- 10 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
As of my previous change titled "Btrfs: fix scrub preventing unused block groups from being deleted", the following warning at extent-tree.c:btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() can be hit when we mount the a filesysten with "-o discard": 10263 void btrfs_delete_unused_bgs(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) 10264 { (...) 10405 if (trimming) { 10406 WARN_ON(!list_empty(&block_group->bg_list)); 10407 spin_lock(&trans->transaction->deleted_bgs_lock); 10408 list_move(&block_group->bg_list, 10409 &trans->transaction->deleted_bgs); 10410 spin_unlock(&trans->transaction->deleted_bgs_lock); 10411 btrfs_get_block_group(block_group); 10412 } (...) This happens because scrub can now add back the block group to the list of unused block groups (fs_info->unused_bgs). This is dangerous because we are moving the block group from the unused block groups list to the list of deleted block groups without holding the lock that protects the source list (fs_info->unused_bgs_lock). The following diagram illustrates how this happens: CPU 1 CPU 2 cleaner_kthread() btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() sees bg X in list fs_info->unused_bgs deletes bg X from list fs_info->unused_bgs scrub_enumerate_chunks() searches device tree using its commit root finds device extent for block group X gets block group X from the tree fs_info->block_group_cache_tree (via btrfs_lookup_block_group()) sets bg X to RO (again) scrub_chunk(bg X) sets bg X back to RW mode adds bg X to the list fs_info->unused_bgs again, since it's still unused and currently not in that list sets bg X to RO mode btrfs_remove_chunk(bg X) --> discard is enabled and bg X is in the fs_info->unused_bgs list again so the warning is triggered --> we move it from that list into the transaction's delete_bgs list, but we can have another task currently manipulating the first list (fs_info->unused_bgs) Fix this by using the same lock (fs_info->unused_bgs_lock) to protect both the list of unused block groups and the list of deleted block groups. This makes it safe and there's not much worry for more lock contention, as this lock is seldom used and only the cleaner kthread adds elements to the list of deleted block groups. The warning goes away too, as this was previously an impossible case (and would have been better a BUG_ON/ASSERT) but it's not impossible anymore. Reproduced with fstest btrfs/073 (using MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o discard"). Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
-
- 25 11月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
It's possible to reach a state where the cleaner kthread isn't able to start a transaction to delete an unused block group due to lack of enough free metadata space and due to lack of unallocated device space to allocate a new metadata block group as well. If this happens try to use space from the global block group reserve just like we do for unlink operations, so that we don't reach a permanent state where starting a transaction for filesystem operations (file creation, renames, etc) keeps failing with -ENOSPC. Such an unfortunate state was observed on a machine where over a dozen unused data block groups existed and the cleaner kthread was failing to delete them due to ENOSPC error when attempting to start a transaction, and even running balance with a -dusage=0 filter failed with ENOSPC as well. Also unmounting and mounting again the filesystem didn't help. Allowing the cleaner kthread to use the global block reserve to delete the unused data block groups fixed the problem. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 22 10月, 2015 6 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I want to set some per transaction flags, so instead of adding yet another int lets just convert the current two int indicators to flags and add a flags field for future use. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We have a mechanism to make sure we don't lose updates for ordered extents that were logged in the transaction that is currently running. We add the ordered extent to a transaction list and then the transaction waits on all the ordered extents in that list. However are substantially large file systems this list can be extremely large, and can give us soft lockups, since the ordered extents don't remove themselves from the list when they do complete. To fix this we simply add a counter to the transaction that is incremented any time we have a logged extent that needs to be completed in the current transaction. Then when the ordered extent finally completes it decrements the per transaction counter and wakes up the transaction if we are the last ones. This will eliminate the softlockup. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
As we have the new metadata reservation functions, use them to replace the old btrfs_qgroup_reserve() call for metadata. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Alexandru Moise 提交于
