Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 26 7月, 2017 13 次提交
  3. 17 7月, 2017 2 次提交
  5. 22 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  7. 21 6月, 2017 4 次提交
  9. 11 5月, 2017 1 次提交
  11. 26 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  13. 16 3月, 2017 1 次提交
    • T
      locking/lockdep: Handle statically initialized PER_CPU locks properly · 383776fa
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      If a PER_CPU struct which contains a spin_lock is statically initialized
via:

DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct foo, bla) = {
	.lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(bla.lock)
};

then lockdep assigns a seperate key to each lock because the logic for
assigning a key to statically initialized locks is to use the address as
the key. With per CPU locks the address is obvioulsy different on each CPU.

That's wrong, because all locks should have the same key.

To solve this the following modifications are required:

 1) Extend the is_kernel/module_percpu_addr() functions to hand back the
    canonical address of the per CPU address, i.e. the per CPU address
    minus the per CPU offset.

 2) Check the lock address with these functions and if the per CPU check
    matches use the returned canonical address as the lock key, so all per
    CPU locks have the same key.

 3) Move the static_obj(key) check into look_up_lock_class() so this check
    can be avoided for statically initialized per CPU locks.  That's
    required because the canonical address fails the static_obj(key) check
    for obvious reasons.
Reported-by: NMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
[ Merged Dan's fixups for !MODULES and !SMP into this patch. ]
Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170227143736.pectaimkjkan5kow@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      383776fa
  15. 07 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  17. 28 2月, 2017 1 次提交
  19. 13 12月, 2016 1 次提交
  21. 20 10月, 2016 1 次提交
    • Z
      percpu: ensure the requested alignment is power of two · 3ca45a46
      由 zijun_hu 提交于 
      The percpu allocator expectedly assumes that the requested alignment
is power of two but hasn't been veryfing the input.  If the specified
alignment isn't power of two, the allocator can malfunction.  Add the
sanity check.

The following is detailed analysis of the effects of alignments which
aren't power of two.

 The alignment must be a even at least since the LSB of a chunk->map
 element is used as free/in-use flag of a area; besides, the alignment
 must be a power of 2 too since ALIGN() doesn't work well for other
 alignment always but is adopted by pcpu_fit_in_area().  IOW, the
 current allocator only works well for a power of 2 aligned area
 allocation.

 See below opposite example for why an odd alignment doesn't work.
 Let's assume area [16, 36) is free but its previous one is in-use, we
 want to allocate a @size == 8 and @align == 7 area.  The larger area
 [16, 36) is split to three areas [16, 21), [21, 29), [29, 36)
 eventually.  However, due to the usage for a chunk->map element, the
 actual offset of the aim area [21, 29) is 21 but is recorded in
 relevant element as 20; moreover, the residual tail free area [29,
 36) is mistook as in-use and is lost silently

 Unlike macro roundup(), ALIGN(x, a) doesn't work if @a isn't a power
 of 2 for example, roundup(10, 6) == 12 but ALIGN(10, 6) == 10, and
 the latter result isn't desired obviously.

tj: Code style and patch description updates.
Signed-off-by: Nzijun_hu <zijun_hu@htc.com>
Suggested-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      3ca45a46
  23. 05 10月, 2016 2 次提交
    • Z
      mm/percpu.c: fix potential memory leakage for pcpu_embed_first_chunk() · 9b739662
      由 zijun_hu 提交于 
      in order to ensure the percpu group areas within a chunk aren't
distributed too sparsely, pcpu_embed_first_chunk() goes to error handling
path when a chunk spans over 3/4 VMALLOC area, however, during the error
handling, it forget to free the memory allocated for all percpu groups by
going to label @out_free other than @out_free_areas.

it will cause memory leakage issue if the rare scene really happens, in
order to fix the issue, we check chunk spanned area immediately after
completing memory allocation for all percpu groups, we go to label
@out_free_areas to free the memory then return if the checking is failed.

in order to verify the approach, we dump all memory allocated then
enforce the jump then dump all memory freed, the result is okay after
checking whether we free all memory we allocate in this function.

