- 29 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
It's part of the driver interface so should be available to modules. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
-
- 30 11月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
This allows read-only access to the device configuration which may be useful for diagnostics. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Acked-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>
-
- 28 11月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lothar Waßmann 提交于
This is caused by dereferencing 'rdev' after device_unregister() in the regulator_unregister() function. 'rdev' is freed by device_unregister(), so it must not be dereferenced after this call. [Edited commit message for legibility -- broonie] Signed-off-by: NLothar Waßmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
-
- 24 11月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rajendra Nayak 提交于
Device nodes in DT can associate themselves with one or more regulators/supply by providing a list of phandles (to regulator nodes) and corresponding supply names. For Example: devicenode: node@0x0 { ... ... vmmc-supply = <®ulator1>; vpll-supply = <®ulator2>; }; The driver would then do a regulator_get(dev, "vmmc"); to get regulator1 and do a regulator_get(dev, "vpll"); to get regulator2. of_get_regulator() extracts the regulator node for a given device, based on the supply name. Use it to look up the regulator for a given consumer from device tree, during a regulator_get(). If not found fallback and lookup through the regulator_map_list instead. Also, since the regulator dt nodes can use the same binding to associate with a parent regulator/supply, allow the drivers to specify a supply_name, which can then be used to lookup dt to find the parent phandle. Signed-off-by: NRajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com> Acked-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
-
由 Rajendra Nayak 提交于
With device tree support for regulators, its needed that the regulator_dev->dev device has the right of_node attached. To be able to do this add an additional parameter to the regulator_register() api, wherein the dt-adapted driver can then pass this additional info onto the regulator core. Signed-off-by: NRajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
-
- 23 11月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
-
- 01 11月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于
Another group of drivers that are taking advantage of the implicit presence of module.h -- and will break when we pull the carpet out from under them during a cleanup. Fix 'em now. Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
- 15 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Heiko Stübner 提交于
In the case where _regulator_enable returns an error it was not checked if a supplying regulator exists before trying to disable it, leading to a null pointer-dereference if no supplying regulator existed. Signed-off-by: NHeiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
-
- 04 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
schedule_delayed_work() returns a bool indicating if the work was already queued when it succeeds so we need to squash a true down to zero. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
-
- 14 9月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
It is a reasonably common pattern for hardware to require some delay after being quiesced before the disable has finalised, especially in mixed signal devices. For example, an active discharge may be required to ensure that the circuit starts up again in a known state. Avoid having to implement such delays in the regulator API by providing regulator_deferred_disable() which will do a regulator_disable() a specified number of milliseconds after it is called. Due to the reference counting done on regulators a deferred disable can be cancelled by doing another regulator_enable(). Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Acked-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>
-
- 29 8月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
Useful for working out why things aren't getting plugged together properly. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
- 22 7月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
We need to dereference the pointers to print their values. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
由 Axel Lin 提交于
Properly kfree rdev->constraints in all set_machine_constraints() error paths. Also properly kfree rdev->constraints in regulator_register() error paths. Signed-off-by: NAxel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com> Acked-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
Prevent some head scratching by making the core log about some rare but possible errors with invalid voltage ranges and modes being set. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
- 05 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
Report the requested load and voltage for each consumer in debugfs when it is enabled. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
- 10 6月, 2011 4 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
No actual users but provide the macro so there's less surprise when it's not there. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
Currently the regulator supply implementation is somewhat complex and fragile as it doesn't look like standard consumers but is instead a parallel implementation. This causes issues with locking and reference counting. Move the implementation over to using standard consumers to address this. Rather than only notifying the supply on the first enable/disable we do so every time the regulator is enabled or disabled, simplifying locking as we don't need to hold a lock on the consumer we are about to enable. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
We may have multiple devices requesting a supply with the same name so include the device name in the generated filename for microamps_requested to avoid duplicate files. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
With verbose filenames we can easily hit 32 characters. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
- 30 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
In order to reduce the impact of ramp times rather than enabling the regulators for a device in series use async tasks to run the actual enables. This means that the delays which the enables implement can all run in parallel, though it does mean that the order in which the supplies come on may be unstable. For super bonus fun points if any of the regulators are shared between multiple supplies on the same device (as is rather likely) then this will test our locking. Note that in this case we only delay once for each physical regulator so the threads shouldn't block each other while delaying. It'd be even nicer if we could coalesce writes to a shared enable registers in PMICs but that's definitely future work, and it may also be useful and is certainly more achievable to optimise out the parallelism if none of the regulators implement ramp delays. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
- 27 5月, 2011 8 次提交
-
-
由 Axel Lin 提交于
In the case of get_voltage callback is NULL, current implementation in _regulator_get_voltage will return -EINVAL. Also returns proper error if ret is negative value. Signed-off-by: NAxel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com> Acked-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
