- 29 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeremy Kerr 提交于
Currently, we get the following output from sputrace: [5.097935954] 1606: spufs_ps_nopfn__enter (thread = 1605, spu = -1) [5.097958164] 1606: spufs_ps_nopfn__insert (thread = 1605, spu = 15) [5.097973529] 1607: spufs_ps_nopfn__enter (thread = 1605, spu = -1) [5.097989174] 1607: spufs_ps_nopfn__insert (thread = 1605, spu = 14) Which leads me to believe that 160[67] is the current thread ID, and 1605 is the context backing the psmap. However, the 'current' and 'owner' tids are reversed - the 'current' tid is on the right. This change puts the current thread ID in the left-hand column instead, and renames the right to 'ctxthread'. Signed-off-by: NJeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
-
- 14 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mathieu Desnoyers 提交于
RCU style multiple probes support for the Linux Kernel Markers. Common case (one probe) is still fast and does not require dynamic allocation or a supplementary pointer dereference on the fast path. - Move preempt disable from the marker site to the callback. Since we now have an internal callback, move the preempt disable/enable to the callback instead of the marker site. Since the callback change is done asynchronously (passing from a handler that supports arguments to a handler that does not setup the arguments is no arguments are passed), we can safely update it even if it is outside the preempt disable section. - Move probe arm to probe connection. Now, a connected probe is automatically armed. Remove MARK_MAX_FORMAT_LEN, unused. This patch modifies the Linux Kernel Markers API : it removes the probe "arm/disarm" and changes the probe function prototype : it now expects a va_list * instead of a "...". If we want to have more than one probe connected to a marker at a given time (LTTng, or blktrace, ssytemtap) then we need this patch. Without it, connecting a second probe handler to a marker will fail. It allow us, for instance, to do interesting combinations : Do standard tracing with LTTng and, eventually, to compute statistics with SystemTAP, or to have a special trigger on an event that would call a systemtap script which would stop flight recorder tracing. Signed-off-by: NMathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Mike Mason <mmlnx@us.ibm.com> Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Cc: David Smith <dsmith@redhat.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 06 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
This adds markers two important points in the spufs code and a new module (sputrace.ko) that allows reading these out through a proc file. Long-term I'd rather see something like lttng extended to use the spufs instrumentation, but for now I think this is a good enough quick solution. We'll probably want to add various addition event in addition to that ones I have already. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-