1. 08 8月, 2014 16 次提交
  2. 01 8月, 2014 2 次提交
  3. 30 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  4. 24 7月, 2014 6 次提交
  5. 23 7月, 2014 1 次提交
    • K
      NFSD: Fix crash encoding lock reply on 32-bit · f98bac5a
      Kinglong Mee 提交于
      Commit 8c7424cf "nfsd4: don't try to encode conflicting owner if low
      on space" forgot to free conf->data in nfsd4_encode_lockt and before
      sign conf->data to NULL in nfsd4_encode_lock_denied, causing a leak.
      
      Worse, kfree() can be called on an uninitialized pointer in the case of
      a succesful lock (or one that fails for a reason other than a conflict).
      
      (Note that lock->lk_denied.ld_owner.data appears it should be zero here,
      until you notice that it's one arm of a union the other arm of which is
      written to in the succesful case by the
      
      	memcpy(&lock->lk_resp_stateid, &lock_stp->st_stid.sc_stateid,
      	                                sizeof(stateid_t));
      
      in nfsd4_lock().  In the 32-bit case this overwrites ld_owner.data.)
      Signed-off-by: NKinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
      Fixes: 8c7424cf ""nfsd4: don't try to encode conflicting owner if low on space"
      Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
      f98bac5a
  6. 22 7月, 2014 2 次提交
  7. 20 7月, 2014 2 次提交
    • E
      btrfs: test for valid bdev before kobj removal in btrfs_rm_device · 0bfaa9c5
      Eric Sandeen 提交于
      commit 99994cde btrfs: dev delete should remove sysfs entry
      added a btrfs_kobj_rm_device, which dereferences device->bdev...
      right after we check whether device->bdev might be NULL.
      
      I don't honestly know if it's possible to have a NULL device->bdev
      here, but assuming that it is (given the test), we need to move
      the kobject removal to be under that test.
      
      (Coverity spotted this)
      Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      0bfaa9c5
    • L
      Btrfs: fix abnormal long waiting in fsync · 98ce2ded
      Liu Bo 提交于
      xfstests generic/127 detected this problem.
      
      With commit 7fc34a62, now fsync will only flush
      data within the passed range.  This is the cause of the above problem,
      -- btrfs's fsync has a stage called 'sync log' which will wait for all the
      ordered extents it've recorded to finish.
      
      In xfstests/generic/127, with mixed operations such as truncate, fallocate,
      punch hole, and mapwrite, we get some pre-allocated extents, and mapwrite will
      mmap, and then msync.  And I find that msync will wait for quite a long time
      (about 20s in my case), thanks to ftrace, it turns out that the previous
      fallocate calls 'btrfs_wait_ordered_range()' to flush dirty pages, but as the
      range of dirty pages may be larger than 'btrfs_wait_ordered_range()' wants,
      there can be some ordered extents created but not getting corresponding pages
      flushed, then they're left in memory until we fsync which runs into the
      stage 'sync log', and fsync will just wait for the system writeback thread
      to flush those pages and get ordered extents finished, so the latency is
      inevitable.
      
      This adds a flush similar to btrfs_start_ordered_extent() in
      btrfs_wait_logged_extents() to fix that.
      Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      98ce2ded
  8. 18 7月, 2014 10 次提交