The value of num_items that start_transaction() ultimately always takes is a small one, so a 64 bit integer is overkill. Also change num_items for btrfs_start_transaction() and btrfs_start_transaction_lflush() as well. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Alexandru Moise 提交于
Use memset() to null out the btrfs_delayed_ref_root of btrfs_transaction instead of setting all the members to 0 by hand. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Alexandru Moise 提交于
Just call kmem_cache_zalloc() instead of calling kmem_cache_alloc(). We're just initializing most fields to 0, false and NULL later on _anyway_, so to make the code mode readable and potentially gain a bit of performance (completely untested claim), we should fill our btrfs_trans_handle with zeros on allocation then just initialize those five remaining fields (not counting the list_heads) as normal. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 11 10月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Reduce number of undocumented barriers out there. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
waitqueue_active should be preceded by a barrier, in this function we don't need to call it all the time. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 06 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
Josef ran into a deadlock while a transaction handle was finalizing the creation of its block groups, which produced the following trace: [260445.593112] fio D ffff88022a9df468 0 8924 4518 0x00000084 [260445.593119] ffff88022a9df468 ffffffff81c134c0 ffff880429693c00 ffff88022a9df488 [260445.593126] ffff88022a9e0000 ffff8803490d7b00 ffff8803490d7b18 ffff88022a9df4b0 [260445.593132] ffff8803490d7af8 ffff88022a9df488 ffffffff8175a437 ffff8803490d7b00 [260445.593137] Call Trace: [260445.593145] [<ffffffff8175a437>] schedule+0x37/0x80 [260445.593189] [<ffffffffa0850f37>] btrfs_tree_lock+0xa7/0x1f0 [btrfs] [260445.593197] [<ffffffff810db7c0>] ? prepare_to_wait_event+0xf0/0xf0 [260445.593225] [<ffffffffa07eac44>] btrfs_lock_root_node+0x34/0x50 [btrfs] [260445.593253] [<ffffffffa07eff6b>] btrfs_search_slot+0x88b/0xa00 [btrfs] [260445.593295] [<ffffffffa08389df>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x4f/0x90 [btrfs] [260445.593324] [<ffffffffa07f1a06>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x66/0xc0 [btrfs] [260445.593351] [<ffffffffa07ea94a>] ? btrfs_alloc_path+0x1a/0x20 [btrfs] [260445.593394] [<ffffffffa08403b9>] btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc+0x1c9/0x570 [btrfs] [260445.593427] [<ffffffffa08002ab>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x11b/0x200 [btrfs] [260445.593459] [<ffffffffa0800964>] do_chunk_alloc+0x2a4/0x2e0 [btrfs] [260445.593491] [<ffffffffa0803815>] find_free_extent+0xa55/0xd90 [btrfs] [260445.593524] [<ffffffffa0803c22>] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xd2/0x220 [btrfs] [260445.593532] [<ffffffff8119fe5d>] ? account_page_dirtied+0xdd/0x170 [260445.593564] [<ffffffffa0803e78>] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x108/0x4a0 [btrfs] [260445.593597] [<ffffffffa080c9de>] ? btree_set_page_dirty+0xe/0x10 [btrfs] [260445.593626] [<ffffffffa07eb5cd>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x12d/0x5b0 [btrfs] [260445.593654] [<ffffffffa07ebbff>] btrfs_cow_block+0x11f/0x1c0 [btrfs] [260445.593682] [<ffffffffa07ef8c7>] btrfs_search_slot+0x1e7/0xa00 [btrfs] [260445.593724] [<ffffffffa08389df>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x4f/0x90 [btrfs] [260445.593752] [<ffffffffa07f1a06>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x66/0xc0 [btrfs] [260445.593830] [<ffffffffa07ea94a>] ? btrfs_alloc_path+0x1a/0x20 [btrfs] [260445.593905] [<ffffffffa08403b9>] btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc+0x1c9/0x570 [btrfs] [260445.593946] [<ffffffffa08002ab>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x11b/0x200 [btrfs] [260445.593990] [<ffffffffa0815798>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xa8/0xb40 [btrfs] [260445.594042] [<ffffffffa085abcd>] ? btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x6d/0x80 [btrfs] [260445.594089] [<ffffffffa082bc84>] btrfs_sync_file+0x294/0x350 [btrfs] [260445.594115] [<ffffffff8123e29b>] vfs_fsync_range+0x3b/0xa0 [260445.594133] [<ffffffff81023891>] ? syscall_trace_enter_phase1+0x131/0x180 [260445.594149] [<ffffffff8123e35d>] do_fsync+0x3d/0x70 [260445.594169] [<ffffffff81023bb8>] ? syscall_trace_leave+0xb8/0x110 [260445.594187] [<ffffffff8123e600>] SyS_fsync+0x10/0x20 [260445.594204] [<ffffffff8175de6e>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x71 This happened because the same transaction handle created a large number of block groups and while finalizing their creation (inserting new items and updating existing items in the chunk and device trees) a new metadata extent had to be allocated and no free space was found in the current metadata block groups, which made find_free_extent() attempt to allocate a new block group via do_chunk_alloc(). However at do_chunk_alloc() we ended up allocating a new system chunk too and exceeded the threshold of 2Mb of reserved chunk bytes, which makes do_chunk_alloc() enter the final part of block group creation again (at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups()) and