->regulatory_flags |= REGULATORY_STRICT_REG
      @@
      expression e;
      @@
      -e->flags |= WIPHY_FLAG_STRICT_REGULATORY
      +e->regulatory_flags |= REGULATORY_STRICT_REG
      @@
      struct wiphy *wiphy;
      @@
      -wiphy->flags &= ~WIPHY_FLAG_STRICT_REGULATORY
      +wiphy->regulatory_flags &= ~REGULATORY_STRICT_REG
      @@
      struct wiphy *wiphy;
      @@
      -wiphy->flags & WIPHY_FLAG_STRICT_REGULATORY
      +wiphy->regulatory_flags & REGULATORY_STRICT_REG
      
      @@
      struct wiphy *wiphy;
      @@
      -wiphy->flags |= WIPHY_FLAG_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS
      +wiphy->regulatory_flags |= REGULATORY_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS
      @@
      expression e;
      @@
      -e->flags |= WIPHY_FLAG_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS
      +e->regulatory_flags |= REGULATORY_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS
      @@
      struct wiphy *wiphy;
      @@
      -wiphy->flags &= ~WIPHY_FLAG_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS
      +wiphy->regulatory_flags &= ~REGULATORY_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS
      @@
      struct wiphy *wiphy;
      @@
      -wiphy->flags & WIPHY_FLAG_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS
      +wiphy->regulatory_flags & REGULATORY_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS
      
      Generated-by: Coccinelle SmPL
      Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
      Cc: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
      Cc: Mihir Shete <smihir@qti.qualcomm.com>
      Cc: Henri Bahini <hbahini@qca.qualcomm.com>
      Cc: Tushnim Bhattacharyya <tushnimb@qca.qualcomm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
      [fix up whitespace damage, overly long lines]
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      a2f73b6c
    • J
      cfg80211/mac80211: DFS setup chandef for cac event · d2859df5
      Janusz Dziedzic 提交于
      To report channel width correctly we have
      to send correct channel parameters from
      mac80211 when calling cfg80211_cac_event().
      
      This is required in case of using channel width
      higher than 20MHz and we have to set correct
      dfs channel state after CAC (NL80211_DFS_AVAILABLE).
      Signed-off-by: NJanusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com>
      Reviewed-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      d2859df5
    • L
      cfg80211: force WIPHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY on wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory() · 222ea581
      Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
      wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory() implies WIPHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY
      but we never enforced it, do that now and warn if the driver
      didn't set it. All drivers should be following this today already.
      
      Having WIPHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY does not however mean you will
      use wiphy_apply_custom_regulatory() though, you may have your own
      _orig value set up tools / helpers. The intel drivers are examples
      of this type of driver.
      Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      222ea581
    • L
      cfg80211: consolidate passive-scan and no-ibss flags · 8fe02e16
      Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
      These two flags are used for the same purpose, just
      combine them into a no-ir flag to annotate no initiating
      radiation is allowed.
      
      Old userspace sending either flag will have it treated as
      the no-ir flag. To be considerate to older userspace we
      also send both the no-ir flag and the old no-ibss flags.
      Newer userspace will have to be aware of older kernels.
      
      Update all places in the tree using these flags with the
      following semantic patch:
      
      @@
      @@
      -NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN
      +NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
      @@
      @@
      -NL80211_RRF_NO_IBSS
      +NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
      @@
      @@
      -IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN
      +IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR
      @@
      @@
      -IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IBSS
      +IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR
      @@
      @@
      -NL80211_RRF_NO_IR | NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
      +NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
      @@
      @@
      -IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR | IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR
      +IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR
      @@
      @@
      -(NL80211_RRF_NO_IR)
      +NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
      @@
      @@
      -(IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR)
      +IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR
      
      Along with some hand-optimisations in documentation, to
      remove duplicates and to fix some indentation.
      Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
      [do all the driver updates in one go]
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      8fe02e16
  3. 28 10月, 2013 2 次提交
  4. 19 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 11 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  6. 26 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 23 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  8. 12 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 02 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  10. 01 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  11. 16 7月, 2013 7 次提交
  12. 20 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  13. 18 6月, 2013 2 次提交
  14. 11 6月, 2013 2 次提交
  15. 05 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  16. 04 6月, 2013 3 次提交
    • J
      cfg80211: separate internal SME implementation · ceca7b71
      Johannes Berg 提交于
      The current internal SME implementation in cfg80211 is
      very mixed up with the MLME handling, which has been
      causing issues for a long time. There are three things
      that the implementation has to provide:
       * a basic SME implementation for nl80211's connect()
         call (for drivers implementing auth/assoc, which is
         really just mac80211) and wireless extensions
       * MLME events for the userspace SME
       * SME events (connected, disconnected etc.) for all
         different SME implementation possibilities (driver,
         cfg80211 and userspace)
      
      To achieve these goals it isn't necessary to track the
      software SME's connection status outside of it's state
      (which is the part that caused many issues.) Instead,
      track it only in the SME data (wdev->conn) and in the
      general case only track whether the wdev is connected
      or not (via wdev->current_bss.)
      
      Also separate the internal implementation to not have
      callbacks from the SME events, but rather call it from
      the API functions that the driver (or rather mac80211)
      calls. This separates the code better.
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      ceca7b71
    • J
      cfg80211/mac80211: clean up cfg80211 SME APIs · 6ff57cf8
      Johannes Berg 提交于
      Do some cleanups in the cfg80211 SME APIs, which are
      only used by mac80211.
      
      Most of these functions get a frame passed, and there
      isn't really any reason to export multiple functions
      as cfg80211 can check the frame type instead, do that.
      
      Additionally, the API functions have confusing names
      like cfg80211_send_...() which was meant to indicate
      that it sends an event to userspace, but gets a bit
      confusing when there's both TX and RX and they're not
      all clearly labeled.
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      6ff57cf8
    • J
      cfg80211: take WoWLAN support information out of wiphy struct · 964dc9e2
      Johannes Berg 提交于
      There's no need to take up the space for devices that don't
      support WoWLAN, and most drivers can even make the support
      data static const (except where it's modified at runtime.)
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      964dc9e2
  17. 29 5月, 2013 2 次提交
  18. 27 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  19. 25 5月, 2013 3 次提交
  20. 17 5月, 2013 3 次提交
  21. 22 4月, 2013 1 次提交