Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 23 12月, 2013 17 次提交
  3. 11 11月, 2013 1 次提交
    • C
      f2fs: issue more large discard command · 29e59c14
      由 Changman Lee 提交于 
      o Changes from v1
  Use find_next(_zero)_bit suggested by jg.kim

When f2fs issues discard command, if segment is contiguous,
let's issue more large segment to gather adjacent segments.

** blktrace **
179,1    0     5859    42.619023770   971  C   D 131072 + 2097152 [0]
179,1    0    33665   108.840475468   971  C   D 2228224 + 2494464 [0]
179,1    0    33671   109.131616427   971  C   D 14909440 + 344064 [0]
179,1    0    33677   109.137100677   971  C   D 15261696 + 4096 [0]
Signed-off-by: NChangman Lee <cm224.lee@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
      29e59c14
  5. 08 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 06 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 30 10月, 2013 1 次提交
    • F
      f2fs: change the method of calculating the number summary blocks · 9a47938b
      由 Fan Li 提交于 
      npages_for_summary_flush uses (SUMMARY_SIZE + 1) as the size of a f2fs_summary
while its actual size is  SUMMARY_SIZE. So the result sometimes is bigger than
actual number by one, which causes checkpoint can't be written into disk
contiguously, and sometimes summary blocks can't be compacted like they should.
Besides, when writing summary blocks into pages, if remain space in a page
isn't big enough for one f2fs_summary, it will be left unused, current code
seems not to take it into account.
Signed-off-by: NFan Li <fanofcode.li@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
      9a47938b
  11. 29 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  13. 28 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  15. 25 10月, 2013 4 次提交
  17. 22 10月, 2013 2 次提交
  19. 18 10月, 2013 1 次提交
    • G
      f2fs: avoid wait if IO end up when do_checkpoint for better performance · e2340887
      由 Gu Zheng 提交于 
      Previously, do_checkpoint() will call congestion_wait() for waiting the pages
(previous submitted node/meta/data pages) to be written back.
Because congestion_wait() will set a regular period (e.g. HZ / 50 ) for waiting, and
no additional wake up mechanism was introduced if IO ends up before regular period costed.
Yuan Zhong found there is a situation that after the pages have been written back,
but the checkpoint thread still wait for congestion_wait to exit.

So here we store checkpoint task into f2fs_sb when doing checkpoint, it'll wait for IO completes
if there's IO going on, and in the end IO path, wake up checkpoint task when IO ends up.

Thanks to Yuan Zhong's pre work about this problem.
Reported-by: NYuan Zhong <yuan.mark.zhong@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NGu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
      e2340887
  21. 24 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  23. 19 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  25. 12 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  27. 06 8月, 2013 1 次提交
    • J
      f2fs: fix a deadlock in fsync · a569469e
      由 Jin Xu 提交于 
      This patch fixes a deadlock bug that occurs quite often when there are
concurrent write and fsync on a same file.

Following is the simplified call trace when tasks get hung.

fsync thread:
- f2fs_sync_file
 ...
 - f2fs_write_data_pages
 ...
  - update_extent_cache
  ...
   - update_inode
    - wait_on_page_writeback

bdi writeback thread
- __writeback_single_inode
 - f2fs_write_data_pages
  - mutex_lock(sbi->writepages)

The deadlock happens when the fsync thread waits on a inode page that has
been added to the f2fs' cached bio sbi->bio[NODE], and unfortunately,
no one else could be able to submit the cached bio to block layer for
writeback. This is because the fsync thread already hold a sbi->fs_lock and
the sbi->writepages lock, causing the bdi thread being blocked when attempt
to write data pages for the same inode. At the same time, f2fs_gc thread
does not notice the situation and could not help. Even the sync syscall
gets blocked.

To fix it, we could submit the cached bio first before waiting on a inode page
that is being written back.
Signed-off-by: NJin Xu <jinuxstyle@gmail.com>
[Jaegeuk Kim: add more cases to use f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback]
Signed-off-by: NJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
      a569469e
  29. 30 7月, 2013 1 次提交
  31. 02 7月, 2013 2 次提交
    • J
      f2fs: remove reusing any prefree segments · 763bfe1b
      由 Jaegeuk Kim 提交于 
      This patch removes check_prefree_segments initially designed to enhance the
performance by narrowing the range of LBA usage across the whole block device.

When allocating a new segment, previous f2fs tries to find proper prefree
segments, and then, if finds a segment, it reuses the segment for further
data or node block allocation.

However, I found that this was totally wrong approach since the prefree segments
have several data or node blocks that will be used by the roll-forward mechanism
operated after sudden-power-off.

Let's assume the following scenario.

/* write 8MB with fsync */
for (i = 0; i < 2048; i++) {
	offset = i * 4096;
	write(fd, offset, 4KB);
	fsync(fd);
}

In this case, naive segment allocation sequence will be like:
 data segment: x, x+1, x+2, x+3
 node segment: y, y+1, y+2, y+3.

But, if we can reuse prefree segments, the sequence can be like:
 data segment: x, x+1, y, y+1
 node segment: y, y+1, y+2, y+3.
Because, y, y+1, and y+2 became prefree segments one by one, and those are
reused by data allocation.

After conducting this workload, we should consider how to recover the latest
inode with its data.
If we reuse the prefree segments such as y or y+1, we lost the old node blocks
so that f2fs even cannot start roll-forward recovery.

Therefore, I suggest that we should remove reusing prefree segments.
Signed-off-by: NJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
      763bfe1b
    • N
      f2fs: optimize the init_dirty_segmap function · 8736fbf0
      由 Namjae Jeon 提交于 
      Optimize the while loop condition

Since this condition will always be true and while loop will
be terminated by the following condition in code:

if (segno >= TOTAL_SEGS(sbi))
    break;
Hence we can replace the while loop condition with while(1)
instead of always checking for segno to be less than Total segs.

Also we do not need to use TOTAL_SEGS() everytime. We can store
this value in a local variable since this value is constant.
Signed-off-by: NNamjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NPankaj Kumar <pankaj.km@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
      8736fbf0
  33. 14 6月, 2013 3 次提交