attempt to lock again the root of the chunk tree when it's already write locked by the same task. Similarly we can deadlock on extent tree nodes/leafs if while we are running delayed references we end up creating a new metadata block group in order to allocate a new node/leaf for the extent tree (as part of a CoW operation or growing the tree), as btrfs_create_pending_block_groups inserts items into the extent tree as well. In this case we get the following trace: [14242.773581] fio D ffff880428ca3418 0 3615 3100 0x00000084 [14242.773588] ffff880428ca3418 ffff88042d66b000 ffff88042a03c800 ffff880428ca3438 [14242.773594] ffff880428ca4000 ffff8803e4b20190 ffff8803e4b201a8 ffff880428ca3460 [14242.773600] ffff8803e4b20188 ffff880428ca3438 ffffffff8175a437 ffff8803e4b20190 [14242.773606] Call Trace: [14242.773613] [<ffffffff8175a437>] schedule+0x37/0x80 [14242.773656] [<ffffffffa057ff07>] btrfs_tree_lock+0xa7/0x1f0 [btrfs] [14242.773664] [<ffffffff810db7c0>] ? prepare_to_wait_event+0xf0/0xf0 [14242.773692] [<ffffffffa0519c44>] btrfs_lock_root_node+0x34/0x50 [btrfs] [14242.773720] [<ffffffffa051ef6b>] btrfs_search_slot+0x88b/0xa00 [btrfs] [14242.773750] [<ffffffffa0520a06>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x66/0xc0 [btrfs] [14242.773758] [<ffffffff811ef4a2>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x1d2/0x200 [14242.773786] [<ffffffffa0520ad1>] btrfs_insert_item+0x71/0xf0 [btrfs] [14242.773818] [<ffffffffa052f292>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x102/0x200 [btrfs] [14242.773850] [<ffffffffa052f96e>] do_chunk_alloc+0x2ae/0x2f0 [btrfs] [14242.773934] [<ffffffffa0532825>] find_free_extent+0xa55/0xd90 [btrfs] [14242.773998] [<ffffffffa0532c22>] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xc2/0x1d0 [btrfs] [14242.774041] [<ffffffffa0532e38>] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x108/0x4a0 [btrfs] [14242.774078] [<ffffffffa051a5cd>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x12d/0x5b0 [btrfs] [14242.774118] [<ffffffffa051abff>] btrfs_cow_block+0x11f/0x1c0 [btrfs] [14242.774155] [<ffffffffa051e8c7>] btrfs_search_slot+0x1e7/0xa00 [btrfs] [14242.774194] [<ffffffffa0528021>] ? __btrfs_free_extent.isra.70+0x2e1/0xcb0 [btrfs] [14242.774235] [<ffffffffa0520a06>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x66/0xc0 [btrfs] [14242.774274] [<ffffffffa051994a>] ? btrfs_alloc_path+0x1a/0x20 [btrfs] [14242.774318] [<ffffffffa052c433>] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xbb3/0x1020 [btrfs] [14242.774358] [<ffffffffa052f404>] btrfs_run_delayed_refs.part.78+0x74/0x280 [btrfs] [14242.774391] [<ffffffffa052f627>] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x17/0x20 [btrfs] [14242.774432] [<ffffffffa05be236>] commit_cowonly_roots+0x8d/0x2bd [btrfs] [14242.774474] [<ffffffffa059d07f>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x1cf/0x210 [btrfs] [14242.774516] [<ffffffffa05adac3>] ? btrfs_qgroup_account_extents+0x83/0x130 [btrfs] [14242.774558] [<ffffffffa0544c40>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x590/0xb40 [btrfs] [14242.774599] [<ffffffffa0589b9d>] ? btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x6d/0x80 [btrfs] [14242.774642] [<ffffffffa055ac54>] btrfs_sync_file+0x294/0x350 [btrfs] [14242.774650] [<ffffffff8123e29b>] vfs_fsync_range+0x3b/0xa0 [14242.774657] [<ffffffff81023891>] ? syscall_trace_enter_phase1+0x131/0x180 [14242.774663] [<ffffffff8123e35d>] do_fsync+0x3d/0x70 [14242.774669] [<ffffffff81023bb8>] ? syscall_trace_leave+0xb8/0x110 [14242.774675] [<ffffffff8123e600>] SyS_fsync+0x10/0x20 [14242.774681] [<ffffffff8175de6e>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x71 Fix this by never recursing into the finalization phase of block group creation and making sure we never trigger the finalization of block group creation while running delayed references. Reported-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Fixes: 00d80e34 ("Btrfs: fix quick exhaustion of the system array in the superblock") Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
-
- 29 9月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
btrfs_error() and btrfs_std_error() does the same thing and calls _btrfs_std_error(), so consolidate them together. And the main motivation is that btrfs_error() is closely named with btrfs_err(), one handles error action the other is to log the error, so don't closely name them. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Suggested-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 23 9月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
When dropping a snapshot we need to account for the qgroup changes. If we drop the snapshot in all one go then the backref code will fail to find blocks from the snapshot we dropped since it won't be able to find the root in the fs root cache. This can lead to us failing to find refs from other roots that pointed at blocks in the now deleted root. To handle this we need to not remove the fs roots from the cache until after we process the qgroup operations. Do this by adding dropped roots to a list on the transaction, and letting the transaction remove the roots at the same time it drops the commit roots. This will keep all of the backref searching code in sync properly, and fixes a problem Mark was seeing with snapshot delete and qgroups. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Tested-by: NHolger Hoffstätte <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 20 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
