Tony Jones reported that the ftrace self tests on s390 do not work:

<6>Testing dynamic ftrace ops #1: (0 0 0 0 0) FAILED!
<6>Testing tracer irqsoff:
<3>failed to start irqsoff tracer
<4>.. no entries found ..FAILED!
<6>Testing tracer wakeup:
<3>failed to start wakeup tracer
<4>.. no entries found ..FAILED!
<6>Testing tracer function_graph:
<4>Failed to init function_graph tracer, init returned -19
<4>FAILED!

This happens because we forgot to adjust the instruction pointer that gets
passed to the ftrace trace function by MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE.

In addition change MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE to the correct value on 31 bit.
It only worked so far because the to be patched instruction was identical.
Reported-by: NTony Jones <tonyj@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>

Do the mcount offset adjustment in the recordmcount.pl/recordmcount.[ch]
at compile time and not in ftrace_call_adjust at run time.
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Do the mcount offset adjustment in the recordmcount.pl/recordmcount.[ch]
at compile time and not in ftrace_call_adjust at run time.
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>

Function graph tracer support for s390.
Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>

Dynamic ftrace support for s390.
Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>

This implements just the basic function tracer (_mcount) backend for s390.
The dynamic variant will come later.
Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>