1. 20 9月, 2013 7 次提交
    • J
      drm/i915/vlv: honor i915_enable_rc6 boot param on VLV · a2b23fe0
      Jesse Barnes 提交于
      Disabling it isn't really an option on these platforms, but having it
      available for power comparisons is useful.
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      a2b23fe0
    • B
      drm/i915: s/HAS_L3_GPU_CACHE/HAS_L3_DPF · 040d2baa
      Ben Widawsky 提交于
      We'd only ever used this define to denote whether or not we have the
      dynamic parity feature (DPF) and never to determine whether or not L3
      exists. Baytrail is a good example of where L3 exists, and not DPF.
      
      This patch provides clarify in the code for future use cases which might
      want to actually query whether or not L3 exists.
      
      v2: Add /* DPF == dynamic parity feature */
      Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      040d2baa
    • B
      drm/i915: Do remaps for all contexts · 3ccfd19d
      Ben Widawsky 提交于
      On both Ivybridge and Haswell, row remapping information is saved and
      restored with context. This means, we never actually properly supported
      the l3 remapping because our sysfs interface is asynchronous (and not
      tied to any context), and the known faulty HW would be reused by the
      next context to run.
      
      Not that due to the asynchronous nature of the sysfs entry, there is no
      point modifying the registers for the existing context. Instead we set a
      flag for all contexts to load the correct remapping information on the
      next run. Interested clients can use debugfs to determine whether or not
      the row has been remapped.
      
      One could propose at this point that we just do the remapping in the
      kernel. I guess since we have to maintain the sysfs interface anyway,
      I'm not sure how useful it is, and I do like keeping the policy in
      userspace; (it wasn't my original decision to make the
      interface the way it is, so I'm not attached).
      
      v2: Force a context switch when we have a remap on the next switch.
      (Ville)
      Don't let userspace use the interface with disabled contexts.
      
      v3: Don't force a context switch, just let it nop
      Improper context slice remap initialization, 1<<1 instead of 1<<i, but I
      rewrote it to avoid a second round of confusion.
      Error print moved to error path (All Ville)
      Added a comment on why the slice remap initialization happens.
      
      CC: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      3ccfd19d
    • B
      drm/i915: Keep a list of all contexts · a33afea5
      Ben Widawsky 提交于
      I have implemented this patch before without creating a separate list
      (I'm having trouble finding the links, but the messages ids are:
      <1364942743-6041-2-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net>
      <1365118914-15753-9-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net>)
      
      However, the code is much simpler to just use a list and it makes the
      code from the next patch a lot more pretty.
      
      As you'll see in the next patch, the reason for this is to be able to
      specify when a context needs to get L3 remapping. More details there.
      Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      a33afea5
    • B
      drm/i915: Make l3 remapping use the ring · c3787e2e
      Ben Widawsky 提交于
      Using LRI for setting the remapping registers allows us to stream l3
      remapping information. This is necessary to handle per context remaps as
      we'll see implemented in an upcoming patch.
      
      Using the ring also means we don't need to frob the DOP clock gating
      bits.
      
      v2: Add comment about lack of worry for concurrent register access
      (Daniel)
      Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      [danvet: Bikeshed the comment a bit by doing a s/XXX/Note - there's
      nothing to fix.]
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      c3787e2e
    • B
      drm/i915: Add second slice l3 remapping · 35a85ac6
      Ben Widawsky 提交于
      Certain HSW SKUs have a second bank of L3. This L3 remapping has a
      separate register set, and interrupt from the first "slice". A slice is
      simply a term to define some subset of the GPU's l3 cache. This patch
      implements both the interrupt handler, and ability to communicate with
      userspace about this second slice.
      
      v2:  Remove redundant check about non-existent slice.
      Change warning about interrupts of unknown slices to WARN_ON_ONCE
      Handle the case where we get 2 slice interrupts concurrently, and switch
      the tracking of interrupts to be non-destructive (all Ville)
      Don't enable/mask the second slice parity interrupt for ivb/vlv (even
      though all docs I can find claim it's rsvd) (Ville + Bryan)
      Keep BYT excluded from L3 parity
      
      v3: Fix the slice = ffs to be decremented by one (found by Ville). When
      I initially did my testing on the series, I was using 1-based slice
      counting, so this code was correct. Not sure why my simpler tests that
      I've been running since then didn't pick it up sooner.
      Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      35a85ac6
    • B
      drm/i915: Fix HSW parity test · 1c966dd2
      Ben Widawsky 提交于
      Haswell changed the log registers to be WO, so we can no longer read
      them to determine the programming (which sucks, see later note). For
      now, simply use the cached value, and hope HW doesn't screw us over.
      
      v2: Simplify the logic to avoid an extra !, remove last, and fix the
      buffer offset which broke along the rebase (Ville)
      
      Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57441
      CC: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      1c966dd2
  2. 19 9月, 2013 3 次提交
  3. 18 9月, 2013 1 次提交
    • P
      drm/i915: check for more ASLC interrupts · 507c1a45
      Paulo Zanoni 提交于
      Sometimes I see the "non asle set request??" message on my Haswell
      machine, so I decided to get the spec and see if some bits are missing
      from the mask. We do have some bits missing from the mask, so this
      patch adds them, and the corresponding code to print "unsupported"
      messages just like we do with the other bits we don't support.
      
      But I still see the "non asle set request??" message on my machine :(
      
      Also use the proper ASLC name to indicate the registers we're talking
      about.
      
      v2: - Properly set the new FAILED bits
          - Rename the old FAILED bits
          - Print everything we don't support
      Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      507c1a45
  4. 17 9月, 2013 29 次提交