While we are committing a transaction, it's possible the previous one is still finishing its commit and therefore we wait for it to finish first. However we were not checking if that previous transaction ended up getting aborted after we waited for it to commit, so we ended up committing the current transaction which can lead to fs corruption because the new superblock can point to trees that have had one or more nodes/leafs that were never durably persisted. The following sequence diagram exemplifies how this is possible: CPU 0 CPU 1 transaction N starts (...) btrfs_commit_transaction(N) cur_trans->state = TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START; (...) cur_trans->state = TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING; (...) cur_trans->state = TRANS_STATE_UNBLOCKED; root->fs_info->running_transaction = NULL; btrfs_start_transaction() --> starts transaction N + 1 btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction(trans, root); --> starts writing all new or COWed ebs created at transaction N creates some new ebs, COWs some existing ebs but doesn't COW or deletes eb X btrfs_commit_transaction(N + 1) (...) cur_trans->state = TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START; (...) wait_for_commit(root, prev_trans); --> prev_trans == transaction N btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction() continues writing ebs --> fails writing eb X, we abort transaction N and set bit BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR on fs_info->fs_state, so no new transactions can start after setting that bit cleanup_transaction() btrfs_cleanup_one_transaction() wakes up task at CPU 1 continues, doesn't abort because cur_trans->aborted (transaction N + 1) is zero, and no checks for bit BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR in fs_info->fs_state are made btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction(trans, root); --> succeeds, no errors during writeback write_ctree_super(trans, root, 0); --> succeeds --> we have now a superblock that points us to some root that uses eb X, which was never written to disk In this scenario future attempts to read eb X from disk results in an error message like "parent transid verify failed on X wanted Y found Z". So fix this by aborting the current transaction if after waiting for the previous transaction we verify that it was aborted. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 15 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于
Preparation to hide the sb->s_writers internals from xfs and btrfs. Add 2 trivial define's they can use rather than play with ->s_writers directly. No changes in btrfs/transaction.o and xfs/xfs_aops.o. Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.com>
-
- 09 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zhaolei 提交于
These arguments are not used in functions, remove them for cleanup and make kernel stack happy. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 29 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
When we clear the dirty bits in btrfs_delete_unused_bgs for extents in the empty block group, it results in btrfs_finish_extent_commit being unable to discard the freed extents. The block group removal patch added an alternate path to forget extents other than btrfs_finish_extent_commit. As a result, any extents that would be freed when the block group is removed aren't discarded. In my test run, with a large copy of mixed sized files followed by removal, it left nearly 2/3 of extents undiscarded. To clean up the block groups, we add the removed block group onto a list that will be discarded after transaction commit. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 23 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> reported a lockdep warning of delayed_iput_sem in xfstests generic/241: [ 2061.345955] ============================================= [ 2061.346027] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 2061.346027] 4.1.0+ #268 Tainted: G W [ 2061.346027] --------------------------------------------- [ 2061.346027] btrfs-cleaner/3045 is trying to acquire lock: [ 2061.346027] (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff814063ab>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x6b/0x100 [ 2061.346027] but task is already holding lock: [ 2061.346027] (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff814063ab>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x6b/0x100 [ 2061.346027] other info that might help us debug this: [ 2061.346027] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 2061.346027] CPU0 [ 2061.346027] ---- [ 2061.346027] lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem); [ 2061.346027] lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem); [ 2061.346027] *** DEADLOCK *** It is