1. 18 5月, 2012 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / PCI / PM: Fix device PM regression related to D3hot/D3cold · 5c7dd710
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Commit 1cc0c998 ("ACPI: Fix D3hot v D3cold confusion") introduced a
      bug in __acpi_bus_set_power() and changed the behavior of
      acpi_pci_set_power_state() in such a way that it generally doesn't work
      as expected if PCI_D3hot is passed to it as the second argument.
      
      First off, if ACPI_STATE_D3 (equal to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD) is passed to
      __acpi_bus_set_power() and the explicit_set flag is set for the D3cold
      state, the function will try to execute AML method called "_PS4", which
      doesn't exist.
      
      Fix this by adding a check to ensure that the name of the AML method
      to execute for transitions to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD is correct in
      __acpi_bus_set_power().  Also make sure that the explicit_set flag
      for ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD will be set if _PS3 is present and modify
      acpi_power_transition() to avoid accessing power resources for
      ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD, because they don't exist.
      
      Second, if PCI_D3hot is passed to acpi_pci_set_power_state() as the
      target state, the function will request a transition to
      ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT instead of ACPI_STATE_D3.  However,
      ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT is now only marked as supported if the _PR3 AML
      method is defined for the given device, which is rare.  This causes
      problems to happen on systems where devices were successfully put
      into ACPI D3 by pci_set_power_state(PCI_D3hot) which doesn't work
      now.  In particular, some unused graphics adapters are not turned
      off as a result.
      
      To fix this issue restore the old behavior of
      acpi_pci_set_power_state(), which is to request a transition to
      ACPI_STATE_D3 (equal to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD) if either PCI_D3hot or
      PCI_D3cold is passed to it as the argument.
      
      This approach is not ideal, because generally power should not
      be removed from devices if PCI_D3hot is the target power state,
      but since this behavior is relied on, we have no choice but to
      restore it at the moment and spend more time on designing a
      better solution in the future.
      
      References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43228Reported-by: Nrocko <rockorequin@hotmail.com>
      Reported-by: NCristian Rodríguez <crrodriguez@opensuse.org>
      Reported-and-tested-by: NPeter <lekensteyn@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      5c7dd710
  2. 05 5月, 2012 1 次提交
    • L
      ACPI: Fix D3hot v D3cold confusion · 1cc0c998
      Lin Ming 提交于
      Before this patch, ACPI_STATE_D3 incorrectly referenced D3hot
      in some places, but D3cold in other places.
      
      After this patch, ACPI_STATE_D3 always means ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD;
      and all references to D3hot use ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT.
      
      ACPI's _PR3 method is used to enter both D3hot and D3cold states.
      What distinguishes D3hot from D3cold is the presence _PR3
      (Power Resources for D3hot)  If these resources are all ON,
      then the state is D3hot.  If _PR3 is not present,
      or all _PR0 resources for the devices are OFF,
      then the state is D3cold.
      
      This patch applies after Linux-3.4-rc1.
      A future syntax cleanup may remove ACPI_STATE_D3
      to emphasize that it always means ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD.
      Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Reviewed-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@amd.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      1cc0c998
  3. 30 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  4. 07 1月, 2012 2 次提交
    • R
      PCI/ACPI/PM: Avoid resuming devices that don't signal PME · 4716a450
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Modify pci_acpi_wake_dev() to avoid resuming PME-capable devices
      whose PME Status bits are not set, which may happen currently if
      several devices are associated with the same wakeup GPE and all
      of them are notified whenever at least one of them signals PME.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      4716a450
    • M
      PCI: Rework ASPM disable code · 10f6dc7e
      Matthew Garrett 提交于
      Right now we forcibly clear ASPM state on all devices if the BIOS indicates
      that the feature isn't supported. Based on the Microsoft presentation
      "PCI Express In Depth for Windows Vista and Beyond", I'm starting to think
      that this may be an error. The implication is that unless the platform
      grants full control via _OSC, Windows will not touch any PCIe features -
      including ASPM. In that case clearing ASPM state would be an error unless
      the platform has granted us that control.
      
      This patch reworks the ASPM disabling code such that the actual clearing
      of state is triggered by a successful handoff of PCIe control to the OS.
      The general ASPM code undergoes some changes in order to ensure that the
      ability to clear the bits isn't overridden by ASPM having already been
      disabled. Further, this theoretically now allows for situations where
      only a subset of PCIe roots hand over control, leaving the others in the
      BIOS state.
      
      It's difficult to know for sure that this is the right thing to do -
      there's zero public documentation on the interaction between all of these
      components. But enough vendors enable ASPM on platforms and then set this
      bit that it seems likely that they're expecting the OS to leave them alone.
      
