Back in 2014, commit fb7023e0 ("drm/i915: BDW: Adding Reserved PCI
IDs.") added the reserved PCI IDs in order to try to make sure we had
working drivers in case we ever released products using these IDs
(since we had instances of this type of problem in the past). The
problem is that the patch only touched the macros used by
early-quirks.c and by the user space components that rely on
i915_pciids.h, it didn't touch the macros used by i915_pci.c. So we
correctly handled the stolen memory for these theoretical IDs, but we
didn't actually drive the devices from i915.ko.

So this patch fixes the original commit by actually making i915.ko
drive these IDs, which was the goal. There's no information on what
would be the GT count on these IDs, so we just go with the safer
intel_broadwell_info, at the risk of ignoring a possibly inexistent
BSD2_RING.

I did some checking, and it seems that these IDs are driven by
intel-gpu-tools, xf86-video-intel and libdrm (since they contain old
copies of i915_pciids.h), but they are not checked by mesa.

The alternative to this patch would be to just assume we're actually
never going to use these IDs, and then remove them from our ID lists
and make sure our user space components sync the latest i915_pciids.h
copy. I'm fine with either approaches, as long as we make sure that
every component tries to drive the same list of PCI IDs.

Fixes: fb7023e0 ("drm/i915: BDW: Adding Reserved PCI IDs.")
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1483473860-17644-3-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com

The code was moved, but the comment not updated. It confused me.

Fixes: 7f4c6284 ("drm/i915: Assign hwmode after encoder state readout")
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161219082423.27798-6-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch

After commit 1c74eeaf ("drm/i915: Move number of scalers initialization to
runtime init"), scalers are not initialized properly for skl and glk
since num_scalers is left as 0 for those platforms.

Fixes: 1c74eeaf ("drm/i915: Move number of scalers initialization to runtime init")
Cc: Nabendu Maiti <nabendu.bikash.maiti@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v2)
Cc: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
Cc: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: NAnder Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Tested-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1483365281-10569-1-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com

Ville explained that the wakelock was being acquired during set-idle in
order to flush the voltage change from the punit.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170102152845.32352-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

This function is only used by intel_guc_send() and it doesn't
need to be exposed outside of intel_uc.o file. Also when defined
as static, compiler will generate smaller code. Additionally let
it take guc param instead dev_priv to match function name.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161220115531.76120-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

In future patches, we require greater flexibility in describing
the number of scalers available on each CRTC. To ease that transition
we move the current assignment to intel_device_info.

Scaler structure initialisation is done if scaler is available on the CRTC.
Gen9 check is not required as on depending upon numbers of scalers we
initialize scalers or return without doing anything in skl_init_scalers.

v3: Changed skl_init_scaler to intel_crtc_init_scalers

v2: Added Chris's comments.
Signed-off-by: NNabendu Maiti <nabendu.bikash.maiti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v2)
Reviewed-by: NAnder Conselvan de Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnder Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1480398794-22741-1-git-send-email-nabendu.bikash.maiti@intel.com

The function intel_atomic_get_shared_dpll_state() is only called from
intel_dpll_mgr.c and it concerns the same data structures as the other
functions in that file, so move it there and make it static.
Signed-off-by: NAnder Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Suggested-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1483024933-3726-8-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com

DRRS is not yet kerneldoc despite the allusion prior to enum
drrs_refresh_rate_type. Drop the '**' to avoid the warnings from
make htmldocs.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161231112012.29263-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The existing kerneldoc was outdated, so time for a refresh.

v2: Use single line kdoc, mention functions for manipulation
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161231112012.29263-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Parameter - no.
Parameter: yes.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161231112012.29263-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The read of the page pin count and the bind count are unordered,
presenting races in the assert and it firing off incorrectly. Prevent
this by restricting the assert to the vma bind/unbind routines where we
have local cpu ordering between the two.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161231112012.29263-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Remove the IS_PLATFORM() macros from intel_dump_pipe_config() and split
that logic in platform specific implementations inside the dpll code,
accessed through a platform independent interface.

v2: Rebase.
Signed-off-by: NAnder Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (v1)
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1483024933-3726-7-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com

The documentation for most of the non-static members and structs were
missing. Fix that.

v2: Fix typos (Durga)

v3: Rebase.
    Fix make docs warnings.
    Document more.

v4: capitilize CRTC; say that the prepare hook is a nop if the DPLL is
    already enabled; link to struct intel_dpll_hw_state from @hw_state
    field in struct intel_shared_dpll_state; reorganize DPLL flags; link
    intel_shared_dpll_state to other structs and functions. (Daniel)
Signed-off-by: NAnder Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1483024933-3726-6-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com

The hook is called from intel_prepare_shared_dpll(). The name doesn't
make sense after all the changes to modeset code. So just call it
prepare.
Signed-off-by: NAnder Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDurgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1483024933-3726-5-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com

Struct intel_shared_dpll_config is used to hold the state of the DPLL in
the "atomic" sense, so call it state like everything else atomic.