rarely happened, about 1/400 in my test env. The reason is recursion of btrfs_run_delayed_iputs(): cleaner_kthread -> btrfs_run_delayed_iputs() *1 -> get delayed_iput_sem lock *2 -> iput() -> ... -> btrfs_commit_transaction() -> btrfs_run_delayed_iputs() *1 -> get delayed_iput_sem lock (dead lock) *2 *1: recursion of btrfs_run_delayed_iputs() *2: warning of lockdep about delayed_iput_sem When fs is in high stress, new iputs may added into fs_info->delayed_iputs list when btrfs_run_delayed_iputs() is running, which cause second btrfs_run_delayed_iputs() run into down_read(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem) again, and cause above lockdep warning. Actually, it will not cause real problem because both locks are read lock, but to avoid lockdep warning, we can do a fix. Fix: Don't do btrfs_run_delayed_iputs() in btrfs_commit_transaction() for cleaner_kthread thread to break above recursion path. cleaner_kthread is calling btrfs_run_delayed_iputs() explicitly in code, and don't need to call btrfs_run_delayed_iputs() again in btrfs_commit_transaction(), it also give us a bonus to avoid stack overflow. Test: No above lockdep warning after patch in 1200 generic/241 tests. Reported-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 12 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
When we call btrfs_commit_transaction(), we splice the list "ordered" of our transaction handle into the transaction's "pending_ordered" list, but we don't re-initialize the "ordered" list of our transaction handle, this means it still points to the same elements it used to before the splice. Then we check if the current transaction's state is >= TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START and if it is we end up calling btrfs_end_transaction() which simply splices again the "ordered" list of our handle into the transaction's "pending_ordered" list, leaving multiple pointers to the same ordered extents which results in list corruption when we are iterating, removing and freeing ordered extents at btrfs_wait_pending_ordered(), resulting in access to dangling pointers / use-after-free issues. Similarly, btrfs_end_transaction() can end up in some cases calling btrfs_commit_transaction(), and both did a list splice of the transaction handle's "ordered" list into the transaction's "pending_ordered" without re-initializing the handle's "ordered" list, resulting in exactly the same problem. This produces the following warning on a kernel with linked list debugging enabled: [109749.265416] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [109749.266410] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 324 at lib/list_debug.c:59 __list_del_entry+0x5a/0x98() [109749.267969] list_del corruption. prev->next should be ffff8800ba087e20, but was fffffff8c1f7c35d (...) [109749.287505] Call Trace: [109749.288135] [<ffffffff8145f077>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b [109749.298080] [<ffffffff81095de5>] ? console_unlock+0x356/0x3a2 [109749.331605] [<ffffffff8104b3b0>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb [109749.334849] [<ffffffff81260642>] ? __list_del_entry+0x5a/0x98 [109749.337093] [<ffffffff8104b410>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48 [109749.337847] [<ffffffff81260642>] __list_del_entry+0x5a/0x98 [109749.338678] [<ffffffffa053e8bf>] btrfs_wait_pending_ordered+0x46/0xdb [btrfs] [109749.340145] [<ffffffffa058a65f>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x149/0x163 [btrfs] [109749.348313] [<ffffffffa054077d>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x36b/0xa10 [btrfs] [109749.349745] [<ffffffff81087310>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf [109749.350819] [<ffffffffa055370d>] btrfs_sync_file+0x36f/0x3fc [btrfs] [109749.351976] [<ffffffff8118ec98>] vfs_fsync_range+0x8f/0x9e [109749.360341] [<ffffffff8118ecc3>] vfs_fsync+0x1c/0x1e [109749.368828] [<ffffffff8118ee1d>] do_fsync+0x34/0x4e [109749.369790] [<ffffffff8118f045>] SyS_fsync+0x10/0x14 [109749.370925] [<ffffffff81465197>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x6f [109749.382274] ---[ end trace 48e0d07f7c03d95a ]--- On a non-debug kernel this leads to invalid memory accesses, causing a crash. Fix this by using list_splice_init() instead of list_splice() in btrfs_commit_transaction() and btrfs_end_transaction(). Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 50d9aa99 ("Btrfs: make sure logged extents complete in the current transaction V3" Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 11 6月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
qgroup. Make snapshot accounting work with new extent-oriented mechanism by skipping given root in new/old_roots in create_pending_snapshot(). Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