BTW, The approach is chosen after thinking over the below scenes
 - we don't go to label @out_free directly to fix this issue since we
   maybe free several allocated memory blocks twice
 - the aim of jumping after pcpu_setup_first_chunk() is bypassing free
   usable memory other than handling error, moreover, the function does
   not return error code in any case, it either panics due to BUG_ON()
   or return 0.
Signed-off-by: Nzijun_hu <zijun_hu@htc.com>
Tested-by: Nzijun_hu <zijun_hu@htc.com>
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      9b739662
    • Z
      mm/percpu.c: correct max_distance calculation for pcpu_embed_first_chunk() · 93c76b6b
      由 zijun_hu 提交于 
      pcpu_embed_first_chunk() calculates the range a percpu chunk spans into
@max_distance and uses it to ensure that a chunk is not too big compared
to the total vmalloc area. However, during calculation, it used incorrect
top address by adding a unit size to the highest group's base address.

This can make the calculated max_distance slightly smaller than the actual
distance although given the scale of values involved the error is very
unlikely to have an actual impact.

Fix this issue by adding the group's size instead of a unit size.

BTW, The type of variable max_distance is changed from size_t to unsigned
long too based on below consideration:
 - type unsigned long usually have same width with IP core registers and
   can be applied at here very well
 - make @max_distance type consistent with the operand calculated against
   it such as @ai->groups[i].base_offset and macro VMALLOC_TOTAL
 - type unsigned long is more universal then size_t, size_t is type defined
   to unsigned int or unsigned long among various ARCHs usually
Signed-off-by: Nzijun_hu <zijun_hu@htc.com>
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      93c76b6b
  25. 25 5月, 2016 2 次提交
  27. 18 3月, 2016 4 次提交
  29. 23 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  31. 06 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  33. 21 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  35. 25 6月, 2015 1 次提交
    • L
      mm: kmemleak_alloc_percpu() should follow the gfp from per_alloc() · 8a8c35fa
      由 Larry Finger 提交于 
      Beginning at commit d52d3997 ("ipv6: Create percpu rt6_info"), the
following INFO splat is logged:

  ===============================
  [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
  4.1.0-rc7-next-20150612 #1 Not tainted
  -------------------------------
  kernel/sched/core.c:7318 Illegal context switch in RCU-bh read-side critical section!
  other info that might help us debug this:
  rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
   3 locks held by systemd/1:
   #0:  (rtnl_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff815f0c8f>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x1f/0x40
   #1:  (rcu_read_lock_bh){......}, at: [<ffffffff816a34e2>] ipv6_add_addr+0x62/0x540
   #2:  (addrconf_hash_lock){+...+.}, at: [<ffffffff816a3604>] ipv6_add_addr+0x184/0x540
  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Not tainted 4.1.0-rc7-next-20150612 #1
  Hardware name: TOSHIBA TECRA A50-A/TECRA A50-A, BIOS Version 4.20   04/17/2014
  Call Trace:
    dump_stack+0x4c/0x6e
    lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xe7/0x120
    ___might_sleep+0x1d5/0x1f0
    __might_sleep+0x4d/0x90
    kmem_cache_alloc+0x47/0x250
    create_object+0x39/0x2e0
    kmemleak_alloc_percpu+0x61/0xe0
    pcpu_alloc+0x370/0x630

Additional backtrace lines are truncated.  In addition, the above splat
is followed by several "BUG: sleeping function called from invalid
context at mm/slub.c:1268" outputs.  As suggested by Martin KaFai Lau,
these are the clue to the fix.  Routine kmemleak_alloc_percpu() always
uses GFP_KERNEL for its allocations, whereas it should follow the gfp
from its callers.
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NKamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NLarry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>	[3.18+]
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      8a8c35fa
  37. 25 3月, 2015 1 次提交