1. 10 12月, 2009 3 次提交
  2. 25 11月, 2009 3 次提交
  3. 03 11月, 2009 2 次提交
  4. 13 10月, 2009 2 次提交
  5. 10 10月, 2009 1 次提交
  6. 29 9月, 2009 2 次提交
  7. 28 9月, 2009 4 次提交
    • A
      sony-laptop: Don't unregister the SPIC driver if it wasn't registered · 5e6f9725
      Alan Jenkins 提交于
      This fixes a warning when the module is unloaded on machines without SPIC.
      
      ------------[ cut here ]------------
      WARNING: at drivers/base/driver.c:261 driver_unregister+0x6e/0x80()
      Hardware name: OEM
      Unexpected driver unregister!
      Modules linked in: sony_laptop(-) rfkill af_packet i915
       drm i2c_algo_bit cfbcopyarea i2c_core cfbimgblt cfbfillrect binfmt_misc
       ipv6 kvm_intel kvm acpi_cpufreq cpufreq_userspace cpufreq_powersave
       cpufreq_stats acpi_pad ac video output battery pci_slot sbs sbshc
       container iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables ext2 fuse
       snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm_oss
       snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event
       snd_seq snd_timer snd_seq_device snd fan sg serio_raw sr_mod cdrom
       soundcore button thermal processor thermal_sys floppy snd_page_alloc
       pcspkr intel_agp evdev [last unloaded: asus_atk0110]
      Pid: 8136, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.31-rc8debug #50
      Call Trace:
      [<ffffffff8121ec7e>] ? driver_unregister+0x6e/0x80
      [<ffffffff81047577>] warn_slowpath_common+0x87/0xb0
      [<ffffffff81047624>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x64/0x70
      [<ffffffff8119a360>] ? kobject_release+0x0/0x1f0
      [<ffffffff8119a267>] ? kobject_put+0x27/0x60
      [<ffffffff8121d346>] ? bus_put+0x16/0x20
      [<ffffffff8121d406>] ? bus_remove_driver+0xb6/0xf0
      [<ffffffff8121ec7e>] driver_unregister+0x6e/0x80
      [<ffffffff811cab50>] acpi_bus_unregister_driver+0x10/0x12
      [<ffffffffa035e86c>] sony_laptop_exit+0x2c/0x2e [sony_laptop]
      [<ffffffff8107ddc6>] sys_delete_module+0x176/0x230
      [<ffffffff8107186d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14d/0x1a0
      [<ffffffff81350a04>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
      [<ffffffff8100bdab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      ---[ end trace f638b6a59b19703e ]---
      Signed-off-by: NAlan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NMattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      5e6f9725
    • M
      sony-laptop: remove _INI call at init time · 922553f2
      Mattia Dongili 提交于
      This is unnecessary as OSPM is supposed to call the method already when
      the device is discovered.
      Signed-off-by: NMattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      922553f2
    • M
      sony-laptop: SPIC unset IRQF_SHARED, set IRQF_DISABLED · d1e0de92
      Mattia Dongili 提交于
      The SPIC irq is not really shareable, the IO port cannot be cleared and
      always returns some data so there is no real way to understand if the irq
      is for us or not. Moreover the _PRS acpi method says the irq is not
      shareable.
      In addition to this, in some cases, an additional write to the IO port has
      to be performed in order to properly decode the event received from the
      device. This generates another interrupt which may overlap with the
      previous one. In the future this is going to be important for properly
      decoding events.
      Signed-off-by: NMattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      d1e0de92
    • M
      sony-laptop: remove device_ctrl and the SPIC mini drivers · 31df7144
      Mattia Dongili 提交于
      Having separate drivers for SPIC showed to be useless, only type3 has a
      slightly different behaviour than the others and there seem to be no real
      conflict between them.
      Signed-off-by: NMattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it>
      Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      31df7144
  8. 27 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  9. 22 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  10. 21 9月, 2009 6 次提交
  11. 19 9月, 2009 14 次提交
  12. 18 9月, 2009 1 次提交
    • D
      Input: libps2 - additional locking for i8042 ports · 181d683d
      Dmitry Torokhov 提交于
      The serio ports on i8042 are not completely isolated; while we provide
      enough locking to ensure proper serialization when accessing control
      and data registers AUX and KBD ports can still have an effect on each
      other on PS/2 protocol level. The most prominent effect is that
      issuing a command for the device connected to one port may cause
      abort of the command currently executing by the device connected to
      another port.
      
      Since i8042 nor serio subsystem are not aware of the details of the
      PS/2 protocol (length of the commands and their replies and so on) the
      locking should be done on libps2 level by adding special handling when
      we see that we are dealing with serio port on i8042.
      Signed-off-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>
      181d683d