When applying the set_voltage() requests from consumers skip over those consumers that haven't set anything, otherwise we'll come out with a maximum voltage of zero. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
If either a regulator driver can't tell us what the optimum mode is (or doesn't have modes in the first place) or the system doesn't allow DRMS changes then it's more helpful for users to just say that we're in the optimal mode, even if it's from a selection of one. Still report errors if the process of picking and setting a mode changes as this may indicate that we're stuck in a low power mode and unable to deliver a higher current that the consumer just asked for. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
Some systems, particularly physically large systems used for early prototyping, may experience substantial voltage drops between the regulator and the consumers as a result of long traces in the system. With these systems voltages may need to be set higher than requested in order to ensure reliable system operation. Allow systems to work around such hardware issues by allowing constraints to supply an offset to be applied to any requested and reported voltages. This is not ideal, especially since the voltage drop may be load dependant, but is sufficient for most affected systems, it is not expected to be used in production hardware. The offset is applied after all constraint processing so constraints should be specified in terms of consumer values not physically configured values. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
supply_regulator_dev (using a struct pointer) has been deprecated in favour of supply_regulator (using a regulator name) for quite a few releases now with a warning generated if it is used and there are no current in tree users so just remove the code. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
Don't go looking up the rdev pointer every time, just use a local variable like everything else. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
由 Axel Lin 提交于
The second parameter of regulator_mode_constrain takes a pointer. This patch fixes below warning: drivers/regulator/core.c: In function 'regulator_set_mode': drivers/regulator/core.c:2014: warning: passing argument 2 of 'regulator_mode_constrain' makes pointer from integer without a cast drivers/regulator/core.c:200: note: expected 'int *' but argument is of type 'unsigned int' Signed-off-by: NAxel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com> Acked-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@vega.(none)>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
If a mode requested by a consumer is not allowed by constraints automatically fall back to a higher power mode if possible. This ensures that consumers get at least the output they requested while allowing machine drivers to transparently limit lower power modes if required. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
- 31 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lucas De Marchi 提交于
Fixes generated by 'codespell' and manually reviewed. Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>
-
- 26 3月, 2011 4 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
This exposes the functionality for rise/fall fime when setting voltage to the consumers. Cc: Bengt Jonsson <bengt.g.jonsson@stericsson.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
This makes it possible to set the stabilization time for voltage regulators in the same manner as enable_time(). The interface only supports regulators that implements fixed selectors. Cc: Bengt Jonsson <bengt.g.jonsson@stericsson.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
由 MyungJoo Ham 提交于
The regulator core had suspend-prepare that turns off the regulators when entering a system-wide suspend. However, it did not have suspend-finish that pairs with suspend-prepare and the regulator core has assumed that the regulator devices and their drivers support autonomous recover at resume. This patch adds regulator_suspend_finish that pairs with the previously-existed regulator_suspend_prepare. The function regulator_suspend_finish turns on the regulators that have always_on set or positive use_count so that we can reset the regulator states appropriately at resume. In regulator_suspend_finish, if has_full_constraints, it disables unnecessary regulators. Signed-off-by: NMyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Acked-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> -- Updates v3 comments corrected (Thanks to Igor) v2 disable unnecessary regulators (Thanks to Mark) Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
Makes it a bit easier to identify if it's a problem with the supplies, the usual error would be omitting the supply name entirely. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
- 12 1月, 2011 7 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
We only expose the use and open counts to userspace, providing a tiny bit of insight into what the API is up to. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
It's a boolean value so use the type. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
The recent introduction of standard regulator API logging macros means that all our log messages have at least the function name in them and logging that the constraints are for the regulator API is probably a bit much. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
If a consumer sets the same voltage range as is currently configured for that consumer there's no need to run through setting the voltage again. This pattern may occur with some CPUfreq implementations where the same voltage range is used for multiple frequencies. Reported-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
When cooperating with an external control source the regulator setup may be changed underneath the API. Currently consumers can just redo the regulator_set_voltage() to restore a previously set configuration but provide an explicit API for doing this as optimsations in the regulator_set_voltage() implementation will shortly prevent that. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
Currently we notify a voltage change whenever we exit set_voltage(), even if the change failed for some reason (eg, a constraints issue). This shouldn't cause any substantial ill effects but is wasteful as listeners get notified on noops. Fix this by moving the notification into _do_set_voltage() and only notifying if we don't return an error. Reported-by: NSaravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
Many regulator drivers implement voltage setting by looping through a table of possible values, normally because the set of available voltages can't be mapped onto selectors with simple calcuation. Factor out these loops by providing a variant of set_voltage() which takes a selector rather than a voltage range as an argument and implementing a loop through the available selectors in the core. This is not going to be suitable for use with all devices as when the regulator voltage can be mapped onto selector values with a simple calculation the linear scan through the available values will be more expensive than just doing the calculation, especially for regulators that provide fine grained voltage control. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
-