- 26 10月, 2010 5 次提交
-
-
由 Nick Piggin 提交于
The use of the same inode list structure (inode->i_list) for two different list constructs with different lifecycles and purposes makes it impossible to separate the locking of the different operations. Therefore, to enable the separation of the locking of the writeback and reclaim lists, split the inode->i_list into two separate lists dedicated to their specific tracking functions. Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Nick Piggin 提交于
Convert the inode LRU to use lazy updates to reduce lock and cacheline traffic. We avoid moving inodes around in the LRU list during iget/iput operations so these frequent operations don't need to access the LRUs. Instead, we defer the refcount checks to reclaim-time and use a per-inode state flag, I_REFERENCED, to tell reclaim that iget has touched the inode in the past. This means that only reclaim should be touching the LRU with any frequency, hence significantly reducing lock acquisitions and the amount contention on LRU updates. This also removes the inode_in_use list, which means we now only have one list for tracking the inode LRU status. This makes it much simpler to split out the LRU list operations under it's own lock. Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Dave Chinner 提交于
The number of inodes allocated does not need to be tied to the addition or removal of an inode to/from a list. If we are not tied to a list lock, we could update the counters when inodes are initialised or destroyed, but to do that we need to convert the counters to be per-cpu (i.e. independent of a lock). This means that we have the freedom to change the list/locking implementation without needing to care about the counters. Based on a patch originally from Eric Dumazet. [AV: cleaned up a bit, fixed build breakage on weird configs Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
note: for race-free uses you inode_lock held Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Add a new helper to write out the inode using the writeback code, that is including the correct dirty bit and list manipulation. A few of filesystems already opencode this, and a lot of others should be using it instead of using write_inode_now which also writes out the data. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 04 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
We currently use struct backing_dev_info for various different purposes. Originally it was introduced to describe a backing device which includes an unplug and congestion function and various bits of readahead information and VM-relevant flags. We're also using for tracking dirty inodes for writeback. To make writeback properly find all inodes we need to only access the per-filesystem backing_device pointed to by the superblock in ->s_bdi inside the writeback code, and not the instances pointeded to by inode->i_mapping->backing_dev which can be overriden by special devices or might not be set at all by some filesystems. Long term we should split out the writeback-relevant bits of struct backing_device_info (which includes more than the current bdi_writeback) and only point to it from the superblock while leaving the traditional backing device as a separate structure that can be overriden by devices. The one exception for now is the block device filesystem which really wants different writeback contexts for it's different (internal) inodes to handle the writeout more efficiently. For now we do this with a hack in fs-writeback.c because we're so late in the cycle, but in the future I plan to replace this with a superblock method that allows for multiple writeback contexts per filesystem. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
- 22 9月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Inodes of devices such as /dev/zero can get dirty for example via utime(2) syscall or due to atime update. Backing device of such inodes (zero_bdi, etc.) is however unable to handle dirty inodes and thus __mark_inode_dirty complains. In fact, inode should be rather dirtied against backing device of the filesystem holding it. This is generally a good rule except for filesystems such as 'bdev' or 'mtd_inodefs'. Inodes in these pseudofilesystems are referenced from ordinary filesystem inodes and carry mapping with real data of the device. Thus for these inodes we have to use inode->i_mapping->backing_dev_info as we did so far. We distinguish these filesystems by checking whether sb->s_bdi points to a non-trivial backing device or not. Example: Assume we have an ext3 filesystem on /dev/sda1 mounted on /. There's a device inode A described by a path "/dev/sdb" on this filesystem. This inode will be dirtied against backing device "8:0" after this patch. bdev filesystem contains block device inode B coupled with our inode A. When someone modifies a page of /dev/sdb, it's B that gets dirtied and the dirtying happens against the backing device "8:16". Thus both inodes get filed to a correct bdi list. Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
