1. 24 4月, 2011 1 次提交
  2. 21 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  3. 20 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  4. 05 3月, 2011 3 次提交
  5. 04 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  6. 02 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  7. 24 2月, 2011 3 次提交
  8. 18 2月, 2011 1 次提交
  9. 04 2月, 2011 3 次提交
  10. 14 1月, 2011 1 次提交
  11. 11 1月, 2011 1 次提交
  12. 10 1月, 2011 1 次提交
  13. 05 1月, 2011 8 次提交
  14. 21 12月, 2010 1 次提交
  15. 12 12月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      drivers/net: don't use flush_scheduled_work() · 23f333a2
      Tejun Heo 提交于
      flush_scheduled_work() is on its way out.  This patch contains simple
      conversions to replace flush_scheduled_work() usage with direct
      cancels and flushes.
      
      Directly cancel the used works on driver detach and flush them in
      other cases.
      
      The conversions are mostly straight forward and the only dangers are,
      
      * Forgetting to cancel/flush one or more used works.
      
      * Cancelling when a work should be flushed (ie. the work must be
        executed once scheduled whether the driver is detaching or not).
      
      I've gone over the changes multiple times but it would be much
      appreciated if you can review with the above points in mind.
      Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      Cc: Jay Cliburn <jcliburn@gmail.com>
      Cc: Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>
      Cc: Divy Le Ray <divy@chelsio.com>
      Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
      Cc: Vasanthy Kolluri <vkolluri@cisco.com>
      Cc: Samuel Ortiz <samuel@sortiz.org>
      Cc: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
      Cc: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@myri.com>
      Cc: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
      Cc: Ramkrishna Vepa <ramkrishna.vepa@exar.com>
      Cc: Matt Carlson <mcarlson@broadcom.com>
      Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
      Cc: Shreyas Bhatewara <sbhatewara@vmware.com>
      Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
      23f333a2
  16. 11 12月, 2010 1 次提交
  17. 18 11月, 2010 1 次提交
    • S
      r8169: fix checksum broken · d5d3ebe3
      Shan Wei 提交于
      If r8196 received packets with invalid sctp/igmp(not tcp, udp) checksum, r8196 set skb->ip_summed
      wit CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY. This cause that upper protocol don't check checksum field.
      
      I am not family with r8196 driver. I try to guess the meaning of RxProtoIP and IPFail.
      RxProtoIP stands for received IPv4 packet that upper protocol is not tcp and udp.
      !(opts1 & IPFail) is true means that driver correctly to check checksum in IPv4 header.
      
      If it's right, I think we should not set ip_summed wit CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY for my sctp packets
      with invalid checksum.
      
      If it's not right, please tell me.
      Signed-off-by: NShan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Acked-by: NFrancois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      d5d3ebe3
  18. 10 11月, 2010 2 次提交
  19. 21 10月, 2010 8 次提交