v2: Rebase
Signed-off-by: NAnder Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (v1)
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1483024933-3726-4-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com

The function intel_shared_dpll_commit() performs the equivalent of
drm_atomic_helper_swap_state() for the shared dpll state, which is not
handled by the helpers. So make it do a full swap of the state and
rename it for consistency.

v2: Fix typo in the commit message. (Durga)
v3: Rebase.
v4: Swap the states instead of just renaming the function. (Daniel)
Signed-off-by: NAnder Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com> (v2)
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (v3)
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1483024933-3726-3-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com

While the details of getting a shared dpll are wrapped by
intel_get_shared_dpll(), the release was still hand rolled into the
modeset code. Fix that by creating an entry point for releasing the
pll and move that code there.

v2: Take old_dpll from crtc->state instead of crtc_state. (CI)
Signed-off-by: NAnder Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1483024933-3726-2-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com

A couple of parameters slipped through the kerneldoc net.
Reported-by: Nkbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161228105120.14500-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Drivers need to take care. Motivated by a discussion between Mark and
Rob on dri-devel.

Cc: Mark yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[danvet: s/alloc|freeing/modifications/ per Chris' suggestion.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1482833457-29592-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch

Remove a superfluous helper as drm_mm_insert_node is equivalent to
insert_node_in_range with a range of [0, U64_MAX].
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-37-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

mm->color_adjust() compares the hole with its neighbouring nodes. They
only abutt before we restrict the hole, so we have to apply color_adjust
before we apply the range restriction.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-36-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Insulate users from changes to the internal hole tracking within
struct drm_mm_node by using an accessor for hole_follows.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
[danvet: resolve conflicts in i915_vma.c]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Using mm->color_adjust makes the eviction scanner much tricker since we
don't know the actual neighbours of the target hole until after it is
created (after scanning is complete). To work out whether we need to
evict the neighbours because they impact upon the hole, we have to then
check the hole afterwards - requiring an extra step in the user of the
eviction scanner when they apply color_adjust.

v2: Massage kerneldoc.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-34-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Since we mandate a strict reverse-order of drm_mm_scan_remove_block()
after drm_mm_scan_add_block() we can further simplify the list
manipulations when generating the temporary scan-hole.

v2: Highlight the games being played with the lists to track the scan
holes without allocation.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-33-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Add an assertion to the plain i915_ggtt_offset() to double check that
any offset we hand to the GuC is outside of its unmappable ranges.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161224193146.4402-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>

For power-of-two alignments, we can avoid the 64bit divide and do a
simple bitwise add instead.

v2: s/alignment_mask/remainder_mask/
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-32-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Compute the minimal required hole during scan and only evict those nodes
that overlap. This enables us to reduce the number of nodes we need to
evict to the bare minimum.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-31-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The range restriction should be applied after the color adjustment, or
else we may inadvertently apply the color adjustment to the restricted
hole (and not against its neighbours).
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-30-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Doing the check is trivial (low cost in comparison to overall eviction)
and helps simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-29-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Acknowledging that we were building up the hole was more useful to me
when reading the code, than knowing the relationship between this node
and the previous node.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-28-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Kbuild really doesn't like non-recursive Makefiles, but they do work
as long as you build without O=
Reported-by: Nkbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Fixes: 50f0033d ("drm: Add some kselftests for the DRM range manager (struct drm_mm)")
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1482918077-30027-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch

The scan state occupies a large proportion of the struct drm_mm and is
rarely used and only contains temporary state. That makes it suitable to
moving to its struct and onto the stack of the callers.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
[danvet: Fix up etnaviv to compile, was missing a BUG_ON.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

A simple assert to ensure that we don't overflow start + size when
initialising the drm_mm, or its scanner.

In future, we may want to switch to tracking the value of ranges (rather
than size) so that we can cover the full u64, for example like resource
tracking.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-26-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Since commit ea7b1dd4 ("drm: mm: track free areas implicitly"),
to test whether there are any nodes allocated within the range manager,
we merely have to ask whether the node_list is empty.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-25-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Protect ourselves from a caller passing in node.start + node.size that
will overflow and trick us into reserving that node.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-24-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The nodes must be removed in the *reverse* order. This is correct in the
overview, but backwards in the function description. Whilst here add
Intel's copyright statement and tweak some formatting.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-23-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

In places (e.g. i915.ko), the alignment is exported to userspace as u64
and there now exists hardware for which we can indeed utilize a u64
alignment. As such, we need to keep 64bit integers throughout when
handling alignment.

Testcase: igt/drm_mm/align64
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_alignment
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-22-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Check that after applying the driver's color adjustment, restricted
eviction scanning finds a suitable hole.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-20-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Check that after applying the driver's color adjustment, eviction
scanning finds a suitable hole.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-19-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Check that after applying the driver's color adjustment, fitting of the
node and its alignment are still correct.

v2: s/no_color_touching/separate_adjacent_colors/
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161222083641.2691-18-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk