Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 20 1月, 2014 8 次提交
  3. 19 1月, 2014 3 次提交
  5. 15 1月, 2014 1 次提交
    • M
      IB/core: Ethernet L2 attributes in verbs/cm structures · dd5f03be
      由 Matan Barak 提交于 
      This patch add the support for Ethernet L2 attributes in the
verbs/cm/cma structures.

When dealing with L2 Ethernet, we should use smac, dmac, vlan ID and priority
in a similar manner that the IB L2 (and the L4 PKEY) attributes are used.

Thus, those attributes were added to the following structures:

* ib_ah_attr - added dmac
* ib_qp_attr - added smac and vlan_id, (sl remains vlan priority)
* ib_wc - added smac, vlan_id
* ib_sa_path_rec - added smac, dmac, vlan_id
* cm_av - added smac and vlan_id

For the path record structure, extra care was taken to avoid the new
fields when packing it into wire format, so we don't break the IB CM
and SA wire protocol.

On the active side, the CM fills. its internal structures from the
path provided by the ULP.  We add there taking the ETH L2 attributes
and placing them into the CM Address Handle (struct cm_av).

On the passive side, the CM fills its internal structures from the WC
associated with the REQ message.  We add there taking the ETH L2
attributes from the WC.

When the HW driver provides the required ETH L2 attributes in the WC,
they set the IB_WC_WITH_SMAC and IB_WC_WITH_VLAN flags. The IB core
code checks for the presence of these flags, and in their absence does
address resolution from the ib_init_ah_from_wc() helper function.

ib_modify_qp_is_ok is also updated to consider the link layer. Some
parameters are mandatory for Ethernet link layer, while they are
irrelevant for IB.  Vendor drivers are modified to support the new
function signature.
Signed-off-by: NMatan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NOr Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NRoland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
      dd5f03be
  7. 04 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  9. 23 12月, 2013 3 次提交
  11. 21 12月, 2013 7 次提交
  13. 19 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  15. 17 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  17. 16 12月, 2013 2 次提交
  19. 12 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  21. 18 11月, 2013 6 次提交
    • M
      IB/core: Re-enable create_flow/destroy_flow uverbs · 69ad5da4
      由 Matan Barak 提交于 
      This commit reverts commit 7afbddfa ("IB/core: Temporarily disable
create_flow/destroy_flow uverbs").  Since the uverbs extensions
functionality was experimental for v3.12, this patch re-enables the
support for them and flow-steering for v3.13.
Signed-off-by: NMatan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NRoland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
      69ad5da4
    • Y
      IB/core: extended command: an improved infrastructure for uverbs commands · f21519b2
      由 Yann Droneaud 提交于 
      Commit 400dbc96 ("IB/core: Infrastructure for extensible uverbs
commands") added an infrastructure for extensible uverbs commands
while later commit 436f2ad0 ("IB/core: Export ib_create/destroy_flow
through uverbs") exported ib_create_flow()/ib_destroy_flow() functions
using this new infrastructure.

According to the commit 400dbc96, the purpose of this
infrastructure is to support passing around provider (eg. hardware)
specific buffers when userspace issue commands to the kernel, so that
it would be possible to extend uverbs (eg. core) buffers independently
from the provider buffers.

But the new kernel command function prototypes were not modified to
take advantage of this extension. This issue was exposed by Roland
Dreier in a previous review[1].

So the following patch is an attempt to a revised extensible command
infrastructure.

This improved extensible command infrastructure distinguish between
core (eg. legacy)'s command/response buffers from provider
(eg. hardware)'s command/response buffers: each extended command
implementing function is given a struct ib_udata to hold core
(eg. uverbs) input and output buffers, and another struct ib_udata to
hold the hw (eg. provider) input and output buffers.

Having those buffers identified separately make it easier to increase
one buffer to support extension without having to add some code to
guess the exact size of each command/response parts: This should make
the extended functions more reliable.

Additionally, instead of relying on command identifier being greater
than IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_THRESHOLD, the proposed infrastructure rely on
unused bits in command field: on the 32 bits provided by command
field, only 6 bits are really needed to encode the identifier of
commands currently supported by the kernel. (Even using only 6 bits
leaves room for about 23 new commands).

So this patch makes use of some high order bits in command field to
store flags, leaving enough room for more command identifiers than one
will ever need (eg. 256).

The new flags are used to specify if the command should be processed
as an extended one or a legacy one. While designing the new command
format, care was taken to make usage of flags itself extensible.

Using high order bits of the commands field ensure that newer
libibverbs on older kernel will properly fail when trying to call
extended commands. On the other hand, older libibverbs on newer kernel
will never be able to issue calls to extended commands.

The extended command header includes the optional response pointer so
that output buffer length and output buffer pointer are located
together in the command, allowing proper parameters checking. This
should make implementing functions easier and safer.

Additionally the extended header ensure 64bits alignment, while making
all sizes multiple of 8 bytes, extending the maximum buffer size:

                             legacy      extended

   Maximum command buffer:  256KBytes   1024KBytes (512KBytes + 512KBytes)
  Maximum response buffer:  256KBytes   1024KBytes (512KBytes + 512KBytes)

For the purpose of doing proper buffer size accounting, the headers
size are no more taken in account in "in_words".

One of the odds of the current extensible infrastructure, reading
twice the "legacy" command header, is fixed by removing the "legacy"
command header from the extended command header: they are processed as
two different parts of the command: memory is read once and
information are not duplicated: it's making clear that's an extended
command scheme and not a different command scheme.

The proposed scheme will format input (command) and output (response)
buffers this way:

- command:

  legacy header +
  extended header +
  command data (core + hw):

    +----------------------------------------+
    | flags     |   00      00    |  command |
    |        in_words    |   out_words       |
    +----------------------------------------+
    |                 response               |
    |                 response               |
    | provider_in_words | provider_out_words |
    |                 padding                |
    +----------------------------------------+
    |                                        |
    .              <uverbs input>            .
    .              (in_words * 8)            .
    |                                        |
    +----------------------------------------+
    |                                        |
    .             <provider input>           .
    .          (provider_in_words * 8)       .
    |                                        |
    +----------------------------------------+

- response, if present:

    +----------------------------------------+
    |                                        |
    .          <uverbs output space>         .
    .             (out_words * 8)            .
    |                                        |
    +----------------------------------------+
    |                                        |
    .         <provider output space>        .
    .         (provider_out_words * 8)       .
    |                                        |
    +----------------------------------------+

The overall design is to ensure that the extensible infrastructure is
itself extensible while begin more reliable with more input and bound
checking.

Note:

The unused field in the extended header would be perfect candidate to
hold the command "comp_mask" (eg. bit field used to handle
compatibility).  This was suggested by Roland Dreier in a previous
review[2].  But "comp_mask" field is likely to be present in the uverb
input and/or provider input, likewise for the response, as noted by
Matan Barak[3], so it doesn't make sense to put "comp_mask" in the
header.

[1]:
http://marc.info/?i=CAL1RGDWxmM17W2o_era24A-TTDeKyoL6u3NRu_=t_dhV_ZA9MA@mail.gmail.com

[2]:
http://marc.info/?i=CAL1RGDXJtrc849M6_XNZT5xO1+ybKtLWGq6yg6LhoSsKpsmkYA@mail.gmail.com

[3]:
http://marc.info/?i=525C1149.6000701@mellanox.comSigned-off-by: NYann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com>
Link: http://marc.info/?i=cover.1383773832.git.ydroneaud@opteya.com

[ Convert "ret ? ret : 0" to the equivalent "ret".  - Roland ]
Signed-off-by: NRoland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
      f21519b2
    • Y
      IB/core: Remove ib_uverbs_flow_spec structure from userspace · 2490f20b
      由 Yann Droneaud 提交于 
      The structure holding any types of flow_spec is of no use to
userspace.  It would be wrong for userspace to do:

  struct ib_uverbs_flow_spec flow_spec;

  flow_spec.type = IB_FLOW_SPEC_TCP;
  flow_spec.size = sizeof(flow_spec);

Instead, userspace should use the dedicated flow_spec structure for
  - Ethernet : struct ib_uverbs_flow_spec_eth,
  - IPv4     : struct ib_uverbs_flow_spec_ipv4,
  - TCP/UDP  : struct ib_uverbs_flow_spec_tcp_udp.

In other words, struct ib_uverbs_flow_spec is a "virtual" data
structure that can only be use by the kernel as an alias to the other.
Signed-off-by: NYann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com>
Link: http://marc.info/?i=cover.1383773832.git.ydroneaud@opteya.comSigned-off-by: NRoland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
      2490f20b
    • Y
      IB/core: Make uverbs flow structure use names like verbs ones · b68c9560
      由 Yann Droneaud 提交于 
      This patch adds "flow" prefix to most of data structure added as part
of commit 436f2ad0 ("IB/core: Export ib_create/destroy_flow through
uverbs") to keep those names in sync with the data structures added in
commit 319a441d ("IB/core: Add receive flow steering support").

It's just a matter of translating 'ib_flow' to 'ib_uverbs_flow'.
Signed-off-by: NYann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com>
Link: http://marc.info/?i=cover.1383773832.git.ydroneaud@opteya.comSigned-off-by: NRoland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
      b68c9560
    • Y
      IB/core: Rename 'flow' structs to match other uverbs structs · d82693da
      由 Yann Droneaud 提交于 
      Commit 436f2ad0 ("IB/core: Export ib_create/destroy_flow through
uverbs") added public data structures to support receive flow
steering.  The new structs are not following the 'uverbs' pattern:
they're lacking the common prefix 'ib_uverbs'.

This patch replaces ib_kern prefix by ib_uverbs.
Signed-off-by: NYann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com>
Link: http://marc.info/?i=cover.1383773832.git.ydroneaud@opteya.comSigned-off-by: NRoland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
      d82693da
    • M
      IB/core: clarify overflow/underflow checks on ib_create/destroy_flow · f8848274
      由 Matan Barak 提交于 
      This patch fixes the following issues:

1. Unneeded checks were removed

2. Removed the fixed size out of flow_attr.size, thus simplifying the checks.

3. Remove a 32bit hole on 64bit systems with strict alignment in
   struct ib_kern_flow_att by adding a reserved field.
Signed-off-by: NMatan Barak <matanb@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NRoland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
      f8848274
  23. 17 11月, 2013 2 次提交
  25. 16 11月, 2013 4 次提交