1. 31 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  2. 06 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 17 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  4. 29 3月, 2014 1 次提交
    • C
      x86, CMCI: Add proper detection of end of CMCI storms · 27f6c573
      Chen, Gong 提交于
      When CMCI storm persists for a long time(at least beyond predefined
      threshold. It's 30 seconds for now), we can watch CMCI storm is
      detected immediately after it subsides.
      
      ...
      Dec 10 22:04:29 kernel: CMCI storm detected: switching to poll mode
      Dec 10 22:04:59 kernel: CMCI storm subsided: switching to interrupt mode
      Dec 10 22:04:59 kernel: CMCI storm detected: switching to poll mode
      Dec 10 22:05:29 kernel: CMCI storm subsided: switching to interrupt mode
      ...
      
      The problem is that our logic that determines that the storm has
      ended is incorrect. We announce the end, re-enable interrupts and
      realize that the storm is still going on, so we switch back to
      polling mode. Rinse, repeat.
      
      When a storm happens we disable signaling of errors via CMCI and begin
      polling machine check banks instead. If we find any logged errors,
      then we need to set a per-cpu flag so that our per-cpu tests that
      check whether the storm is ongoing will see that errors are still
      being logged independently of whether mce_notify_irq() says that the
      error has been fully processed.
      
      cmci_clear() is not the right tool to disable a bank. It disables the
      interrupt for the bank as desired, but it also clears the bit for
      this bank in "mce_banks_owned" so we will skip the bank when polling
      (so we fail to see that the storm continues because we stop looking).
      New cmci_storm_disable_banks() just disables the interrupt while
      allowing polling to continue.
      Reported-by: NWilliam Dauchy <wdauchy@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChen, Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      27f6c573
  5. 20 3月, 2014 3 次提交
    • S
      x86, therm_throt.c: Remove unused therm_cpu_lock · 7b7139d4
      Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于
      After fixing the CPU hotplug callback registration code, the callbacks
      invoked for each online CPU, during the initialization phase in
      thermal_throttle_init_device(), can no longer race with the actual CPU
      hotplug notifier callbacks (in thermal_throttle_cpu_callback). Hence the
      therm_cpu_lock is unnecessary now. Remove it.
      
      Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
      Suggested-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      7b7139d4
    • S
      x86, therm_throt.c: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration · 4e6192bb
      Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于
      Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
      initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
      below:
      
      	get_online_cpus();
      
      	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
      		init_cpu(cpu);
      
      	register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
      
      	put_online_cpus();
      
      This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
      cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
      with CPU hotplug operations).
      
      Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
      registration is:
      
      	cpu_notifier_register_begin();
      
      	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
      		init_cpu(cpu);
      
      	/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
      	__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
      
      	cpu_notifier_register_done();
      
      Fix the thermal throttle code in x86 by using this latter form of callback
      registration.
      
      Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      4e6192bb
    • S
      x86, mce: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration · 82a8f131
      Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于
      Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
      initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
      below:
      
      	get_online_cpus();
      
      	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
      		init_cpu(cpu);
      
      	register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
      
      	put_online_cpus();
      
      This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
      cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
      with CPU hotplug operations).
      
      Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
      registration is:
      
      	cpu_notifier_register_begin();
      
      	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
      		init_cpu(cpu);
      
      	/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
      	__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
      
      	cpu_notifier_register_done();
      
      Fix the mce code in x86 by using this latter form of callback registration.
      
      Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      82a8f131
  6. 12 1月, 2014 1 次提交
    • B
      x86, mce: Fix mce_start_timer semantics · 4f75d841
      Borislav Petkov 提交于
      So mce_start_timer() has a 'cpu' argument which is supposed to mean to
      start a timer on that cpu. However, the code currently starts a timer on
      the *current* cpu the function runs on and causes the sanity-check in
      mce_timer_fn to fire:
      
      	WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c:1286 mce_timer_fn
      
      because it is running on the wrong cpu.
      
      This was triggered by Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> by offlining
      all the cpus in succession.
      
