Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 12 10月, 2016 1 次提交
  3. 20 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 19 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  7. 15 8月, 2016 3 次提交
  9. 05 8月, 2016 4 次提交
  11. 04 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  13. 03 8月, 2016 4 次提交
  15. 22 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  17. 20 7月, 2016 3 次提交
  19. 05 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  21. 04 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  23. 17 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  25. 12 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  27. 09 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  29. 28 4月, 2016 3 次提交
  31. 25 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  33. 14 4月, 2016 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Late request cancellations are harmful · aa9b7810
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Conceptually, each request is a record of a hardware transaction - we
build up a list of pending commands and then either commit them to
hardware, or cancel them. However, whilst building up the list of
pending commands, we may modify state outside of the request and make
references to the pending request. If we do so and then cancel that
request, external objects then point to the deleted request leading to
both graphical and memory corruption.

The easiest example is to consider object/VMA tracking. When we mark an
object as active in a request, we store a pointer to this, the most
recent request, in the object. Then we want to free that object, we wait
for the most recent request to be idle before proceeding (otherwise the
hardware will write to pages now owned by the system, or we will attempt
to read from those pages before the hardware is finished writing). If
the request was cancelled instead, that wait completes immediately. As a
result, all requests must be committed and not cancelled if the external
state is unknown.

All that remains of i915_gem_request_cancel() users are just a couple of
extremely unlikely allocation failures, so remove the API entirely.

A consequence of committing all incomplete requests is that we generate
excess breadcrumbs and fill the ring much more often with dummy work. We
have completely undone the outstanding_last_seqno optimisation.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93907Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1460565315-7748-16-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      aa9b7810
  35. 31 3月, 2016 1 次提交
    • J
      drm/i915: Refer to GGTT {,VM} consistently · 72e96d64
      由 Joonas Lahtinen 提交于 
      Refer to the GGTT VM consistently as "ggtt->base" instead of just "ggtt",
"vm" or indirectly through other variables like "dev_priv->ggtt.base"
to avoid confusion with the i915_ggtt object itself and PPGTT VMs.

Refer to the GGTT as "ggtt" instead of indirectly through chaining.

As a bonus gets rid of the long-standing i915_obj_to_ggtt vs.
i915_gem_obj_to_ggtt conflict, due to removal of i915_obj_to_ggtt!

v2:
- Added some more after grepping sources with Chris

v3:
- Refer to GGTT VM through ggtt->base consistently instead of ggtt_vm
  (Chris)

v4:
- Convert all dev_priv->ggtt->foo accesses to ggtt->foo.

v5:
- Make patch checker happy

Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      72e96d64
  37. 18 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  39. 16 3月, 2016 2 次提交
  41. 21 1月, 2016 1 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: simplify allocation of driver-internal requests · 26827088
      由 Dave Gordon 提交于 
      There are a number of places where the driver needs a request, but isn't
working on behalf of any specific user or in a specific context. At
present, we associate them with the per-engine default context. A future
patch will abolish those per-engine context pointers; but we can already
eliminate a lot of the references to them, just by making the allocator
allow NULL as a shorthand for "an appropriate context for this ring",
which will mean that the callers don't need to know anything about how
the "appropriate context" is found (e.g. per-ring vs per-device, etc).

So this patch renames the existing i915_gem_request_alloc(), and makes
it local (static inline), and replaces it with a wrapper that provides
a default if the context is NULL, and also has a nicer calling
convention (doesn't require a pointer to an output parameter). Then we
change all callers to use the new convention:
OLD:
	err = i915_gem_request_alloc(ring, user_ctx, &req);
	if (err) ...
NEW:
	req = i915_gem_request_alloc(ring, user_ctx);
	if (IS_ERR(req)) ...
OLD:
	err = i915_gem_request_alloc(ring, ring->default_context, &req);
	if (err) ...
NEW:
	req = i915_gem_request_alloc(ring, NULL);
	if (IS_ERR(req)) ...

v4:	Rebased
Signed-off-by: NDave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NNick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1453230175-19330-2-git-send-email-david.s.gordon@intel.comSigned-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      26827088
  43. 02 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  45. 23 6月, 2015 5 次提交
    • J
      drm/i915: Update intel_ring_begin() to take a request structure · 5fb9de1a
      由 John Harrison 提交于 
      Now that everything above has been converted to use requests, intel_ring_begin()
can be updated to take a request instead of a ring. This also means that it no
longer needs to lazily allocate a request if no-one happens to have done it
earlier.

