- 07 3月, 2010 4 次提交
-
-
由 KOSAKI Motohiro 提交于
commit e815af95 ("change all_unreclaimable zone member to flags") changed all_unreclaimable member to bit flag. But it had an undesireble side effect. free_one_page() is one of most hot path in linux kernel and increasing atomic ops in it can reduce kernel performance a bit. Thus, this patch revert such commit partially. at least all_unreclaimable shouldn't share memory word with other zone flags. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix patch interaction] Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 KOSAKI Motohiro 提交于
Commit cf40bd16 ("lockdep: annotate reclaim context") introduced reclaim context annotation. But it didn't annotate zone reclaim. This patch do it. The point is, commit cf40bd16 annotate __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim but zone-reclaim doesn't use __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim. current call graph is __alloc_pages_nodemask get_page_from_freelist zone_reclaim() __alloc_pages_slowpath __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim try_to_free_pages Actually, if zone_reclaim_mode=1, VM never call __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim in usual VM pressure. Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Acked-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 KOSAKI Motohiro 提交于
The get_scan_ratio() should have all scan-ratio related calculations. Thus, this patch move some calculation into get_scan_ratio. Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Minchan Kim 提交于
Kswapd checks that zone has sufficient pages free via zone_watermark_ok(). If any zone doesn't have enough pages, we set all_zones_ok to zero. !all_zone_ok makes kswapd retry rather than sleeping. I think the watermark check before shrink_zone() is pointless. Only after kswapd has tried to shrink the zone is the check meaningful. Move the check to after the call to shrink_zone(). [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix comment, layout] Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 17 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 KOSAKI Motohiro 提交于
Commit f50de2d3 (vmscan: have kswapd sleep for a short interval and double check it should be asleep) can cause kswapd to enter an infinite loop if running on a single-CPU system. If all zones are unreclaimble, sleeping_prematurely return 1 and kswapd will call balance_pgdat() again. but it's totally meaningless, balance_pgdat() doesn't anything against unreclaimable zone! Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Reported-by: NWill Newton <will.newton@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Tested-by: NWill Newton <will.newton@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 16 12月, 2009 11 次提交
-
-
由 Huang Shijie 提交于
Simplify the code for shrink_inactive_list(). Signed-off-by: NHuang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Rik van Riel 提交于
In AIM7 runs, recent kernels start swapping out anonymous pages well before they should. This is due to shrink_list falling through to shrink_inactive_list if !inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc), when all we really wanted to do is pre-age some anonymous pages to give them extra time to be referenced while on the inactive list. The obvious fix is to make sure that shrink_list does not fall through to scanning/reclaiming inactive pages when we called it to scan one of the active lists. This change should be safe because the loop in shrink_zone ensures that we will still shrink the anon and file inactive lists whenever we should. [kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: inactive_file_is_low() should be inactive_anon_is_low()] Reported-by: NLarry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org> Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 KOSAKI Motohiro 提交于
Fix small inconsistent of ">" and ">=". Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 KOSAKI Motohiro 提交于
Now, All caller of reclaim use swap_cluster_max as SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX. Then, we can remove it perfectly. Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 KOSAKI Motohiro 提交于
In old days, we didn't have sc.nr_to_reclaim and it brought sc.swap_cluster_max misuse. huge sc.swap_cluster_max might makes unnecessary OOM risk and no performance benefit. Now, we can stop its insane thing. Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 KOSAKI Motohiro 提交于
shrink_all_zone() was introduced by commit d6277db4 (swsusp: rework memory shrinker) for hibernate performance improvement. and sc.swap_cluster_max was introduced by commit a06fe4d307 (Speed freeing memory for suspend). commit a06fe4d307 said Without the patch: Freed 14600 pages in 1749 jiffies = 32.61 MB/s (Anomolous!) Freed 88563 pages in 14719 jiffies = 23.50 MB/s Freed 205734 pages in 32389 jiffies = 24.81 MB/s With the patch: Freed 68252 pages in 496 jiffies = 537.52 MB/s Freed 116464 pages in 569 jiffies = 798.54 MB/s Freed 209699 pages in 705 jiffies = 1161.89 MB/s At that time, their patch was pretty worth. However, Modern Hardware trend and recent VM improvement broke its worth. From several reason, I think we should remove shrink_all_zones() at all. detail: 1) Old days, shrink_zone()'s slowness was mainly caused by stupid io-throttle at no i/o congestion. but current shrink_zone() is sane, not slow. 