      Measured to save around 5W on an idle Thinkpad X220.
      Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      10f6dc7e
  5. 06 12月, 2011 2 次提交
    • R
      PCI/ACPI/PM: Avoid resuming devices that don't signal PME · a424948d
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Modify pci_acpi_wake_dev() to avoid resuming PME-capable devices
      whose PME Status bits are not set, which may happen currently if
      several devices are associated with the same wakeup GPE and all
      of them are notified whenever at least one of them signals PME.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      a424948d
    • M
      PCI: Rework ASPM disable code · 3c076351
      Matthew Garrett 提交于
      Right now we forcibly clear ASPM state on all devices if the BIOS indicates
      that the feature isn't supported. Based on the Microsoft presentation
      "PCI Express In Depth for Windows Vista and Beyond", I'm starting to think
      that this may be an error. The implication is that unless the platform
      grants full control via _OSC, Windows will not touch any PCIe features -
      including ASPM. In that case clearing ASPM state would be an error unless
      the platform has granted us that control.
      
      This patch reworks the ASPM disabling code such that the actual clearing
      of state is triggered by a successful handoff of PCIe control to the OS.
      The general ASPM code undergoes some changes in order to ensure that the
      ability to clear the bits isn't overridden by ASPM having already been
      disabled. Further, this theoretically now allows for situations where
      only a subset of PCIe roots hand over control, leaving the others in the
      BIOS state.
      
      It's difficult to know for sure that this is the right thing to do -
      there's zero public documentation on the interaction between all of these
      components. But enough vendors enable ASPM on platforms and then set this
      bit that it seems likely that they're expecting the OS to leave them alone.
      
      Measured to save around 5W on an idle Thinkpad X220.
      Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      3c076351
  6. 15 10月, 2011 2 次提交
    • R
      PCI / PM: Remove unnecessary error variable from acpi_dev_run_wake() · 78d090b0
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The result returned by acpi_dev_run_wake() is always either -EINVAL
      or -ENODEV, while obviously it should return 0 on success.  The
      problem is that the leftover error variable, that's not really used
      in the function, is initialized with -ENODEV and then returned
      without modification.
      
      To fix this issue remove the error variable from acpi_dev_run_wake()
      and make the function return 0 on success as appropriate.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      78d090b0
    • R
      PCI / PM: Extend PME polling to all PCI devices · 379021d5
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The land of PCI power management is a land of sorrow and ugliness,
      especially in the area of signaling events by devices.  There are
      devices that set their PME Status bits, but don't really bother
      to send a PME message or assert PME#.  There are hardware vendors
      who don't connect PME# lines to the system core logic (they know
      who they are).  There are PCI Express Root Ports that don't bother
      to trigger interrupts when they receive PME messages from the devices
      below.  There are ACPI BIOSes that forget to provide _PRW methods for
      devices capable of signaling wakeup.  Finally, there are BIOSes that
      do provide _PRW methods for such devices, but then don't bother to
      call Notify() for those devices from the corresponding _Lxx/_Exx
      GPE-handling methods.  In all of these cases the kernel doesn't have
      a chance to receive a proper notification that it should wake up a
      device, so devices stay in low-power states forever.  Worse yet, in
      some cases they continuously send PME Messages that are silently
      ignored, because the kernel simply doesn't know that it should clear
      the device's PME Status bit.
      
      This problem was first observed for "parallel" (non-Express) PCI
      devices on add-on cards and Matthew Garrett addressed it by adding
      code that polls PME Status bits of such devices, if they are enabled
      to signal PME, to the kernel.  Recently, however, it has turned out
      that PCI Express devices are also affected by this issue and that it
      is not limited to add-on devices, so it seems necessary to extend
      the PME polling to all PCI devices, including PCI Express and planar
      ones.  Still, it would be wasteful to poll the PME Status bits of
      devices that are known to receive proper PME notifications, so make
      the kernel (1) poll the PME Status bits of all PCI and PCIe devices
      enabled to signal PME and (2) disable the PME Status polling for
      devices for which correct PME notifications are received.
      Tested-by: NSarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      379021d5
  7. 29 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  8. 25 2月, 2011 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI: Remove the wakeup.run_wake_count device field · 51907267
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field is only used by the PCI
      runtime PM code to "protect" devices from being prepared for
      generating wakeup signals more than once in a row.  However, it
      really doesn't provide any protection, because (1) all of the
      functions it is supposed to protect use their own reference counters
      effectively ensuring that the device will be set up for generating
      wakeup signals just once and (2) the PCI runtime PM code uses
      wakeup.run_wake_count in a racy way, since nothing prevents
      acpi_dev_run_wake() from being called concurrently from two different
      threads for the same device.
      
      Remove the wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field which is
      unnecessary, confusing and used in a wrong way.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      51907267
  9. 15 1月, 2011 1 次提交
  10. 24 12月, 2010 1 次提交
    • M
      PCI: Disable ASPM if BIOS asks us to · 2f671e2d
      Matthew Garrett 提交于
      We currently refuse to touch the ASPM registers if the BIOS tells us that
      ASPM isn't supported. This can cause problems if the BIOS has (for any
      reason) enabled ASPM on some devices anyway. Change the code such that we
      explicitly clear ASPM if the FADT indicates that ASPM isn't supported,
      and make sure we tidy up appropriately on device removal in order to deal
      with the hotplug case. If ASPM is disabled because the BIOS doesn't hand
      over control then we won't touch the registers.
      Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      2f671e2d
  11. 19 7月, 2010 1 次提交
    • R
      PM: Make it possible to avoid races between wakeup and system sleep · c125e96f
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      One of the arguments during the suspend blockers discussion was that
      the mainline kernel didn't contain any mechanisms making it possible
      to avoid races between wakeup and system suspend.
      
