Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 05 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  3. 26 1月, 2008 1 次提交
  5. 20 11月, 2007 1 次提交
  7. 18 7月, 2007 1 次提交
  9. 17 7月, 2007 1 次提交
    • H
      generic bug: use show_regs() instead of dump_stack() · 608e2619
      由 Heiko Carstens 提交于 
      The current generic bug implementation has a call to dump_stack() in case a
WARN_ON(whatever) gets hit.  Since report_bug(), which calls dump_stack(),
gets called from an exception handler we can do better: just pass the
pt_regs structure to report_bug() and pass it to show_regs() in case of a
warning.  This will give more debug informations like register contents,
etc...  In addition this avoids some pointless lines that dump_stack()
emits, since it includes a stack backtrace of the exception handler which
is of no interest in case of a warning.  E.g.  on s390 the following lines
are currently always present in a stack backtrace if dump_stack() gets
called from report_bug():

 [<000000000001517a>] show_trace+0x92/0xe8)
 [<0000000000015270>] show_stack+0xa0/0xd0
 [<00000000000152ce>] dump_stack+0x2e/0x3c
 [<0000000000195450>] report_bug+0x98/0xf8
 [<0000000000016cc8>] illegal_op+0x1fc/0x21c
 [<00000000000227d6>] sysc_return+0x0/0x10
Acked-by: NJeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Acked-by: NHaavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      608e2619
  11. 19 6月, 2007 2 次提交
  13. 09 5月, 2007 2 次提交
  15. 27 4月, 2007 2 次提交
    • H
      [S390] Use generic bug. · c0007f1a
      由 Heiko Carstens 提交于 
      Generic bug implementation for s390. Will increase the value of the
console output on BUG() statements since registers r0-r5,r14 will
not be clobbered by a printk() call that was previously done before
the illegal instruction of BUG() was hit.
Also implements an architecture specific WARN_ON(). Output of that
could be increased but requires common code change.
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      c0007f1a
    • M
      [S390] Improved oops output. · bb11e3bd
      由 Martin Schwidefsky 提交于 
      This patch adds two improvements to the oops output. First it adds an
additional line after the PSW which decodes the different fields of it.
Second a disassembler is added that decodes the instructions surrounding
the faulting PSW. The output of a test oops now looks like this:

kernel BUG at init/main.c:419
illegal operation: 0001 [#1]
CPU:    0    Not tainted
Process swapper (pid: 0, task: 0000000000464968, ksp: 00000000004be000)
Krnl PSW : 0700000180000000 00000000000120b6 (rest_init+0x36/0x38)
           R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:0 W:0 P:0 AS:0 CC:0 PM:0 EA:3
Krnl GPRS: 0000000000000003 00000000004ba017 0000000000000022 0000000000000001
           000000000003a5f6 0000000000000000 00000000004be6a8 0000000000000000
           0000000000000000 00000000004b8200 0000000000003a50 0000000000008000
           0000000000516368 000000000033d008 00000000000120b2 00000000004bdee0
Krnl Code: 00000000000120a6: e3e0f0980024       stg     %r14,152(%r15)
           00000000000120ac: c0e500014296       brasl   %r14,3a5d8
           00000000000120b2: a7f40001           brc     15,120b4
          >00000000000120b6: 0707               bcr     0,%r7
           00000000000120b8: eb7ff0500024       stmg    %r7,%r15,80(%r15)
           00000000000120be: c0d000195825       larl    %r13,33d108
           00000000000120c4: a7f13f00           tmll    %r15,16128
           00000000000120c8: a7840001           brc     8,120ca
Call Trace:
([<00000000000120b2>] rest_init+0x32/0x38)
 [<00000000004be614>] start_kernel+0x37c/0x410
 [<0000000000012020>] _ehead+0x20/0x80
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      bb11e3bd
  17. 06 2月, 2007 2 次提交
  19. 04 12月, 2006 2 次提交
  21. 27 10月, 2006 1 次提交
  23. 10 10月, 2006 1 次提交
  25. 06 10月, 2006 1 次提交
  27. 28 9月, 2006 1 次提交
    • M
      [S390] Inline assembly cleanup. · 94c12cc7
      由 Martin Schwidefsky 提交于 
      Major cleanup of all s390 inline assemblies. They now have a common
coding style. Quite a few have been shortened, mainly by using register
asm variables. Use of the EX_TABLE macro helps  as well. The atomic ops,
bit ops and locking inlines new use the Q-constraint if a newer gcc
is used.  That results in slightly better code.

Thanks to Christian Borntraeger for proof reading the changes.
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      94c12cc7
  29. 20 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  31. 12 7月, 2006 1 次提交
  33. 01 7月, 2006 1 次提交
  35. 29 6月, 2006 1 次提交
  37. 08 2月, 2006 1 次提交
  39. 13 1月, 2006 2 次提交
  41. 07 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  43. 07 11月, 2005 1 次提交
    • M
      [PATCH] s390: remove pagex support · d4b68996
      由 Martin Schwidefsky 提交于 
      Remove pagex pseudo page fault code.  It does not work together with the
system call speedup that makes the complete system call path enabled for
interrupts.  To make pagex and the syscall speedup code work together we would
have to add code to the program check handler to do a critical section cleanup
like the asynchronous interrupt code.  This would make program checks slower.
Not what we want.

Newer versions of z/VM have the improved pfault pseudo page fault interface.
This replaces the old pagex interface and does not have the problem.  So its
better to just rip out the pagex code.
Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      d4b68996
  45. 02 8月, 2005 1 次提交
  47. 26 6月, 2005 1 次提交
  49. 22 6月, 2005 1 次提交
  51. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
      1da177e4