2) shrink_all_zone() try to shrink all pages at a time. but it doesn't works fine on numa system. example) System has 4GB memory and each node have 2GB. and hibernate need 1GB. optimal) steal 500MB from each node. shrink_all_zones) steal 1GB from node-0. Oh, Cache balancing logic was broken. ;) Unfortunately, Desktop system moved ahead NUMA at nowadays. (Side note, if hibernate require 2GB, shrink_all_zones() never success on above machine) 3) if the node has several I/O flighting pages, shrink_all_zones() makes pretty bad result. schenario) hibernate need 1GB 1) shrink_all_zones() try to reclaim 1GB from Node-0 2) but it only reclaimed 990MB 3) stupidly, shrink_all_zones() try to reclaim 1GB from Node-1 4) it reclaimed 990MB Oh, well. it reclaimed twice much than required. In the other hand, current shrink_zone() has sane baling out logic. then, it doesn't make overkill reclaim. then, we lost shrink_zones()'s risk. 4) SplitLRU VM always keep active/inactive ratio very carefully. inactive list only shrinking break its assumption. it makes unnecessary OOM risk. it obviously suboptimal. Now, shrink_all_memory() is only the wrapper function of do_try_to_free_pages(). it bring good reviewability and debuggability, and solve above problems. side note: Reclaim logic unificication makes two good side effect. - Fix recursive reclaim bug on shrink_all_memory(). it did forgot to use PF_MEMALLOC. it mean the system be able to stuck into deadlock. - Now, shrink_all_memory() got lockdep awareness. it bring good debuggability. Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 KOSAKI Motohiro 提交于
Currently, sc.scap_cluster_max has double meanings. 1) reclaim batch size as isolate_lru_pages()'s argument 2) reclaim baling out thresolds The two meanings pretty unrelated. Thus, Let's separate it. this patch doesn't change any behavior. Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 KOSAKI Motohiro 提交于
If reclaim fails to make sufficient progress, the priority is raised. Once the priority is higher, kswapd starts waiting on congestion. However, if the zone is below the min watermark then kswapd needs to continue working without delay as there is a danger of an increased rate of GFP_ATOMIC allocation failure. This patch changes the conditions under which kswapd waits on congestion by only going to sleep if the min watermarks are being met. [mel@csn.ul.ie: add stats to track how relevant the logic is] [mel@csn.ul.ie: make kswapd only check its own zones and rename the relevant counters] Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Mel Gorman 提交于
After kswapd balances all zones in a pgdat, it goes to sleep. In the event of no IO congestion, kswapd can go to sleep very shortly after the high watermark was reached. If there are a constant stream of allocations from parallel processes, it can mean that kswapd went to sleep too quickly and the high watermark is not being maintained for sufficient length time. This patch makes kswapd go to sleep as a two-stage process. It first tries to sleep for HZ/10. If it is woken up by another process or the high watermark is no longer met, it's considered a premature sleep and kswapd continues work. Otherwise it goes fully to sleep. This adds more counters to distinguish between fast and slow breaches of watermarks. A "fast" premature sleep is one where the low watermark was hit in a very short time after kswapd going to sleep. A "slow" premature sleep indicates that the high watermark was breached after a very short interval. Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Vincent Li 提交于
Commit 543ade1f ("Streamline generic_file_* interfaces and filemap cleanups") removed generic_file_write() in filemap. Change the comment in vmscan pageout() to __generic_file_aio_write(). Signed-off-by: NVincent Li <macli@brc.ubc.ca> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 David Rientjes 提交于
When memory is hot-removed, its node must be cleared in N_HIGH_MEMORY if there are no present pages left. In such a situation, kswapd must also be stopped since it has nothing left to do. Signed-off-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Signed-off-by: NLee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com> Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com> Cc: Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@hp.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 29 10月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Weiner 提交于
Isolators putting a page back to the LRU do not hold the page lock, and if the page is mlocked, another thread might munlock it concurrently. Expecting this, the putback code re-checks the evictability of a page when it just moved it to the unevictable list in order to correct its decision. The problem, however, is that ordering is not garuanteed between setting PG_lru when moving the page to the list and checking PG_mlocked afterwards: #0: #1 spin_lock() if (TestClearPageMlocked()) if (PageLRU()) move to evictable list SetPageLRU() spin_unlock() if (!PageMlocked()) move to evictable list The PageMlocked() check may get reordered before SetPageLRU() in #0, resulting in #0 not moving the still mlocked page, and in #1 failing to isolate and move the page as well. The page is now stranded on the unevictable list. The race condition is very unlikely. The consequence currently is one page falling off the reclaim grid and eventually getting freed with PG_unevictable set, which triggers a warning in the page allocator. TestClearPageMlocked() in #1 already provides full memory barrier semantics. This patch adds an explicit full barrier to force ordering between SetPageLRU() and PageMlocked() so that either one of the competitors rescues the page. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