For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      5fb9de1a
    • J
      drm/i915: Update add_request() to take a request structure · 75289874
      由 John Harrison 提交于 
      Now that all callers of i915_add_request() have a request pointer to hand, it is
possible to update the add request function to take a request pointer rather
than pulling it out of the OLR.

For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      75289874
    • J
      drm/i915: Update overlay code to do explicit request management · dad540ce
      由 John Harrison 提交于 
      The overlay update code path to do explicit request creation and submission
rather than relying on the OLR to do the right thing.

For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      dad540ce
    • J
      drm/i915: Update i915_gem_object_sync() to take a request structure · 91af127f
      由 John Harrison 提交于 
      The plan is to pass requests around as the basic submission tracking structure
rather than rings and contexts. This patch updates the i915_gem_object_sync()
code path.

v2: Much more complex patch to share a single request between the sync and the
page flip. The _sync() function now supports lazy allocation of the request
structure. That is, if one is passed in then that will be used. If one is not,
then a request will be allocated and passed back out. Note that the _sync() code
does not necessarily require a request. Thus one will only be created until
certain situations. The reason the lazy allocation must be done within the
_sync() code itself is because the decision to need one or not is not really
something that code above can second guess (except in the case where one is
definitely not required because no ring is passed in).

The call chains above _sync() now support passing a request through which most
callers passing in NULL and assuming that no request will be required (because
they also pass in NULL for the ring and therefore can't be generating any ring
code).

The exeception is intel_crtc_page_flip() which now supports having a request
returned from _sync(). If one is, then that request is shared by the page flip
(if the page flip is of a type to need a request). If _sync() does not generate
a request but the page flip does need one, then the page flip path will create
its own request.

v3: Updated comment description to be clearer about 'to_req' parameter (Tomas
Elf review request). Rebased onto newer tree that significantly changed the
synchronisation code.

v4: Updated comments from review feedback (Tomas Elf)

For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      91af127f
    • J
      drm/i915: i915_add_request must not fail · bf7dc5b7
      由 John Harrison 提交于 
      The i915_add_request() function is called to keep track of work that has been
written to the ring buffer. It adds epilogue commands to track progress (seqno
updates and such), moves the request structure onto the right list and other
such house keeping tasks. However, the work itself has already been written to
the ring and will get executed whether or not the add request call succeeds. So
no matter what goes wrong, there isn't a whole lot of point in failing the call.

At the moment, this is fine(ish). If the add request does bail early on and not
do the housekeeping, the request will still float around in the
ring->outstanding_lazy_request field and be picked up next time. It means
multiple pieces of work will be tagged as the same request and driver can't
actually wait for the first piece of work until something else has been
submitted. But it all sort of hangs together.

This patch series is all about removing the OLR and guaranteeing that each piece
of work gets its own personal request. That means that there is no more
'hoovering up of forgotten requests'. If the request does not get tracked then
it will be leaked. Thus the add request call _must_ not fail. The previous patch
should have already ensured that it _will_ not fail by removing the potential
for running out of ring space. This patch enforces the rule by actually removing
the early exit paths and the return code.

Note that if something does manage to fail and the epilogue commands don't get
written to the ring, the driver will still hang together. The request will be
added to the tracking lists. And as in the old case, any subsequent work will
generate a new seqno which will suffice for marking the old one as complete.

v2: Improved WARNings (Tomas Elf review request).

For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      bf7dc5b7