This is used by later qgroup fix patches for snapshot. As current snapshot accounting is done by btrfs_qgroup_inherit(), but new extent oriented quota mechanism will account extent from btrfs_copy_root() and other snapshot things, causing wrong result. So add this ability to handle snapshot accounting. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Switch from old ref_node based qgroup to extent based qgroup mechanism for normal operations. The new mechanism should hugely reduce the overhead of btrfs quota system, and further more, the codes and logic should be more clean and easier to maintain. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Add hook in add_delayed_ref_head() to record quota-related extent record into delayed_ref_root->dirty_extent_record rb-tree for later qgroup accounting. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 03 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
While creating a block group, we often end up getting ENOSPC while updating the chunk tree, which leads to a transaction abortion that produces a trace like the following: [30670.116368] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 20735 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260 __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]() [30670.117777] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28) (...) [30670.163567] Call Trace: [30670.163906] [<ffffffff8142fa46>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b [30670.164522] [<ffffffff8108b6a2>] ? console_unlock+0x361/0x3ad [30670.165171] [<ffffffff81045ea5>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb [30670.166323] [<ffffffffa035daa7>] ? __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs] [30670.167213] [<ffffffff81045f05>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48 [30670.167862] [<ffffffffa035daa7>] __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs] [30670.169116] [<ffffffffa03743d7>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x101/0x130 [btrfs] [30670.170593] [<ffffffffa038426a>] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x84/0x366 [btrfs] [30670.171960] [<ffffffffa038455c>] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x12 [btrfs] [30670.174649] [<ffffffffa036eb6b>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x11f/0x27c [btrfs] [30670.176092] [<ffffffffa039450d>] btrfs_fallocate+0x7c8/0xb96 [btrfs] [30670.177218] [<ffffffff812459f2>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x15 [30670.178622] [<ffffffff81152447>] vfs_fallocate+0x14c/0x1de [30670.179642] [<ffffffff8116b915>] ? __fget_light+0x2d/0x4f [30670.180692] [<ffffffff81152863>] SyS_fallocate+0x47/0x62 [30670.186737] [<ffffffff81435b32>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17 [30670.187792] ---[ end trace 0373e6b491c4a8cc ]--- This is because we don't do proper space reservation for the chunk block reserve when we have multiple tasks allocating chunks in parallel. So block group creation has 2 phases, and the first phase essentially checks if there is enough space in the system space_info, allocating a new system chunk if there isn't, while the second phase updates the device, extent and chunk trees. However, because the updates to the chunk tree happen in the second phase, if we have N tasks, each with its own transaction handle, allocating new chunks in parallel and if there is only enough space in the system space_info to allocate M chunks, where M < N, none of the tasks ends up allocating a new system chunk in the first phase and N - M tasks will get -ENOSPC when attempting to update the chunk tree in phase 2 if they need to COW any nodes/leafs from the chunk tree. Fix this by doing proper reservation in the chunk block reserve. The issue could be reproduced by running fstests generic/038 in a loop, which eventually triggered the problem. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 11 4月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
We loop through all of the dirty block groups during commit and write the free space cache. In order to make sure the cache is currect, we do this while no other writers are allowed in the commit. If a large number of block groups are dirty, this can introduce long stalls during the final stages of the commit, which can block new procs trying to change the filesystem. This commit changes the block group cache writeout to take appropriate locks and allow it to run earlier in the commit. We'll still have to redo some of the block groups, but it means we can get most of the work out of the way without blocking the entire FS. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This changes our delayed refs calculations to include the space needed to write back dirty block groups. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
As we delete large extents, we end up doing huge amounts of COW in order to delete the corresponding crcs. This adds accounting so that we keep track of that space and flushing of delayed refs so that we don't build up too much delayed crc work. This helps limit the delayed work that must be done at commit time and tries to avoid ENOSPC aborts because the crcs eat all the global reserves. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