      Then, we were fiddling with the CMCI storm settings when starting the
      timer whereas there's no need for that - if there's storm happening
      on this newly restarted cpu, we're going to be in normal CMCI mode
      initially and then when the CMCI interrupt starts firing, we're going to
      go to the polling mode with the timer real soon.
      Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
      Tested-by: NPrarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
      Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NChen, Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1387722156-5511-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com
      4f75d841
  7. 07 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  8. 21 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 30 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  10. 24 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  11. 30 7月, 2013 1 次提交
  12. 15 7月, 2013 1 次提交
    • P
      x86: delete __cpuinit usage from all x86 files · 148f9bb8
      Paul Gortmaker 提交于
      The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
      some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
      do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
      commit 5e427ec2 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
      is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
      with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
      
      After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
      the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
      we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
      
      Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
      notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
      are flagged as __cpuinit  -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
      arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
      As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
      content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
      of these warnings.  In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
      
      This removes all the arch/x86 uses of the __cpuinit macros from
      all C files.  x86 only had the one __CPUINIT used in assembly files,
      and it wasn't paired off with a .previous or a __FINIT, so we can
      delete it directly w/o any corresponding additional change there.
      
      [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
      
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
      Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: x86@kernel.org
      Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Acked-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      148f9bb8
  13. 09 7月, 2013 1 次提交
    • N
      mce: acpi/apei: Honour Firmware First for MCA banks listed in APEI HEST CMC · c3d1fb56
      Naveen N. Rao 提交于
      The Corrected Machine Check structure (CMC) in HEST has a flag which can be
      set by the firmware to indicate to the OS that it prefers to process the
      corrected error events first. In this scenario, the OS is expected to not
      monitor for corrected errors (through CMCI/polling). Instead, the firmware
      notifies the OS on corrected error events through GHES.
      
      Linux already has support for GHES. This patch adds support for parsing CMC
      structure and to disable CMCI/polling if the firmware first flag is set.
      
      Further, the list of machine check bank structures at the end of CMC is used
      to determine which MCA banks function in FF mode, so that we continue to
      monitor error events on the other banks.
      Signed-off-by: NNaveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Acked-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      c3d1fb56
  14. 28 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  15. 26 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  16. 21 6月, 2013 2 次提交
    • S
      x86, trace: Add irq vector tracepoints · cf910e83
      Seiji Aguchi 提交于
      [Purpose of this patch]
      
      As Vaibhav explained in the thread below, tracepoints for irq vectors
      are useful.
      
      http://www.spinics.net/lists/mm-commits/msg85707.html
      
      <snip>
      The current interrupt traces from irq_handler_entry and irq_handler_exit
      provide when an interrupt is handled.  They provide good data about when
      the system has switched to kernel space and how it affects the currently
      running processes.
      
      There are some IRQ vectors which trigger the system into kernel space,
      which are not handled in generic IRQ handlers.  Tracing such events gives
      us the information about IRQ interaction with other system events.
      
      The trace also tells where the system is spending its time.  We want to
      know which cores are handling interrupts and how they are affecting other
      processes in the system.  Also, the trace provides information about when
      the cores are idle and which interrupts are changing that state.
      <snip>
      
      On the other hand, my usecase is tracing just local timer event and
      getting a value of instruction pointer.
      
      I suggested to add an argument local timer event to get instruction pointer before.
      But there is another way to get it with external module like systemtap.
      So, I don't need to add any argument to irq vector tracepoints now.
      
      [Patch Description]
      
      Vaibhav's patch shared a trace point ,irq_vector_entry/irq_vector_exit, in all events.
      But there is an above use case to trace specific irq_vector rather than tracing all events.
      In this case, we are concerned about overhead due to unwanted events.
      
