1. 11 4月, 2006 1 次提交
    • J
      [PATCH] splice: add support for sys_tee() · 70524490
      Jens Axboe 提交于
      Basically an in-kernel implementation of tee, which uses splice and the
      pipe buffers as an intelligent way to pass data around by reference.
      
      Where the user space tee consumes the input and produces a stdout and
      file output, this syscall merely duplicates the data inside a pipe to
      another pipe. No data is copied, the output just grabs a reference to the
      input pipe data.
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
      70524490
  2. 03 4月, 2006 1 次提交
  3. 01 4月, 2006 1 次提交
  4. 08 3月, 2006 1 次提交
    • P
      powerpc: Fix various syscall/signal/swapcontext bugs · 1bd79336
      Paul Mackerras 提交于
      A careful reading of the recent changes to the system call entry/exit
      paths revealed several problems, plus some things that could be
      simplified and improved:
      
      * 32-bit wasn't testing the _TIF_NOERROR bit in the syscall fast exit
        path, so it was only doing anything with it once it saw some other
        bit being set.  In other words, the noerror behaviour would apply to
        the next system call where we had to reschedule or deliver a signal,
        which is not necessarily the current system call.
      
      * 32-bit wasn't doing the call to ptrace_notify in the syscall exit
        path when the _TIF_SINGLESTEP bit was set.
      
      * _TIF_RESTOREALL was in both _TIF_USER_WORK_MASK and
        _TIF_PERSYSCALL_MASK, which is odd since _TIF_RESTOREALL is only set
        by system calls.  I took it out of _TIF_USER_WORK_MASK.
      
      * On 64-bit, _TIF_RESTOREALL wasn't causing the non-volatile registers
        to be restored (unless perhaps a signal was delivered or the syscall
        was traced or single-stepped).  Thus the non-volatile registers
        weren't restored on exit from a signal handler.  We probably got
        away with it mostly because signal handlers written in C wouldn't
        alter the non-volatile registers.
      
      * On 32-bit I simplified the code and made it more like 64-bit by
        making the syscall exit path jump to ret_from_except to handle
        preemption and signal delivery.
      
      * 32-bit was calling do_signal unnecessarily when _TIF_RESTOREALL was
        set - but I think because of that 32-bit was actually restoring the
        non-volatile registers on exit from a signal handler.
      
      * I changed the order of enabling interrupts and saving the
        non-volatile registers before calling do_syscall_trace_leave; now we
        enable interrupts first.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      1bd79336
  5. 10 2月, 2006 2 次提交
  6. 19 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  7. 11 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  8. 10 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  9. 09 1月, 2006 3 次提交
    • A
      [PATCH] ppc64: fix time syscall · 002ec58e
      Anton Blanchard 提交于
      ppc64 has its own version of sys_time. It looks pretty scary, touching
      a whole bunch of variables without any locking or memory ordering.
      
      In fact, a recent bugreport has shown it can actually go backwards. Time
      to remove it and just use the generic sys_time, which is implemented on
      top of do_gettimeofday.
      Signed-off-by: NAnton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      002ec58e
    • A
      [PATCH] spufs: The SPU file system, base · 67207b96
      Arnd Bergmann 提交于
      This is the current version of the spu file system, used
      for driving SPEs on the Cell Broadband Engine.
      
      This release is almost identical to the version for the
      2.6.14 kernel posted earlier, which is available as part
      of the Cell BE Linux distribution from
      http://www.bsc.es/projects/deepcomputing/linuxoncell/.
      
      The first patch provides all the interfaces for running
      spu application, but does not have any support for
      debugging SPU tasks or for scheduling. Both these
      functionalities are added in the subsequent patches.
      
      See Documentation/filesystems/spufs.txt on how to use
      spufs.
      Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arndb@de.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      67207b96
    • D
      [PATCH] syscall entry/exit revamp · 401d1f02
      David Woodhouse 提交于
      This cleanup patch speeds up the null syscall path on ppc64 by about 3%,
      and brings the ppc32 and ppc64 code slightly closer together.
      
      The ppc64 code was checking current_thread_info()->flags twice in the
      syscall exit path; once for TIF_SYSCALL_T_OR_A before disabling
      interrupts, and then again for TIF_SIGPENDING|TIF_NEED_RESCHED etc after
      disabling interrupts. Now we do the same as ppc32 -- check the flags
      only once in the fast path, and re-enable interrupts if necessary in the
      ptrace case.
      
      The patch abolishes the 'syscall_noerror' member of struct thread_info
      and replaces it with a TIF_NOERROR bit in the flags, which is handled in
      the slow path. This shortens the syscall entry code, which no longer
      needs to clear syscall_noerror.
      
      The patch adds a TIF_SAVE_NVGPRS flag which causes the syscall exit slow
      path to save the non-volatile GPRs into a signal frame. This removes the
      need for the assembly wrappers around sys_sigsuspend(),
      sys_rt_sigsuspend(), et al which existed solely to save those registers
      in advance. It also means I don't have to add new wrappers for ppoll()
      and pselect(), which is what I was supposed to be doing when I got
      distracted into this...
      
      Finally, it unifies the ppc64 and ppc32 methods of handling syscall exit
      directly into a signal handler (as required by sigsuspend et al) by
      introducing a TIF_RESTOREALL flag which causes _all_ the registers to be
      reloaded from the pt_regs by taking the ret_from_exception path, instead
      of the normal syscall exit path which stomps on the callee-saved GPRs.
      
      It appears to pass an LTP test run on ppc64, and passes basic testing on
      ppc32 too. Brief tests of ptrace functionality with strace and gdb also
      appear OK. I wouldn't send it to Linus for 2.6.15 just yet though :)
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      401d1f02
  10. 18 10月, 2005 2 次提交
  11. 17 10月, 2005 1 次提交
  12. 10 10月, 2005 1 次提交