- 29 6月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
As seen on sparc64-allnoconfig: CC arch/sparc64/mm/tlb.o In file included from arch/sparc64/mm/tlb.c:19: include/asm/tlb.h: In function 'tlb_flush_mmu': include/asm/tlb.h:60: warning: implicit declaration of function 'release_pages' include/asm/tlb.h: In function 'tlb_remove_page': include/asm/tlb.h:92: warning: implicit declaration of function 'page_cache_release' Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@sw.ru> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 4月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-
- 08 11月, 2005 2 次提交
-
-
由 Hugh Dickins 提交于
Minor simplification to the sparc64 tlb_flush_mmu: tlb_remove_page set need_flush only after handling the tlb_fast_mode case, then tlb_flush_mmu need not consider whether it's tlb_fast_mode. Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
It isn't needed any longer, as noted by Hugh Dickins. We still need the flush routines, due to the one remaining call site in hugetlb_prefault_arch_hook(). That can be eliminated at some later point, however. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 30 10月, 2005 3 次提交
-
-
由 Hugh Dickins 提交于
zap_pte_range has been counting the pages it frees in tlb->freed, then tlb_finish_mmu has used that to update the mm's rss. That got stranger when I added anon_rss, yet updated it by a different route; and stranger when rss and anon_rss became mm_counters with special access macros. And it would no longer be viable if we're relying on page_table_lock to stabilize the mm_counter, but calling tlb_finish_mmu outside that lock. Remove the mmu_gather's freed field, let tlb_finish_mmu stick to its own business, just decrement the rss mm_counter in zap_pte_range (yes, there was some point to batching the update, and a subsequent patch restores that). And forget the anal paranoia of first reading the counter to avoid going negative - if rss does go negative, just fix that bug. Remove the mmu_gather's flushes and avoided_flushes from arm and arm26: no use was being made of them. But arm26 alone was actually using the freed, in the way some others use need_flush: give it a need_flush. arm26 seems to prefer spaces to tabs here: respect that. Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Hugh Dickins 提交于
tlb_is_full_mm? What does that mean? The TLB is full? No, it means that the mm's last user has gone and the whole mm is being torn down. And it's an inline function because sparc64 uses a different (slightly better) "tlb_frozen" name for the flag others call "fullmm". And now the ptep_get_and_clear_full macro used in zap_pte_range refers directly to tlb->fullmm, which would be wrong for sparc64. Rather than correct that, I'd prefer to scrap tlb_is_full_mm altogether, and change sparc64 to just use the same poor name as everyone else - is that okay? Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Hugh Dickins 提交于
tlb_gather_mmu dates from before kernel preemption was allowed, and uses smp_processor_id or __get_cpu_var to find its per-cpu mmu_gather. That works because it's currently only called after getting page_table_lock, which is not dropped until after the matching tlb_finish_mmu. But don't rely on that, it will soon change: now disable preemption internally by proper get_cpu_var in tlb_gather_mmu, put_cpu_var in tlb_finish_mmu. Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-