Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 15 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  3. 13 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  5. 12 5月, 2012 2 次提交
  7. 04 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  9. 17 4月, 2012 3 次提交
  11. 09 4月, 2012 1 次提交
    • M
      regulator: core: Use a struct to pass in regulator runtime configuration · c172708d
      由 Mark Brown 提交于 
      Rather than adding new arguments to regulator_register() every time we
want to add a new bit of dynamic information at runtime change the function
to take these via a struct. By doing this we avoid needing to do further
changes like the recent addition of device tree support which required each
regulator driver to be updated to take an additional parameter.

The regulator_desc which should (mostly) be static data is still passed
separately as most drivers are able to configure this statically at build
time.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
      c172708d
  13. 04 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  15. 03 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  17. 01 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  19. 29 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  21. 16 3月, 2012 1 次提交
    • P
      device.h: audit and cleanup users in main include dir · 313162d0
      由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于 
      The <linux/device.h> header includes a lot of stuff, and
it in turn gets a lot of use just for the basic "struct device"
which appears so often.

Clean up the users as follows:

1) For those headers only needing "struct device" as a pointer
in fcn args, replace the include with exactly that.

2) For headers not really using anything from device.h, simply
delete the include altogether.

3) For headers relying on getting device.h implicitly before
being included themselves, now explicitly include device.h

4) For files in which doing #1 or #2 uncovers an implicit
dependency on some other header, fix by explicitly adding
the required header(s).

Any C files that were implicitly relying on device.h to be
present have already been dealt with in advance.

Total removals from #1 and #2: 51.  Total additions coming
from #3: 9.  Total other implicit dependencies from #4: 7.

As of 3.3-rc1, there were 110, so a net removal of 42 gives
about a 38% reduction in device.h presence in include/*
Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      313162d0
  23. 07 3月, 2012 2 次提交
  25. 04 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  27. 21 2月, 2012 1 次提交
  29. 17 2月, 2012 1 次提交
  31. 02 2月, 2012 1 次提交
  33. 30 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  35. 27 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  37. 23 1月, 2012 2 次提交
  39. 20 1月, 2012 2 次提交
  41. 04 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  43. 02 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  45. 06 12月, 2011 1 次提交
    • S
      regulator: pass device_node to of_get_regulator_init_data() · d9a861cc
      由 Shawn Guo 提交于 
      It's not always true that the device_node of regulator can be found
at dev->of_node at the time when of_get_regulator_init_data() is being
called, because in some cases the regulator nodes in device tree do
not have 'struct device' behind them until regulator_dev gets created
for it by core function regulator_register().

The patch adds device_node as a new parameter to
of_get_regulator_init_data(), so that caller can pass in the node of
regulator directly.
Signed-off-by: NShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
      d9a861cc
  47. 24 11月, 2011 3 次提交
    • R
      regulator: map consumer regulator based on device tree · 69511a45
      由 Rajendra Nayak 提交于 
      Device nodes in DT can associate themselves with one or more
regulators/supply by providing a list of phandles (to regulator nodes)
and corresponding supply names.

For Example:
	devicenode: node@0x0 {
		...
		...
		vmmc-supply = <&regulator1>;
		vpll-supply = <&regulator2>;
	};

The driver would then do a regulator_get(dev, "vmmc"); to get
regulator1 and do a regulator_get(dev, "vpll"); to get
regulator2.

of_get_regulator() extracts the regulator node for a given
device, based on the supply name.

Use it to look up the regulator for a given consumer from device tree, during
a regulator_get(). If not found fallback and lookup through
the regulator_map_list instead.

