Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 03 12月, 2014 1 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix race between fs trimming and block group remove/allocation · 04216820
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      Our fs trim operation, which is completely transactionless (doesn't start
or joins an existing transaction) consists of visiting all block groups
and then for each one to iterate its free space entries and perform a
discard operation against the space range represented by the free space
entries. However before performing a discard, the corresponding free space
entry is removed from the free space rbtree, and when the discard completes
it is added back to the free space rbtree.

If a block group remove operation happens while the discard is ongoing (or
before it starts and after a free space entry is hidden), we end up not
waiting for the discard to complete, remove the extent map that maps
logical address to physical addresses and the corresponding chunk metadata
from the the chunk and device trees. After that and before the discard
completes, the current running transaction can finish and a new one start,
allowing for new block groups that map to the same physical addresses to
be allocated and written to.

So fix this by keeping the extent map in memory until the discard completes
so that the same physical addresses aren't reused before it completes.

If the physical locations that are under a discard operation end up being
used for a new metadata block group for example, and dirty metadata extents
are written before the discard finishes (the VM might call writepages() of
our btree inode's i_mapping for example, or an fsync log commit happens) we
end up overwriting metadata with zeroes, which leads to errors from fsck
like the following:

        checking extents
        Check tree block failed, want=833912832, have=0
        Check tree block failed, want=833912832, have=0
        Check tree block failed, want=833912832, have=0
        Check tree block failed, want=833912832, have=0
        Check tree block failed, want=833912832, have=0
        read block failed check_tree_block
        owner ref check failed [833912832 16384]
        Errors found in extent allocation tree or chunk allocation
        checking free space cache
        checking fs roots
        Check tree block failed, want=833912832, have=0
        Check tree block failed, want=833912832, have=0
        Check tree block failed, want=833912832, have=0
        Check tree block failed, want=833912832, have=0
        Check tree block failed, want=833912832, have=0
        read block failed check_tree_block
        root 5 root dir 256 error
        root 5 inode 260 errors 2001, no inode item, link count wrong
                unresolved ref dir 256 index 0 namelen 8 name foobar_3 filetype 1 errors 6, no dir index, no inode ref
        root 5 inode 262 errors 2001, no inode item, link count wrong
                unresolved ref dir 256 index 0 namelen 8 name foobar_5 filetype 1 errors 6, no dir index, no inode ref
        root 5 inode 263 errors 2001, no inode item, link count wrong
        (...)
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      04216820
  3. 25 11月, 2014 1 次提交
    • Q
      btrfs: Fix a lockdep warning when running xfstest. · 084b6e7c
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      The following lockdep warning is triggered during xfstests:

[ 1702.980872] =========================================================
[ 1702.981181] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
[ 1702.981482] 3.18.0-rc1 #27 Not tainted
[ 1702.981781] ---------------------------------------------------------
[ 1702.982095] kswapd0/77 just changed the state of lock:
[ 1702.982415]  (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffffa03b0b51>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x41/0x1f0 [btrfs]
[ 1702.982794] but this lock took another, RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock in the past:
[ 1702.983160]  (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock){+.+.+.}

and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.

[ 1702.984675]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 1702.985524] Chain exists of:
  &delayed_node->mutex --> &found->groups_sem --> &fs_info->dev_replace.lock

[ 1702.986799]  Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:

[ 1702.987681]        CPU0                    CPU1
[ 1702.988137]        ----                    ----
[ 1702.988598]   lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.lock);
[ 1702.989069]                                local_irq_disable();
[ 1702.989534]                                lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
[ 1702.990038]                                lock(&found->groups_sem);
[ 1702.990494]   <Interrupt>
[ 1702.990938]     lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
[ 1702.991407]
 *** DEADLOCK ***

It is because the btrfs_kobj_{add/rm}_device() will call memory
allocation with GFP_KERNEL,
which may flush fs page cache to free space, waiting for it self to do
the commit, causing the deadlock.

To solve the problem, move btrfs_kobj_{add/rm}_device() out of the
dev_replace lock range, also involing split the
btrfs_rm_dev_replace_srcdev() function into remove and free parts.