It is possible to have !Anon but SwapBacked pages, and some apps could create huge number of such pages with MAP_SHARED|MAP_ANONYMOUS. These pages go into the ANON lru list, and hence shall not be protected: we only care mapped executable files. Failing to do so may trigger OOM. Tested-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 KOSAKI Motohiro 提交于
commit 8aa7e847 (Fix congestion_wait() sync/async vs read/write confusion) replace WRITE with BLK_RW_ASYNC. Unfortunately, concurrent mm development made the unchanged place accidentally. This patch fixes it too. Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 26 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
-
- 24 9月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
It's unused. It isn't needed -- read or write flag is already passed and sysctl shouldn't care about the rest. It _was_ used in two places at arch/frv for some reason. Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Balbir Singh 提交于
Implement reclaim from groups over their soft limit Permit reclaim from memory cgroups on contention (via the direct reclaim path). memory cgroup soft limit reclaim finds the group that exceeds its soft limit by the largest number of pages and reclaims pages from it and then reinserts the cgroup into its correct place in the rbtree. Add additional checks to mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim() to detect long loops in case all swap is turned off. The code has been refactored and the loop check (loop < 2) has been enhanced for soft limits. For soft limits, we try to do more targetted reclaim. Instead of bailing out after two loops, the routine now reclaims memory proportional to the size by which the soft limit is exceeded. The proportion has been empirically determined. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: build fix] [kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com: fix softlimit css refcnt handling] [nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp: refcount of the "victim" should be decremented before exiting the loop] Signed-off-by: NBalbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDaisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 22 9月, 2009 17 次提交
-
-
由 Vincent Li 提交于
Commit 084f71ae(kill page_queue_congested()) removed page_queue_congested(). Remove the page_queue_congested() comment in vmscan pageout() too. Signed-off-by: NVincent Li <macli@brc.ubc.ca> Reviewed-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
For mem_cgroup, shrink_zone() may call shrink_list() with nr_to_scan=1, in which case shrink_list() _still_ calls isolate_pages() with the much larger SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX. It effectively scales up the inactive list scan rate by up to 32 times. For example, with 16k inactive pages and DEF_PRIORITY=12, (16k >> 12)=4. So when shrink_zone() expects to scan 4 pages in the active/inactive list, the active list will be scanned 4 pages, while the inactive list will be (over) scanned SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX=32 pages in effect. And that could break the balance between the two lists. It can further impact the scan of anon active list, due to the anon active/inactive ratio rebalance logic in balance_pgdat()/shrink_zone(): inactive anon list over scanned => inactive_anon_is_low() == TRUE => shrink_active_list() => active anon list over scanned So the end result may be - anon inactive => over scanned - anon active => over scanned (maybe not as much) - file inactive => over scanned - file active => under scanned (relatively) The accesses to nr_saved_scan are not lock protected and so not 100% accurate, however we can tolerate small errors and the resulted small imbalanced scan rates between zones. Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NBalbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Vincent Li 提交于
The name `zone_nr_pages' can be mis-read as zone's (total) number pages, but it actually returns zone's LRU list number pages. Signed-off-by: NVincent Li <macli@brc.ubc.ca> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Johannes Weiner 提交于
Enlighten the reader of this code about what reference count makes a page cache page freeable. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Johannes Weiner 提交于
Make page_has_private() return a true boolean value and remove the double negations from the two callsites using it for arithmetic. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Johannes Weiner 提交于
page_is_file_cache() has been used for both boolean checks and LRU arithmetic, which was always a bit weird. Now that page_lru_base_type() exists for LRU arithmetic, make page_is_file_cache() a real predicate function and adjust the boolean-using callsites to drop those pesky double negations. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Johannes Weiner 提交于
