1. 14 12月, 2011 2 次提交
  2. 08 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  3. 07 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  4. 29 11月, 2011 2 次提交
    • L
      rtlwifi: Fix incorrect return of IRQ_HANDLED · de2e56ce
      Larry Finger 提交于
      The recent discussion regarding an incorrect return of IRQ_HANDLED
      from rt2800pci caused me to look at this PCI interrupt routine. I
      discovered that changes were needed.
      Signed-off-by: NLarry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      de2e56ce
    • S
      rtlwifi: fix lps_lock deadlock · e55b32c1
      Stanislaw Gruszka 提交于
      rtl_lps_leave can be called from interrupt context, so we have to
      disable interrupts when taking lps_lock.
      
      Below is full lockdep info about deadlock:
      
      [   93.815269] =================================
      [   93.815390] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
      [   93.815472] 2.6.41.1-3.offch.fc15.x86_64.debug #1
      [   93.815556] ---------------------------------
      [   93.815635] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
      [   93.815743] swapper/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
      [   93.815832]  (&(&rtlpriv->locks.lps_lock)->rlock){+.?...}, at: [<ffffffffa025dad6>] rtl_lps_leave+0x26/0x103 [rtlwifi]
      [   93.815947] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
      [   93.815947]   [<ffffffff8108e10d>] __lock_acquire+0x369/0xd0c
      [   93.815947]   [<ffffffff8108efb3>] lock_acquire+0xf3/0x13e
      [   93.815947]   [<ffffffff814e981d>] _raw_spin_lock+0x45/0x79
      [   93.815947]   [<ffffffffa025de34>] rtl_swlps_rf_awake+0x5a/0x76 [rtlwifi]
      [   93.815947]   [<ffffffffa025aec0>] rtl_op_config+0x12a/0x32a [rtlwifi]
      [   93.815947]   [<ffffffffa01d614b>] ieee80211_hw_config+0x124/0x129 [mac80211]
      [   93.815947]   [<ffffffffa01e0af3>] ieee80211_dynamic_ps_disable_work+0x32/0x47 [mac80211]
      [   93.815947]   [<ffffffff81075aa5>] process_one_work+0x205/0x3e7
      [   93.815947]   [<ffffffff81076753>] worker_thread+0xda/0x15d
      [   93.815947]   [<ffffffff8107a119>] kthread+0xa8/0xb0
      [   93.815947]   [<ffffffff814f3184>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
      [   93.815947] irq event stamp: 547822
      [   93.815947] hardirqs last  enabled at (547822): [<ffffffff814ea1a7>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x45/0x61
      [   93.815947] hardirqs last disabled at (547821): [<ffffffff814e9987>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x22/0x8e
      [   93.815947] softirqs last  enabled at (547790): [<ffffffff810623ed>] _local_bh_enable+0x13/0x15
      [   93.815947] softirqs last disabled at (547791): [<ffffffff814f327c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
      [   93.815947]
      [   93.815947] other info that might help us debug this:
      [   93.815947]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      [   93.815947]
      [   93.815947]        CPU0
      [   93.815947]        ----
      [   93.815947]   lock(&(&rtlpriv->locks.lps_lock)->rlock);
      [   93.815947]   <Interrupt>
      [   93.815947]     lock(&(&rtlpriv->locks.lps_lock)->rlock);
      [   93.815947]
      [   93.815947]  *** DEADLOCK ***
      [   93.815947]
      [   93.815947] no locks held by swapper/0.
      [   93.815947]
      [   93.815947] stack backtrace:
      [   93.815947] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.41.1-3.offch.fc15.x86_64.debug #1
      [   93.815947] Call Trace:
      [   93.815947]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff814dfd00>] print_usage_bug+0x1e7/0x1f8
      [   93.815947]  [<ffffffff8101a849>] ? save_stack_trace+0x2c/0x49
      [   93.815947]  [<ffffffff8108d55c>] ? print_irq_inversion_bug.part.18+0x1a0/0x1a0
      [   93.815947]  [<ffffffff8108dc8a>] mark_lock+0x106/0x220
      [   93.815947]  [<ffffffff8108e099>] __lock_acquire+0x2f5/0xd0c
      [   93.815947]  [<ffffffff810152af>] ? native_sched_clock+0x34/0x36
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffff810152ba>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0xd
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffff81080181>] ? sched_clock_local+0x12/0x75
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffffa025dad6>] ? rtl_lps_leave+0x26/0x103 [rtlwifi]
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffff8108efb3>] lock_acquire+0xf3/0x13e
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffffa025dad6>] ? rtl_lps_leave+0x26/0x103 [rtlwifi]
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffff814e981d>] _raw_spin_lock+0x45/0x79
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffffa025dad6>] ? rtl_lps_leave+0x26/0x103 [rtlwifi]
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffff81422467>] ? skb_dequeue+0x62/0x6d
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffffa025dad6>] rtl_lps_leave+0x26/0x103 [rtlwifi]
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffffa025f677>] _rtl_pci_ips_leave_tasklet+0xe/0x10 [rtlwifi]
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffff8106281f>] tasklet_action+0x8d/0xee
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffff810629ce>] __do_softirq+0x112/0x25a
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffff814f327c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffff81010bf6>] do_softirq+0x4b/0xa1
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffff81062d7d>] irq_exit+0x5d/0xcf
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffff814f3b7e>] do_IRQ+0x8e/0xa5
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffff814ea533>] common_interrupt+0x73/0x73
      [   93.830125]  <EOI>  [<ffffffff8108b825>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0xf
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffff812bb6d5>] ? intel_idle+0xe5/0x10c
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffff812bb6d1>] ? intel_idle+0xe1/0x10c
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffff813f8d5e>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x11c/0x1fe
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffff8100e2ef>] cpu_idle+0xab/0x101
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffff814c6373>] rest_init+0xd7/0xde
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffff814c629c>] ? csum_partial_copy_generic+0x16c/0x16c
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffff81d4bbb0>] start_kernel+0x3dd/0x3ea
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffff81d4b2c4>] x86_64_start_reservations+0xaf/0xb3
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffff81d4b140>] ? early_idt_handlers+0x140/0x140
      [   93.830125]  [<ffffffff81d4b3ca>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x102/0x111
      
