1. 23 12月, 2008 5 次提交
  2. 04 12月, 2008 1 次提交
  3. 03 12月, 2008 9 次提交
  4. 02 12月, 2008 7 次提交
  5. 28 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • J
      udf: Fix BUG_ON() in destroy_inode() · 52b19ac9
      Jan Kara 提交于
      udf_clear_inode() can leave behind buffers on mapping's i_private list (when
      we truncated preallocation). Call invalidate_inode_buffers() so that the list
      is properly cleaned-up before we return from udf_clear_inode(). This is ugly
      and suggest that we should cleanup preallocation earlier than in clear_inode()
      but currently there's no such call available since drop_inode() is called under
      inode lock and thus is unusable for disk operations.
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      52b19ac9
  6. 27 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • J
      [CIFS] fix regression in cifs_write_begin/cifs_write_end · a98ee8c1
      Jeff Layton 提交于
      The conversion to write_begin/write_end interfaces had a bug where we
      were passing a bad parameter to cifs_readpage_worker. Rather than
      passing the page offset of the start of the write, we needed to pass the
      offset of the beginning of the page. This was reliably showing up as
      data corruption in the fsx-linux test from LTP.
      
      It also became evident that this code was occasionally doing unnecessary
      read calls. Optimize those away by using the PG_checked flag to indicate
      that the unwritten part of the page has been initialized.
      
      CC: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
      Acked-by: NDave Kleikamp <shaggy@us.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
      a98ee8c1
  7. 22 11月, 2008 3 次提交
    • A
      UBIFS: pre-allocate bulk-read buffer · 3477d204
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      To avoid memory allocation failure during bulk-read, pre-allocate
      a bulk-read buffer, so that if there is only one bulk-reader at
      a time, it would just use the pre-allocated buffer and would not
      do any memory allocation. However, if there are more than 1 bulk-
      reader, then only one reader would use the pre-allocated buffer,
      while the other reader would allocate the buffer for itself.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      3477d204
    • A
      UBIFS: do not allocate too much · 6c0c42cd
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      Bulk-read allocates 128KiB or more using kmalloc. The allocation
      starts failing often when the memory gets fragmented. UBIFS still
      works fine in this case, because it falls-back to standard
      (non-optimized) read method, though. This patch teaches bulk-read
      to allocate exactly the amount of memory it needs, instead of
      allocating 128KiB every time.
      
      This patch is also a preparation to the further fix where we'll
      have a pre-allocated bulk-read buffer as well. For example, now
      the @bu object is prepared in 'ubifs_bulk_read()', so we could
      path either pre-allocated or allocated information to
      'ubifs_do_bulk_read()' later. Or teaching 'ubifs_do_bulk_read()'
      not to allocate 'bu->buf' if it is already there.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      6c0c42cd
    • A
      UBIFS: do not print scary memory allocation warnings · 39ce81ce
      Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
      Bulk-read allocates a lot of memory with 'kmalloc()', and when it
      is/gets fragmented 'kmalloc()' fails with a scarry warning. But
      because bulk-read is just an optimization, UBIFS keeps working fine.
      Supress the warning by passing __GFP_NOWARN option to 'kmalloc()'.
      
      This patch also introduces a macro for the magic 128KiB constant.
      This is just neater.
      
      Note, this is not really fixes the problem we had, but just hides
      the warnings. The further patches fix the problem.
      Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
      39ce81ce
  8. 21 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • S
      [CIFS] Do not attempt to close invalidated file handles · ddb4cbfc
      Steve French 提交于
      If a connection with open file handles has gone down
      and come back up and reconnected without reopening
      the file handle yet, do not attempt to send an SMB close
      request for this handle in cifs_close.  We were
      checking for the connection being invalid in cifs_close
      but since the connection may have been reconnected
      we also need to check whether the file handle
      was marked invalid (otherwise we could close the
      wrong file handle by accident).
      Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
      ddb4cbfc
  9. 20 11月, 2008 3 次提交
  10. 19 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  11. 18 11月, 2008 6 次提交
  12. 17 11月, 2008 2 次提交