Instead of abusing page_is_file_cache() for LRU list index arithmetic, add another helper with a more appropriate name and convert the non-boolean users of page_is_file_cache() accordingly. This new helper gives the LRU base type a page is supposed to live on, inactive anon or inactive file. [hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk: convert del_page_from_lru() also] Signed-off-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Johannes Weiner 提交于
Remove double negations where the operand is already boolean. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Reviewed-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 KOSAKI Motohiro 提交于
The pages in the list passed move_active_pages_to_lru() are already touched by shrink_active_list(). IOW the prefetch in move_active_pages_to_lru() don't populate any cache. it's pointless. This patch remove it. Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 KOSAKI Motohiro 提交于
The page_lru() already evaluate PageActive() and PageSwapBacked(). We don't need to re-evaluate it. Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 KOSAKI Motohiro 提交于
The move_active_pages_to_lru() function is called under irq disabled and ClearPageActive() doesn't need irq disabling. Then, this patch move it into shrink_active_list(). Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Minchan Kim 提交于
The VM already avoids attempting to reclaim anon pages in various places, But it doesn't avoid it for lumpy reclaim. It shuffles lru list unnecessary so that it is pointless. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: cleanup] Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
global_lru_pages() / zone_lru_pages() can be used in two ways: - to estimate max reclaimable pages in determine_dirtyable_memory() - to calculate the slab scan ratio When swap is full or not present, the anon lru lists are not reclaimable and also won't be scanned. So the anon pages shall not be counted in both usage scenarios. Also rename to _reclaimable_pages: now they are counting the possibly reclaimable lru pages. It can greatly (and correctly) increase the slab scan rate under high memory pressure (when most file pages have been reclaimed and swap is full/absent), thus reduce false OOM kills. Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: "Li, Ming Chun" <macli@brc.ubc.ca> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Rik van Riel 提交于
When way too many processes go into direct reclaim, it is possible for all of the pages to be taken off the LRU. One result of this is that the next process in the page reclaim code thinks there are no reclaimable pages left and triggers an out of memory kill. One solution to this problem is to never let so many processes into the page reclaim path that the entire LRU is emptied. Limiting the system to only having half of each inactive list isolated for reclaim should be safe. Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 KOSAKI Motohiro 提交于
If the system is running a heavy load of processes then concurrent reclaim can isolate a large number of pages from the LRU. /proc/vmstat and the output generated for an OOM do not show how many pages were isolated. This has been observed during process fork bomb testing (mstctl11 in LTP). This patch shows the information about isolated pages. Reproduced via: ----------------------- % ./hackbench 140 process 1000 => OOM occur active_anon:146 inactive_anon:0 isolated_anon:49245 active_file:79 inactive_file:18 isolated_file:113 unevictable:0 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0 buffer:39 free:370 slab_reclaimable:309 slab_unreclaimable:5492 mapped:53 shmem:15 pagetables:28140 bounce:0 Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Acked-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 KOSAKI Motohiro 提交于
If sc->isolate_pages() return 0, we don't need to call shrink_page_list(). In past days, shrink_inactive_list() handled it properly. But commit fb8d14e1 (three years ago commit!) breaked it. current shrink_inactive_list() always call shrink_page_list() although isolate_pages() return 0. This patch restore proper return value check. Requirements: o "nr_taken == 0" condition should stay before calling shrink_page_list(). o "nr_taken == 0" condition should stay after nr_scan related statistics modification. Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 KOSAKI Motohiro 提交于
Currently the pgmoved variable has two meanings. It causes harder reviewing. This patch separates it. Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 16 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
try_to_unmap currently has multiple modi (migration, munlock, normal unmap) which are selected by magic flag variables. The logic is not very straight forward, because each of these flag change multiple behaviours (e.g. migration turns off aging, not only sets up migration ptes etc.) Also the different flags interact in magic ways. A later patch in this series adds another mode to try_to_unmap, so this becomes quickly unmanageable. Replace the different flags with a action code (migration, munlock, munmap) and some additional flags as modifiers (ignore mlock, ignore aging). This makes the logic more straight forward and allows easier extension to new behaviours. Change all the caller to declare what they want to do. This patch is supposed to be a nop in behaviour. If anyone can prove it is not that would be a bug. Cc: Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com Cc: npiggin@suse.de Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
-