      Generally, there are two problems in that area.  First, if a wakeup
      event occurs exactly when /sys/power/state is being written to, it
      may be delivered to user space right before the freezer kicks in, so
      the user space consumer of the event may not be able to process it
      before the system is suspended.  Second, if a wakeup event occurs
      after user space has been frozen, it is not generally guaranteed that
      the ongoing transition of the system into a sleep state will be
      aborted.
      
      To address these issues introduce a new global sysfs attribute,
      /sys/power/wakeup_count, associated with a running counter of wakeup
      events and three helper functions, pm_stay_awake(), pm_relax(), and
      pm_wakeup_event(), that may be used by kernel subsystems to control
      the behavior of this attribute and to request the PM core to abort
      system transitions into a sleep state already in progress.
      
      The /sys/power/wakeup_count file may be read from or written to by
      user space.  Reads will always succeed (unless interrupted by a
      signal) and return the current value of the wakeup events counter.
      Writes, however, will only succeed if the written number is equal to
      the current value of the wakeup events counter.  If a write is
      successful, it will cause the kernel to save the current value of the
      wakeup events counter and to abort the subsequent system transition
      into a sleep state if any wakeup events are reported after the write
      has returned.
      
      [The assumption is that before writing to /sys/power/state user space
      will first read from /sys/power/wakeup_count.  Next, user space
      consumers of wakeup events will have a chance to acknowledge or
      veto the upcoming system transition to a sleep state.  Finally, if
      the transition is allowed to proceed, /sys/power/wakeup_count will
      be written to and if that succeeds, /sys/power/state will be written
      to as well.  Still, if any wakeup events are reported to the PM core
      by kernel subsystems after that point, the transition will be
      aborted.]
      
      Additionally, put a wakeup events counter into struct dev_pm_info and
      make these per-device wakeup event counters available via sysfs,
      so that it's possible to check the activity of various wakeup event
      sources within the kernel.
      
      To illustrate how subsystems can use pm_wakeup_event(), make the
      low-level PCI runtime PM wakeup-handling code use it.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Acked-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      Acked-by: Nmarkgross <markgross@thegnar.org>
      Reviewed-by: NAlan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
      c125e96f
  12. 07 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  13. 23 2月, 2010 1 次提交
    • R
      PCI / ACPI / PM: Platform support for PCI PME wake-up · b67ea761
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in
      principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time,
      platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up
      events that can be delivered to the kernel.  If ACPI is used for this
      purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI
      GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that
      we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured
      correctly.
      
      Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated
      with them is quite limited.  The devices without dedicated GPEs have
      to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of
      cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to
      generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them.
      
      Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up:
      o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify
        handlers for run-time PM.
      o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct
        pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to
        generate wake-up events for given device.  Implemet this callback
        for the ACPI platform.
      o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and
        make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all
        PCI devices present in the ACPI tables.
      o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to
        check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at
        run time.
      
      Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      b67ea761
  14. 28 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  15. 17 12月, 2009 1 次提交
    • R
      PCI/PM: Propagate wake-up enable for PCIe devices too · dc1a94ae
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Having read the PM part of the PCIe 2.0 specification more carefully
      I think that it was a mistake to restrict the wake-up enable
      propagation to non-PCIe devices, because if we do not request
      control of the root ports' PME registers via OSC, PCIe PME is
      supposed to be handled by the platform, just like the non-PCIe PME.
      Even if we do that, the wake-up propagation is done to allow the
      devices to wake up the system from sleep states which involves the
      platform anyway, so it won't hurt.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      dc1a94ae
  16. 25 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  17. 10 9月, 2009 3 次提交
  18. 27 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  19. 20 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  20. 08 1月, 2009 6 次提交
  21. 31 12月, 2008 1 次提交
  22. 12 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • K
      PCI: ignore bit0 of _OSC return code · 2485b867
      Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
      Currently acpi_run_osc() checks all the bits in _OSC result code (the
      first DWORD in the capabilities buffer) to see error condition. But the
      bit 0, which doesn't indicate any error, must be ignored.
      
      The bit 0 is used as the query flag at _OSC invocation time. Some
      platforms clear it during _OSC evaluation, but the others don't. On
      latter platforms, current acpi_run_osc() mis-detects error when _OSC is
      evaluated with query flag set because it doesn't ignore the bit 0.
      Because of this, the __acpi_query_osc() always fails on such platforms.
      
      And this is the cause of the problem that pci_osc_control_set() doesn't
      work since the commit 4e39432f which
      changed pci_osc_control_set() to use __acpi_query_osc().
      Tested-by: N"Tomasz Czernecki <czernecki@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      2485b867
  23. 25 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  24. 23 10月, 2008 4 次提交
  25. 29 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  26. 17 7月, 2008 2 次提交