1. 05 5月, 2018 1 次提交
    • G
      Revert "usb: host: ehci: Use dma_pool_zalloc()" · 43b78f11
      Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
      This reverts commit 22072e83 as it is
      broken.
      
      Alan writes:
      	What you can't see just from reading the patch is that in both
      	cases (ehci->itd_pool and ehci->sitd_pool) there are two
      	allocation paths -- the two branches of an "if" statement -- and
      	only one of the paths calls dma_pool_[z]alloc.  However, the
      	memset is needed for both paths, and so it can't be eliminated.
      	Given that it must be present, there's no advantage to calling
      	dma_pool_zalloc rather than dma_pool_alloc.
      Reported-by: NErick Cafferata <erick@cafferata.me>
      Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
      Cc: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      43b78f11
  2. 04 5月, 2018 3 次提交
  3. 03 5月, 2018 1 次提交
  4. 02 5月, 2018 2 次提交
  5. 01 5月, 2018 2 次提交
  6. 25 4月, 2018 6 次提交
  7. 23 4月, 2018 3 次提交
  8. 22 4月, 2018 16 次提交
  9. 20 4月, 2018 3 次提交
  10. 16 4月, 2018 3 次提交