Also, since the regulator dt nodes can use the same binding to
associate with a parent regulator/supply, allow the drivers to
specify a supply_name, which can then be used to lookup dt
to find the parent phandle.
Signed-off-by: NRajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Acked-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
      69511a45
    • R
      regulator: pass additional of_node to regulator_register() · 2c043bcb
      由 Rajendra Nayak 提交于 
      With device tree support for regulators, its needed that the
regulator_dev->dev device has the right of_node attached.
To be able to do this add an additional parameter to the
regulator_register() api, wherein the dt-adapted driver can
then pass this additional info onto the regulator core.
Signed-off-by: NRajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
      2c043bcb
    • R
      regulator: helper routine to extract regulator_init_data · 8f446e6f
      由 Rajendra Nayak 提交于 
      The helper routine is meant to be used by the regulator drivers
to extract the regulator_init_data structure from the data
that is passed from device tree.
'consumer_supplies' which is part of regulator_init_data is not extracted
as the regulator consumer mappings are passed through DT differently,
implemented in subsequent patches.
Similarly the regulator<-->parent/supply mapping is handled in
subsequent patches.

Also add documentation for regulator bindings to be used to pass
regulator_init_data struct information from device tree.

Some of the regulator properties which are linux and board specific,
are left out since its not clear if they can
be in someway embedded into the kernel or passed in from DT.
They will be revisited later.
Signed-off-by: NRajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
      8f446e6f
  49. 01 11月, 2011 1 次提交
  51. 15 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  53. 09 10月, 2011 1 次提交
    • H
      regulator: Add driver for gpio-controlled regulators · 3f0292ae
      由 Heiko Stübner 提交于 
      This patch adds support for regulators that can be controlled via gpios.

Examples for such regulators are the TI-tps65024x voltage regulators
with 4 fixed and 1 runtime-switchable voltage regulators
or the TI-bq240XX charger regulators.

The number of controlling gpios is not limited, the mapping between
voltage/current and target gpio state is done via the states map
and the driver can be used for either voltage or current regulators.

A mapping for a regulator with two GPIOs could look like:

gpios = {
	{ .gpio = GPIO1, .flags = GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, .label = "gpio name 1" },
	{ .gpio = GPIO2, .flags = GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW,  .label = "gpio name 2" },
}

The flags element of the gpios array determines the initial state of
the gpio, set during probe. The initial state of the regulator is also
calculated from these values

states = {
	{ .value = volt_or_cur1, .gpios = (0 << 1) | (0 << 0) },
	{ .value = volt_or_cur2, .gpios = (0 << 1) | (1 << 0) },
	{ .value = volt_or_cur3, .gpios = (1 << 1) | (0 << 0) },
	{ .value = volt_or_cur4, .gpios = (1 << 1) | (1 << 0) },
}

The target-state for the n-th gpio is determined by the n-th bit
in the bitfield of the target-value.
Signed-off-by: NHeiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
      3f0292ae
  55. 14 9月, 2011 1 次提交
    • M
      regulator: Implement deferred disable support · da07ecd9
      由 Mark Brown 提交于 
      It is a reasonably common pattern for hardware to require some delay after
being quiesced before the disable has finalised, especially in mixed signal
devices. For example, an active discharge may be required to ensure that
the circuit starts up again in a known state. Avoid having to implement
such delays in the regulator API by providing regulator_deferred_disable()
which will do a regulator_disable() a specified number of milliseconds
after it is called.

Due to the reference counting done on regulators a deferred disable can
be cancelled by doing another regulator_enable().
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Acked-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>
      da07ecd9
  57. 09 9月, 2011 1 次提交
  59. 09 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  61. 10 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  63. 30 5月, 2011 1 次提交
    • M
      regulator: Do bulk enables of regulators in parallel · f21e0e81
      由 Mark Brown 提交于 
      In order to reduce the impact of ramp times rather than enabling the
regulators for a device in series use async tasks to run the actual
enables. This means that the delays which the enables implement can all
run in parallel, though it does mean that the order in which the
supplies come on may be unstable.

For super bonus fun points if any of the regulators are shared between
multiple supplies on the same device (as is rather likely) then this
will test our locking.  Note that in this case we only delay once for
each physical regulator so the threads shouldn't block each other while
delaying.

It'd be even nicer if we could coalesce writes to a shared enable registers
in PMICs but that's definitely future work, and it may also be useful
and is certainly more achievable to optimise out the parallelism if none
of the regulators implement ramp delays.
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
      f21e0e81