When we are deleting large files with large extents, we are building up a huge set of delayed refs for processing. Truncate isn't checking often enough to see if we need to back off and process those, or let a commit proceed. The end result is long stalls after the rm, and very long commit times. During the commits, other processes back up waiting to start new transactions and we get into trouble. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 17 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Writing the block group cache will modify the extent tree quite a bit because it truncates the old space cache and pre-allocates new stuff. To try and cut down on the churn lets do the setup dance first, then later on hopefully we can avoid looping with newly dirtied roots. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
- 14 3月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Dave could hit this assert consistently running btrfs/078. This is because when we update the block groups we could truncate the free space, which would try to delete the csums for that range and dirty the csum root. For this to happen we have to have already written out the csum root so it's kind of hard to hit this case. This patch fixes this by changing the logic to only write the dirty block groups if the dirty_cowonly_roots list is empty. This will get us the same effect as before since we add the extent root last, and will cover the case that we dirty some other root again but not the extent root. Thanks, Reported-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
This problem is uncovered by a test case: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/244297. Fsync() can report success when it actually doesn't. When we have several threads running fsync() at the same tiem and in one fsync() we get a transaction abortion due to some problems(in the test case it's disk failures), and other fsync()s may return successfully which makes userspace programs think that data is now safely flushed into disk. It's because that after fsyncs() fail btrfs_sync_log() due to disk failures, they get to try btrfs_commit_transaction() where it finds that there is already a transaction being committed, and they'll just call wait_for_commit() and return. Note that we actually check "trans->aborted" in btrfs_end_transaction, but it's likely that the error message is still not yet throwed out and only after wait_for_commit() we're sure whether the transaction is committed successfully. This add the necessary check and it now passes the test. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 06 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This got added with my dirty_bgs patch, it's not needed. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 04 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Clean the opencoded variant, cond_resched_lock also checks the lock for contention so it might help in some cases that were not covered by simple need_resched(). Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 17 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
There are some op tables that can be easily made const, similarly the sysfs feature and raid tables. This is motivated by PaX CONSTIFY plugin. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 15 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
Btrfs will report NO_SPACE when we create and remove files for several times, and we can't write to filesystem until mount it again. Steps to reproduce: 1: Create a single-dev btrfs fs with default option 2: Write a file into it to take up most fs space 3: Delete above file 4: Wait about 100s to let chunk removed 5: goto 2 Script is like following: #!/bin/bash # Recommend 1.2G space, too large disk will make test slow DEV="/dev/sda16" MNT="/mnt/tmp" dev_size="$(lsblk -bn -o SIZE "$DEV")" || exit 2 file_size_m=$((dev_size * 75 / 100 / 1024 / 1024)) echo "Loop write ${file_size_m}M file on $((dev_size / 1024 / 1024))M dev" for ((i = 0; i < 10; i++)); do umount "$MNT" 2>/dev/null; done echo "mkfs $DEV" mkfs.btrfs -f "$DEV" >/dev/null || exit 2 echo "mount $DEV $MNT" mount "$DEV" "$MNT" || exit 2 for ((loop_i = 0; loop_i < 20; loop_i++)); do echo echo "loop $loop_i" echo "dd file..." cmd=(dd if=/dev/zero of="$MNT"/file0 bs=1M count="$file_size_m") "${cmd[@]}" 2>/dev/null || { # NO_SPACE error triggered echo "dd failed: ${cmd[*]}" exit 1 } echo "rm file..." rm -f "$MNT"/file0 || exit 2 for ((i = 0; i < 10; i++)); do df "$MNT" | tail -1 sleep 10 done done Reason: It is triggered by commit: 47ab2a6c which is used to remove empty block groups automatically, but the reason is not in that patch. Code before works well because btrfs don't need to create and delete chunks so many times with high complexity. Above bug is caused by many reason, any of them can trigger it. Reason1: When we remove some continuous chunks but leave other chunks after, these disk space should be used by chunk-recreating, but in current code, only first create will successed. Fixed by Forrest Liu <forrestl@synology.com> in: Btrfs: fix find_free_dev_extent() malfunction in case device tree has hole Reason2: contains_pending_extent() return wrong value in calculation. Fixed by Forrest Liu <forrestl@synology.com> in: Btrfs: fix find_free_dev_extent() malfunction in case device tree has hole Reason3: btrfs_check_data_free_space() try to commit transaction and retry allocating chunk when the first allocating failed, but