      So, add following tracepoints instead of introducing irq_vector_entry/exit.
      so that we can enable them independently.
         - local_timer_vector
         - reschedule_vector
         - call_function_vector
         - call_function_single_vector
         - irq_work_entry_vector
         - error_apic_vector
         - thermal_apic_vector
         - threshold_apic_vector
         - spurious_apic_vector
         - x86_platform_ipi_vector
      
      Also, introduce a logic switching IDT at enabling/disabling time so that a time penalty
      makes a zero when tracepoints are disabled. Detailed explanations are as follows.
       - Create trace irq handlers with entering_irq()/exiting_irq().
       - Create a new IDT, trace_idt_table, at boot time by adding a logic to
         _set_gate(). It is just a copy of original idt table.
       - Register the new handlers for tracpoints to the new IDT by introducing
         macros to alloc_intr_gate() called at registering time of irq_vector handlers.
       - Add checking, whether irq vector tracing is on/off, into load_current_idt().
         This has to be done below debug checking for these reasons.
         - Switching to debug IDT may be kicked while tracing is enabled.
         - On the other hands, switching to trace IDT is kicked only when debugging
           is disabled.
      
      In addition, the new IDT is created only when CONFIG_TRACING is enabled to avoid being
      used for other purposes.
      Signed-off-by: NSeiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/51C323ED.5050708@hds.comSigned-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      cf910e83
    • S
      x86, trace: Introduce entering/exiting_irq() · eddc0e92
      Seiji Aguchi 提交于
      When implementing tracepoints in interrupt handers, if the tracepoints are
      simply added in the performance sensitive path of interrupt handers,
      it may cause potential performance problem due to the time penalty.
      
      To solve the problem, an idea is to prepare non-trace/trace irq handers and
      switch their IDTs at the enabling/disabling time.
      
      So, let's introduce entering_irq()/exiting_irq() for pre/post-
      processing of each irq handler.
      
      A way to use them is as follows.
      
      Non-trace irq handler:
      smp_irq_handler()
      {
      	entering_irq();		/* pre-processing of this handler */
      	__smp_irq_handler();	/*
      				 * common logic between non-trace and trace handlers
      				 * in a vector.
      				 */
      	exiting_irq();		/* post-processing of this handler */
      
      }
      
      Trace irq_handler:
      smp_trace_irq_handler()
      {
      	entering_irq();		/* pre-processing of this handler */
      	trace_irq_entry();	/* tracepoint for irq entry */
      	__smp_irq_handler();	/*
      				 * common logic between non-trace and trace handlers
      				 * in a vector.
      				 */
      	trace_irq_exit();	/* tracepoint for irq exit */
      	exiting_irq();		/* post-processing of this handler */
      
      }
      
      If tracepoints can place outside entering_irq()/exiting_irq() as follows,
      it looks cleaner.
      
      smp_trace_irq_handler()
      {
      	trace_irq_entry();
      	smp_irq_handler();
      	trace_irq_exit();
      }
      
      But it doesn't work.
      The problem is with irq_enter/exit() being called. They must be called before
      trace_irq_enter/exit(),  because of the rcu_irq_enter() must be called before
      any tracepoints are used, as tracepoints use  rcu to synchronize.
      
      As a possible alternative, we may be able to call irq_enter() first as follows
      if irq_enter() can nest.
      
      smp_trace_irq_hander()
      {
      	irq_entry();
      	trace_irq_entry();
      	smp_irq_handler();
      	trace_irq_exit();
      	irq_exit();
      }
      
      But it doesn't work, either.
      If irq_enter() is nested, it may have a time penalty because it has to check if it
      was already called or not. The time penalty is not desired in performance sensitive
      paths even if it is tiny.
      Signed-off-by: NSeiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/51C3238D.9040706@hds.comSigned-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      eddc0e92
  17. 15 6月, 2013 2 次提交
  18. 13 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  19. 05 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  20. 03 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • S
      x86/mce: Rework cmci_rediscover() to play well with CPU hotplug · 7a0c819d
      Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于
      Dave Jones reports that offlining a CPU leads to this trace:
      
