By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-25-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-24-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-23-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-22-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-21-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-20-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-19-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-18-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-17-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-16-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-15-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-14-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-13-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-12-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-11-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-10-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-9-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-8-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-7-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-6-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-5-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-4-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-3-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We want to replace the inline wait_for() with an out-of-line hybrid
busy/sleep wait_for() in the hopes of speeding up the communication wit
the PCode unit.

Indeed, on my i5-2500s, __gen6_update_ring_freq improves from
6,080,661ns to 8172ns.

v2: Missed using _fw variants for sandybridge_pcode_read()
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-2-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Ville Syrjälä reported that in the majority of wait_for(I915_READ()) he
inspect, most completed within the first couple of reads and that the
delay between those wait_for() reads was the ratelimiting step for many
code paths. For example, __gen6_update_ring_freq() was blamed for
slowing down boot by many milliseconds, but under Ville's scrutiny the
issue was just excessive delay waiting for sandybridge_pcode_write().

We can eliminate the wait by initially using a busyspin upon the register
read and only fallback to the sleeping loop in cases where the hardware
is indeed too slow. A threshold of 2 microseconds is used as the initial
ballpark.

To avoid excessive code bloating from converting every wait_for() into a
hybrid busy/sleep loop, we extend wait_for_register_fw() and export it
for use by other callers.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

This reverts commit ee042aa4.

Something appears to be off in the timing, but as far as I can tell it
is not along the event delivery path. The net effect appears to be
rendering flicker (the current render buffer appears on the scanout,
with what appears to be active rendering for a fraction of a frame) and
is causing me a headache.

The cursor is also being stalled by page flips, causing a "heavy mouse"
and jitter.

Daniel Stone did find what appears to the cause of the tearing, in
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2016-June/099466.html
That is the parameter passed to intel_atomic_commit_tail is the
old_state but we need the new_state to wait upon.

That leaves the question of how the CRC based tests didn't spot the
error (how can we improve our tests?), the issue of legacy cursor
stalling flips, and the issue of flips stalling the cursor. For the
moment, step back until the condundrum of new/old state is reviewed
along with more tests!
Reported-and-tested-by: NSteven Newbury <steve@snewbury.org.uk>
Reported-by: NRafael Ristovski  <rafael.ristovski@gmail.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96593
Testcase: igt/kms_cursor_legacy/basic-cursor-vs-flip
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1466772243-21879-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukAcked-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

Since commit 2ed53a94 ("drm/i915: On GPU reset, set the HWS
breadcrumb to the last seqno") once a hang is completed, the seqno is
advanced past all current requests. With this we know that if we wake up
from waiting for a request, if a hang has occurred and reset completed,
our request will be considered complete (i.e.
i915_gem_request_completed() returns true). Therefore we only need to
worry about the situation where a hang has occurred, but not yet reset,
where we may need to release our struct_mutex. Since we don't need to
detect the completed reset using the global gpu_error->reset_counter
anymore, we do not need to track the reset_counter epoch inside the
request.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467211874-11552-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NArun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com>

usleep_range is not recommended for waits shorten than 10us.

Make the wait_for_us use the atomic variant for such waits.

To do so we need to reimplement the _wait_for_atomic macro to
be safe with regards to preemption and interrupts.

v2: Reimplement _wait_for_atomic to be irq and preemption safe.
    (Chris Wilson and Imre Deak)

v3: Fixed in_atomic check due rebase error.
v4: Build bug on non-constant timeouts.
v5: Compile away cpu migration code in atomic paths.
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467114710-29989-1-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com

Required to enable correct wait_for_atomic checks.
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Most notably eDP, DSI, and TV. Add MISSING_CASE handling so we won't
miss this in the future.
Reviewed-and-tested-by: NPeter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/5773794027ea0d699052a343491b52343ba30504.1465810007.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

No functional changes.
Reviewed-and-tested-by: NPeter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ef19172e5a00d8abd8190a5389283ef6b5f7eaa9.1465810007.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

It's easier to read the code when the macro names match the spec. Also
add a bunch of missing ones. No functional changes.
Reviewed-and-tested-by: NPeter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7cfdd2733b8cc7abae43cfa8c81aed902b69ecd5.1465810007.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

This is unusual. Usually IDs listed on early stages of platform
definition are kept there as reserved for later use.

However these IDs here are not listed anymore in any of steppings
and devices IDs tables for Kabylake on configurations overview
section of BSpec.

So it is better removing them before they become used in any
other future platform.
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1466718636-19675-2-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com

The spec has been updated adding new PCI IDs.
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1466718636-19675-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com

Since wait_for_atomic doesn't re-check the wait-for condition after
expiry of the timeout it can fail when called from non-atomic context
even if the condition is set correctly before the expiry. Fix this by
using the non-atomic wait_for instead.

Due to the relatively long 10ms timeout, probably this didn't cause any
real problems, but fix it in any case for consistency.

Fixes: 0351b939 ("drm/i915: Do not lie about atomic timeout granularity")
CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
CC: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
CC: drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467110253-16046-5-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com

Since wait_for_atomic doesn't re-check the wait-for condition after
expiry of the timeout it can fail when called from non-atomic context
even if the condition is set correctly before the expiry. Fix this by
using the non-atomic wait_for instead.

Fixes: 0351b939 ("drm/i915: Do not lie about atomic timeout granularity")
CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
CC: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
CC: drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467110253-16046-4-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com

Since wait_for_atomic doesn't re-check the wait-for condition after
expiry of the timeout it can fail when called from non-atomic context
even if the condition is set correctly before the expiry. Fix this by
using the non-atomic wait_for instead.

Fixes: 0351b939 ("drm/i915: Do not lie about atomic timeout granularity")
CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
CC: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
CC: drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467110253-16046-3-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com

Since wait_for_atomic doesn't re-check the wait-for condition after
expiry of the timeout it can fail when called from non-atomic context
even if the condition is set correctly before the expiry. Fix this by
using the non-atomic wait_for instead.

I noticed this via the PLL locking timing out incorrectly, with this fix
I couldn't reproduce the problem.

Fixes: 0351b939 ("drm/i915: Do not lie about atomic timeout granularity")
CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
CC: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
CC: drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467110253-16046-2-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com

When a display update triggers a DDB re-allocation, we should start by
assuming that only the updated pipes need to be re-allocated (we have
logic later that may add additional pipes if, e.g., a modeset triggers a
change to the global allocation).

We were erroneously using the _active_ pipes as our starting point
rather than the changed pipes.  This causes us to grab CRTC locks that
we didn't actually need, reducing parallelism.  Given the recent
non-blocking atomic changes, it also causes legacy pageflips against one
CRTC to return -EBUSY if there's an outstanding pageflip against a
different CRTC (a situation easily triggered via compositors like
Weston).

Fixes: 98d39494 ("drm/i915/gen9: Compute DDB allocation at atomic check time (v4)")
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467070964-14864-1-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.comReviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

Fix build errors when ACPI is not enabled by adding function stubs:

../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c: In function 'i915_drm_suspend':
../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:635:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'intel_opregion_unregister' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  intel_opregion_unregister(dev_priv);
../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c: In function 'i915_drm_resume':
../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:798:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'intel_opregion_register' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  intel_opregion_register(dev_priv);
Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Fixes: 03d92e47 ("drm/i915/opregion: Rename init/fini functions to register/unregister")
Cc: drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[Jani: dropped the stale init/fini declarations]
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467028399-9965-1-git-send-email-jani.nikula@intel.com