Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 17 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  3. 14 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  5. 12 4月, 2009 1 次提交
    • M
      x86: fix wrong section of pat_disable & make it static · 1ee4bd92
      由 Marcin Slusarz 提交于 
      pat_disable cannot be __cpuinit anymore because it's called from pat_init
and the callchain looks like this:
pat_disable [cpuinit] <- pat_init <- generic_set_all <-
 ipi_handler <- set_mtrr <- (other non init/cpuinit functions)

WARNING: arch/x86/mm/built-in.o(.text+0x449e): Section mismatch in reference
from the function pat_init() to the function .cpuinit.text:pat_disable()
The function pat_init() references
the function __cpuinit pat_disable().
This is often because pat_init lacks a __cpuinit
annotation or the annotation of pat_disable is wrong.

Non CONFIG_X86_PAT version of pat_disable is static inline, so this version
can be static too (and there are no callers outside of this file).
Signed-off-by: NMarcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
LKML-Reference: <49DFB055.6070405@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      1ee4bd92
  7. 11 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  9. 10 4月, 2009 8 次提交
  11. 04 4月, 2009 3 次提交
  13. 02 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  15. 01 4月, 2009 2 次提交
  17. 30 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  19. 25 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  21. 22 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  23. 20 3月, 2009 3 次提交
  25. 19 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  27. 18 3月, 2009 2 次提交
    • R
      x86: cpumask: x86 mmio-mod.c use cpumask_var_t for downed_cpus · c38da569
      由 Rusty Russell 提交于 
      Impact: cleanup, reduce memory usage for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y

Part of the "getting rid of obsolete cpumask_t" patch:

 1) Use cpumask_var_t: this is a pointer if CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y
 2) Call alloc_cpumask_var() on first entry into enter_uniprocessor()
 3) Use modern cpumask_* functions.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Pekka Paalanen <pq@iki.fi>
LKML-Reference: <200903111633.55952.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      c38da569
    • S
      x86: add x2apic_wrmsr_fence() to x2apic flush tlb paths · ce4e240c
      由 Suresh Siddha 提交于 
      Impact: optimize APIC IPI related barriers

Uncached MMIO accesses for xapic are inherently serializing and hence
we don't need explicit barriers for xapic IPI paths.

x2apic MSR writes/reads don't have serializing semantics and hence need
a serializing instruction or mfence, to make all the previous memory
stores globally visisble before the x2apic msr write for IPI.

Add x2apic_wrmsr_fence() in flush tlb path to x2apic specific paths.
Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: "steiner@sgi.com" <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
LKML-Reference: <1237313814.27006.203.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      ce4e240c
  29. 16 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  31. 15 3月, 2009 1 次提交
    • J
      x86: add brk allocation for very, very early allocations · 93dbda7c
      由 Jeremy Fitzhardinge 提交于 
      Impact: new interface

Add a brk()-like allocator which effectively extends the bss in order
to allow very early code to do dynamic allocations.  This is better than
using statically allocated arrays for data in subsystems which may never
get used.

The space for brk allocations is in the bss ELF segment, so that the
space is mapped properly by the code which maps the kernel, and so
that bootloaders keep the space free rather than putting a ramdisk or
something into it.

The bss itself, delimited by __bss_stop, ends before the brk area
(__brk_base to __brk_limit).  The kernel text, data and bss is reserved
up to __bss_stop.

Any brk-allocated data is reserved separately just before the kernel
pagetable is built, as that code allocates from unreserved spaces
in the e820 map, potentially allocating from any unused brk memory.
Ultimately any unused memory in the brk area is used in the general
kernel memory pool.

Initially the brk space is set to 1MB, which is probably much larger
than any user needs (the largest current user is i386 head_32.S's code
to build the pagetables to map the kernel, which can get fairly large
with a big kernel image and no PSE support).  So long as the system
has sufficient memory for the bootloader to reserve the kernel+1MB brk,
there are no bad effects resulting from an over-large brk.
Signed-off-by: NJeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      93dbda7c
  33. 13 3月, 2009 10 次提交
  35. 12 3月, 2009 1 次提交