      numa_remove_cpu cpu 1 node 0: mask now 0,2-3
      smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline
      BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code:
      cpu-offline.sh/10591
      caller is cmci_rediscover+0x6a/0xe0
      Pid: 10591, comm: cpu-offline.sh Not tainted 3.9.0-rc3+ #2
      Call Trace:
       [<ffffffff81333bbd>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xdd/0x100
       [<ffffffff8101edba>] cmci_rediscover+0x6a/0xe0
       [<ffffffff815f5b9f>] mce_cpu_callback+0x19d/0x1ae
       [<ffffffff8160ea66>] notifier_call_chain+0x66/0x150
       [<ffffffff8107ad7e>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10
       [<ffffffff8104c2e3>] cpu_notify+0x23/0x50
       [<ffffffff8104c31e>] cpu_notify_nofail+0xe/0x20
       [<ffffffff815ef082>] _cpu_down+0x302/0x350
       [<ffffffff815ef106>] cpu_down+0x36/0x50
       [<ffffffff815f1c9d>] store_online+0x8d/0xd0
       [<ffffffff813edc48>] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x30
       [<ffffffff81226eeb>] sysfs_write_file+0xdb/0x150
       [<ffffffff811adfb2>] vfs_write+0xa2/0x170
       [<ffffffff811ae16c>] sys_write+0x4c/0xa0
       [<ffffffff81613019>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      
      However, a look at cmci_rediscover shows that it can be simplified quite
      a bit, apart from solving the above issue. It invokes functions that
      take spin locks with interrupts disabled, and hence it can run in atomic
      context. Also, it is run in the CPU_POST_DEAD phase, so the dying CPU
      is already dead and out of the cpu_online_mask. So take these points into
      account and simplify the code, and thereby also fix the above issue.
      Reported-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      7a0c819d
  21. 22 3月, 2013 2 次提交
  22. 21 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  23. 29 12月, 2012 1 次提交
    • T
      x86/mce: don't use [delayed_]work_pending() · 4d899be5
      Tejun Heo 提交于
      There's no need to test whether a (delayed) work item in pending
      before queueing, flushing or cancelling it.  Most uses are unnecessary
      and quite a few of them are buggy.
      
      Remove unnecessary pending tests from x86/mce.  Only compile tested.
      
      v2: Local var work removed from mce_schedule_work() as suggested by
          Borislav.
      Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
      4d899be5
  24. 31 10月, 2012 1 次提交
    • T
      x86/mce: Do not change worker's running cpu in cmci_rediscover(). · 85b97637
      Tang Chen 提交于
      cmci_rediscover() used set_cpus_allowed_ptr() to change the current process's
      running cpu, and migrate itself to the dest cpu. But worker processes are not
      allowed to be migrated. If current is a worker, the worker will be migrated to
      another cpu, but the corresponding  worker_pool is still on the original cpu.
      
      In this case, the following BUG_ON in try_to_wake_up_local() will be triggered:
      BUG_ON(rq != this_rq());
      
      This will cause the kernel panic. The call trace is like the following:
      
