1. 26 5月, 2009 3 次提交
  2. 21 5月, 2009 1 次提交
    • I
      perf_counter: Fix context removal deadlock · 34adc806
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Disable the PMU globally before removing a counter from a
      context. This fixes the following lockup:
      
      [22081.741922] ------------[ cut here ]------------
      [22081.746668] WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c:803 intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x9b/0x24e()
      [22081.755624] Hardware name: X8DTN
      [22081.758903] perfcounters: irq loop stuck!
      [22081.762985] Modules linked in:
      [22081.766136] Pid: 11082, comm: perf Not tainted 2.6.30-rc6-tip #226
      [22081.772432] Call Trace:
      [22081.774940]  <NMI>  [<ffffffff81019aed>] ? intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x9b/0x24e
      [22081.781993]  [<ffffffff81019aed>] ? intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x9b/0x24e
      [22081.788368]  [<ffffffff8104505c>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x77/0xa3
      [22081.794649]  [<ffffffff810450d3>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x45
      [22081.800696]  [<ffffffff81019aed>] ? intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x9b/0x24e
      [22081.807080]  [<ffffffff814d1a72>] ? perf_counter_nmi_handler+0x3f/0x4a
      [22081.813751]  [<ffffffff814d2d09>] ? notifier_call_chain+0x58/0x86
      [22081.819951]  [<ffffffff8105b250>] ? notify_die+0x2d/0x32
      [22081.825392]  [<ffffffff814d1414>] ? do_nmi+0x8e/0x242
      [22081.830538]  [<ffffffff814d0f0a>] ? nmi+0x1a/0x20
      [22081.835342]  [<ffffffff8117e102>] ? selinux_file_free_security+0x0/0x1a
      [22081.842105]  [<ffffffff81018793>] ? x86_pmu_disable_counter+0x15/0x41
      [22081.848673]  <<EOE>>  [<ffffffff81018f3d>] ? x86_pmu_disable+0x86/0x103
      [22081.855512]  [<ffffffff8108fedd>] ? __perf_counter_remove_from_context+0x0/0xfe
      [22081.862926]  [<ffffffff8108fcbc>] ? counter_sched_out+0x30/0xce
      [22081.868909]  [<ffffffff8108ff36>] ? __perf_counter_remove_from_context+0x59/0xfe
      [22081.876382]  [<ffffffff8106808a>] ? smp_call_function_single+0x6c/0xe6
      [22081.882955]  [<ffffffff81091b96>] ? perf_release+0x86/0x14c
      [22081.888600]  [<ffffffff810c4c84>] ? __fput+0xe7/0x195
      [22081.893718]  [<ffffffff810c213e>] ? filp_close+0x5b/0x62
      [22081.899107]  [<ffffffff81046a70>] ? put_files_struct+0x64/0xc2
      [22081.905031]  [<ffffffff8104841a>] ? do_exit+0x1e2/0x6ef
      [22081.910360]  [<ffffffff814d0a60>] ? _spin_lock_irqsave+0x9/0xe
      [22081.916292]  [<ffffffff8104898e>] ? do_group_exit+0x67/0x93
      [22081.921953]  [<ffffffff810489cc>] ? sys_exit_group+0x12/0x16
      [22081.927759]  [<ffffffff8100baab>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      [22081.934076] ---[ end trace 3a3936ce3e1b4505 ]---
      
      And could potentially also fix the lockup reported by Marcelo Tosatti.
      
      Also, print more debug info in case of a detected lockup.
      
      [ Impact: fix lockup ]
      Reported-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      34adc806
  3. 18 5月, 2009 1 次提交
    • I
      perf_counter, x86: speed up the scheduling fast-path · b68f1d2e
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      We have to set up the LVT entry only at counter init time, not at
      every switch-in time.
      
      There's friction between NMI and non-NMI use here - we'll probably
      remove the per counter configurability of it - but until then, dont
      slow down things ...
      
      [ Impact: micro-optimization ]
      
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
      Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
      Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
      LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      b68f1d2e
  4. 17 5月, 2009 1 次提交
    • I
      perf_counter, x86: fix zero irq_period counters · d2517a49
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      The quirk to irq_period unearthed an unrobustness we had in the
      hw_counter initialization sequence: we left irq_period at 0, which
      was then quirked up to 2 ... which then generated a _lot_ of
      interrupts during 'perf stat' runs, slowed them down and skewed
      the counter results in general.
      
      Initialize irq_period to the maximum instead.
      
      [ Impact: fix perf stat results ]
      
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
      Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
      Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      d2517a49
  5. 15 5月, 2009 9 次提交
  6. 13 5月, 2009 1 次提交
  7. 11 5月, 2009 1 次提交
  8. 05 5月, 2009 2 次提交
    • I
      perf_counter: fix fixed-purpose counter support on v2 Intel-PERFMON · 066d7dea
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Fixed-purpose counters stopped working in a simple 'perf stat ls' run:
      
         <not counted>  cache references
         <not counted>  cache misses
      
      Due to:
      
        ef7b3e09: perf_counter, x86: remove vendor check in fixed_mode_idx()
      
      Which made x86_pmu.num_counters_fixed matter: if it's nonzero, the
      fixed-purpose counters are utilized.
      
      But on v2 perfmon this field is not set (despite there being
      fixed-purpose PMCs). So add a quirk to set the number of fixed-purpose
      counters to at least three.
      
      [ Impact: add quirk for three fixed-purpose counters on certain Intel CPUs ]
      
      Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
      Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      LKML-Reference: <1241002046-8832-28-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      066d7dea
    • P
      perf_counter: x86: fixup nmi_watchdog vs perf_counter boo-boo · ba77813a
      Peter Zijlstra 提交于
      Invert the atomic_inc_not_zero() test so that we will indeed detect the
      first activation.
      
      Also rename the global num_counters, since its easy to confuse with
      x86_pmu.num_counters.
      
      [ Impact: fix non-working perfcounters on AMD CPUs, cleanup ]
      Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      LKML-Reference: <1241455664.7620.4938.camel@twins>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      ba77813a
  9. 01 5月, 2009 1 次提交
  10. 30 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  11. 29 4月, 2009 19 次提交