1. 25 1月, 2008 1 次提交
  2. 01 8月, 2007 1 次提交
  3. 18 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  4. 07 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  5. 04 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  6. 28 6月, 2006 2 次提交
    • S
      [PATCH] sched: mc/smt power savings sched policy · 5c45bf27
      Siddha, Suresh B 提交于
      sysfs entries 'sched_mc_power_savings' and 'sched_smt_power_savings' in
      /sys/devices/system/cpu/ control the MC/SMT power savings policy for the
      scheduler.
      
      Based on the values (1-enable, 0-disable) for these controls, sched groups
      cpu power will be determined for different domains.  When power savings
      policy is enabled and under light load conditions, scheduler will minimize
      the physical packages/cpu cores carrying the load and thus conserving
      power(with a perf impact based on the workload characteristics...  see OLS
      2005 CMP kernel scheduler paper for more details..)
      Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
      Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
      Cc: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
      Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      5c45bf27
    • K
      [PATCH] node hotplug: register cpu: remove node struct · 76b67ed9
      KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 提交于
      With Goto-san's patch, we can add new pgdat/node at runtime.  I'm now
      considering node-hot-add with cpu + memory on ACPI.
      
      I found acpi container, which describes node, could evaluate cpu before
      memory. This means cpu-hot-add occurs before memory hot add.
      
      In most part, cpu-hot-add doesn't depend on node hot add.  But register_cpu(),
      which creates symbolic link from node to cpu, requires that node should be
      onlined before register_cpu().  When a node is onlined, its pgdat should be
      there.
      
      This patch-set holds off creating symbolic link from node to cpu
      until node is onlined.
      
      This removes node arguments from register_cpu().
      
      Now, register_cpu() requires 'struct node' as its argument.  But the array of
      struct node is now unified in driver/base/node.c now (By Goto's node hotplug
      patch).  We can get struct node in generic way.  So, this argument is not
      necessary now.
      
      This patch also guarantees add cpu under node only when node is onlined.  It
      is necessary for node-hot-add vs.  cpu-hot-add patch following this.
      
      Moreover, register_cpu calculates cpu->node_id by cpu_to_node() without regard
      to its 'struct node *root' argument.  This patch removes it.
      
      Also modify callers of register_cpu()/unregister_cpu, whose args are changed
      by register-cpu-remove-node-struct patch.
      
      [Brice.Goglin@ens-lyon.org: fix it]
      Signed-off-by: NKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Cc: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBrice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@ens-lyon.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      76b67ed9
  7. 26 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  8. 21 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  9. 11 1月, 2006 2 次提交
  10. 05 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  11. 31 10月, 2005 1 次提交
  12. 29 10月, 2005 1 次提交
    • B
      [PATCH] drivers/base - fix sparse warnings · a1bdc7aa
      Ben Dooks 提交于
      There are a number of sparse warnings from the latest sparse
      snapshot being generated from the drivers/base build. The
      main culprits are due to the initialisation functions not
      being declared in a header file.
      
      Also, the firmware.c file should include <linux/device.h>
      to get the prototype of  firmware_register() and
      firmware_unregister().
      
      This patch moves the init function declerations from the
      init.c file to the base.h, and ensures it is included in
      all the relevant c sources. It also adds <linux/device.h>
      to the included headers for firmware.c.
      
      The patch does not solve all the sparse errors generated,
      but reduces the count significantly.
      
      drivers/base/core.c:161:1: warning: symbol 'devices_subsys' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/base/core.c:417:12: warning: symbol 'devices_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/base/sys.c:253:6: warning: symbol 'sysdev_shutdown' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/base/sys.c:326:5: warning: symbol 'sysdev_suspend' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/base/sys.c:428:5: warning: symbol 'sysdev_resume' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/base/sys.c:450:12: warning: symbol 'system_bus_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/base/bus.c:133:1: warning: symbol 'bus_subsys' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/base/bus.c:667:12: warning: symbol 'buses_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/base/class.c:759:12: warning: symbol 'classes_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/base/platform.c:313:12: warning: symbol 'platform_bus_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/base/cpu.c:110:12: warning: symbol 'cpu_dev_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/base/firmware.c:17:5: warning: symbol 'firmware_register' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/base/firmware.c:23:6: warning: symbol 'firmware_unregister' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/base/firmware.c:28:12: warning: symbol 'firmware_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/base/init.c:28:13: warning: symbol 'driver_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/base/dmapool.c:174:10: warning: implicit cast from nocast type
      drivers/base/attribute_container.c:439:1: warning: symbol 'attribute_container_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
      drivers/base/power/runtime.c:76:6: warning: symbol 'dpm_set_power_state' was not declared. Should it be static?
      Signed-off-by: NBen Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      a1bdc7aa
  13. 26 6月, 2005 3 次提交
  14. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4