1. 13 10月, 2016 1 次提交
  2. 21 9月, 2016 1 次提交
    • J
      net sched actions: fix GETing actions · aecc5cef
      Jamal Hadi Salim 提交于
      With the batch changes that translated transient actions into
      a temporary list lost in the translation was the fact that
      tcf_action_destroy() will eventually delete the action from
      the permanent location if the refcount is zero.
      
      Example of what broke:
      ...add a gact action to drop
      sudo $TC actions add action drop index 10
      ...now retrieve it, looks good
      sudo $TC actions get action gact index 10
      ...retrieve it again and find it is gone!
      sudo $TC actions get action gact index 10
      
      Fixes: 22dc13c8 ("net_sched: convert tcf_exts from list to pointer array"),
      Fixes: 824a7e88 ("net_sched: remove an unnecessary list_del()")
      Fixes: f07fed82 ("net_sched: remove the leftover cleanup_a()")
      Acked-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      aecc5cef
  3. 20 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  4. 18 8月, 2016 3 次提交
  5. 26 7月, 2016 2 次提交
    • W
      net_sched: get rid of struct tcf_common · ec0595cc
      WANG Cong 提交于
      After the previous patch, struct tc_action should be enough
      to represent the generic tc action, tcf_common is not necessary
      any more. This patch gets rid of it to make tc action code
      more readable.
      
      Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      ec0595cc
    • W
      net_sched: move tc_action into tcf_common · a85a970a
      WANG Cong 提交于
      struct tc_action is confusing, currently we use it for two purposes:
      1) Pass in arguments and carry out results from helper functions
      2) A generic representation for tc actions
      
      The first one is error-prone, since we need to make sure we don't
      miss anything. This patch aims to get rid of this use, by moving
      tc_action into tcf_common, so that they are allocated together
      in hashtable and can be cast'ed easily.
      
      And together with the following patch, we could really make
      tc_action a generic representation for all tc actions and each
      type of action can inherit from it.
      
      Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a85a970a
  6. 16 6月, 2016 2 次提交
  7. 08 6月, 2016 3 次提交
  8. 27 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 26 2月, 2016 2 次提交
  10. 27 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  11. 31 7月, 2015 1 次提交
    • D
      net: sched: fix refcount imbalance in actions · 28e6b67f
      Daniel Borkmann 提交于
      Since commit 55334a5d ("net_sched: act: refuse to remove bound action
      outside"), we end up with a wrong reference count for a tc action.
      
      Test case 1:
      
        FOO="1,6 0 0 4294967295,"
        BAR="1,6 0 0 4294967294,"
        tc filter add dev foo parent 1: bpf bytecode "$FOO" flowid 1:1 \
           action bpf bytecode "$FOO"
        tc actions show action bpf
          action order 0: bpf bytecode '1,6 0 0 4294967295' default-action pipe
          index 1 ref 1 bind 1
        tc actions replace action bpf bytecode "$BAR" index 1
        tc actions show action bpf
          action order 0: bpf bytecode '1,6 0 0 4294967294' default-action pipe
          index 1 ref 2 bind 1
        tc actions replace action bpf bytecode "$FOO" index 1
        tc actions show action bpf
          action order 0: bpf bytecode '1,6 0 0 4294967295' default-action pipe
          index 1 ref 3 bind 1
      
      Test case 2:
      
        FOO="1,6 0 0 4294967295,"
        tc filter add dev foo parent 1: bpf bytecode "$FOO" flowid 1:1 action ok
        tc actions show action gact
          action order 0: gact action pass
          random type none pass val 0
           index 1 ref 1 bind 1
        tc actions add action drop index 1
          RTNETLINK answers: File exists [...]
        tc actions show action gact
          action order 0: gact action pass
           random type none pass val 0
           index 1 ref 2 bind 1
        tc actions add action drop index 1
          RTNETLINK answers: File exists [...]
        tc actions show action gact
          action order 0: gact action pass
           random type none pass val 0
           index 1 ref 3 bind 1
      
      What happens is that in tcf_hash_check(), we check tcf_common for a given
      index and increase tcfc_refcnt and conditionally tcfc_bindcnt when we've
      found an existing action. Now there are the following cases:
      
        1) We do a late binding of an action. In that case, we leave the
           tcfc_refcnt/tcfc_bindcnt increased and are done with the ->init()
           handler. This is correctly handeled.
      
        2) We replace the given action, or we try to add one without replacing
           and find out that the action at a specific index already exists
           (thus, we go out with error in that case).
      
      In case of 2), we have to undo the reference count increase from
      tcf_hash_check() in the tcf_hash_check() function. Currently, we fail to
      do so because of the 'tcfc_bindcnt > 0' check which bails out early with
      an -EPERM error.
      
      Now, while commit 55334a5d prevents 'tc actions del action ...' on an
      already classifier-bound action to drop the reference count (which could
      then become negative, wrap around etc), this restriction only accounts for
      invocations outside a specific action's ->init() handler.
      
      One possible solution would be to add a flag thus we possibly trigger
      the -EPERM ony in situations where it is indeed relevant.
      
      After the patch, above test cases have correct reference count again.
      
      Fixes: 55334a5d ("net_sched: act: refuse to remove bound action outside")
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Reviewed-by: NCong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      28e6b67f
  12. 09 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  13. 03 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  14. 30 9月, 2014 3 次提交
  15. 25 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  16. 13 2月, 2014 5 次提交
  17. 22 1月, 2014 2 次提交
  18. 14 1月, 2014 3 次提交
  19. 07 1月, 2014 2 次提交
  20. 02 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  21. 21 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  22. 19 12月, 2013 2 次提交