1. 09 10月, 2012 2 次提交
    • M
      rbtree: move some implementation details from rbtree.h to rbtree.c · bf7ad8ee
      Michel Lespinasse 提交于
      rbtree users must use the documented APIs to manipulate the tree
      structure.  Low-level helpers to manipulate node colors and parenthood are
      not part of that API, so move them to lib/rbtree.c
      
      [dwmw2@infradead.org: fix jffs2 build issue due to renamed __rb_parent_color field]
      Signed-off-by: NMichel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
      Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
      Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com>
      Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      bf7ad8ee
    • M
      rbtree: empty nodes have no color · 4c199a93
      Michel Lespinasse 提交于
      Empty nodes have no color.  We can make use of this property to simplify
      the code emitted by the RB_EMPTY_NODE and RB_CLEAR_NODE macros.  Also,
      we can get rid of the rb_init_node function which had been introduced by
      commit 88d19cf3 ("timers: Add rb_init_node() to allow for stack
      allocated rb nodes") to avoid some issue with the empty node's color not
      being initialized.
      
      I'm not sure what the RB_EMPTY_NODE checks in rb_prev() / rb_next() are
      doing there, though.  axboe introduced them in commit 10fd48f2
      ("rbtree: fixed reversed RB_EMPTY_NODE and rb_next/prev").  The way I
      see it, the 'empty node' abstraction is only used by rbtree users to
      flag nodes that they haven't inserted in any rbtree, so asking the
      predecessor or successor of such nodes doesn't make any sense.
      
      One final rb_init_node() caller was recently added in sysctl code to
      implement faster sysctl name lookups.  This code doesn't make use of
      RB_EMPTY_NODE at all, and from what I could see it only called
      rb_init_node() under the mistaken assumption that such initialization was
      required before node insertion.
      
      [sfr@canb.auug.org.au: fix net/ceph/osd_client.c build]
      Signed-off-by: NMichel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
      Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
      Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@pobox.com>
      Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
      Signed-off-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      4c199a93
  2. 08 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  3. 28 1月, 2011 1 次提交
  4. 05 7月, 2010 1 次提交
    • P
      rbtree: Undo augmented trees performance damage and regression · b945d6b2
      Peter Zijlstra 提交于
      Reimplement augmented RB-trees without sprinkling extra branches
      all over the RB-tree code (which lives in the scheduler hot path).
      
      This approach is 'borrowed' from Fabio's BFQ implementation and
      relies on traversing the rebalance path after the RB-tree-op to
      correct the heap property for insertion/removal and make up for
      the damage done by the tree rotations.
      
      For insertion the rebalance path is trivially that from the new
      node upwards to the root, for removal it is that from the deepest
      node in the path from the to be removed node that will still
      be around after the removal.
      
      [ This patch also fixes a video driver regression reported by
        Ali Gholami Rudi - the memtype->subtree_max_end was updated
        incorrectly. ]
      Acked-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Tested-by: NAli Gholami Rudi <ali@rudi.ir>
      Cc: Fabio Checconi <fabio@gandalf.sssup.it>
      Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      LKML-Reference: <1275414172.27810.27961.camel@twins>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      b945d6b2
  5. 19 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  6. 17 6月, 2009 3 次提交
  7. 01 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  8. 10 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  9. 01 10月, 2006 1 次提交
  10. 06 6月, 2006 1 次提交
  11. 21 4月, 2006 2 次提交
    • D
      [RBTREE] Merge colour and parent fields of struct rb_node. · 55a98102
      David Woodhouse 提交于
      We only used a single bit for colour information, so having a whole
      machine word of space allocated for it was a bit wasteful. Instead,
      store it in the lowest bit of the 'parent' pointer, since that was
      always going to be aligned anyway.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
      55a98102
    • D
      [RBTREE] Remove dead code in rb_erase() · 1975e593
      David Woodhouse 提交于
      Observe rb_erase(), when the victim node 'old' has two children so
      neither of the simple cases at the beginning are taken.
      
      Observe that it effectively does an 'rb_next()' operation to find the
      next (by value) node in the tree. That is; we go to the victim's
      right-hand child and then follow left-hand pointers all the way
      down the tree as far as we can until we find the next node 'node'. We
      end up with 'node' being either the same immediate right-hand child of
      'old', or one of its descendants on the far left-hand side.
      
      For a start, we _know_ that 'node' has a parent. We can drop that check.
      
      We also know that if 'node's parent is 'old', then 'node' is the
      right-hand child of its parent. And that if 'node's parent is _not_
      'old', then 'node' is the left-hand child of its parent.
      
      So instead of checking for 'node->rb_parent == old' in one place and
      also checking 'node's heritage separately when we're trying to change
      its link from its parent, we can shuffle things around a bit and do
      it like this...
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
      1975e593
  12. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4