space_info->full is set in first allocating, and prevent second allocating in retry. Fixed in this patch by clear space_info->full in commit transaction. Tested for severial times by above script. Changelog v3->v4: use light weight int instead of atomic_t to record have_remove_bgs in transaction, suggested by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Changelog v2->v3: v2 fixed the bug by adding more commit-transaction, but we only need to reclaim space when we are really have no space for new chunk, noticed by: Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Actually, our code already have this type of commit-and-retry, we only need to make it working with removed-bgs. v3 fixed the bug with above way. Changelog v1->v2: v1 will introduce a new bug when delete and create chunk in same disk space in same transaction, noticed by: Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> V2 fix this bug by commit transaction after remove block grops. Reported-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Suggested-by: NFilipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Suggested-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 22 1月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Currently any time we try to update the block groups on disk we will walk _all_ block groups and check for the ->dirty flag to see if it is set. This function can get called several times during a commit. So if you have several terabytes of data you will be a very sad panda as we will loop through _all_ of the block groups several times, which makes the commit take a while which slows down the rest of the file system operations. This patch introduces a dirty list for the block groups that we get added to when we dirty the block group for the first time. Then we simply update any block groups that have been dirtied since the last time we called btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups. This allows us to clean up how we write the free space cache out so it is much cleaner. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I've been overloading root->dirty_list to keep track of dirty roots and which roots need to have their commit roots switched at transaction commit time. This could cause us to lose an update to the root which could corrupt the file system. To fix this use a state bit to know if the root is dirty, and if it isn't set we go ahead and move the root to the dirty list. This way if we re-dirty the root after adding it to the switch_commit list we make sure to update it. This also makes it so that the extent root is always the last root on the dirty list to try and keep the amount of churn down at this point in the commit. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 21 1月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Fs_info->pending_changes is never cleared since the original code uses cmpxchg(&fs_info->pending_changes, 0, 0), which will only clear it if pending_changes is already 0. This will cause a lot of problem when mount it with inode_cache mount option. If the btrfs is mounted as inode_cache, pending_changes will always be 1, even when the fs is frozen. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 22 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Liu Bo pointed out that my previous fix would lose the generation update in the scenario I described. It is actually much worse than that, we could lose the entire extent if we lose power right after the transaction commits. Consider the following write extent 0-4k log extent in log tree commit transaction < power fail happens here ordered extent completes We would lose the 0-4k extent because it hasn't updated the actual fs tree, and the transaction commit will reset the log so it isn't replayed. If we lose power before the transaction commit we are save, otherwise we are not. Fix this by keeping track of all extents we logged in this transaction. Then when we go to commit the transaction make sure we wait for all of those ordered extents to complete before proceeding. This will make sure that if we lose power after the transaction commit we still have our data. This also fixes the problem of the improperly updated extent generation. Thanks, cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 21 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
Right now the only caller of find_first_extent_bit() that is interested in caching extent states (transaction or log commit), never gets an extent state cached. This is because find_first_extent_bit() only caches states that have at least one of the flags EXTENT_IOBITS or EXTENT_BOUNDARY, and the transaction/log commit caller always passes a tree that doesn't have ever extent states with any of those flags (they can only have one of the following flags: EXTENT_DIRTY, EXTENT_NEW or EXTENT_NEED_WAIT). This change together with the following one in the patch series (titled "Btrfs: avoid returning -ENOMEM in convert_extent_bit() too early") will help reduce significantly the chances of calls to convert_extent_bit() fail with -ENOMEM when called from the transaction/log commit code. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-