Now only btrfs_rm_dev_replace_remove_srcdev() is called in dev_replace
lock range, and kobj_{add/rm} and btrfs_rm_dev_replace_free_srcdev() are
called out of the lock range.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      084b6e7c
  5. 04 10月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 23 9月, 2014 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: remove empty block groups automatically · 47ab2a6c
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      One problem that has plagued us is that a user will use up all of his space with
data, remove a bunch of that data, and then try to create a bunch of small files
and run out of space.  This happens because all the chunks were allocated for
data since the metadata requirements were so low.  But now there's a bunch of
empty data block groups and not enough metadata space to do anything.  This
patch solves this problem by automatically deleting empty block groups.  If we
notice the used count go down to 0 when deleting or on mount notice that a block
group has a used count of 0 then we will queue it to be deleted.

When the cleaner thread runs we will double check to make sure the block group
is still empty and then we will delete it.  This patch has the side effect of no
longer having a bunch of BUG_ON()'s in the chunk delete code, which will be
helpful for both this and relocate.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      47ab2a6c
  9. 18 9月, 2014 30 次提交
  11. 24 8月, 2014 1 次提交
    • L
      Btrfs: fix task hang under heavy compressed write · 9e0af237
      由 Liu Bo 提交于 
      This has been reported and discussed for a long time, and this hang occurs in
both 3.15 and 3.16.

Btrfs now migrates to use kernel workqueue, but it introduces this hang problem.

Btrfs has a kind of work queued as an ordered way, which means that its
ordered_func() must be processed in the way of FIFO, so it usually looks like --

normal_work_helper(arg)
    work = container_of(arg, struct btrfs_work, normal_work);

    work->func() <---- (we name it work X)
    for ordered_work in wq->ordered_list
            ordered_work->ordered_func()
            ordered_work->ordered_free()

The hang is a rare case, first when we find free space, we get an uncached block
group, then we go to read its free space cache inode for free space information,
so it will

file a readahead request
    btrfs_readpages()
         for page that is not in page cache
                __do_readpage()
                     submit_extent_page()
                           btrfs_submit_bio_hook()
                                 btrfs_bio_wq_end_io()
                                 submit_bio()
                                 end_workqueue_bio() <--(ret by the 1st endio)
                                      queue a work(named work Y) for the 2nd
                                      also the real endio()

So the hang occurs when work Y's work_struct and work X's work_struct happens
to share the same address.

A bit more explanation,

A,B,C -- struct btrfs_work
arg   -- struct work_struct

kthread:
worker_thread()
    pick up a work_struct from @worklist
    process_one_work(arg)
	worker->current_work = arg;  <-- arg is A->normal_work
	worker->current_func(arg)
		normal_work_helper(arg)
		     A = container_of(arg, struct btrfs_work, normal_work);

		     A->func()
		     A->ordered_func()
		     A->ordered_free()  <-- A gets freed

		     B->ordered_func()
			  submit_compressed_extents()
			      find_free_extent()
				  load_free_space_inode()
				      ...   <-- (the above readhead stack)
				      end_workqueue_bio()
					   btrfs_queue_work(work C)
		     B->ordered_free()

As if work A has a high priority in wq->ordered_list and there are more ordered
works queued after it, such as B->ordered_func(), its memory could have been
freed before normal_work_helper() returns, which means that kernel workqueue
code worker_thread() still has worker->current_work pointer to be work
A->normal_work's, ie. arg's address.

Meanwhile, work C is allocated after work A is freed, work C->normal_work
and work A->normal_work are likely to share the same address(I confirmed this
with ftrace output, so I'm not just guessing, it's rare though).

When another kthread picks up work C->normal_work to process, and finds our
kthread is processing it(see find_worker_executing_work()), it'll think
work C as a collision and skip then, which ends up nobody processing work C.

So the situation is that our kthread is waiting forever on work C.

Besides, there're other cases that can lead to deadlock, but the real problem
is that all btrfs workqueue shares one work->func, -- normal_work_helper,
so this makes each workqueue to have its own helper function, but only a
wraper pf normal_work_helper.

With this patch, I no long hit the above hang.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      9e0af237
  13. 19 8月, 2014 5 次提交