      [ 6155.451107] ------------[ cut here ]------------
      [ 6155.452019] kernel BUG at kernel/sched/core.c:1654!
      ......
      [ 6155.452019] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810add15>]  [<ffffffff810add15>] try_to_wake_up_local+0x115/0x130
      ......
      [ 6155.452019] Call Trace:
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff8166fc14>] __schedule+0x764/0x880
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81670059>] schedule+0x29/0x70
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff8166de65>] schedule_timeout+0x235/0x2d0
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff810db57d>] ? mark_held_locks+0x8d/0x140
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff810dd463>] ? __lock_release+0x133/0x1a0
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81671c50>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x50
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff810db8f5>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x105/0x190
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff8166fefb>] wait_for_common+0x12b/0x180
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff810b0b30>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x2f0/0x2f0
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff8167002d>] wait_for_completion+0x1d/0x20
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff8110008a>] stop_one_cpu+0x8a/0xc0
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff810abd40>] ? __migrate_task+0x1a0/0x1a0
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff810a6ab8>] ? complete+0x28/0x60
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff810b0fd8>] set_cpus_allowed_ptr+0x128/0x130
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81036785>] cmci_rediscover+0xf5/0x140
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff816643c0>] mce_cpu_callback+0x18d/0x19d
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81676187>] notifier_call_chain+0x67/0x150
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff810a03de>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81070470>] __cpu_notify+0x20/0x40
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff810704a5>] cpu_notify_nofail+0x15/0x30
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81655182>] _cpu_down+0x262/0x2e0
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81655236>] cpu_down+0x36/0x50
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff813d3eaa>] acpi_processor_remove+0x50/0x11e
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff813a6978>] acpi_device_remove+0x90/0xb2
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff8143cbec>] __device_release_driver+0x7c/0xf0
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff8143cd6f>] device_release_driver+0x2f/0x50
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff813a7870>] acpi_bus_remove+0x32/0x6d
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff813a7932>] acpi_bus_trim+0x87/0xee
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff813a7a21>] acpi_bus_hot_remove_device+0x88/0x16b
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff813a33ee>] acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x27/0x34
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81090589>] process_one_work+0x219/0x680
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81090528>] ? process_one_work+0x1b8/0x680
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff813a33c7>] ? acpi_os_wait_events_complete+0x23/0x23
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff810923be>] worker_thread+0x12e/0x320
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81092290>] ? manage_workers+0x110/0x110
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81098396>] kthread+0xc6/0xd0
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff8167c4c4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81671f30>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff810982d0>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
      [ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff8167c4c0>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
      
      This patch removes the set_cpus_allowed_ptr() call, and put the cmci rediscover
      jobs onto all the other cpus using system_wq. This could bring some delay for
      the jobs.
      Signed-off-by: NTang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      85b97637
  25. 30 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  26. 26 10月, 2012 4 次提交
  27. 19 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  28. 18 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  29. 28 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  30. 10 8月, 2012 2 次提交
    • C
      x86/mce: Add CMCI poll mode · 55babd8f
      Chen Gong 提交于
      On Intel systems corrected machine check interrupts (CMCI) may be sent to
      multiple logical processors; possibly to all processors on the affected
      socket (SDM Volume 3B "15.5.1 CMCI Local APIC Interface").  This means
      that a persistent error (such as a stuck bit in ECC memory) may cause
      a storm of interrupts that greatly hinders or prevents forward progress
      (probably on many processors).
      
      To solve this we keep track of the rate at which each processor sees
      CMCI. If we exceed a threshold, we disable CMCI delivery and switch to
      polling the machine check banks. If the storm subsides (none of the
      affected processors see any more errors for a complete poll interval) we
      re-enable CMCI.
      
      [Tony: Added console messages when storm begins/ends and increased storm
      threshold from 5 to 15 so we have a few more logged entries before we
      disable interrupts and start dropping reports]
      Signed-off-by: NChen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Tested-by: NChen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      55babd8f
    • T
      x86/mce: Make cmci_discover() quiet · 4670a300
      Tony Luck 提交于
      cmci_discover() works out which machine check banks support CMCI, and
      which of those are shared by multiple logical processors. It uses this
      information to ensure that exactly one cpu is designated the owner of
      each bank so that when interrupts are broadcast to multiple cpus, only one
      of them will look in a shared bank to log the error and clear the bank.
      
      At boot time cmci_discover() performs this task silently. But during
      certain cpu hotplug operations it prints out a set of summary lines
      like this:
      
      CPU 35 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3 CMCI:5 CMCI:6 CMCI:7 CMCI:8 CMCI:9 CMCI:10 CMCI:11
      CPU 1 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3
      CPU 39 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3
      CPU 38 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3
      CPU 32 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3
      CPU 37 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3
      CPU 36 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3
      CPU 34 MCA banks CMCI:0 CMCI:1 CMCI:3
      
      The value of these messages seems very low. A user might painstakingly
      cross-check against the data sheet for a processor to ensure that all
      CMCI supported banks are correctly reported, but this seems improbable.
      If users really wanted to do this, we should print the information at
      boot time too.
      
      Remove the messages.
      Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      4670a300
  31. 04 8月, 2012 1 次提交