Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 26 5月, 2017 5 次提交
    • U
      net: phy: put genphy_config_init's EXPORT_SYMBOL directly after the function · a0a32d3a
      由 Uwe Kleine-König 提交于 
      Commit af6b6967 ("net: phy: export genphy_config_init()") introduced
this EXPORT_SYMBOL and put it after gen10g_soft_reset() instead of
directly after genphy_config_init. Probably this happend when the patch
was applied because http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/339622/ looks ok.
Signed-off-by: NUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a0a32d3a
    • E
      tcp: better validation of received ack sequences · d0e1a1b5
      由 Eric Dumazet 提交于 
      Paul Fiterau Brostean reported :

<quote>
Linux TCP stack we analyze exhibits behavior that seems odd to me.
The scenario is as follows (all packets have empty payloads, no window
scaling, rcv/snd window size should not be a factor):

       TEST HARNESS (CLIENT)                        LINUX SERVER

   1.  -                                          LISTEN (server listen,
then accepts)

   2.  - --> <SEQ=100><CTL=SYN>               --> SYN-RECEIVED

   3.  - <-- <SEQ=300><ACK=101><CTL=SYN,ACK>  <-- SYN-RECEIVED

   4.  - --> <SEQ=101><ACK=301><CTL=ACK>      --> ESTABLISHED

   5.  - <-- <SEQ=301><ACK=101><CTL=FIN,ACK>  <-- FIN WAIT-1 (server
opts to close the data connection calling "close" on the connection
socket)

   6.  - --> <SEQ=101><ACK=99999><CTL=FIN,ACK> --> CLOSING (client sends
FIN,ACK with not yet sent acknowledgement number)

   7.  - <-- <SEQ=302><ACK=102><CTL=ACK>      <-- CLOSING (ACK is 102
instead of 101, why?)

... (silence from CLIENT)

   8.  - <-- <SEQ=301><ACK=102><CTL=FIN,ACK>  <-- CLOSING
(retransmission, again ACK is 102)

Now, note that packet 6 while having the expected sequence number,
acknowledges something that wasn't sent by the server. So I would
expect
the packet to maybe prompt an ACK response from the server, and then be
ignored. Yet it is not ignored and actually leads to an increase of the
acknowledgement number in the server's retransmission of the FIN,ACK
packet. The explanation I found is that the FIN  in packet 6 was
processed, despite the acknowledgement number being unacceptable.
Further experiments indeed show that the server processes this FIN,
transitioning to CLOSING, then on receiving an ACK for the FIN it had
send in packet 5, the server (or better said connection) transitions
from CLOSING to TIME_WAIT (as signaled by netstat).

</quote>

Indeed, tcp_rcv_state_process() calls tcp_ack() but
does not exploit the @acceptable status but for TCP_SYN_RECV
state.

What we want here is to send a challenge ACK, if not in TCP_SYN_RECV
state. TCP_FIN_WAIT1 state is not the only state we should fix.

Add a FLAG_NO_CHALLENGE_ACK so that tcp_rcv_state_process()
can choose to send a challenge ACK and discard the packet instead
of wrongly change socket state.

With help from Neal Cardwell.
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: NPaul Fiterau Brostean <p.fiterau-brostean@science.ru.nl>
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Cc: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      d0e1a1b5
    • W
      net_sched: only create filter chains for new filters/actions · 367a8ce8
      由 WANG Cong 提交于 
      tcf_chain_get() always creates a new filter chain if not found
in existing ones. This is totally unnecessary when we get or
delete filters, new chain should be only created for new filters
(or new actions).

Fixes: 5bc17018 ("net: sched: introduce multichain support for filters")
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      367a8ce8
    • J
      net: sched: cls_api: make reclassify return all the way back to the original tp · ee538dce
      由 Jiri Pirko 提交于 
      With the introduction of chain goto action, the reclassification would
cause the re-iteration of the actual chain. It makes more sense to restart
the whole thing and re-iterate starting from the original tp - start
of chain 0.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: NSimon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      ee538dce
    • D
      Merge tag 'mlx5-update-2017-05-23' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux · abc7a4ef
      由 David S. Miller 提交于 
      Saeed Mahameed says:

====================
mlx5-update-2017-05-23

First patch from Leon, came to remove the redundant usage of mlx5_vzalloc,
and directly use kvzalloc across all mlx5 drivers.

2nd patch from Noa, adds new device IDs into the supported devices list.

3rd and 4th patches from Ilan are adding the basic infrastructure and
support for Mellanox's mlx5 FPGA.

Last two patches from Tariq came to modify the outdated driver version
reported in ethtool and in mlx5_ib to more reflect the current driver state
and remove the redundant date string reported in the version.
====================
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      abc7a4ef
  3. 25 5月, 2017 20 次提交
  5. 23 5月, 2017 15 次提交