- 28 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Setting the task state here may cause us to miss the wake up from kthread_stop(), so we need to recheck kthread_should_stop() or risk sleeping forever in the following schedule(). Symptom was an indefinite hang on an NFSv4 mount. (NFSv4 may create multiple mounts in a temporary namespace while traversing the mount path, and since the temporary namespace is immediately destroyed, it may end up destroying a mount very soon after it was created, possibly making this race more likely.) INFO: task mount.nfs4:4314 blocked for more than 120 seconds. "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. mount.nfs4 D 0000000000000000 2880 4314 4313 0x00000000 ffff88001ed6da28 0000000000000046 ffff88001ed6dfd8 ffff88001ed6dfd8 ffff88001ed6c000 ffff88001ed6c000 ffff88001ed6c000 ffff88001e5003a0 ffff88001ed6dfd8 ffff88001e5003a8 ffff88001ed6c000 ffff88001ed6dfd8 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8196090d>] schedule_timeout+0x1cd/0x2e0 [<ffffffff8106a31c>] ? mark_held_locks+0x6c/0xa0 [<ffffffff819639a0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x60 [<ffffffff8106a5fd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14d/0x190 [<ffffffff819671fe>] ? sub_preempt_count+0xe/0xd0 [<ffffffff8195fc80>] wait_for_common+0x120/0x190 [<ffffffff81033c70>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x20 [<ffffffff8195fdcd>] wait_for_completion+0x1d/0x20 [<ffffffff810595fa>] kthread_stop+0x4a/0x150 [<ffffffff81061a60>] ? thaw_process+0x70/0x80 [<ffffffff810cc68a>] bdi_unregister+0x10a/0x1a0 [<ffffffff81229dc9>] nfs_put_super+0x19/0x20 [<ffffffff810ee8c4>] generic_shutdown_super+0x54/0xe0 [<ffffffff810ee9b6>] kill_anon_super+0x16/0x60 [<ffffffff8122d3b9>] nfs4_kill_super+0x39/0x90 [<ffffffff810eda45>] deactivate_locked_super+0x45/0x60 [<ffffffff810edfb9>] deactivate_super+0x49/0x70 [<ffffffff81108294>] mntput_no_expire+0x84/0xe0 [<ffffffff811084ef>] release_mounts+0x9f/0xc0 [<ffffffff81108575>] put_mnt_ns+0x65/0x80 [<ffffffff8122cc56>] nfs_follow_remote_path+0x1e6/0x420 [<ffffffff8122cfbf>] nfs4_try_mount+0x6f/0xd0 [<ffffffff8122d0c2>] nfs4_get_sb+0xa2/0x360 [<ffffffff810edcb8>] vfs_kern_mount+0x88/0x1f0 [<ffffffff810ede92>] do_kern_mount+0x52/0x130 [<ffffffff81963d9a>] ? _lock_kernel+0x6a/0x170 [<ffffffff81108e9e>] do_mount+0x26e/0x7f0 [<ffffffff81106b3a>] ? copy_mount_options+0xea/0x190 [<ffffffff811094b8>] sys_mount+0x98/0xf0 [<ffffffff810024d8>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b 1 lock held by mount.nfs4/4314: #0: (&type->s_umount_key#24){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff810edfb1>] deactivate_super+0x41/0x70 Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com> Acked-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
- 12 8月, 2010 5 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Commit 83ba7b07 ("writeback: simplify the write back thread queue") broke writeback_in_progress() as in that commit we started to remove work items from the list at the moment we start working on them and not at the moment they are finished. Thus if the flusher thread was doing some work but there was no other work queued, writeback_in_progress() returned false. This could in particular cause unnecessary queueing of background writeback from balance_dirty_pages() or writeout work from writeback_sb_if_idle(). This patch fixes the problem by introducing a bit in the bdi state which indicates that the flusher thread is processing some work and uses this bit for writeback_in_progress() test. NOTE: Both callsites of writeback_in_progress() (namely, writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle() and balance_dirty_pages()) would actually need a different information than what writeback_in_progress() provides. They would need to know whether *the kind of writeback they are going to submit* is already queued. But this information isn't that simple to provide so let's fix writeback_in_progress() for the time being. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Acked-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
Unify the logic for kupdate and non-kupdate cases. There won't be starvation because the inodes requeued into b_more_io will later be spliced _after_ the remaining inodes in b_io, hence won't stand in the way of other inodes in the next run. It avoids unnecessary redirty_tail() calls, hence the update of i_dirtied_when. The timestamp update is undesirable because it could later delay the inode's periodic writeback, or may exclude the inode from the data integrity sync operation (which checks timestamp to avoid extra work and livelock). === How the redirty_tail() comes about: It was a long story.. This redirty_tail() was introduced with wbc.more_io. The initial patch for more_io actually does not have the redirty_tail(), and when it's merged, several 100% iowait bug reports arised: reiserfs: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/23/93 jfs: commit 29a424f2 JFS: clear PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY for no-write pages ext2: http://www.spinics.net/linux/lists/linux-ext4/msg04762.html They are all old bugs hidden in various filesystems that become "visible" with the more_io patch. At the time, the ext2 bug is thought to be "trivial", so not fixed. Instead the following updated more_io patch with redirty_tail() is merged: http://www.spinics.net/linux/lists/linux-ext4/msg04507.html This will in general prevent 100% on ext2 and possibly other unknown FS bugs. Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com> Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
This was not a bug, since b_io is empty for kupdate writeback. The next patch will do requeue_io() for non-kupdate writeback, so let's fix it. Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com> Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
Avoid delaying writeback for an expire inode with lots of dirty pages, but no active dirtier at the moment. Previously we only do that for the kupdate case. Any filesystem that does delayed allocation or unwritten extent conversion after IO completion will cause this - for example, XFS. Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
Split get_dirty_limits() into global_dirty_limits()+bdi_dirty_limit(), so that the latter can be avoided when under global dirty background threshold (which is the normal state for most systems). Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 10 8月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
WB_SYNC_NONE writeback is done in rounds of 1024 pages so that we don't write out some huge inode for too long while starving writeout of other inodes. To avoid livelocks, we record time we started writeback in wbc->wb_start and do not write out inodes which were dirtied after this time. But currently, writeback_inodes_wb() resets wb_start each time it is called thus effectively invalidating this logic and making any WB_SYNC_NONE writeback prone to livelocks. This patch makes sure wb_start is set only once when we start writeback. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
add I_CLEAR instead of replacing I_FREEING with it. I_CLEAR is equivalent to I_FREEING for almost all code looking at either; it's there to keep track of having called clear_inode() exactly once per inode lifetime, at some point after having set I_FREEING. I_CLEAR and I_FREEING never get set at the same time with the current code, so we can switch to setting i_flags to I_FREEING | I_CLEAR instead of I_CLEAR without loss of information. As the result of such change, checks become simpler and the amount of code that needs to know about I_CLEAR shrinks a lot. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 08 8月, 2010 12 次提交
-
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Whe the first inode for a bdi is marked dirty, we wake up the bdi thread which should take care of the periodic background write-out. However, the write-out will actually start only 'dirty_writeback_interval' centisecs later, so we can delay the wake-up. This change was requested by Nick Piggin who pointed out that if we delay the wake-up, we weed out 2 unnecessary contex switches, which matters because '__mark_inode_dirty()' is a hot-path function. This patch introduces a new function - 'bdi_wakeup_thread_delayed()', which sets up a timer to wake-up the bdi thread and returns. So the wake-up is delayed. We also delete the timer in bdi threads just before writing-back. And synchronously delete it when unregistering bdi. At the unregister point the bdi does not have any users, so no one can arm it again. Since now we take 'bdi->wb_lock' in the timer, which can execute in softirq context, we have to use 'spin_lock_bh()' for 'bdi->wb_lock'. This patch makes this change as well. This patch also moves the 'bdi_wb_init()' function down in the file to avoid forward-declaration of 'bdi_wakeup_thread_delayed()'. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Finally, we can get rid of unnecessary wake-ups in bdi threads, which are very bad for battery-driven devices. There are two types of activities bdi threads do: 1. process bdi works from the 'bdi->work_list' 2. periodic write-back So there are 2 sources of wake-up events for bdi threads: 1. 'bdi_queue_work()' - submits bdi works 2. '__mark_inode_dirty()' - adds dirty I/O to bdi's The former already has bdi wake-up code. The latter does not, and this patch adds it. '__mark_inode_dirty()' is hot-path function, but this patch adds another 'spin_lock(&bdi->wb_lock)' there. However, it is taken only in rare cases when the bdi has no dirty inodes. So adding this spinlock should be fine and should not affect performance. This patch makes sure bdi threads and the forker thread do not wake-up if there is nothing to do. The forker thread will nevertheless wake up at least every 5 min. to check whether it has to kill a bdi thread. This can also be optimized, but is not worth it. This patch also tidies up the warning about unregistered bid, and turns it from an ugly crocodile to a simple 'WARN()' statement. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Currently, bdi threads can decide to exit if there were no useful activities for 5 minutes. However, this causes nasty races: we can easily oops in the 'bdi_queue_work()' if the bdi thread decides to exit while we are waking it up. And even if we do not oops, but the bdi tread exits immediately after we wake it up, we'd lose the wake-up event and have an unnecessary delay (up to 5 secs) in the bdi work processing. This patch makes the forker thread to be the central place which not only creates bdi threads, but also kills them if they were inactive long enough. This better design-wise. Another reason why this change was done is to prepare for the further changes which will prevent the bdi threads from waking up every 5 sec and wasting power. Indeed, when the task does not wake up periodically anymore, it won't be able to exit either. This patch also moves the the 'wake_up_bit()' call from the bdi thread to the forker thread as well. So now the forker thread sets the BDI_pending bit, then forks the task or kills it, then clears the bit and wakes up the waiting process. The only process which may wain on the bit is 'bdi_wb_shutdown()'. This function was changed as well - now it first removes the bdi from the 'bdi_list', then waits on the 'BDI_pending' bit. Once it wakes up, it is guaranteed that the forker thread won't race with it, because the bdi is not visible. Note, the forker thread sets the 'BDI_pending' bit under the 'bdi->wb_lock' which is essential for proper serialization. And additionally, when we change 'bdi->wb.task', we now take the 'bdi->work_lock', to make sure that we do not lose wake-ups which we otherwise would when raced with, say, 'bdi_queue_work()'. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Currently bdi threads use local variable 'last_active' which stores last time when the bdi thread did some useful work. Move this local variable to 'struct bdi_writeback'. This is just a preparation for the further patches which will make the forker thread decide when bdi threads should be killed. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
The forker thread removes bdis from 'bdi_list' before forking the bdi thread. But this is wrong for at least 2 reasons. Reason #1: if we temporary remove a bdi from the list, we may miss works which would otherwise be given to us. Reason #2: this is racy; indeed, 'bdi_wb_shutdown()' expects that bdis are always in the 'bdi_list' (see 'bdi_remove_from_list()'), and when it races with the forker thread, it can shut down the bdi thread at the same time as the forker creates it. This patch makes sure the forker thread never removes bdis from 'bdi_list' (which was suggested by Christoph Hellwig). In order to make sure that we do not race with 'bdi_wb_shutdown()', we have to hold the 'bdi_lock' while walking the 'bdi_list' and setting the 'BDI_pending' flag. NOTE! The error path is interesting. Currently, when we fail to create a bdi thread, we move the bdi to the tail of 'bdi_list'. But if we never remove the bdi from the list, we cannot move it to the tail either, because then we can mess up the RCU readers which walk the list. And also, we'll have the race described above in "Reason #2". But I not think that adding to the tail is any important so I just do not do that. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Currently, bdi threads ('bdi_writeback_thread()') can lose wake-ups. For example, if 'bdi_queue_work()' is executed after the bdi thread have had finished 'wb_do_writeback()' but before it called 'schedule_timeout_interruptible()'. To fix this issue, we have to check whether we have works to process after we have changed the task state to 'TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE'. This patch also clean-ups handling of the cases when 'dirty_writeback_interval' is zero or non-zero. Additionally, this patch also removes unneeded 'list_empty_careful()' call. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
The write-back code mixes words "thread" and "task" for the same things. This is not a big deal, but still an inconsistency. hch: a convention I tend to use and I've seen in various places is to always use _task for the storage of the task_struct pointer, and thread everywhere else. This especially helps with having foo_thread for the actual thread and foo_task for a global variable keeping the task_struct pointer This patch renames: * 'bdi_add_default_flusher_task()' -> 'bdi_add_default_flusher_thread()' * 'bdi_forker_task()' -> 'bdi_forker_thread()' because bdi threads are 'bdi_writeback_thread()', so these names are more consistent. This patch also amends commentaries and makes them refer the forker and bdi threads as "thread", not "task". Also, while on it, make 'bdi_add_default_flusher_thread()' declaration use 'static void' instead of 'void static' and make checkpatch.pl happy. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
由 Minchan Kim 提交于
83ba7b07 cleans up the writeback. So we don't use wb any more in get_next_work_item. Let's remove unnecessary argument. CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
由 Dave Chinner 提交于
Tracing high level background writeback events is good, but it doesn't give the entire picture. Add visibility into write throttling to catch IO dispatched by foreground throttling of processing dirtying lots of pages. Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
由 Dave Chinner 提交于
Trace queue/sched/exec parts of the writeback loop. This provides insight into when and why flusher threads are scheduled to run. e.g a sync invocation leaves traces like: sync-[...]: writeback_queue: bdi 8:0: sb_dev 8:1 nr_pages=7712 sync_mode=0 kupdate=0 range_cyclic=0 background=0 flush-8:0-[...]: writeback_exec: bdi 8:0: sb_dev 8:1 nr_pages=7712 sync_mode=0 kupdate=0 range_cyclic=0 background=0 This also lays the foundation for adding more writeback tracing to provide deeper insight into the whole writeback path. The original tracing code is from Jens Axboe, though this version is a rewrite as a result of the code being traced changing significantly. Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Move all code for the writeback thread into fs/fs-writeback.c instead of splitting it over two functions in two files. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
The wb_list member of struct backing_device_info always has exactly one element. Just use the direct bdi->wb pointer instead and simplify some code. Also remove bdi_task_init which is now trivial to prepare for the next patch. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