      Resolves:
      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755154
      
      Reported-by: vjain02@students.poly.edu
      Reported-and-tested-by: NOliver Paukstadt <pstadt@sourcentral.org>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Acked-by: NLarry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
      Signed-off-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      e55b32c1
  5. 23 11月, 2011 1 次提交
  6. 22 11月, 2011 4 次提交
  7. 09 11月, 2011 1 次提交
  8. 02 11月, 2011 1 次提交
  9. 01 11月, 2011 2 次提交
  10. 15 10月, 2011 5 次提交
  11. 12 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  12. 04 10月, 2011 1 次提交
    • E
      mac80211: pass vif param to conf_tx() callback · 8a3a3c85
      Eliad Peller 提交于
      tx params should be configured per interface.
      add ieee80211_vif param to the conf_tx callback,
      and change all the drivers that use this callback.
      
      The following spatch was used:
      @rule1@
      struct ieee80211_ops ops;
      identifier conf_tx_op;
      @@
      	ops.conf_tx = conf_tx_op;
      
      @rule2@
      identifier rule1.conf_tx_op;
      identifier hw, queue, params;
      @@
      	conf_tx_op (
      -		struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
      +		struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
      		u16 queue,
      		const struct ieee80211_tx_queue_params *params) {...}
      Signed-off-by: NEliad Peller <eliad@wizery.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      8a3a3c85
  13. 01 10月, 2011 2 次提交
  14. 28 9月, 2011 1 次提交
  15. 27 9月, 2011 1 次提交
  16. 21 9月, 2011 4 次提交
  17. 15 9月, 2011 1 次提交
  18. 14 9月, 2011 2 次提交
  19. 25 8月, 2011 5 次提交
  20. 23 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  21. 10 8月, 2011 1 次提交