- 06 7月, 2010 3 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
First remove items from work_list as soon as we start working on them. This means we don't have to track any pending or visited state and can get rid of all the RCU magic freeing the work items - we can simply free them once the operation has finished. Second use a real completion for tracking synchronous requests - if the caller sets the completion pointer we complete it, otherwise use it as a boolean indicator that we can free the work item directly. Third unify struct wb_writeback_args and struct bdi_work into a single data structure, wb_writeback_work. Previous we set all parameters into a struct wb_writeback_args, copied it into struct bdi_work, copied it again on the stack to use it there. Instead of just allocate one structure dynamically or on the stack and use it all the way through the stack. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
The case where we have a superblock doesn't require a loop here as we scan over all inodes in writeback_sb_inodes. Split it out into a separate helper to make the code simpler. This also allows to get rid of the sb member in struct writeback_control, which was rather out of place there. Also update the comments in writeback_sb_inodes that explain the handling of inodes from wrong superblocks. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
This was just an odd wrapper around writeback_inodes_wb. Removing this also allows to get rid of the bdi member of struct writeback_control which was rather out of place there. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
- 01 7月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Randy Dunlap 提交于
Fix kernel-doc to match the function's changed args. Warning(fs/fs-writeback.c:190): No description found for parameter 'args' Warning(fs/fs-writeback.c:190): Excess function parameter 'sb' description in 'bdi_queue_work_onstack' Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
- 15 6月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Remove all rcu head inits. We don't care about the RCU head state before passing it to call_rcu() anyway. Only leave the "on_stack" variants so debugobjects can keep track of objects on stack. Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NMathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andries Brouwer <aeb@cwi.nl>
-
- 11 6月, 2010 8 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
We need to check for s_instances to make sure we don't bother working against a filesystem that is beeing unmounted, and we need to call put_super to make sure a superblock is freed when we race against umount. Also no need to keep sb_lock after we got a reference on it. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
In "writeback: fix writeback_inodes_wb from writeback_inodes_sb" I accidentally removed the requeue_io if we need to skip a superblock because we can't pin it. Add it back, otherwise we're getting spurious lockups after multiple xfstests runs. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
bdi_start_writeback now never gets a superblock passed, so we can just remove that case. And to further untangle the code and flatten the call stack split it into two trivial helpers for it's two callers. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
bdi_writeback_all only has one caller, so fold it to simplify the code and flatten the call stack. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
When we call writeback_inodes_wb from writeback_inodes_sb we always have s_umount held, which currently makes the whole operation a no-op. But if we are called to write out inodes for a specific superblock we always have s_umount held, so replace the incorrect logic checking for WB_SYNC_ALL which only worked by coincidence with the proper check for an explicit superblock argument. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Make sure that not only sync_filesystem but all callers of writeback_inodes_sb have the superblock protected against remount. As-is this disables all functionality for these callers, but the next patch relies on this locking to fix writeback_inodes_sb for sync_filesystem. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
If we want to rely on s_umount in the caller we need to wait for completion of the I/O submission before returning to the caller. Refactor bdi_sync_writeback into a bdi_queue_work_onstack helper and use it for this case. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
The code dealing with bdi_work->state and completion of a bdi_work is a major mess currently. This patch makes sure we directly use one set of flags to deal with it, and use it consistently, which means: - always notify about completion from the rcu callback. We only ever wait for it from on-stack callers, so this simplification does not even cause a theoretical slowdown currently. It also makes sure we don't miss out on the notification if we ever add other callers to wait for it. - make earlier completion notification depending on the on-stack allocation, not the sync mode. If we introduce new callers that want to do WB_SYNC_NONE writeback from on-stack callers this will be nessecary. Also rename bdi_wait_on_work_clear to bdi_wait_on_work_done and inline a few small functions into their only caller to make the code understandable. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
-